![]() |
MEDIEVAL HISTORY LIBRARY |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
BOOK
III.
HENRY VI—PHILIP—OTHO IV.CHAPTER XV.
OTHO IV. [1212—1215.
Frederics Expedition—Contest with Otho—War with
France—Battle of Bouvines—General Desertion of Otho—Coronation, of Frederic—
Children’s Crusade.
But if the prospect that had induced Frederic to set
forward upon his bold adventure was alluringly bright, the approach was far
from easy. The path, in the very first steps, was anything but smooth. He was
not as yet even free to repair to his destination had the road been clear of
the perils thickly besetting it. He had not, up to this day, visited the
continental portion of his kingdom, and felt the necessity of so doing, in
order to provide for the administration of Apulia—always, seemingly, kept distinct
from that of Sicily,—before removing to a great distance, for an indefinite
length of time. For this purpose he landed at Gaeta, and kept the Easter
festival at Benevento; there he received many Apulian vassals, appointed
officers of various descriptions, and made arrangements with respect to the
general conduct of affairs in his absence.
From Benevento he repaired to Rome, where he passed
the greater part of the month of April, in long and important conferences with
his former guardian. Innocent gave him all imaginable encouragement with much
good advice, and supplied him with money for his arduous undertaking; but, for
the assistance thus afforded, he demanded a high price. Frederic had again
attempted to exercise the right ceded or confirmed by the Popes to his Norman
ancestors, naming a bishop to the vacant see of Policastro; the Pope had not
only pronounced the nomination invalid, but had himself appointed a Bishop of
Policastro, in virtue of the resignation of the rights, extorted from the
deceased Empress. He now required the young King to cancel his own nomination,
and acknowledge the papal Bishop. He required him further, to bind himself by
oath, not to unite upon his own head all the crowns he claimed, but, as soon as
he should be Emperor, to resign Sicily to his son. Frederic, whose chance of
success seemed to depend upon the part the Pope should take, had no choice but
to comply; and Innocent rewarded this compulsory submission by relieving from
excommunication, and granting a full pardon to Leopold, Bishop of Worms,
ex-Archbishop of Mainz; who had been the victim of his fidelity to Frederic’s
uncle Philip; and even since his deprivation of his see had incurred new papal
displeasure, by his unsuccessful efforts to preserve Tuscany for its royal
Duke. The thoughts and feelings of the young King, at this proof that some of
his Queen’s apprehensions were well founded, there are no means of
ascertaining; but if a conjecture, that he impatiently anticipated a time when
a Pope’s friendship no longer need be purchased at a price so exorbitant, be
admissible, it will follow that in the sacrifices now extorted, were sown the
seeds of his subsequent opposition to Papal pretensions.
Amidst the disorders of Tancred’s usurpation, Henry
VI's conquests, and his son’s minority, Sicily had, apparently, ceased to be a
maritime power; since Frederic was obliged to seek assistance for that portion
of travel which he designed to make by sea; and at Innocent’s desire, the
Genoese sent a fleet to convey him from Ostia to their city. Genoa having been
laid under the ban of the Empire by Otho, as Ghibeline,
or rather as hostile to himself, Pisa had, in pure Ghibelinism,
attached herself to the Guelph Otho, as Emperor; and Genoa, not habitually
Imperialist, attached herself to Otho’s Ghibeline rival, mainly, perhaps, actuated by enmity to Pisa. But, whatever her motive,
Genoa received the young King, when in the month of May he landed from her
squadron, loyally; and in acknowledgment of vassalage, defrayed all his
expenses during his sojourn within her walls.
Beyond all expectation was this sojourn prolonged, for
at Genoa began the difficulties of Frederic’s enterprise, and nearly two months
did they detain him there. The problem to be solved was, how, notwithstanding
the almost universal hostility of the Lombards,—and nearly universal indeed
that hostility was,—to traverse their country without an army. The usual Guelphism of Milan, being merely the symptom of her desire
for independence, was adopted, or superseded by Ghibelinism,
as the interest or whim of the moment dictated; and in 1212 the anti-papal
spirit,—originating in the spiritual pretensions of her earl-archbishops,—was
revived, by the prevalence of heresy amongst her citizens. The attachment she
professed to Frederic Barbarossa and his race, when, upon the cordial
reconciliation, he celebrated his son’s marriage in her cathedral, expired when
Innocent befriended Barbarossa’s grandson. Milan adhered to Otho, rejecting the
papal candidate for the Empire; and Innocent laid the city under an interdict.
But Guelphs disregarded papal thunders, when launched against themselves, as
completely as could Ghibelines. Milan was stubborn; and, voluntarily or
perforce, so generally did the Lombard cities follow her lead, that from Turin
to Mantua and the banks of the Brenta, the papal command was generally
slighted. Only Pavia and Cremona persevered in their hereditary loyalty to the
Swabian Emperors. Even of the naturally Ghibeline,
noble vassals, some adhered upon principle to the de facto sovereign; some
resented the Pope’s presuming to depose a lawfully elected and crowned emperor;
some, like the cities, succumbed to Milan; whilst the mightiest amongst them,
Ezzelino di Romano, was, like Salinguerra, won by the
ample grants received from Otho.
