|  |  | 
|  | 
 
 HAILE SELASSIE. 1892 – 1975. EMPEROR OF ETHIOPIACHAPTER VII.THE WRITINGS OF COSMAS
 The earliest Christian, map-maker, Cosmas of Alexandria, named
              also Cosmas Indicopleustes on account of his many
              voyages to the East, has a good deal to say about Abyssinia where he travelled,
              traded, and pursued historical enquiry about the middle of the sixth century
              after Christ. He is an earnest, accurate and entertaining writer save when he
              indulges in theological digressions; but it is worth while suffering these for
              the occasional excellence of his descriptive material. It must be remembered,
              too, that but for his religious purposes it is unlikely that any of his great
              works would have been written, for he retired to a monastery in Sinai to end
              his years in the peaceful compilation of several geographic treatises to the
              greater glory of God.
               Of his works
              there survives only his Topographia Christiana—that
              is, a Christian as opposed to a pagan design of the universe. His Geography, in
              which presumably he gave a more detailed account of the earth’s surface, is
              lost together with his various treatises on the motions of the stars, his
              annotations of the Psalms, and his Commentary on the Song of Songs, this last
              a particularly unfortunate loss to the student of the legend of the Queen of
              Sheba, concerning which Cosmas had probably collected first hand information
              during his visit to the Holy City of Aksum situated just on the borders of
              Eritrea. Fortunately, however, it was necessary in any description of the
              universal scheme to include considerable mention of the earth, so the Topographia is fairly well supplied with geographical
              detail and has some extremely interesting maps.
               Cosmas has been
              long undervalued, but for this his theological obsessions are to blame. The
              fate of the souls of still-born babies no longer appeals to the average reader
              as a fascinating problem to be solved by the nice application of logic to
              selected quotations from sacred sources, and when Cosmas treats of this and
              kindred subjects he sinks to a level of complicated absurdity which only amuses
              for a page or so, and then becomes tedious beyond bearing. But for those
              prepared to overlook both his theology and his scientific theory there is a
              rich reward.
               Some, no doubt,
              will find it harder to forgive his science than his exegesis. The modern
              reader, for instance, will be inclined to smile indulgently at a writer who,
              wishing to substantiate his theory that all the earth slopes upwards to the
              north where a huge conical mountain is the hiding place of the sun, brings
              forward as conclusive evidence the fact, which he has observed in the course of
              his travels, that Euphrates and Tigris, rivers flowing to the southward, are
              swifter than the northward flowing Nile. To our minds it seems inconceivable
              that a geographer, capable at other times of such shrewd observations, should
              think of a great river as labouring uphill to its
              mouth, but before Cosmas is dismissed as a humbug there is one point which must
              be urged in his favour. He states quite frankly that
              he has never seen a unicorn.
               Now this is a
              notable admission, for it suggests that Cosmas sticks to facts. After all, it
              is facts which we want from our ancient geographers and historians. Their
              theories may be ludicrous, but that is unimportant by comparison if only the
              facts which they have collected are right. Cosmas believed with a passionate
              certainty that the earth was flat, and considered the pagan Ptolemy, also a
              citizen of Alexandria, a blasphemous fool for suggesting that it was round and
              that the path of the sun encircled it. This must detract from the reputation of
              Cosmas as a philosopher, but it makes very little difference to his usefulness.
              What the historian needs is not philosophy but plentiful and accurate detail,
              and when a monk of the Dark Ages, with his reputation as a traveller to uphold, is careful enough of the truth to admit that he has never seen a
              unicorn, this must be considered as splendid testimony to his reliability.
               In fact, the
              picture which Cosmas gives of the Abyssinia of that day, can be accepted as
              true in all essentials; and it is this which makes his works so important,
              since but for them we should know practically nothing of the vast trade which,
              with Rome as its main base, connected the whole Mediterranean seaboard with
              India, Africa, Socotra and Ceylon, using for this purpose the ships of
              Abyssinia.
               For it is quite
              clear from the manner in which Cosmas refers to his voyages that he was no
              Columbus discovering new worlds but simply a trader, one of many, who followed
              established routes in pursuit of normal commerce.
               He describes
              the huge palace of the King of Abyssinia with four great towers and statues of
              unicorns cunningly wrought in bronze. He describes the great city of Aksum,
              more than one hundred miles inland from its port, Adulis, and was, he says, the honoured guest of the Governor of that port. He was
              consulted in the matter of some ancient inscriptions (of which, unfortunately,
              the modern explorers have found no trace) and actually went on an expedition in
              search of them. Interest in archaeology and learned dispute concerning it, for
              it is clear there was much considered argument, indicate a very high level of
              culture. And indeed the general picture is one of great peace and prosperity,
              trade being extensive and well organised, currency
              soundly managed, and justice adequately administered over a large area.
               Diplomatic
              exchanges with the great ports of the Mediterranean appear to have been
              frequent, the country was considered a valuable ally against the non-Christian
              peoples of Yemen, and as an important stage on the sea route to the Indies was
              able to extract considerable wealth from the trade in spices and silks.
               But it was not
              only to India and Ceylon that the traders went. Cosmas describes far stranger
              journeyings in which he himself played an honourable part.
               The King of
              Aksum, he tells us, sent every year a well-equipped trading fleet to bargain
              with the people of Barbary. This term, from the Greek barbaroi—literally
              the people whose speech sounded “bar . . . bar . . . bar” —is used of almost
              any tribe of lesser civilisation and must not be
              confused with its later uses in the Mediterranean. The Barbary coast of the
              Abyssinians was almost certainly Italian Somaliland, probably the southern and
              more fertile parts.
