INTRODUCTION

TO THE CREATION OF THE UNIVERSE ACCORDING THE GENESIS

PART SIX

CREATION OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM

DYNAMIC STRUCTURE OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM

The answer to the riddle set forth in the preceding section, namely, what kind of automatic brake keeps the cruising velocity of the Solar System equal to itself against the gravitational law which exposes the necessity of a constant acceleration by reason of diminishing distances between the Sun and any point it approaches? - the answer to this dilemma is unequivocal. Now, and I confess my fault, duty demands further specification of the nature of the problem. I mean, we are and have been accustomed to working with a photo finish of the Solar System. Here it is:

By inertia and previous virtual simulation implanted during the years of our intellectual formation we tend to be omniscient and the application of Kepler's laws to the imaginary photo is enough for us to feel like god. The implantation comes from centuries and the image is inherited in the viscera with such subtlety that the professionals of the intellectual formation only need to impose the order with the baton of their state regimes to close the problem. The fact is that today this simplistic image of the Keplerian movement is typical of retarded minds and of intelligences without any independent activity with no capacity for critical judgment. What is certain is that the result looks good and even beautiful and achieves its goal: to make even the biggest idiot feel greater than a St. Thomas and a St. Augustine together. When it comes to correspondence with Reality, this photo of a Solar System frozen in time is the most contrary to the Physics of a Solar System that moves among stars a few light years away and with which they form, by all means, - cacophony? - an Open Star Cluster. Let's make a simple exercise of mental intelligence and let's put in vertical position the classic plane representative of the Solar System, and let's see flying in movement from back to front the Planets, and in that center a Sun with its own speed. What does it give us? It seems obvious that the image we see in our mind is that of a magnetic field in motion, created by the Sun and around which the planets move forward drawing in space a wave. In the image below put the Sun in the center and imagine that the brown ribbon is the motion of a planet around it. Multiply this ribbon by nine at different distances and all moving in pursuit of the same star as it moves through space at its own speed. Once this is done, make the trajectory of the Sun be that of a star endowed with relative motion, that is, within a closed space-time; the result will be a nutation. The next problem will be to know which are the members of the Solar Star Cluster.

If we take for measurement the parameters of the open star clusters of our Heavens, and combine those of the binary and multiple star systems, where the distances between the stars of an Individualized Stellar System exceed in many occasions the distance between the Sun and Alpha Centauri, for example, I wonder where is that picture for children just initiated in Astrophysics that came out of Kepler's workshop in the days of Maria Chestnut? They say that the law operates at infinite distances and they deny that the same law acts between bodies located at a distance of only four or five light years? Someone, besides common sense, lost his Reason during the 19th century, and no one in the 20th century, once the Academy was launched into the adventure of the Search for the Origin of the Cosmos, already settled in the ship of Time that was to lead the wise men to the Nucleus of the Origin and from there jump to the End by means of a fold of Space ... it did not occur to anyone to press the button and start the photo of the Solar System frozen in time that Kepler launched into the future. Not even for a bit of fun. The dogmatism of the disciples of the Einsteinian revolution proved to be so primitive and strong that not even with the most current dynamical calculations on the table did any astronomer dare to press the button and see the Solar System as it exists in Space and Time, embedded in a Local Star Cluster and its planetary members endowed with solid structure. It is, therefore, depressing to the point of the most resounding laughter to open a Manual of Astronomy, written by Professors, as for example the Manual of the Complutense of Madrid, not to get lost in other more subtle Languages, and to read that Pluto is a gaseous body. Because one is well educated, one puts up with vomit. Let us continue then.