At Genoa, Frederic was visited by the chiefs of his
strangely mixed party; the faithful adherents of his family, confederating with
those of the Papal See. These visitors were the Marquess of Montferrat—son of
the Crusader King of Thessalonica, delighted to reconcile his attachment to
his Imperial Liege Lord and kinsman with his duty to the Pope—the Marquess of
Este, the Conte di San Bonifazio, a few other nobles,
and the deputies of the loyal cities. The subject of constant discussion was
the possibility of the young King’s reaching Germany without an army to force
his way. The beautiful Riviera road to Nice, whence, crossing the Var, he would
have been in Provence—included in the Arelat, part
of the Empire—did not then exist. The Alps could not be turned, but must be
crossed, and how, with the few troops that could on the spur of the emergency
be raised, get through the strongly guarded passes? How even reach them? All
Frederic’s counsellors, persuaded that he must inevitably be intercepted, and
compelled to fight his way against an overpowering disparity of numbers,
vehemently opposed his stirring from Genoa.
But during this delay Otho was well known to be daily
gaining strength in Germany; and hurrying on the marriage by which he trusted
to win to his side the very partisans upon whom Frederic and his friends
relied. The young King felt that procrastination must be fatal to his hopes,
that his standard ought to be raised in Germany prior to the impending
marriage. He neither could nor would longer delay; but after a tedious
struggle, resolved to set forth, fears and opposition notwithstanding, trusting
to the celerity of his movements for baffling the designs of his enemies. His
faithful friends reluctantly submitted to his determination, and all
arrangements, including especially what may be termed the relays of his escort,
were made accordingly.
Upon the 15th of July Frederic quitted Genoa, escorted
by the Marquess of Montferrat as far as Pavia; which was reached before the
Milanese—taken somewhat by surprise, as, expecting him, probably, to move only
at the head of an army—were ready to oppose his progress. But now, knowing him
in motion, they armed, ordered out their mercenaries, summoned their dependants
and allies, and made sure of capturing him upon his next move. Frederic eluded
the danger by starting at dusk and marching all night. Thus he reached the
Lambro uninterrupted; here he thanked and dismissed his Pavian escort, crossed the river without losing a moment, and found Marchese Azzo, at
the head of the Este vassals, awaiting him upon the further bank. So narrowly
had the royal adventurer escaped the overwhelming force which the Milanese had
now collected, that the Pavian troop was attacked
upon its return home, and defeated, with a loss of seventy men taken prisoners;
Pavia was in consequence compelled to become a member
of the Lombard League. Azzo conveyed Frederic through Cremona, where he was
received with the warmest demonstrations of loyalty, to Verona, and there
resigned his charge to Conte San Bonifazio. It was
almost the last act of his life, for in this same year 1212, Marchese Azzo
died, and was succeeded by his son Aldrovandini. San Bonifazio in his turn conducted the King safely up the
valley of the Adige, into the Tyrol, as far as Trent.
Thus far Milan had been the only formidable foe, and
her army had been evaded; whilst against all others—the force of the Lombard
League not having had time to assemble since his start from Genoa—Frederic had
felt his escort sufficient. But from this point he was satisfied that such
escort must be unavailing; whilst the very short notice that could be given
rendered it impossible for his scattered friends to collect in numbers adequate
to encounter the strong posts guarding the usual Alpine passes against the
Apulian child, as Otho was wont derisively to designate his youthful
competitor. The Apulian child saw that his only chance of effecting his further
passage again lay in evading those whom he might not hope successfully to
encounter; and this he resolved to attempt. He therefore took leave of San Bonifazio and his Italian friends, engaged a Tyrolese
guide, and, almost unattended, quitted the high roads, turning westward, to try
the dangerous paths by which the active, and early-trained chamois hunter
pursues his game in all directions, amidst and over those mountain barriers.
Making his perilous way along these tracks, with their never-melted glaciers,
broken by fearful chasms, scaling crags and peaks, even to the primaeval snow,
thus to avoid all known passes, Frederic crossed some part of the ridge
dividing the Valteline from the Engadine:—the very ridge over which to
construct a military road has, at the present day, been deemed a miracle of
engineering science. He was now in the land of the Grisons, forming part of his
hereditary duchy of Swabia, and descended upon Chur or Coire. Arnold von Ems,
Bishop of Coire, and Ulrich, Abbot of St. Gall, were staunch Ghibelines, and
from Innocent’s having once specifically commissioned them to extort from a
plundering
Upon their way thither they heard that Otho, either
hoping to encounter his rival whilst yet unprepared, or to destroy these
faithful Swabians, before their natural Lord, who would reckon upon their
support, should appear, was advancing upon Constance, at the head of such a
body of troops as the Abbot, with his band of sixty men, or even reinforced by
the episcopal vassals of Coire, could not dream of opposing. And this army was
even then upon the banks of the Lake of Constance, whilst the Emperor’s harbingers
and cooks were in the town itself, preparing his quarters and his supper. A
momentary hesitation ensued; but Frederic, inexperienced as he was, clearly
perceived that upon the result of the next hour depended the success of his
enterprise, of his life’s grand aim, and, supported by the bold Abbot, he
pressed forward. He presented himself at the gate of Constance. The Bishop had
admitted Otho’s harbingers apparently because unprepared to resist the approaching
force; but his heart was Ghibeline. The sight of the
little band of St. Gall, with the spirited appeal of the heir of his ducal
Lords, of his Imperial sovereigns, revived the courage of the prelate and of
the citizens He declared that to shun all intercourse with an excommunicated
person, whatever his rank, was his duty; they threw open the gate; and
Frederic, with his escort, was received within the walls of Constance.
