THEHISTORY OF MUSIC LIBRARY |
THE VIOLIN. ITS FAMOUS MAKERS AND THEIR IMITATORS SECTION IV The French School The French have long
occupied a foremost place in the production of articles needing
delicate workmanship, and it is therefore not surprising that they
should at an early period have turned their attention to the art
of Violin-making, which requires in a high degree both skilful workmanship
and artistic treatment. The French manufacture of Violins appears
to have commenced about the same period as the English, viz., in
the early part of the 17th century, François Médard and Tywersus
being among the French makers, and Rayman and Wise their fellows
in England. The primitive French makers, like their English brethren,
copied the instruments made at Brescia and Cremona, to which course
they adhered down to the days of Barak Norman, when the two nations
parted company, as regards having a common type, the French continuing
the path they had hitherto taken, and copying the Italians, with
scarcely any deviation, to the present time. The English left the
Italian form for the German one of Jacob Stainer, which they adopted,
with but few exceptions, for nearly a century, recovering the Italian
about the middle of the 18th century. It is remarkable that French
makers should have restrained themselves from following the pattern
of the famous German maker when his name was at its height and his
instruments were in such demand. That in not adopting the then popular
form they were rightly guided, experience has clearly demonstrated.
When we scan the older works the French have left us, and consider
the advantage they had in keeping to the Italian form, we cannot
but feel disappointed in finding so few meritorious instruments
among them. There appear to have been many makers who were quite
unconcerned whether their instruments possessed merit becoming the
productions of a true artist; their chief aim would seem to have
been to make in dozens—in other words, quantity in place of
quality. If the early French makers are carefully studied, it will
be seen that Boquay, Pierray, and one or two of their pupils are
the only makers deserving of praise. It must be admitted that the
shortcomings of the makers of the first period were adequately supplied
by those of the second period, which includes the king of French
artists, Nicolas Lupot. The old French school, originating with
Tywersus and Médard, includes the following makers: Nicolas Renault,
of Nancy, Médard, also of Nancy, Dumesnil, Bertrand, Pierray, Boquay,
Gaviniés, Chappuy, Ouvrard, Paul Grosset, Despont, Saint-Paul, Salomon,
Véron, with others of less importance. Many of these makers had
a fair amount of ideas, which, had they been well directed, might
have led to fame. Others contented themselves with copying, without
giving any place to their fancy. It will be found that many of the
instruments by Boquay, Pierray, and a few others, have varnish upon
them closely resembling that of the Venetian school; it is full-bodied,
very transparent, and rich in colour. Many of their works are covered
with a very inferior quality of varnish, which has caused some confusion
respecting the merit due to them as varnishers, they being frequently
judged by their inferior instruments, without reference to their
good ones. It is evident that they made two qualities of varnish,
in accordance with the price they were to obtain, as was commonly
done in England by the Forsters, Banks, and Wamsley, where similar
confusion exists. The Italians happily avoided this objectionable
practice. Their works are of one uniform quality in point of varnish.
This divergence may possibly be accounted for by the difference
of climate. In Italy, oil varnish, judiciously used, would dry rapidly,
whereas in France or England the reverse would be the case; hence
its more sparing use. We will now glance
at the second French School of makers, commencing with De Comble.
Learning his art in Italy, and, it is said, under Stradivari, he
brought to bear a knowledge superior to that possessed by the makers
mentioned above. The form he introduced was seen to be in advance
of that hitherto met with among the French and Belgian makers, and
led to its being chiefly followed. The next maker was Pique, who
made Violins and Violas that were excellent in point of workmanship,
and had he been equally successful in varnishing he would probably
have been held in the same estimation as Nicolas Lupot. From these
makers sprang quite a little school of its own, comprising François
Gand, in Paris, who succeeded to the business of Lupot, and Bernardel,
with several others less known. Mention must not be omitted of another
excellent copyist—Silvestre, of Lyons. He has left some charming
specimens of his art. They are lighter in character than the works
of Nicolas Lupot, and resemble the work of Stradivari from 1680
to 1710. Every portion of the work evidences the skill and judgment
of the maker. The wood, with scarcely an exception, has not been
manipulated in order to darken it, consequently the instruments
become of increasing merit as age acts upon them. The practice of preparing
the wood for Violin-making, either by baking it or by the application
of acids, may be traced, in the first instance, to a desire to obtain
artificially those results which are brought about by the hand of
time. In obtaining lightness and dryness in new wood, it was imagined
that the object in view would be reached without the aid of Dame
Nature. Experience, however, has shown that Fiddles, like all things
intended to pass into green old age, mature gradually, and are not
to be benefited by any kind of forcing process. The earliest account
I have met with of Fiddle-baking occurred in England about 150 years
since. One Jeacocke, a baker by trade, and a lover of music by nature,
used to bake his Fiddles in sawdust for a week whenever their tones
showed symptoms of not being up to his standard of quality. In France
the practice may be said to have been introduced about eighty years
ago, with a view of facilitating the creation of such mysteries
as Duiffoprugcar and Morella Violins, baked and browned until they
had something of a fifteenth-century hue. The same means were adopted
in the production of instruments intended as copies of the works
of Stradivari and Guarneri. The brown hue of the originals, and
the worn and broken condition of the varnish which comes of age
alone, were imitated with more or less ingenuity. Happily the error
is recognised, as far as the best workmanship is concerned, in France.