I said above that the answer to why the velocity of the Solar System escapes the rule of the gravitational law under whose force the whole universe is governed, must be an unequivocal, simple and logical answer. I recognize now that verbal expressions, unlike mathematics, possess an ambiguity of such a profound nature as to be capable of swallowing in its abyss the purity of no matter what mountain of numbers. And I would like to explain this enigma. The word, in short, is a vehicle capable of transporting in its bosom different travelers and it happens that depending on the traveler a word can stop meaning one thing to come to have a new meaning. Politicians are masters in this art. But not only them, let's not be cruel to those little animals. The number, for example, is a perfect entity, its meaning is untransferable, divine in its incorruptibility, and hence the pagan, savage adoration that mathematicians feel for these entities. A four is a four, and whether it applies to bananas or mice, the essence and substance of the four, as an abstract, pure, immaculate entity, remains in spite of changes. I, who am an asshole, and being so I serve as an example, because I can be a cretin as well as a flower, from which one can see the ambiguity of the word, a confusion to which the number does not lend itself under any excuse, and because I defend the need to hit the button of the Solar Sistemological Movement in order to overcome the Keplerian traumas and the complexes inherited from past centuries, I reserve for myself the laughter I get when I see on the Net the defense at all costs of this ancient systemological system which, if it was born to revolutionize in its day, is at present the most reactionary system I know. I do not know why astronomers do not do their job and do not process the mountain of data with which, if Kepler and Newton had worked, the finished image of the inherited system would have been added to the long list of errors, necessary as a step forward, but enemies of Civilization because of their refusal to move on to a better history.

But just because an answer can be unequivocal does not mean that it should not be complex. Everything will depend on the model with which one works. If the reasoning collides with an intelligence anchored in the archetypal image that identifies the planets with balls of gas, one will eventually arrive at the bridge of sighs, to write a melancholic: "Poor thing! This problem overcome and taking for granted that the data bank at our service makes it impossible for us to keep active an answer obtained from a series of weightless data at the foot of the mountain of knowledge from the top of which we look again at the Universe, the Cosmos and the Solar System, the decision is ours, and in our hands has been left the processing of this accumulation of parameters whose final equality, and because it is based on a new series of data, by logic it has to put in front of our eyes a Local Stelogical Architecture with respect to which - without denying the Keplerian photo finish - this Applied Finistic Systematics is only the opening action and never the point and end to the main question of this Section: why the Sun's velocity is stable and deviates from the law of universal gravitation, according to which and as the Sun approaches an astrophysical system it must double its velocity depending on the distance?

It can be seen that by the mere fact of its complexity an answer is no less simple. It must be placed in its true context. To specify the nature of the problem it embodies. Define what law it incites. To open space and draw on the screen of our intelligence the nature of the question to which we seek an answer. There is a moment in which the experts are the ones who must intervene, because they are the ones who have that bank of data processing which can demonstrate or refute, if possible, the Integration of the Sun within a Stellar Cluster, more or less open and more or less populated according to the Gravitational Architecture to which those data give rise. Let us take a new local stellar extension at 20 light years:

How many open star clusters could serve us as an astrophysical model? Obviously we are talking about a real revolution in the conceptualization of what a star cluster is. We will have to erase old concepts and work from binary systems to open regional gravitational fields in universal space within whose perimeters the stars behave like atoms inside an astrophysical molecule. This would explain the reason for the optical constancy of the stellar formations in the firmament of the heavens, the constancy in distances and velocities of the stellar systems within the Universal Milky Network, and would place us before a Universe that behaves like a Crystalline Body, fed by gravitational currents, according to which the consumption of the total energy is maintained in time within a band of maximums and minimums. Hence the fluctuations of stellar luminous intensities. This implies God, of course, but in this Cosmological System God is taken for granted, so let us now punctuate the local answer to the problem of the constancy of the Sun's velocity.