Three hours afterwards Otho arrived, and found the
city gates closed against him. So important had been every minute of time! So
happily had the adventurous King’s movements, notwithstanding some unavoidable
delays, been calculated. Had Frederic, whilst still so poor in numbers, been
excluded from Constance, as he would perforce have been had Otho preceded him
there, his attempt to recover his patrimony must, in contemporaneous judgment,
have been completely foiled. Yet even the detention at Genoa, of which he had
reasonably been impatient, as ruinous to his hopes, had proved fortunate; for
had he entered Germany prior to the melancholy death of his young cousin Beatrice,
he might have found many, if not most, of the friends of his house, reluctant
to rise at his call, against her consort. Now they could look to no head but
himself; and, for the moment, he was safe within the walls of Constance. Otho
did not feel himself in strength to take the city by storm, and therefore fell
back to Ueberlingen, a strong position, that would
enable him, he trusted, to cut Frederic off from the greater part of Swabia;
concluding that he would, in the first instance, seek support amongst the
hereditary vassals of his family.
Otho had judged well; nevertheless feudal zeal made
the scheme a failure. Whatever ambitious views might be entertained by some
Swabian vassals, the duchy in general was loyal to its dukes. The powerful Graf
von Kyburg, who, descending by females from the Zäringen
stock, was distantly related to the house of Hohenstaufen, hastened with his
vassals to Constance, to escort Frederic down the Rhine. His kinsman, the Graf
von Habsburg with his, reinforced by all their relations and connexions,
followed his example; and Frederic left Constance at the head of a troop equal
to encountering Otho, in his actual condition, without any material
disadvantage. As he advanced, Swiss knights and nobles flocked to his banner,
and Basle joyfully welcomed the heir of the race in which Swabia gloried. At
Basle he received homage and proffers of service from all parts of the duchy;
thither came a body of troops sent by the Duke of Lorrain to his aid ; and
messengers from Philip Augustus to arrange an interview between the two kings
at Vaucouleurs in Lorrain. Otho, quitting Ueberlingen,
had moved in a line parallel to his competitor’s march, taking post at Brisach:
and Frederic, while still at Basle, learned that the citizens of Brisach, at
once exasperated by insults and outrages to their wives, sisters, and
daughters, and encouraged by the vicinity of their rightful lord, had risen in
arms, declared for him, and expelled Otho and his troops from their walls. His
hereditary duchy was now his! Stimulated by this example, Bavaria, whose Dukes
were so deeply indebted to Frederic Barbarossa, likewise declared for the
daring grandson and heir of that Emperor, and Otho withdrew to Brunswick.
Frederic continued his course down the Rhine, and at
Worms had the gratification of reinstalling a victim to his Ghibeline fidelity, Bishop Leopold, in his original see. Thence he repaired to Vaucouleur, where he met, not King Philip, who was
prevented by indisposition from keeping his appointment, but his son, Prince
Lewis. With him the league of friendship that had, almost uninterruptedly,
subsisted between Philip Augustus of France, and Frederic’s father and uncle,
Henry VI and Philip, was renewed. Enmity to Otho was now the bond of union; and
to promote their common interest by his overthrow, Lewis, in his father’s name,
presented Frederic with a subsidy of 20,000 marks, towards defraying his
unavoidable expenses.
Frederic, after parting from the French Prince,
repaired to Mainz, where he arrived in December, and received the homage of
many princes. There his uncle’s trusty Chancellor, the Bishop of Spires, who
seems to have held the same post under himself, asked him, where he would have
the French subsidy kept. He replied: “Nowhere! It is not to be kept, but
distributed amongst our friends.” An answer offering a contrast to Otho’s
habitual parsimony, even more favourable to the heir of the Swabian Emperors,
than did that of his gracious, and cheerfully affable, demeanour to his rival’s
rudeness. Happy for him and for the Empire, had such pecuniary sacrifices been
all that he was obliged to make, as the price of obtaining his ancestral crown.
The whole south of Germany had now acknowledged
Frederic, and he proceeded to regulate its affairs. He held Diets in which he
recompensed and further secured the services of his partisans, by various
grants; some of them so decidedly detrimental to Empire and Emperor, as to be
excusable only in consideration of Frederic’s circumstances. His boyish
inexperience probably perceived not the importance of some amongst the
sacrifices wrung from him by his urgent need of the favour of Pope, vassals,
and neighbours; in short by the irresistible constraint under which he acted.