The legitimate imitator's art no longer includes that of depicting
wear and brownness, rendering abortive so much excellent work. It only remains now
to mention Salle, Vuillaume, Chanot, Gand, Germain, Mennégand, Gaillard,
and Miremont, all copyists of more or less note, who may be said
to complete the modern French school. These makers are or were the
chief manufacturers of Violins in France of a better class. Those
made by thousands yearly at Mirecourt are not Violins in the eyes
of the connoisseur. They are made, as common cabinet work is produced
in England, by several workmen, each taking a portion, one making
the backs, another the sides, another the bellies, and so on with
the other parts of the instrument, the whole being finally arranged
by a finisher. Such work must necessarily be void of any artistic
nature; they are like instruments made in a mould,
not on a mould, so painfully are they alike. This
Manchester of Fiddle-making has doubtless been called into being
by the great demand for cheap instruments, and has answered thus
far its purpose, but it has certainly helped to destroy the gallant
little bands of makers who were once common in France, Germany,
and England, among whom were men who were guided by reverential
feelings for the art, irrespective of the gains they reaped by their
labours. The number of instruments yearly made in Mirecourt and
Saxony amounts to many thousands, and is yearly increasing. They
send forth repeated copies of Amati, Maggini, Guarneri, and Stradivari,
all duly labelled and dated, to all parts of the world, frequently
disappointing their simple-minded purchasers, who fondly fancy they
have thus become possessed of the real article at the trifling cost
of a few pounds. They produce various kinds of modern antiques in
Violins, some of which display an amount of ingenuity worthy of
being exercised in a better cause; but usually the whole thing is
overdone, and the results, in point of tone, are far more disastrous
than in the common French copies. The following list of French,
Belgian, and Dutch makers contains many names not included in the
first edition of this book. The works wherein several of these names
occur are M. J. Gallay's, "Les Luthiers Italiens aux 17ième et
18ième Siècles," 1869; M. Fétis, "Biographie
Universelle des Musiciens;" M. Vidal, "Les Instruments
à Archet," 1876; the "Catalogue Raisonné," of the
instruments at the Conservatoire, by Gustave Chouquet, Paris, 1875;
"Recherches sur les facteurs de Clavecins," by M. le Chevalier
de Burbure, Antwerp, 1863; Pougin's "Supplement to the Dictionary
of Fétis;" and Mendel's "Musikalisches Conversations-Lexikon,"
1880.
French Makers ALDRIC, Paris, 1790-1844.
Copied Stradivari with great skill. He was also well known as a
dealer in Cremonese instruments. He was one of the earliest French
makers who dealt with Luigi Tarisio, the famous Italian connoisseur.
He generally used a red varnish of good quality. ALLAR, ——,
Paris, 1788. AMELOT, ——,
Lorient; worked early in the present century. He used a highly ornamented
label. AUBRY, ——,
Paris, 1840. Succeeded his uncle Aldric, mentioned above. AUGIÈRE, ——,
Paris, about 1830, was established in the Rue Saint Eustache, in
partnership with Calot, and made some good instruments. Augière
formerly worked in the shop of Clement of Paris. BACHELIER, ——,
Paris, 1788. BASSOT, ——,
Paris, 1788. BERNARDEL, Auguste
Sébastien Philippe, born at Mirecourt in 1802, was in the workshop
of Lupot, in Paris. The instruments of this maker are excellently
made, and the wood judiciously selected. He took his sons into partnership
in 1859 and retired from business in 1866. He died in 1870. His
sons, Ernst Auguste and Gustave Adolphe, were in partnership with
Eugène Gand, and the firm was known as "Gand et Bernardel frères." BERTRAND, Nicolas,
Paris, about 1700 to 1735, used varnish of a superior kind. He made
many of the Viols of the type common in Paris, for some time after
the Violin had been introduced; they were named Dessus-de-Viole,
Pardessus, Quinton, and Viole-haut-contre. His name is often seen
branded on the backs of his instruments, inside. BOIVIN, Claude, about
1749, Paris. M. Chouquet, in his "Catalogue Raisonné"
of the instruments at the Paris Conservatoire, described a Guitar
by this maker, made for a daughter of Louis XV.