At present I have to correct myself and after having emphasized the really important point: the existence of the Sun as a Member of a Sidereal System, my own thought leads me to define the transformation of the planetary mass into a Correction Mechanism of the Solar Orbit, by whose action the Centrifugal Force to which the Sun is subject in response to the Motion of its System within a Cumulus Gravitational Field is annulled and becomes subject to a specific constant. If I said before that "We have but to transform the total mass of the planetary family into drag mass, and we have the stabilizing brake of the Sun's cruising speed", I now think that this transformation concentrates its weight on the Correcting Equation of the Sun's Orbit, by which, as I have said, the centrifugal force to which the Sun is subject is overcome by the transformation of the planetary mass into Steering Control by Remote Mechanism. (If the objection comes to your mind think of running away pulling only your bodies and then repeat the same operation throwing a bag of sand on your back. This at the outset. But before we throw on our backs not the globe, in the likeness of that titan, but the nine planets with their satellites and the belts of solar rings, before we take the lever to move the universe, you will have to abandon the ballast of the decadent vision of the planets as immense balls of gases floating among the electromagnetic threads of the field of the Sun).

I want to insist on this subject because I think it is important. The academic statement that the planets are balls of gases compressed under gravitational pressure is one of those primitive pseudo-scientific arguments, typical of 20th century fundamentalism that do not stand on their own feet in any way, but are maintained in the 21st century as a symbol of submission of the universities to the genius of scientific atheism. How long will idiocy and genius go together on both sides of the same coin is not easy to say for sure. Until yesterday, for example, Mars was a ball of gas, like Venus, Mercury, Jupiter, Saturn and the other members of our System. And so it continues to be described in the manuals produced by the most prestigious heads of the planet for the consumption of the masses. The photos and expeditions to Mars and its neighbors are proof of this absurd gaseous vision of the planets. However, the evidence is not enough to erase this shameful hoax from astronomy textbooks and natural science textbooks. It is therefore funny to the point of clownishness to see the eminent geniuses of the astronomical observatories all over the world continue preaching the gospel of the gaseous nature of the planets. Some hidden reason they must have for confessing with their lips what their ears hold for heresy. Now, if there is any eminent super-sage in any of the universities of the world who can prove that Mars is a ball of gas, do not stand still and exorcise us, that fulfilling the will of such megadios to the tartarus of fools we shall go. Shame on us -I say- when we see in astronomy textbooks words that only in the mouth of an idiot could be excused; shame on us because those who write them are all eminent, owners of professorships and the like. Does the 21st century deserve the typical mind of a fool for a teacher and guide of the knowledge of the universe? The question remains: under what kind of philosophy shall we grant a Cosmology for Suicide the floor knowing that its effects on nations, this time with infinitely more deadly means of destruction within its reach, will be the same? Let us remember that Satan did not kill with the sword, but with the word, because, although there are still those who do not believe it, the ultimate weapon, for good and for evil, is the word. How then to believe in these days that Pluto is a ball of gas? At this point you have to be a real lout to teach such an absurdity, and an idiot to believe it. The one who writes, and the one who reads, out of that deadly circle typical of the 20th century, what interests us now is to discover how the sum of the total planetary mass comes into play at the time of the corrective stabilization of the Sun's cruising speed. Let us then return to the problem at hand, which on another occasion circumstances themselves will lead us back to the belly of this black hole in whose belly they wash the brains of the world's youth, in which against nature it is written that the planets are balls of gases. And I am Little Red Riding Hood, it is clear.

Let us then resume the thread. Sailing at cruising speed X we have among the constellations of the heavens a star called the Sun. The friction of this ship against the surface of flight is negligible to slow down its speed; and what is more natural, the thrust of the centrifugal force to which its orbit is subject drives this ship outward from the gravitational field to which it belongs. Our problem is to know why it does not increase its velocity of approach with respect to the star toward which it is moving as time passes. Independently now of whether the Sun flies in a straight line or following a curved line, while the Sun navigates in the interstellar space the distances between it and the apparent point of approach: they shorten. It is a matter of course. And as soon as the distance between the Sun and the apparent point of approach is shortened, the force of attraction between the Sun and that stellar point increases. The law of gravity is what prevails. As the attraction between the Sun and the point reference stellar system increases, the approach velocity increases. Consequently, the cruising speed of our system increases. And it keeps adding up. The shorter the distance between two stars becomes, the higher the velocity of the smaller of the two becomes. We may or may not be talking about the Sun. Whether the Sun is the larger or the smaller of the pair in play, the fact is that there is a variation in its cruising speed. But since we are talking about the Sun .... let's talk.