For instance, to the Pope, to whom he felt himself deeply indebted, he ratified
and confirmed Otho’s concessions: save as his rival’s specific assurance of
Sardinia and Corsica, to the Roman See, might be held to sanction Frederic’s
inference, that the whole Matildan heritage was not
included in the general guarantee, to that See, of “all territories thereunto
belonging.” That he renewed his grant of the county of Sora to Innocent’s
brother, Conte Ricciardo, and his heirs for ever, might be an act of free pure
gratitude; but the others were extorted. To Waldemar of Denmark—whose alliance
or at least neutrality it was essential to secure, and who had latterly been
not a little alienated from his imperial brother-in-law by the ardent
friendship which his own dreaded kinsman, the ambitious Archbishop Waldemar,
professed for Otho, excommunicated as he was—to Waldemar, Frederic granted
investiture of some of the northern Slavonian districts lying nearest to Denmark.
Waldemar had for many years been in possession of these, and of all the other
northern Slavonian provinces west of the margraviate of Brandenburg; and
Frederic was at the time utterly unable to recover any of them from him; still
the grant was and is much censured, as an abandonment of the right to do so
thereafter. To Ottocar of Bohemia he granted the right of investing bishops
with their temporalities, and exemption from attendance at any, save some few
specified, Diets.
In northern Germany, the Archbishop of Magdeburg, the
Landgrave of Thuringia, and the Bishop of Munster, were Frederic’s only
partisans east of the Rhine; and the Bishop of Liege west of that river. Otho
now hastened to secure the Duke of Brabant permanently to his interest, by
fulfilling the long-deferred engagement with his daughter Mary, which he had,
indeed, actually broken, to wed Beatrice of Hohenstaufen. There was an idle report
that no priest would venture to perform the marriage rite for the
excommunicated Emperor; but if Brabant prelates refused their services, which
is possible, Otho had abundance of ecclesiastics of all grades in his own
party, who could not entertain scruples upon the subject—his nuptials with
Beatrice had been celebrated since his excommunication; and at all events,
certain it is that Mary of Brabant thenceforward appears as his wife and
Empress. Her father immediately invaded the bishopric of Liege, whilst Otho
himself again carried devastation into Thuringia. But Frederic, fully aware of
the value of time, presently followed his rival thither, and cleared the
landgraviate of enemies. Again Otho retreated to Brunswick.
In Lower Lorrain the war is chiefly remarkable for an
incident characteristic of the age. The ravages committed by the Duke of
Brabant are said to have been as barbarous as his language was blasphemous. The
Prince-Bishop assembled his vassals, and fully relying upon divine justice,
prepared, in defence of his people, to offer the far superior forces of the
Duke battle. Upon Sunday, October 14th, 1213, he arrayed his small army for the
encounter; and then rode through the ranks giving his blessing to those who
were about to risk their lives for the protection of their hearths and their
families. Thrice his warriors knelt, either to receive that blessing or to
offer up a correspondent prayer. The Duke, a practised general, had on his part
so drawn up his men as to take every advantage of his numerical preponderance,
of the ground, the position of the sun, and the like; and he and his veterans
scoffed at the bigotry of the kneeling cowards. His brother, Duke William, of Ruschebrock, on the contrary, was reverentially impressed
by the spectacle, and entreated permission to mediate a reconciliation. The
Duke scornfully refused it, when Duke William forebodingly exclaimed: “Brother
mine, already art thou defeated?”. His presentiment was verified, even the
strategy of the Duke being baffled. One display of skill had been so posting
his men as must compel their adversaries to front the west, so that, the day
being far advanced, the low afternoon sun might dazzle them; and as the battle
began clouds overshadowed “the orb of day,” nullifying the anticipated
advantage. Both parties saw in this atmospheric accident a divine
interposition, which, depressing the Brabanters,
inspirited the defenders of their invaded native soil. These last fought
gallantly, and won the victory; 3000 Brabanters were
slain, and numbers taken; the bishopric was immediately evacuated, and peace
concluded.
Frederic, since his appearance in Germany, had not
been re-elected, the party that had invited and supported him, acknowledging
him in virtue of his unanimous election in his infancy. Neither had he been,
nor did he seem anxious to be, crowned, important as that ceremony was then
esteemed; because its importance depending upon strict conformity to
established custom, to be of avail to him, it must take place at Achen; and
notwithstanding the firm Ghibelinism of the
Prince-Bishop of Liege, in whose diocese that town is situated, the attachment
of the other Princes of Lower Lorrain to his competitor, rendered Charlemagne’s
favourite capital now inaccessible. The impolicy of Otho was about to clear his
path of that obstruction. From the hour of his expulsion from Thuringia, the
anathematized Emperor, instead of concentrating his efforts against his young
and active antagonist, (omitting even to assist his father-in-law—who, indeed,
deemed himself strong enough single-handed—against the Bishop of Liege,)
appears to have been wholly engrossed with enmity to Philip Augustus, and
schemes for the conquest of France, whilst his own empire was crumbling in his
hand. It is possible that he might be herein actuated by some plausible, if
mistaken notion; and ascribing Frederic’s success to Philip’s support, might
fancy that to defeat, or even sicken the supporter, would insure victory over
the supported, and perhaps over the Pope; or he might look upon his uncle of
England’s recovery of his French dominions as an essential element of his own
power. But the probability is, that hie was simply indulging long-cherished
resentment of the silly jest lately mentioned; encouraged so to do, and deluded
by the misrepresentations of a great French vassal who was sedulously stirring
up enemies to his inimical liege Lord.