BOQUAY, Jacques,
Paris, 1700-1730. One of the first of the old French school. He,
with a few of his contemporaries, inherited a good amount of the
Italian character of workmanship, introduced probably into France
by Nicolas Renault. Boquay, with others whose names are mentioned
in this list of French makers, used varnish closely allied to that
of Cremona; its colour is a warm brown, very transparent, and of
a soft nature. He made many instruments of small size. The model
is often that of Girolamo Amati, but slightly more arched; the sound-hole
is more rounded and less striking. The scroll can scarcely be considered
a copy of Girolamo Amati's; it is well cut, but lacks the peculiar
grace of the Italian. The tone is sweet, without much power. BORLON, Artus or
Arnould, about 1579, Antwerp, maker of stringed instruments (mentioned
in the pamphlet by M. le Chevalier de Burbure). BORLON, or PORLON,
Pierre, Antwerp, about 1647, of whom M. de Burbure says: "Pierre
Borlon, or Porlon, made in the year 1647 a Double-Bass for the orchestra
of the Cathedral (Antwerp). The instrument is in existence, and
inside is the name 'Peeter Porlon tot, Antwerpen f. 1647.'"
The same author mentions another early Double-Bass made in 1636
by Maître Daniel for a chapel in Antwerp, and remarks, in passing,
that in other countries the Double-Bass was not used until about
half a century later. The question of priority in this matter is
important and interesting; but in order to arrive at a satisfactory
conclusion, it is necessary to be certain that these Belgian Basses
are not, together with the Brescian and others, converted Viols. BORLON, Joannes,
Antwerp, also a maker of Viols. BORLON, François, Antwerp, Viol-maker. BOULLANGIER, C.,
1823-1888. Worked in Paris, and for the late Mr. Withers. Was in
business for many years in Frith Street, Soho, and has made many
excellent instruments. BOUMEESTER, Amsterdam,
about 1650. BOURDET, Sébastien,
Mirecourt, one of the earliest Violin-makers in Mirecourt. BOURDET, Jacques, Paris, 1751. BOUSSU, Eterbeck, le Bruxelles, about 1750. BRETON, 1777. This
name is met with branded on the backs, "Breton à Paris."
A little heavy in character, but fairly made; dark brown colour. BRETON, Le, Mirecourt, 1812-30. Commonplace
instruments. Large pattern, usually stamped with name inside. BRUGÈRE, the name
of several contemporary French makers, dating from Mirecourt and
elsewhere. Some show good workmanship and varnish. CALOT, ——,
about 1830. He was in the workshop of Clément prior to date given. CASTAGNERY, Jean
Paul. M. Fétis mentions this maker as having worked in Paris, 1638-62. CHAMPION, René, Paris,
about 1735. His instruments are well made, and the varnish is of
good quality. CHANOT, François,
born at Mirecourt in 1788. An engineer by profession. Becoming interested
in the construction of Violins, he designed one having sides like
those of the guitar. M. Chouquet describes a Violin of this maker,
made for Viotti, and remarks that the experiment of François Chanot
opened the way to those of Savart. The date of Chanot's patent is
1818. The paper of Savart on the construction of bow instruments
was read at the French Academy in the following year. CHANOT, Georges,
Paris. Brother of the above-named; born at Mirecourt, 1801. Throughout
life was a most indefatigable worker. He has made a very large number
of copies of Stradivari and Guarneri, chiefly of the former, which
are also the best. They are well constructed instruments, and the
wood is of an excellent description. He was long known as a dealer
in Cremonese instruments, and many notable rarities passed into
his possession. The instruments of this maker will, at no distant
date, be valued higher than they are at the present time. He died
in 1883. CHANOT, Georges,
London. Son of Georges Chanot, Paris. Assisted Charles Maucotel,
and a short time afterwards started in business on his own behalf.
He died in 1893. CHANOT, F. Son of
Georges Chanot. CHANOT, G. A. Brother
of the above-named. CHAPPUY, Nicolas-Augustin,
about 1765. His instruments are chiefly of large pattern; nearly
all are branded on the button, in a similar manner to those of the
Testore family. Chappuy differed greatly in his work. When he used
plenty of wood we have instruments of a good kind and worthy of
attention. There are many, however, having his brand that are scarcely
fit to be called Violins, so inferior is the work and wood. The Violin M. Habeneck
used during thirty-seven years, when instructing his class at the
Conservatoire, Paris, was made by Chappuy, and is preserved at that
institution. CHARDON, Joseph,
Paris, son-in-law and pupil of Georges Chanot, Paris, to whose business
he succeeded in the year 1872. CHAROTTE, ——,
born at Mirecourt, settled at Rouen. Died in 1836. CHATERAIN, Paris,
about 1759. Good workmanship. CHEVRIER, André-Augustin,
about 1838. Born at Mirecourt, worked in Paris and Brussels. CLAUDOT, Charles,
Paris, possibly came from Mirecourt. The workmanship is heavy; varnish
mostly yellow. His instruments are good for orchestral purposes.