I believe the distance from the Sun to the nearest star system is a few scant light years. Proxima Centauri is about four years from the Sun. Even closer stars have been discovered. At the speed the Sun is moving, about 600 kilometers per second, the collision between the Sun and the Proxima Centauri system, counting from right now, would take place in about 500 years. We ask ourselves point-blank now: How many thousands of years has the Sun been sailing among the constellations of the Heavens? And from these millions of years during which life on Earth has followed its path without experiencing a lethal alteration, can we not deduce the stability of the cruising speed of the Sun? And are we not in our right to believe that the speed of the Sun is a constant? And being a constant, does this constant not force us to correct the phenomenology of gravity, not as a law but as to its nature? I point out this fragment by specifying that my questions try to open the field, never to close ways. To the best of my knowledge, I do my best to condense in order to see the process from a dynamic point of view. I do not admit in my head the Keplerian photo finish and if I relate the motion of the planets around the Sun to something, it is to an electric current on a metal bar, solenoid type. The very angularity of the orbits projected to a three-dimensional space exposes the necessity of a flight in current waves where the Sun takes the place of the metal bar. More or less like this:

Working from this image the three-dimensional question is simplified and the nutational irregularities of some external orbits are deduced. In another section, dedicated exclusively to the Solar System, I will return to the subject trying to further define the image by importing physical data. I do not intend with this solenoidal image but to displace the image frozen in time that circulates since the times of Kepler, Galileo and Newton, and that has become a wall in these times, a cheap idol before which every god thinks he is a genius, and bending his knees he goes quietly home because he already knows everything.

The Academy, always so brilliant, knows how to find the explanation that best suits it to keep its glory intact in the face of future criticism. And it seems that the Sun navigates following an atypical trajectory, such that it avoids gravitational contact with the other constellations. Playing ignorant, in the style of that Socrates who only knew that he knew nothing, but knew everything, the Academy forbids the Universities the permission to erase from the Astronomy Manuals the falsehoods on which its idea about the Solar System and its place in the Universe is based. For of course, if the Sun does not follow a trajectory natural to a body that is subject to the law of universal gravity: what kind of trajectory does the Sun draw among the other star systems in its neighborhood? The childish calculation that I established above between Proxima Centauri we can extrapolate it to the last five hundred million years and having been these five hundred thousand times the Sun on the verge of collision, that it has not done it gives me rope to remove from the map the happy idea of a solitary Sun, member of no Cluster. And you should stop in your tracks and look up and feel under your feet the vibrations of the stellar engine. Ask yourselves how is it possible that the Sun, in the millions of years that it has been sailing at 600 kms per second, has not collided with any of these gentlemen of its neighborhood. Does it not seem logical to you to think that it could not and cannot because the Sun simply belongs to this Cluster? I insist on the image:

This is really an interesting question, which by the simplicity of its statement may sound like an unimportant trifle. Or is the passenger boarding the plane not interested at all in the mechanics of the ship, knowing as we do that one risks one's life in the air? Isn't the Sun a ship eternally in the air, full of passengers? As for the maintenance of the autonomous speed of the solar spacecraft, we can deduce it by transforming the solar photospheric phenomenology into the burning of the fuel necessary to move a body in space. How are the great solar flares not similar to the jet of the reactor that moves a spacecraft in the opposite direction of its emission? Are not both phenomena subject to the same law of action-reaction? And since we know the eleven-year cycle by which the temperature of the solar photospheric body is governed, and since this photospheric heating cycle is subject to a stable cycle, can we not deduce from its constancy the mechanics of controlled propulsion that governs the cruising speed of the Sun, mechanics in turn subject to the law of transformation of gravitational energy into luminous energy? The answer is difficult but not impossible.