The French King had, in fact, offended several of his
great vassals, the most formidable of whom were the Earl and Countess of
Flanders. Upon the reported death of the Emperor Baldwin, he had claimed the
wardship of that Emperor’s daughter, Joanna, heiress of Flanders and Hainault.
Flanders belonged chiefly to France, but in part likewise to the Empire; whilst
Hainault, though speaking Walloon, i.e., northern French, was almost
wholly a German fief; but the contest for the Empire between Philip and Otho
probably prevented any Imperial opposition to this pretension. Philip, Earl of
Namur, to whom his brother, Earl Baldwin had at his departure intrusted the
care of his children, and of his dominions, being seduced into the abandonment
of his duty—and indeed unsupported he could not have maintained his office
against the power of France—through the offer of the hand of the King’s
legitimate daughter by his illegal marriage with Agnes von Andechs,
sent his two nieces, Countess Joanna and her younger sister Margaret, to Paris.
As soon as the young Countess could be deemed marriageable, Philip Augustus
sold her and her two counties to Prince Ferdinand of Portugal, for the promised
cession of two Flemish towns, St. Omer and Aire. The nuptials were celebrated
with great magnificence at Paris, but at the expense of the bride’s counties,
and the wedded pair went home. But upon their way, Ferdinand and Joanna were
captured by Prince Lewis, and kept prisoners, until he was in possession of the
ceded towns. Naturally Ferdinand thought more both of this affront and of what
was extorted from him, than of what was given or sold him; and had he proved
tamer, the resentment of Countess Joanna and her vassals, would have obliged
him to affect such sentiments.
But if the new Earl of Flanders and Hainault was the
most powerful of the French malcontents, the Earl of Boulogne, offended by the
King’s attempt to curtail the feudal privileges of the great vassals, with
respect to private wars, was the most active of them. He had visited England
and persuaded John to attempt the recovery of the provinces that had been torn
from him; and from England he repaired to Germany and excited Otho to join and
head the confederation that he was organizing against Philip Augustus. Otho
needed no pressing; eagerly he consented, and the allies deemed their triumph
certain.
King John invaded his lost patrimony, and Prince Lewis
with a large portion of the force of France was defending Poitou and Anjou
against him, when the Emperor menaced the eastern frontier of the kingdom.
Otho’s army, comprising his own Saxons and other northern Germans, the German
and French vassals of Countess Joanna, the compatriot vassals of Renaud de
Boulogne, and other revolted French nobles, and a considerable body of English
under his illegitimate uncle, the Earl of Salisbury, has been variously
estimated at 120,000 and 200,000 men, and may perhaps be safely taken at about
150,000. To oppose this host Philip, whose troops were necessarily divided, could
bring but very inferior numbers. He indeed summoned both nobles and citizens to
aid in defending their assailed country; and the call was the more readily
obeyed from his having the year before, a.d. 1213,
relieved the kingdom from the evils of an interdict, by obeying the Pope and
reconciling himself to the ill-treated Ingeborg. But these armed citizens
appear to have been in France of too small account to be noticed in numbering
the army; and passing them by, the highest amount at which his force is calculated
is 50,000 men.
With this army Philip Augustus, in July 1214, entered
Flanders, to chastise his rebellious vassal, ere joined by Otho; who on his
part was hurrying forward to meet, and, surrounding, as he hoped, to extinguish
the inferior numbers of his old enemy. So far the King of France succeeded,
that he had wrought some devastation in the industrious and prosperous French
fief before he heard of the excommunicated Emperor’s approach. Then, fearing to
engage at such disadvantage, he retreated towards Lille, pursued by Otho, who
was so confident as to the result, that he had already parcelled out as much of
France as was not the lawful patrimony of his uncle John, between himself, his
faithful vassals, and his allies. Near Bouvines, upon the 27th of July, he
accomplished the first object of his desires, overtaking the enemy. It is said
that Philip Augustus anticipated no attack that day, because it was Sunday. The
statement, if correct, is remarkable, since many battles had been fought upon
Sundays; one just mentioned by the pious Bishop of Liege against the invaders
of his principality : even the more venerated great festivals of the Church
were by no means uniformly so respected. The present occasion seems to be the
first indication of such religious respect for Sunday, as should prevent the
taking fair advantage of an enemy.