His name is generally found stamped on the back, inside. CLAUDOT, Augustin,
Paris, "Strad" pattern, yellow varnish, good wood. CLEMENT, ——, Paris, 1815-40. CLIQUOT, Henri, Paris, about 1765. CLIQUOT, Louis Alexandre,
about 1765. COUSINEAU, Paris,
about the end of the 18th century. Well made, name often branded
on button. CUNAULT, Georges,
Paris, contemporary; worked with Miremont, and afterwards alone;
a careful maker. CUNY, ——,
Paris. 18th century. CUYPERS, Johannes,
1755-18—. Worked at the Hague; varnish often yellow in colour.
Well finished instruments, which are rising in value. DANIEL, ——,
1656, is described as having made a Double-Bass for the orchestra
of one of the chapels at Antwerp Cathedral. DARCHE, Nicholas, Aix la Chapelle, died 1873. Made many useful
instruments on the lines of the Cremonese Masters. Other makers
of this name worked in Brussels and Mirecourt in the 19th century. DAVID, ——.
Maker to the court of Louis XVI. DE COMBLE, Ambroise, Tournay, about 1760. It is said that he
worked in the shop of Antonio Stradivari, and judging from the character
of the work, together with that of the varnish, it is not unlikely
that he did receive instructions from the great Cremonese maker.
The varnish is very like Italian; the colour often a rich red, with
much body. His instruments are inclined to roughness as regards
workmanship, and therefore are not pleasing to the eye. There is
a resemblance to the instruments of Stradivari after 1732 in form,
though not in workmanship, and he would therefore seem to have copied
those late instruments. They may be described as of large pattern,
flat model, and having an abundance of wood. They are deserving
of attention both from the professor and the amateur, the workmanship
being skilful and the material excellent. The tone is large, and
frequently possesses the richness so much admired in the works of
the Italians. This quality is traceable to the soft and flexible
nature of the superior varnish with which these instruments are
covered. Several Violas and Violoncellos are extant which were made
by De Comble. DELANOIX, ——,
Bruxelles, about 1760. DELAUNAY, ——,
Paris, 1775, Viol-maker. M. Chouquet describes an instrument of
this maker which is in the collection at the Conservatoire. DELEPLANQUE, Gérard, Lille, 1768. DERAZEY, Honoré, Mirecourt. Many of the instruments of this
maker are carefully finished. They are heavy in wood. The varnish
is inclined to hardness. Died 1875. DERAZEY, J. A., Mirecourt,
1815-85. Son of Honoré; purchased the business of Nicolas. Made
many useful instruments. DESPONS, Antoine,
Paris, 17th century, is said to have made excellent instruments
of various patterns. DIEULAFAIT, ——,
1720, Viol-maker. A Viol da Gamba of this maker is at the Conservatoire,
Paris. DROULOT, ——, Paris, 1788. DUCHERON, Mathurin, Paris, 1714. DU MESNIL, Jacques, Paris, about 1655. EESBROECK, Jean Van,
1585, Antwerp, Lute-maker. M. C. Chevalier de Brabure states he
was the son of Josse van Eesbroeck, of Maria Kerch. He gives some
interesting particulars relative to the connection of music with
the guild of St. Luke at Antwerp, and speaks of the makers of Clavichords
seeking for admission into the Guild in 1557, adding that it was
natural these makers should desire to belong to a corporation so
great and honourable as that of St. Luke, which since 1480 had its
Chambers of Rhetoric "dite de Violiren, de Violier." FALAISE, ——.
Copied the Amatis and Stradivari. The workmanship may be likened
to that of Pique. Varnish yellow and thin. There is no indication
of a resort to any maturing process. Wood frequently handsome. FENT, or FENDT, ——,
Paris, 1780. A maker known among French connoisseurs; related to
the Fendts who worked in London. FLEURY, Benoist,
Paris, from about 1755 to 1788. A Viol da Gamba of this maker, from
the Clapisson collection, is at the Conservatoire, Paris. GAILLARD, Charles,
Paris, about 1850-81. Born at Mirecourt. Worked in Paris with C.
A. Gand, and later on his own account. He was one of the best modern
French makers, and his instruments already take high rank and command
good prices. GAILLARD-LAJOUE,
J. B., Mirecourt, brother of the above. Apprenticed to Gand, for
whom he worked until about 1852. Much of his work is of a high order,
and his best instruments are yearly increasing in value. He died
about 1870. GAND, Charles François,
Paris. He became a pupil of Nicolas Lupot in the year 1802. During
his apprenticeship he proved himself an excellent maker, and was
much valued by his famous instructor. He married the daughter of
Lupot, and succeeded him in the Rue Croix des Petits Champs in the
year 1824. The career of François Gand was one of much activity.
As a repairer of the works of the great masters he early obtained
a high reputation, and perhaps restored more valuable instruments
than any repairer of his time. The care that he took and the judgment
which he exercised in endeavouring to bring together the various
broken parts of an imperfect instrument, that the original appearance
might be maintained as closely as possible, cannot be too highly
praised. He often accomplished seeming impossibilities. Splintered
cracks were by his ingenuity closed as though no fibre had been
severed, while at other times pieces were inserted so deftly that
the most experienced eyes might fail to detect their presence. It
was with him a labour of love, and he did not scruple to spend days
over work on which others would only spend hours. He made many Violins,
several of which were given as prizes at the Paris Conservatoire.