Let us take the reaction of the Sun to the passage of comet Hale Boop. Do you remember it? The extraordinary flare seen on the solar surface immediately after the passage of comet Hale Boop, is it not a sufficient phenomenon to open our intelligence to the connection between temperature, gravitational density and speed of transformation, in this case caused by a wave front with a solid head? And if the connection between the passage of Hale Boop and the observed extraordinary flare is a scientific fact, how can we continue to maintain within the same parameters of behavior the relationship between the Sun and the planets when a tiny body is enough to accelerate for an equis time the speed of transformation of an entire star!

One of the basic pillars of the development of human thought concerns the search for the causes following the observed effects, and on the contrary, to discover the effects starting from the given causes. Thanks to the ability of intelligence to make use of the instruments of logic, the adventure of thought was able to reach unexpected heights. But with the passage of time and many exploits, the once revolutionary thinkers committed the nefarious crime defined by killing the cause originating the observed effect because the discovery did not suit their subjective interests and irrational emotions. The twentieth century being lost in the web of a scientific atheism that erased causes and set reasons against the logic of reality, it is to be believed that the heirs of those geniuses know how to twist the path between effect and cause and lead the ignorant to the abyss of an old-fashioned irrationality. For, however difficult it may be to believe, Science became an atheist in order to prove to itself that it knew more than God. The fact that it ended its discourse at the foot of the Great War did not make it reflect during the Cold War on the pathology into which its intelligence had slipped its logic. Her pathology was called Atheism. But let us return to the subject of our Solar System.

The first who had to think of all the factors to be taken into account at the time of the dynamic stability of the Solar System was the Engineer who considered its creation within an astrophysical molecular network called the Heavens. The greatest difficulty that God had to overcome was the millions of years that the Evolution of the tree of species required for its birth and growth. If in the case of the creation of the Biosphere the processes could be accelerated without causing any scientific conflict, in the case of Life the law was and is very different. In the field of Life, let's put it this way: the laws are more rigorous. The millions of years that the Evolution of Life on Earth demanded of God by necessity had to place before Him a complex system of systematic equations. Among which how to maintain the Sun's cruising speed constant in space and time, and how to endow his System with a flight path such that it could glide between the constellations without integrating into their systems, were the two great and main challenges that his Intelligence had to overcome. And looking here for how he did it, we are at it.

The autonomy of flight that the stars have in their nature as transformers of energy into light and heat, a phenomenon very similar to the behavior of an excited particle, which defends itself by radiating a subparticle, is an aspect that implies the need to correct the hypothesis of astrophysical motion from and only from the law of universal gravity. It is not denied, but simply its definition is corrected. If up to now the law was the only force, from now on we have a mechanics of energy transformation, one of whose effects generates the autonomy of propulsion necessary to maintain constant the velocity of the System. In this order, the phenomenology of the solar photosphere serves us as a frame of reference from which to activate the image of a star as a ship propelled autonomously through the transformation of its energy into the fuel necessary to maintain the initial impulse. Another thing will be that in its scientific irrationality the Academy wants to deny the application of the action-reaction law to stellar fulgurations and sidereal velocity. The author does not see how such a denial can be demonstrated and therefore prefers to go on with his exposition on the relationship between the planets and the Sun's spin during its trajectory between the constellations that mark its orbit.

Let us put ourselves in the case. We have the System in which we are going to cultivate the Tree of Life. We know positively that from the time we plant it until it bears its fruit millions of calendar years must pass. We also know that the development of Life demands that Nature maintain its Structure in the conditions that are proper to it. This means that we must avoid interference in the evolutionary process of external cosmological factors. This obliges us to protect the Biospheric System in such a way that without ceasing to be within a Universe, the existence of this Universe does not imply the creation of a lethal interference. How to do it? The cruising speed of the Sun itself, about 600 kilometers per second, and its subjection to the law of Gravity says that as time goes by that speed must go up, which is precisely what we do not want. And consequently it forces us to provide the Solar System with a safety brake that acts automatically and is triggered by reacting to the increase in its speed. This is what we are looking for. Let us see what practical solutions our Creator has found.