               Five hundred
              men would set out on these expeditions. As they rounded Cape Gardafui, they “were careful not to be caught by the great
              currents which would sweep them south into the “unnavigable oceans.”... This
              actually happened once to Cosmas, whose ship was driven so far off her course
              that he gave himself up for lost. He records that a huge bird was sighted over
              the sea— no doubt, an albatross, from which it seems likely that he was indeed
              carried several hundred miles to the south and was in considerable danger.
               But this was
              only one of the many perils which these traders had to encounter. When they
              landed on the coast of Sasu “on the edge of the Great Ocean,” there was a long
              journey inland to the “Land of Gold.” The three chief products with which they
              traded were cattle, salt and iron, all of which they exchanged for lumps of
              gold which the natives mined, where and how they were never able to discover.
              Driving their cattle before them and labouring under
              their heavy loads the expedition would push on through the wild and
              inhospitable country until they reached the established rendezvous. Here a
              strange method of trade was employed, the reasons for which are easily
              imagined. Arrived at the level ground where the bargaining was to be conducted,
              the traders would advance cautiously and place their salt, iron or beef
              wherever convenient—often, says Cosmas, on thorns. The traders then retired
              into safety and the natives, emerging from concealment, would bring their lumps
              of gold, placing the amount of it they were willing to pay on or beside any
              ‘lot’ they wanted. They then went back to hiding and it was the custom for the
              merchants to come forward to value the offers. If they took the gold and left
              the goods that meant that they were satisfied; but if they considered that more
              gold was necessary they retired having touched nothing. It was then for the
              natives either to place more gold on the various piles until the traders were
              satisfied or to take back their gold as a sign that they were calling off the
              negotiations. This bargaining went on for several days, though rarely more than
              five. Then came the dash back to the coast with the bartered gold. Even in the
              matter of fact phrases of the shrewd old merchant turned monk it is possible to
              feel the fear which possessed all members of the expedition that robbers or
              other disaster might rob them of their hard-won gains. Trade was indeed an
              adventure in those times, and it is impossible not to feel respect for Cosmas,
              the sturdy adventurer, who, though plagued by poor sight and terrible digestive
              miseries (for which dysentery was doubtless a good deal to blame) travelled,
              and bargained, and nosed into all sorts of strange places, and then placed his
              doings on record in honour of the God in whom he so
              devoutly believed.
               Cosmas retired
              to his Sinaian monastery in A.D. 549. His muddled
              thinking and preoccupation with nonessentials are typical of the state of
              learning at that time. Alexandria, once the centre of
              the world’s intellectual activity, the city of the great Museum of the
              Ptolemies and of the first great scientific library of the human race, had
              become a hive of petty and bickering theologians. Cosmas was a victim of the
              prevailing infection, and he would not merit further mention here were it not
              that in his Topographia the Tabernacle of Moses plays
              a prominent part.
               Cosmas
              believed, and he was not alone in this, that the Tabernacle was more than a
              shrine, that it was, in fact, in its construction a model of the entire
              Universe. Ideas of this kind were not new, for the Egyptians had often held
              that their temples were models of the world, but never had this type of theory
              been worked out with such fantastic logic as when Cosmas set himself to prove
              it by detailed demonstration. The table of shewbread surrounded by a waved
              border was the earth surrounded by the ocean. The ocean, on which only Noah had
              sailed led to the Earthly Paradise where the sons of men lived before the Flood.
              From this abode rose the walls of Heaven, the north and south walls curving to
              meet in a high vault. On a gallery in this vault lay Heaven itself.
               Since the
              dimensions of the scheme are such that the enclosed space is twice as long east
              to west as broad north to south, this plan of the universe has been jocularly
              described as resembling a lady’s trunk with a rounded lid and with a top shelf
              inside it. Cosmas himself says that it is all very like the Public Baths.
               The whole
              Ptolemaic conception of the universe was anathema to Cosmas, but what shocked
              him most was the idea that the heavenly bodies moved of their own accord. It is
              clear from his vehemence that the idea of an automatic universe frightened him
              badly. That way lay madness. His scheme required the assistance of angels in
              pushing the stars round their courses, and he felt much safer when stellar
              motion was thus provided for; though it never occurred to him that this
              condemnation of the angelic creatures to perpetual hard labour was surely a little unfair.
               But it is not
              these astronomical speculations of Cosmas that make his narrative of value
              here, though it was impossible without them to give a true picture of the man.
              What lends his theory interest is that it explains the great veneration with
              which the Ark of the Covenant is guarded by the Ethiopian Church to-day.
               By giving into
              the hands of His Church a mystic model of the world God gave them the power to
              conquer. The Ethiopian Church considers that the Ark guards the fate of their
              country. While it is in their possession they cannot be conquered. Lesser arks
              are taken into battle to encourage the soldiers, but the true Ark is hidden
              where no invader can find it. The taking of the Holy City of Aksum means
              nothing so long as the Ark of the Covenant is saved.
               This the
              Emperor Haile Selassie has sworn to guard with his life. He and his chieftains
              are pledged by the most sacred oaths to perish to the last man rather than let
              the sacred symbol pass into the hands of an invader.
               The Legend of
              the Ark of the Covenant is one of the great stories on which the Ethiopian
              faith is founded. There is another legend, hardly less remarkable, with which
              Abyssinian history is inextricably mingled.... The Story of Presbyter John.
                 
               CHAPTER VIII.THE LEGEND OF PRESTER JOHN
 |  | 
|  |  |