They are well-made instruments, though heavy in appearance. They
are good serviceable instruments, and, the wood not having been
browned by baking or other injurious process, age mellows them greatly.
He died in the year 1845. GAND, Charles Adolphe,
son of Charles François Gand, was instructed by his father, and
succeeded, together with his brother, to the old-established house
founded by his grandfather. He died in 1866. GAND, Charles Nicholas
Eugène, Paris, brother of C. Adolphe Gand, was a connoisseur of
much experience and reputation. Upon the death of his brother C.
Adolphe he entered into partnership with Bernardel Brothers. The
firm employed many workmen, and turned out large numbers of useful,
well-made instruments, with red varnish. They were the recipients
of numerous medals and decorations. C. N. E. Gand died in 1892. GAVINIÉS, François,
Paris, about 1734. Father of Pierre Gaviniés, the Violinist. Old
French school. The wood is often of excellent quality, and the varnish
also. Many of these old French makers, like our good English ones,
made instruments of two qualities, and Gaviniés was one of them. GERMAIN, Joseph Louis,
born at Mirecourt in 1822. In Paris he was employed by François
Gand, and afterwards worked for Vuillaume, for whom he made several
choice instruments. It is to be regretted that his exceptional abilities
were not allowed to add lustre to his name, he having made for the
trade. He died in 1870. GERMAIN, Emile, Paris.
Son of the above; established in Paris as a maker and restorer of
Violins. He was, until 1882, in partnership with a maker named Dehommais. GOSSELIN, ——,
Paris, 1814-40. GRAND-GERARD, Paris,
about 1800. Commonplace work branded occasionally with his name. GRANDSON, Fils, Mirecourt, about 1850. GROSSET, Paul François, Paris, about 1750. Pupil of Claude Pierray. GUERSAN, Louis, succeeded
Paul Pierray. HEL, Pierre Joseph, Lille, contemporary. Well-made instruments. HENRY, Jean Baptiste.
Born 1757, near Mirecourt. Worked in Paris. HENRY, Jean Baptiste
Felix, son of the above. Established in Paris 1817. HENRY, Charles, brother
of the above, born 1803. Made several excellent instruments. HENRY, Octave, nephew
of Charles. HENRY, Eugène, son
of Charles, born in 1843. HOFMANS, Mathias,
Antwerp, 1700-25. A Kit of this maker was exhibited at Milan in
1870. JACOBS, Hendrik,
Amsterdam, 1690-17—. A close imitator of Niccolò Amati. Few
makers have been more mistaken than Jacobs; so exact was he in following
the model of Amati, that numbers of his Violins are passed by the
inexperienced as original. He mostly selected the grand pattern
of Amati for his model, which gave him full scope for the exercise
of his powers. He selected wood as nearly as possible resembling
that found in the works of Niccolò Amati. The backs are mostly of
even grain, and compact; the modelling can only be found fault with
near the purfling, where its sharpness at once catches the attention
of the critic in these matters, and divulges the true author. The
varnish, though good, is not equal to that of Amati. The scroll
is inferior to the body in merit. The purfling is of whalebone,
like that of most of the Dutch makers. JACOBS, ——,
Amsterdam, probably a son of the above. Excellent varnish, of a
deep red, very transparent; full of character, but wanting in finish.