The first practical solution was logical: to load the solar spacecraft in such a way that the gravitational acceleration would be slowed down by the displacement work and would force the spacecraft to transform this exogenous acceleration into the force necessary to perform the displacement work of the braking load. In this practical way the solar spacecraft would maintain its cruising speed always constant, while overcoming the inertial tendency to increase its speed with time. But let's transfer this case to the ground. Let's imagine that we have the machine loaded with fuel. The time during which the machine will be on the road will depend, in addition to the developed speed, on the weight with which we load it. If we load the trunk to the maximum we reduce the time of work that can develop the tank. We will call this type of brake exogenous.

But now let us imagine an even more sophisticated type of exogenous brake. Let us imagine that as the machine travels over a larger space, the load in the trunk multiplies its weight. Wouldn't the moment come when the machine would be slowed down, crushed under the weight acquired by this exogenous brake? The question is: Is the Sun endowed with this kind of exogenous brake, so that the weight of the planets is multiplied by the potential energy acquired during the elapsed time? And vice versa, is it not by this law of the rise of potential energy and its transformation into weight that the tendency of the Sun to behave according to the law of universal gravitation is restrained?

The ideas concerning the nature of the planets being false, the numbers must be false. Which leads me to say that we cannot get anywhere as long as the dictatorship of 20th century cosmology continues to impose its dogmatic law and its rationalistic absolutism on the intelligence of the 21st century. Until yesterday Mars -as I said before- was a ball of gas. So if we have to wait for the probes to reach Pluto to translate its body into geophysical mass, let us sit and wait for death to come; death will come sooner than the probe to Pluto. Once the correct calculations are on the table, then we can start working on facts and not on reasons imposed on the basis of prizes. Passing, then, of the destructive criticism against such geniuses, let us continue traveling aboard the solar ship and let us continue asking ourselves questions.

The Sun is approaching a stellar system and consequently its acceleration is going to be triggered even against the operability of the exogenous brake. How are we going to overcome this new problem? In the imaginative game that we have opened we are in command, we pilot the ship and therefore its future depends on us. What we should do now is to take the steering wheel and turn, for example, to the left. Either that or we collide with the stars of the stellar system towards which the law of gravity is dragging us. Maybe not tomorrow or the day after tomorrow. It is the same thing. Our mission is to find a way to provoke the turn that will lead us away from the inevitable collision with the system that has taken control of our ship's controls with its gravity. The first thing that occurs to us is to look for the steering wheel. Where is it? Because there is one. Millions of years and still the Sun in route are the best proof that God has endowed the solar ship with an exogenous brake, which are the planets and the play of energies that move them, and a steering wheel that is moved by a remote control program that overcomes the invincible interconstellational acceleration forcing the ship to rotate. My intelligence leads me to look around me and ask myself: What kind of endogenous force is capable of making the Solar System behave like a ship piloted by an intelligent captain? To make possible this spin that the Sun has been executing since the dawn of time and without whose mechanism the ship would have been integrated into any stellar system in the neighborhood: with what kind of autonomous mechanics did God endow the Sun?

As yesterday and as always, I raise my arms to my Creator and dedicate to Him the joy that my admiration for His answer to these problems arouses in my intelligence. The program of remote route control is called Interplanetary Alignment. The exogenous brake has been created, why do you want a brake if there is no foot to step on it? We will call this foot action on the brake Endogenous Turning Mechanics. If the exogenous braking action comes as a response of the System as a whole to the universal medium, this action of the foot on the brake is given as a response of the planets to the behavior of the Sun. More or less. But before going into the effect of planetary alignments on the solar trajectory, at this point I would like to bring to mind the multiplication of arm strength under water and the reduction of weight of a body under the same element. Do not think that I am doing this to mislead you. On the contrary, I do it to open up the natural environment in which the play of natural forces moves to our System.