However this may be, the French monarch—more likely
unaware of the close proximity of the Imperialists—had lain down under an ash
tree to sleep whilst his army should be occupied in passing a small stream,
called the Marque, when he was roused by information that his rear-guard which
had not yet crossed, was attacked by the enemy. The Duke of Burgundy
accompanied his unwelcome intelligence with an earnest prayer that the King
would preserve a life, so valuable to the country, by retiring to the adjacent
strong Castle of Lens, whilst they should fight the now inevitable battle. “That
were unkingly,” returned Philip Augustus, who, if not animated with his
lion-hearted rival’s disinterested love of fighting, knew how to brave danger
when occasion required. “And to whom”, he then asked, “shall I, as to the
worthiest, intrust the Oriflamme?” The Duke
replied, “I know a stalwart knight, a veteran, but so poor that he has pawned
house and land to equip himself for this expedition. To him, Walo, (or
according to other writers Galon or Gui,) de Montigny, may the Oriflamme be safely intrusted.’’ The knight was
summoned, and the monarch offered him the standard with the words “To thee,
friend Walo, I intrust the honour of France.’’ The actually confounded Knight
exclaimed: “ What am I, my liege, to undertake such a trust?” The King
rejoined: “Thou art a man who, I am assured, fears nothing; and who when, by
God’s grace, the victory is ours, shall be amply rewarded.” The Knight bowed,
and as he took the standard, replied: “ Since such is your royal will, so be
it; and if the Oriflamme thirst for blood,
this day shall the thirst be slaked.
Philip Augustus had originally professed to wage this
war, as the Champion of the Church, upon two excommunicated monarchs. John’s
excommunication had thus been made the pretext for despoiling the English crown
of its French provinces; but his relief from that sentence, and readmission
into the bosom of the Church, upon his becoming a vassal of the Roman See in
the preceding year, had not induced this self-constituted defender of the Papal
authority, to desist, at Innocent’s command, from such spoliation. He probably
chose to consider the reconciled uncle’s continued intercourse with, and
support of, the still refractory and excommunicated nephew’, sufficient sin to
render him liable to all the temporal consequences of spiritual contumacy. And
that nephew had latterly deepened and redoubled his guilt in the pontifical
eyes by threatening to resume all the lands with which his predecessors had
endowed the Church; including, upon what ground is not apparent, even those
that were gifts of vassal-princes of the Empire. He purposed thus to reduce the
clergy of all grades in his dominions to tithes as their sole provision. With
the view, perhaps, of stamping this sacred character upon the war, Philip’s
next preparation for the impending engagement was to perform his devotions in a
small neighbouring church. That done, he proceeded to array his forces, in
which operation he shewed great judgment; taking advantage of some marshy
ground near Bouvines for the protection of his flanks, he managed in some
measure to neutralize Otho’s great numerical superiority.
Otho, on the other hand, displayed his wonted inconsiderate
rashness. He threatened Renaud de Boulogne with chains, for traitorously, as he
phrased it, dissuading from any attack upon the French, unless they could be
taken decidedly at disadvantage. He gave not a thought to guarding his troops
from the scorching July sun, which now, in the early afternoon, shone
dazzlingly in their faces. And he appears to have formed no plan of operations
beyond requiring the Earls of Flanders and Boulogne to bind themselves, as he
did, by oath, to direct all their efforts against the person of the French
King. Whether he so bound them under the persuasion that the royal general’s
death must needs decide the fate of the day—at the battle of Muret both parties
have been seen influenced by such an idea—or was actuated solely by rankling
animosity, can only be matter of conjecture.
Hence the battle was fought by the Germans without
concert, and again more resembles a Homeric battle, than one of modern times.
Whilst Otho, with the main body, and Renaud de Boulogne, with the left wing,
were wholly intent upon seeking Philip, Ferdinand of Flanders with the right
wing was, after some hard fighting, completely routed by the impetuous valour
of the French chivalry; and he himself, wounded by de Montigny with the shaft
of the standard, and falling half under his slain charger, was taken prisoner.
Both monarchs were repeatedly in great danger; Otho’s death or capture being
apparently as much the object of the French warriors—though not by previous
arrangement—as Philip’s, by imperial command, of the Germans. Philip was
dragged off his horse by some German infantry, and only the excellence of his
armour,—wherein his assailants could discover neither fault nor joint, which
might admit the passage of their weapons—saved his life during the few minutes
he remained in their hands, ere rescued and remounted by his own people. Otho,
whilst laying about him really like one of the heroes of the Iliad or of
mediaeval romance, found his bridle-rein clutched by a French knight, named
Pierre de Mauvoisin, who was striving to drag him
away captive. A struggle between the Emperor and the Knight ensued, during
which Gerard de la Truye hastened to his countryman’s
assistance, and dealt a mighty blow on Otho’s breast. The battle axe recoiled
from the imperial armour. He aimed a second, which was intercepted by the
steed’s head, tossed high in his efforts to release himself from Mauvoisin’s grasp. The wound was mortal, but in the
convulsive struggles of his agony, the horse did break loose; when rearing, he
turned round, and galloped a short distance before he fell dead upon the
ground. That dying effort had carried Otho back amidst his friends, and Graf
Horstmann instantly alighting, gave him his own charger. But the accident had
borne the semblance of flight; the French exulted, the Germans were dispirited;
and before Otho could well show himself remounted, the rout was so complete
that, whilst endeavouring to rally his fugitive troops, he was irresistibly swept
along with the stream. This appears to be the most, if not the only, plausible account
of an otherwise inexplicable flight; Otho being a man of such undoubted
courage, as to have been deemed a worthy pupil and emulator of his uncle of the
lion’s heart. The Comte de Boulogne fell into the hands of his offended
sovereign, much as the Portuguese husband of the Countess of Flanders had been
taken.