Purfling embedded. JACQUOT, Charles,
born at Mirecourt in 1804. Worked in Paris. He obtained prizes for
his instruments at the Paris and other exhibitions. JACQUOT, Pierre Charles,
Nancy, son of the above. JEANDEL, P. N., born
in 1812. Worked for some years in Paris, and received prizes at
the Paris and other exhibitions. He died in 1879. KOLIKER, ——,
Paris, 1789-1820. LAMBERT, Jean Nicolas,
Paris, about 1745. LAPAIX, ——, Lille, about 1855. LAPREVOTTE, Etienne, Paris, 1825-56. LECLERC, ——, Paris, about 1775. LECOMTE, ——, Paris, 1788. LEDUC, Pierre, Paris, 1646. LEFEBVRE, ——, Amsterdam, about
1730. LEFEBVRE, ——, Paris, 1788. LE JEUNE, François, Paris, 175-. LE PILEUR, Pierre, about 1754. LESCLOP, François Henry, Paris, 1746. LOUIS, ——, Geneva. LOUVET, Jean, Paris, 1750. LUPOT, Jean, Mirecourt. LUPOT, Laurent, Mirecourt, born 1696. Son of Jean Lupot,
removed to Plombières, afterwards to Luneville, and again to Orleans. LUPOT, François,
born 1736. Son of Laurent. Born at Plombières. In the year 1758
he removed to Stuttgart, and was appointed maker to the Duke of
Wurtemberg. François removed with his son Nicolas to Orleans in
1770. He died in Paris in 1804. The workmanship and style are similar
to those seen in the instruments of Chappuy and other makers of
that period. Scroll rather rough, varnish dark brown, broad pattern. LUPOT, Nicolas, son
of François, born at Stuttgart in 1758, removed with his father
to Orleans in 1770. He established himself in Paris in 1794, his
fame having reached that city some time before. The attention which
he soon received from the musical world of Paris proved to him that
his removal was advantageous. He had not long been in Paris before
he was honoured with the patronage of the Conservatoire of Music,
an honour which is attended with many benefits, the chief of which
is the making of a Violin annually, to be awarded as a prize to
the most successful student among the Violinists. By this arrangement
the maker has an opportunity of exercising to the best advantage
all the skill of which he is capable, as he is at once aware that
the attention of the public is directed to the constructor of the
prize, as well as to the receiver, and that an immediate road to
popularity is thus opened. Lupot's appointment as maker to the Conservatoire
was enjoyed by his successor, François Gand, and was retained by
the latter's son, in conjunction with Bernardel. Nicolas Lupot may
be justly termed the French Stradivari. He was an artist in every
sense of the word. He regarded the works of Stradivari with the
utmost veneration. While, however, he laboured unceasingly to imitate
him, he scorned all those mischievous maturing processes common
to so many French copyists; he never desired that his copy should
pass with the unwary as the original; it left his hands wholly unsophisticated.
There is not an instance in which he did not varnish the copy all
over, leaving time to do its work of wear, although by so doing
he doubtless sacrificed much in his own time, inasmuch as all new
Violins, so varnished, have a crude appearance, notwithstanding
any amount of high finish expended upon them. What, however, Lupot
lost in his own day has been awarded to his name a hundredfold since.
He seldom occupied himself in copying Guarneri or Amati, although
there are a few beautiful examples met with now and again in which
he adopted these forms. Stradivari was his idol, and from the fact
already mentioned, that he is very rarely found to have followed
any other model than that of Stradivari, he would seem to have been
aware of his own peculiar fitness for the great master's design.
Every feature of Lupot's instruments was clearly a matter of study
with him. It cannot be said of him, as of most other makers, that
certain points are good, while others are weak. Every portion of
his work contributes to the harmonious whole. The outline is perfect;
the sound-hole is executed in a masterly manner; the model, purfling,
and scroll of equal merit. He was untouched in his own day, and
his productions have never been approached since. The varnish of
Lupot is peculiar to him. Its qualities are good, being free from
hardness. Though it is not of the Italian type, neither is it of
the kind usually met with on the Violins of his contemporaries:
it may be described as a quality of varnish coming between the Italian
and the French. Its colour varies between light and dark red. Age
has assisted in heightening its lustre, and although it will never
rank with the varnish of Cremona, yet it will hold its own among
the varnishes of modern times. It is said that many instruments
having the name of Pique in them are the work of Lupot, and this
misnomer is accounted for by the story that Pique purchased them
in an unvarnished state, and varnished them with his preparation.
Be this as it may, it is certain that the varnish of Pique could
not serve to benefit such instruments; on the contrary, it would
reduce their value. The tone of Lupot's instruments improves yearly.
The quality is round and telling, and free from roughness. He died
in Paris in 1824, aged 66, and was succeeded in his business by
his son-in-law, François Gand. MARQUIS DE LAIR, Mirecourt, about 1800. The name is generally
branded on the back. The wood is chiefly of a plain description,
and varnish wanting in transparency. MAST, Jean Laurent, Paris, about 1750. MAST, Joseph Laurent,
Mirecourt and Toulouse. Son of Jean Laurent. A Violin dated 1816
is in the Museum of the Paris Conservatoire. MAUCOTEL, Charles,
born at Mirecourt, in 1807. In 1834 he entered the workshop of Gand
in Paris. In 1844 he was employed by Davis, of Coventry Street,
London, and ultimately commenced business in Rupert Street, from
which he retired in 1860, and returned to France. He made several
instruments, all of which have good qualities in workmanship and
tone. They are strong in wood and carefully modelled. MAUCOTEL, Charles
Adolphe, Mirecourt, worked in Paris from 1839 until 1858, in which
year he died. He made many excellent instruments. MÉDARD, François,
was established in Paris about 1700. The work is excellent, and
the varnish soft and transparent. MÉDARD, Nicolas,
Nancy, brother of François. MÉDARD, Jean, Nancy,
brother of Nicolas. MENNÉGAND, Charles,
born at Nancy in 1822. He is distinguished both as a maker and repairer
of instruments. He entered the service of Rambaux in Paris in 1840.