Think that the weight of a body is in direct relation to gravity. The same mass has a rock of one kilogram on the Earth as on the Moon. And that same rock does not have the same mass in the water as out of the water? They have the same weight, however, don't they? Don't they? Now we apply this reality to the Sun itself. This without pretending to equal in vision the genius who looked for a lever to move the universe. Let us imagine then that we put the Sun at one end of the lever, we put ourselves at the other end and it is our turn to move it. The first thing we must ask ourselves is what is the value of gravity in the medium in which we have placed ourselves. Although it may seem tricky, the lower the gravity, the lower the weight of the body and the greater the effectiveness of the force of the arm against the lever. The deduction is obvious. The weight of the Sun and of any sidereal body varies according to the gravitational interaction of the momentum. This from one place. On the other, that unlike the Sun the planets of our System do move in a stable gravitational medium and therefore maintain the equality between the force they develop and the weight they can lift.

 The Planetary Alignment, Total or Partial, Multiple or Simple, acts as an Arm, and its action on the Sun is that of the arm against the lever. The systematic equation says that the solar acceleration is slowed down by the regulating program in which God transformed the planetary alignment. The planets transform the weight of the only body into which the alignment converts them: into force, and, since all force has by nature to do work, the work they perform is to provoke the angle of rotation of which we spoke, and to maintain it constant. This, in effect, is the flywheel we were looking for.

As for the physical-mathematical description of this remotely guided starship in autonomous flight within the constellations of the heavens, I leave it to another more expert in numbers, unknowns and other complex equations. Always highlighting the partial planetary alignments as the total ones in the picture of Applied Astrophysical Systematics, the first acting as a counterweight to the velocity, and the second as the displacement of the nose of the System towards the hemisphere from which the load is made. In short, before sowing the seed of the tree of species under the waters of the great ocean, God had to solve many equations.

Concluding: Everything is yet to be solved at the level of final data. Ideas are the prelude to research. And in this context I have wanted to retouch my first idea about the relation between the Planets and the Sun in the bosom of a shared gravitational field, in which, as well as the solar field itself is the cause of a centrifugal force that pushes away the bodies and produces the external asteroid rings; the Sun being integrated in a multi-stellar field, whose center is gravitational, as if we were to say that it is a reference point around which the cumular motion takes place, this center is the cause of a general centrifugal force, which the Sun overcomes by means of the general planetary mass that corresponds to its system. Which leads us, finally, to a structure of Astrophysical Engineering so perfect that to leave it to chaos is, purely and simply, of genius that incapable of understanding the complex building of equations that this Divine Engineer solved at the beginning, and because he is not able to accept the failure to emulate by himself, if not in three dimensions at least on paper, the infinite Science of this Creative Intelligence opts for the alternative of the madman: God does not exist. Let the astronomers and mathematicians of this century take note.

Things, then, are what they are, and not what they appear to be; though sometimes what they appear to be is what they are. We are talking about an indefinite number of millions of years, time during which the biospheric system demanded its integration into a stable astrophysical structure. So far the time quantities for the geophysical sequences described have not entered into the story. I left these numbers to the challenges that one by one God overcame. And I believe I said that once related the Creator Omnipotence to the physical concept of power the natural calculations burn in Fire, freeze in Ice, drown in Water and evaporate in Air. In how many millions of years did God reduce the sublimation and thawing of the Ice Mantle when integrating the Earth into the Solar System by means of the boreal parabola? If the thawing of the Ice Mantle had been exposed to the distance corresponding to the third orbit, how many millions of years would the thawing have lasted?

PART SEVEN

THE CREATION OF THE HEAVENS