This was esteemed the greatest battle fought, the
victory the most important gained, by the French, since the defeat of the Arabs
by Charles Martel. Otho’s loss in killed, wounded, and prisoners, was estimated
at 30,000 men; Philip’s, at only 300 : the great slaughter being, as usual, of
infantry, cut down unresisting in their flight. The armour of the knights
rendering them nearly invulnerable, necessarily diminished the loss of life in
battle. Of this the battle of Bouvines offers striking examples, as in the
just-described escape of Philip Augustus, and in the following, somewhat
unchivalrous, incident. A Brabant knight having dashed forward, shouting: “Death
to the French!” was encountered by one Michel des Harmes, who clasped him in
his brawny arms, crying Here shall thy insolent tongue find the death thou denouncest to the French.” He held him fast, whilst a
second French knight, with one hand forcing back his head, sought an aperture
in his armour through which to insinuate his dagger’s point. For awhile the
search was as fruitless as in Philip’s case; but at last the juncture of the gorget and breast-plate or shirt of mail disclosed the
desired fault, and the offending Brabanter was slain.
How many more of his grade fell is doubtful, but amongst the prisoners the
victor is reported to have had Palsgrave Henry, five earls—two have been named,
and Salisbury was a third—and twenty-five bannerets. His own rebellious vassals
of Boulogne and Flanders Philip held to have forfeited their lives,—though the
double vassalage of the Earl of Flanders and Hainault, and the rules laid down
for the case of war between two liege lords of one vassal might have been
supposed to protect the Portuguese from such forfeiture; unless indeed the
French King chose to consider the papal excommunication and deposal of the
Emperor, as depriving the Imperial vassals who adhered to him of the plea of
their duties of vassalage. Death, the lawful doom of one of the two Earls, and,
as asserted, of both, was mercifully commuted for life-long imprisonment; and
such it proved in the case of Renaud de Boulogne who died in captivity. Not so
in Ferdinand’s; but not till he had pined through many weary years, during
which Joanna vainly endeavoured to ransom him; indeed, not till after the death
of Philip Augustus and his son Lewis VIII, was the Portuguese Peer of France
and Prince of the Empire, at length released by the Queen Regent, Blanche, on
paying the heavy ransom of 55,000 lb. of silver. The booty made at Bouvines was
immense, and amongst it was Otho’s carroccio-fashioned standard. This
Philip took to Paris as a trophy; but the Imperial eagle adorning it he sent to
Frederic, in token of Heaven’s sanction upon his claim to the Empire.
The battle of Bouvines terminated the war. John of
England purchased peace for the sum of 60,000 marks, and obtained the liberty
of the Earl of Salisbury, in exchange for a French nobleman of high rank.
Otho’s father-in-law, the Duke of Brabant, sought to propitiate the victor by
congratulations. Philip, in reply, sent him two letters, the one blank, the
other containing merely these words: “As that letter is devoid of writing, so
is thy heart of truth.” He nevertheless made peace with him, accepting one of
his sons as a hostage for his observing the conditions.
Otho himself seems to have abandoned all further
thought of war with France, and took refuge at Cologne; which, like most of the
powerful cities, esteeming him, since his re-election, the lawful Emperor,
still faithfully adhered to him. At Cologne he was joined by his Empress; but
better had it, perhaps, been for him had his Italian mistress persisted in her
resolve that he should have no wife unless he conferred that title upon
herself. Mary of Brabant is said to have been reckless of expense and of decorum,
if not of character, in her pursuit of amusement; and amongst her favourite
pastimes ranked high play. The large sums she lost at dice, her general
extravagance, and the debts she idly incurred, together with the peculiar
unfitness of such conduct under her consort’s circumstances, disgusted the
staid burghers of Cologne. Their loyalty cooled, and they now demanded payment
of the Empress’s debts, as well as of a good round sum, previously lent Otho,
to forward his warlike preparations. Having no means of satisfying their just
claims, Otho, about Easter, left Cologne, according to some accounts, under
colour of a hunting party, and fled to Brunswick; whither the Empress, escaping
from her creditors in the garb of a pilgrim, presently followed him. Other
writers state that Cologne, to get rid of annoying guests, no longer positively
esteemed imperial, not only forgave the debts of Otho and Mary, but defrayed
the expense of their return to Brunswick.
The victory of Philip Augustus had been as decisive
for Frederic as for himself, Otho evidently remaining powerless. The Duke of
Brabant has been seen endeavouring to conciliate his son-in-law’s foreign
enemy, and he now submitted to his compatriot rival, giving him another son, as
a hostage for his fidelity. The Duke of Saxony and the Margrave of Brandenburg
had been induced by the general aspect of the contest, to renounce Otho and
acknowledge the heir of the Swabian dynasty, to which their House was deeply
indebted. And Frederic, who had been engaged in subduing individual adherents
of his competitors in southern Germany, and holding Diets there for the regulation
of local affairs; now convoked a Diet at Frankfort-on-the-Main. It was more
numerously attended than any of his had yet been; and he obtained the promise
of the assembled Estates to elect his infant son King of the Romans.