He has been rightly regarded as having displayed singular ability
in the delicate and difficult task of "cutting" the large
Italian Violoncellos and Tenors. The practice of reducing the dimensions
of Cremonese instruments has happily come to be looked upon as emulative
of the acts of the Goths and Vandals. It is in any case certain
that numerous instruments have been operated upon with no greater
skill than might have been expected at the hands of those barbarians.
"These ruthless men," remarks Charles Reade, "just
sawed a crescent off the top, and another off the bottom, and the
result is a thing with the inner bout of a giant and the upper and
lower bout of a dwarf." He rightly names this, "cutting
in the statutory sense, viz., cutting and maiming," and implores
the owner of an instrument in its original state to spare it, and
if too large, to play on one of the value of £5, with the Cremona
set before him to look at while he plays. To "cut" a Cremona,
and to cut a diamond into a brilliant or a rose, are tasks equally
difficult. The indifferent operator, in both cases, suffers more
or less from the injury and annoyance his unskilfulness has occasioned.
Borgis, a Venetian diamond-cutter, was employed by Shah Jehan to
cut the Koh-i-nor, and in place of a reward was fined ten thousand
ducats for his imperfect performance. Had it happened that some
possessors of Cremonese gems had inflicted monetary or other punishment
on incapable instrument cutters, the world would have been richer
in Cremonas. Mennégand was at Amsterdam for a few years, and returned
to Paris in 1857. He died in 1885. MIREMONT, Claude
Augustin, Paris. Born at Mirecourt in 1827, removed to Paris in
1844. Miremont has made several excellent Violins, copies of Stradivari
and Guarneri. He was for some years in New York, but returned to
Paris and died at Pontorson in 1887. MODESSIER, ——,
Paris, 1810. Made several instruments of large pattern, excellent
for orchestral purposes. Wood of good quality. MOUGENOT, Georges,
Brussels, contemporary. NAMY, ——,
Paris, 1780 to 1806. NEZOT, ——,
about 1750, maker of Viols. NICOLAS, François
(Nicolas Fourrier), went from Mirecourt to Paris, where he is said
to have worked from about 1784 to 1816. NICOLAS, Didier,
Mirecourt, 1757-1833. The instruments of this maker are chiefly
of large size, the outline being after that of Stradivari. They
are mostly stamped on the back, inside, "A la ville de Cremonne,
D. Nicolas Ainé." Colour, yellow; tone very powerful, and admirably
adapted for the orchestra. NICOLAS, Joseph,
son of Didier, born 1796, died 1864. OUVRARD, Jean, pupil of Claude Pierray.
PACHERELE, Michel, Paris, about 1779. PACHEREL, Pierre,
Nice, died 1871, probably related to Michel Pacherele. Good workmanship;
made several copies of Stradivari. PAUL, Saint, Paris,
17th century. Chiefly copied Amati. In the style of Boquay. PIERRAY, Claude,
Paris, from about 1700 to 1725. Was an excellent workman, and many
of his productions partake of the Italian character to a considerable
extent. They are of two patterns, the majority being large. Amati
would seem to have been his model, but his instruments can scarcely
be considered copies of that maker, the outline only being retained,
while the other features are dissimilar. The wood is rarely handsome,
but its quality is good; the thicknesses are variable. The work
is of average merit. Varnish is of a pale red colour, of good quality.
It is interesting to learn that these instruments were appreciated
in England at the beginning of the eighteenth century. Tom Britton
had in his collection of books and instruments at Clerkenwell a
"Claude Pierray," which is described in the sale catalogue
as "a very beautiful Violin, and as good as a Cremona." PIÈTE, N., Paris, about 1780. PILLEMENT, F., Paris, 1790-1820. Work branded inside. PIQUE, F. L., Paris,
about 1788-1822. As a copyist of Stradivari, this maker approached,
perhaps, nearest to Nicolas Lupot. It has been supposed that some
Violins bearing the name of Pique were made by Lupot, and varnished
by Pique. There are several specimens of Pique's instruments upon
which have been lavished care and skill of a very high order. Each
feature is brought out, while, at the same time, exaggeration, that
common error of the copyist, is avoided. The scrolls are well executed,
both in point of finish and style; the sound-hole also is cut with
precision. Many of his instruments have whole backs, of well-chosen
material; the bellies are of a fine quality of wood. The instruments
of Pique have long been esteemed, and will grow in reputation. PIROT, Claude, Paris,
about 1800. Pressenda style and appearance. PONS, César, Grenoble,
about 1775. PONS, ——,
Paris, chiefly known as a maker of Guitars. RAMBAUX, Claude Victor,
born 1809. Worked in early life at Mirecourt, and afterwards in
Paris. He was a clever repairer, and gifted with excellent judgment
in his treatment of the works of the old masters. He was at one
time in the workshop of Gand. He died in 1871. RANCE, Thomas, Brussels,
about 1683. Good workmanship, well purfled, flat model. RAUT, Jean, worked
at Rennes about 1760. REMY, ——,
Paris, about 1760. REMY, Jean Mathurin,
Paris, 1770-1854. REMY, Jules, Paris,
1813-76. REMY, ——,
London, 1840. Originally from Paris. Copied the old masters with
average ability, but unfortunately adopted the pernicious practice
of preparing the wood, making his instruments prematurely old without
the qualities of healthy age. RENAUDIN, Léopold,
Paris, about 1788. RENAULT, Nicolas,
an early maker, contemporary with Tywersus. ROMBOUTS, Peeter,
Amsterdam, about the middle of the 18th century. High model, varnish
of much brilliancy, but flaky. ROZE, ——,
Orleans, about 1760. Average workmanship, yellow varnish, heavy
scroll. SACQUIN, ——,
Paris, 1830-60, made several excellent instruments; oil varnish
of good quality, neat work, "Strad" pattern, name branded
on back, inside. SALLE, ——,
Paris, about 1825-50. Made several copies of Guarneri, many of which
are excellent. He was also a clever restorer of old instruments,
and had a critical eye for the works of the old Italian masters,
in which he dealt to some extent. SALOMON, Jean Baptiste Deshayes, Paris, about
1750. SAUNIER, ——,
about 1740-70. SCHNOECK, Egidius, Brussels,
1700-30. SILVESTRE, Pierre,
Lyons. A maker of rare abilities. The finish of his instruments
is of the highest order; indeed, it would be difficult to find any
maker within the range of the modern French school who has surpassed
him in delicate workmanship. It may be said of him, as of many others,
that extreme fineness of work is obtained often at the expense of
character; to develop both qualities needs the mind of a Stradivari.
Silvestre was fortunate in procuring wood of beautiful quality;
there is scarcely an instrument of his which is not handsome. He
chiefly copied Stradivari. It is to be regretted that so few of
his works are to be met with. Pierre Silvestre was born at Sommerwiller
in 1801, and died at Lyons in 1859. In Paris he worked in the workshop
of Lupot, and in that of his successor, François Gand. SILVESTRE, Hippolyte,
born 1808, brother of Pierre, with whom he worked in partnership
at Lyons from 1831-48. Hippolyte worked in the shop of Vuillaume.
He retired from business in 1865. SILVESTRE, Hippolyte
Chrétien, Lyons, succeeded to the business of his uncles, Pierre
and Hippolyte, which he transferred in 1884 to Paris. SIMON, Claude, Paris,
about 1788. SIMONIN, Charles,
Paris and Toulouse, pupil of J. B. Vuillaume. SOCQUET, Louis, Paris,
about 1760-1800. THERESS, Charles,
London. THIBOUT, Jacques
Pierre, Paris, born 1777, died 1856. A well-known dealer in rare
Italian instruments. To him belongs the merit of having encouraged
Luigi Tarisio to bring to Paris his Cremonese gems. When Tarisio
paid his first visit to Paris, the reception that he met with was
not of such a nature as to warrant his returning; but having ultimately
decided upon once more visiting the French capital, he met with
Thibout, who, by earnest solicitation, prevailed on him to remove
his rich wares to Paris. Jacques Pierre Thibout was an excellent
workman, and his instruments are highly esteemed. THOMASSIN, ——,
Paris, about 1845. TYWERSUS, ——,
Nancy, 16th century. VAILLANT, François, Paris, about 1750. VÉRON, Pierre André, 1720-50. VIBRECHT, Gysbert, Amsterdam, about 1700. VUILLAUME, Jean, Mirecourt, 1700-40. VUILLAUME, Claude,
Paris, 1772-1834. The earliest maker of this family; made commonplace
instruments branded with his name. VUILLAUME, J. B.,
Paris, born 1798, died in 1875. There are upwards of 2,500 Violins
which bear his name. Many of these he made throughout. The early
ones are much appreciated, and having been wisely varnished over
at first, now begin to show the good results of such handling. The
career of Vuillaume was singularly eventful. Commencing life from
the first stage of the ladder, he gradually mounted to the highest,
by the help of the usual nurses of fortune, skill and perseverance.
He was a great lover of Cremonese instruments, and was intimately
associated with Tarisio. At the death of the celebrated Italian
connoisseur, he purchased the whole of his collection. He employed
a number of skilful workmen, some of whom have achieved independent
and individual reputations, and will be found noticed in their proper
places in this work. VUILLAUME, N. F.,
Brussels. Brother of the above. Was well known both as a maker and
connoisseur. Born in 1802; died 1876. VUILLAUME, Claude
François, born 1807. VUILLAUME, Sébastien,
Paris, nephew of J. B. Vuillaume, made a few excellent instruments.
He died in the same year, 1875.
CONTENTS
SECTION
III.—THE ITALIAN SCHOOL. THE ITALIAN VARNISH. THE ITALIAN
MAKERS . SECTION
IV.—THE FRENCH SCHOOL AND MAKERS. SECTION
V.—THE GERMAN SCHOOL AND MAKERS
|