The allegiance of Cologne was now avowedly transferred
to him, and no further impediment to his descending the Rhine existed. Frederic
therefore turned his steps northward, inviting the Princes to attend him to his
coronation. Achen, indeed, still professed allegiance to Otho; but, when the
heir of her Emperors appeared, threw her gates open to him. And there, in the
Cathedral of Charlemagne, upon the 15th of July, 1215, Frederic II was crowned
with all due rites and solemnities. Two deviations from established form,
nevertheless, unavoidably occurred. The one, that the proper regalia being in
Otho’s possession, substitutes for the genuine crown, sceptre, &c., were
necessarily employed. The other, that the See of Cologne being
vacant—Archbishop Adolf had not survived to enjoy and participate in Ghibeline triumph—the Archbishop of Mainz was the
officiating prelate. And thus, at the early age of twenty, had Frederic,
victorious over all obstacles, recovered the throne of his ancestors.
Upon the very day of his coronation the young sovereign
took the Cross, and his example was followed by many princes, prelates, and
nobles. This, certainly precipitate, step, may be presumed to have been less an
impulse of enthusiasm, either religious or chivalrous, than the fulfilment of
an engagement to his papal ex-guardian, and still important protector. Innocent
was then vehemently exhorting Europe to undertake a new crusade for the
recovery of Jerusalem, the arrangements for the organization and conduct of
which were to be made in the Ecumenic Council, summoned to assemble at the
Lateran in the autumn of this same year. To Innocent, Frederic strongly
expressed and evidently felt real gratitude, of which he gave him a yet more
difficult proof than this rash crusading engagement, made whilst he still had
to defend his crown against a competitor. In compliance with another of his
requisitions,—the most annoying—he now, in the very exultation of success, sent
him a renewal of his promise, to resign the Two Sicilies to his son, when he
himself should have received the Imperial crown; thus severing them from
Germany and the Empire; and further, for the government of those realms during
his son’s minority, to appoint regents such as the Pope should approve.
Whilst the contest for Germany had been in progress,
occurred one of the strange incidents peculiarly characterizing the middle
ages. This was a Crusade of children! It began in France, where, even during
the heat of the Crusade against the Albigenses, Robert de Courçon,
an Englishman, formerly the school or college friend of Innocent III, at
Paris, and now his Legate there, was preaching a Crusade for the recovery of
Jerusalem. Though an able man, the preacher was hot-headed, and performed his
office after the manner of Peter the Hermit and his enthusiastic associates,
giving the Cross to all descriptions of persons, fit and unfit,
indiscriminately. His passionate exhortations inflamed all minds, and in 1213,
had actually enfrenzied a shepherd boy named Stephen.
This lad asserted that the Saviour himself had, in a letter addressed to the
King of France, authorized him, Stephen, to preach and lead a Crusade. Children
of all ranks and of both sexes, in spite of their parents’ utmost endeavours to
restrain them, flocked to this juvenile leader, until he was at the head of
30,000 French boys and girls. From France the mania spread into Germany, where
another boy collected an army of 7,000 children: amongst whom, however, there
are said to have been some adult individuals.
The German division of this parody upon the favourite
and—as believed—hallowed enterprise of the epoch, crossed the Alps and reached
Genoa, where the discovery that hence the way to Palestine was by sea, for
which money was indispensable, put a final stop to the progress of the strange
army. Well was it for those who, in whatever station born, there remained as
servants to the Italians! The majority, in their opposite attempts, some to
proceed, by begging, or trying to steal a passage, others, by retracing their
steps, to return home, were plundered and ill used; of the last, moreover,
numbers died of heat, hunger, thirst, or fatigue, by the road side. A few only
eventually found their way back to Germany, where the males became objects of
ridicule, the females of worse, their chastity not being supposed to have
survived the perils of such an expedition.
The lot of the French host of juvenile Crusaders was
even more disastrous. Headed by Stephen, borne in state in a tapestried waggon,
they arrived at Marseilles, where some merchants, professing unbounded
admiration of their heroic piety, offered them a gratuitous passage to
Palestine. Of course the bewildered children, utterly at a loss how to proceed,
gladly accepted both admiration and offer. They are said to have embarked in
seven ships, so scanty an allowance of room for 30,000 passengers, of- whatever
growth, as to induce a hope that the numbers may be somewhat exaggerated. Of
these seven ships two were wrecked off Sardinia, when every, soul on board
perished, and those so lost were the least unfortunate amongst the shepherd boy’s host. For the
merchants, whose fair show of disinterested kindness and piety had entrapped the
poor children on board their ships, carried their dupes to Africa, where they
sold them into Moslem slavery. Slaves being then held to be lawful merchandize,
and the ever repeated papal bulls and decrees of Councils, against selling
Christians to the Heathen, showing the practice to be common, the crime of
these Marseilles merchants, how abominably atrocious soever, is less
incredible than, at first sight, it appears. There is reason to hope that
these traitorous, kidnapping slave-dealers were afterwards caught and severely
punished by Frederic II.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |