KINGS:
DAVID (1055-1015 BC) AND SOLOMON (970-931 BC)
THE king
who was placed at the head of the people through their own eager insistence, and
with the unwilling consent of the prophet proved, more effectually than any
objections could do, how little a monarchical constitution was fitted to
realise the expectations founded on it; for the king, until his accession a
simple and excellent man, with no thoughts of ambition or arbitrary power, did
not shrink from cruelty and inhumanity in order to assert his dignity.
By
the aid of prophetic guidance, care was taken that he should not resemble the
repulsive prototype drawn by Samuel, or become so independent as to place
himself above all laws and rules, but that he should ever remain mindful of his
lowly origin. Samuel did not select a king from the haughty tribe of Ephraim,
lest he should, act like Abimelech, who, in his presumption and ambition, had
killed his own brothers, and laid waste whole districts; but the king was
chosen from the smallest of the tribes, the tribe of Benjamin. His family, that
of Matri, was one of the lowliest in Benjamin. His father, Kish, was not in any
way distinguished; he was a simple countryman; and nothing could be said in
his praise, except that he was an upright man. Saul was chosen because he was
content to work at his plough, and watch the increase of his father’s flocks.
He had no thought beyond the village in which he was born, and barely an idea
that there were human beings to whom the possession of power was an attraction.
In his shyness he displayed the ways of a true peasant; these circumstances,
and the personal qualities of Saul seemed to be a security against any
presumption or pride on the part of the first king of Israel.
The
circumstances attending the choice of a king left a deep and pleasing
impression. “See”, said Samuel, “this is the man whom God has chosen as king;
his like is not to be found in all Israel”. Most of the bystanders, carried
away by the solemn proceeding and by Saul’s appearance, shouted, “Long live the
king!” Samuel then anointed the newly elected king with holy oil, by which he
was believed to be rendered inviolable. The elders rejoiced that their
heartfelt wish of having a king to rule over them was at length realised. They
looked forward to happy days. This choice of a king was an important epoch in
the history of the Jewish people; it determined their entire future. Yet during
the joyful and solemn proceedings, discord had already arisen. Some discontented
people, probably Ephraimites, who had hoped to have a king chosen from their
own ranks, loudly expressed their disappointment. “How can this man help us!”.
Whilst all the other elders, according to universal custom, brought the king
gifts of homage, and a few of the most courageous followed him to Gibeah to
assist him against the enemies of Israel, the malcontents kept apart and
refused their allegiance.
Saul’s
courage, after his elevation to the throne, must have increased greatly, or he
must have felt himself guided by God after his unexpected elevation. He now
boldly confronted the task of opposing his mighty enemies, and of settling the
disorganised affairs of the commonwealth. The position of the people at his
accession was very sad and humiliating, almost worse than in the days of the
Judges. Their arms, such as bows and arrows, swords, etc., had been carried off
by the victorious Philistines, who left no smith in the land to make new
weapons. The newly elected king lacked a sword,—that symbol of royalty among
all nations and at all times. His election was probably conducted so secretly
that the Philistines knew nothing of it. The Philistine tax-gatherers exhausted
the strength of the country, and at the same time repressed every attempt at
revolt. So greatly were the Israelites humbled that some of them had to
accompany the Philistines on expeditions against their own brethren. Nought but
a miraculous event could have saved them, and such an event was brought about
by Saul with his son and kinsmen.
Saul’s
eldest son, Jonathan, was perhaps worthier of the kingly dignity than his
father. Modest and unselfish perhaps to a greater extent even than his father,
courageous in the very face of death, he combined with these qualities an
almost excessive kindliness and gentleness,—a feature which endeared him to
all, but which would have been a serious failing in a ruler who had to display
a certain amount of firmness and severity. Jonathan was, besides, endowed with
an enthusiastic nature which appealed to every heart. He was truthful, and an
enemy to all deceit; he uttered his opinions freely, at the risk of
displeasing, or of losing his position and even his life, all of which
qualities made him a favourite with the people. Abner, the cousin of Saul, was
of an entirely different disposition; he was a warrior of unbending firmness,
and possessed a considerable degree of artfulness. To the inexperienced king
and the people he, too, rendered important service in their distress.
Surrounded by these and other faithful adherents of his family, and by the
tribe of Benjamin in general, who were proud to gain importance through him,
Saul set forth on the unequal contest with the Philistines. Jonathan commenced
hostilities. In the town of Geba, or Gibeah of Benjamin, lived the Philistine
tax-gatherers, surrounded by a host of warriors. Jonathan attacked this post
and killed the garrison. This was the first declaration of war; it was made at
Saul's command and with his full approval. The king now ordered that the trumpet-blast,
announcing that the war with the Philistines had commenced, should sound
throughout the land of Benjamin. Many heard the news with joy, others with
sadness and dismay.
All
who had courage assembled in order to stand by their king, determined to aid
him in casting off the disgrace of Israel, or to perish in the attempt. Those
who were cowards escaped to the opposite side of the Jordan, or hid in caverns,
in clefts of the rocks, or in subterranean passages. A feeling of intense
anxiety filled all minds as to the result of the contest. The meeting-place of
the Israelites was then in Gilgal, the town most remote from the land of the
Philistines. This place of meeting had been appointed by the prophet Samuel. He
had directed Saul to repair thither, and stay there seven days to await his
arrival and further instructions. Gilgal probably contained the choir of
musicians and prophets, whose psalms and songs were to inspire the Israelite
warriors with martial courage and with trust in the deliverance of their
fatherland. Meanwhile the Philistines prepared themselves for a war of
extermination against the Israelites. The news of Jonathan’s attack on their
outposts had exasperated them; they were, however, more surprised than
terrified. How could the cowardly, weaponless, unarmed Israelites dare to
attack the Philistines, their masters? A numerous band of warriors, supported
by cavalry, passed through the valleys of the southern mountain-range of
Ephraim, and through the entire breadth of the land as far as Michmash; from
this camping-place they spread their marauding bands in three directions, the
most humiliating circumstance being that many Israelites were compelled to
assist the Philistines in subduing their own tribesmen.
This
was a critical time for the people of Israel. Whilst the Philistines were
gradually pushing forward to Michmash, Saul, surrounded by the brave men of his
tribe, awaited in Gilgal the prophet who was to give the warriors his inspired
directions, and thus endow them with courage. But day after day passed and
Samuel did not appear. Every hour spent in idleness seemed to destroy the
chance of a successful issue. Saul feared that the enemy would descend from the
mountains into the valley, attack Gilgal, and destroy or put to flight the
small body of Israelites. Not a few of his soldiers had already deserted,
looking on Samuel's absence as an inauspicious omen. Saul, becoming impatient,
determined on the seventh day to attack the enemy on his own responsibility.
According to ancient practice, he made a sacrifice in order to propitiate the
Deity, and to ensure his success in the battle. Just as he was preparing the
burnt-offering, Samuel suddenly appeared, and upbraided the king severely for
being carried away by impatience. He resented this error with great austerity,
departed from Gilgal, and left Saul to his own resources—a hard blow for him,
as he had reckoned confidently on the prophet's assistance at this dangerous
juncture. After Samuel had departed from Gilgal, Saul found it useless to
remain there. He therefore repaired with the remnant of his troops to Gibeah.
On reviewing his soldiers here, he found them to amount to not more than six
hundred. It is not surprising that Saul and Jonathan became dispirited at the
sight of this slight force, which was unarmed and had to fight the
well-appointed armies of the enemy. Saul and Jonathan alone possessed swords.
It was indeed a sad honey-moon for the young kingdom. The most painful blow for
Saul was that, through Samuel’s absence, he was deprived of the means by which
the people might ascertain the will of God.
Jonathan,
however, made a good beginning at Gibeah, where Saul and his troops lay
encamped, at scarce an hour's distance from Michmash, the site of the
Philistine camp. Between the two armies lay a valley, but the road which led
from one place to the other was impracticable, the valley being bordered by
steep, almost perpendicular walls of rocks and precipices, which closed it up
on the east till it became a mere gorge of about ten feet in width. On the west
side, where the valley formed a wide pass, the Philistines had stationed their
outposts. Thus the Philistines and Israelites could only come to an encounter
in the narrow path. At last Jonathan determined to ascend the steepest part of
the pass, and, accompanied by his sword-bearer, he climbed, on hands and feet,
up the steep sharp points of the rock on the side of Michmash. One false step
would have precipitated him into the depth, but happily he and his man arrived
safely at the highest point. When the Philistines beheld them, they were not a
little surprised that, on this rocky road, a path had been found to their camp.
Deceived by this ruse, and fearing that other Israelites would follow, they
called out scornfully, “Look at the Hebrews, they are crawling out of their
hiding-places; come higher up, we wish to become better acquainted with
you”. It had been previously agreed between Jonathan and his
sword-bearer that, should they receive such a challenge, they would press on
and bravely commence the attack. The Philistines who first beheld the daring climbers,
soon left off scoffing, for twenty men were killed at the first attack with
pieces of rock and sling-stones. The Benjamites were very skilful in the use of
the sling, and Jonathan and his sword-bearer advanced further, and continued
hurling masses of rock at the Philistines. Terror-stricken by this sudden
attack from a side where approach had seemed impossible, they could only
imagine themselves attacked by supernatural beings, and, seized with fear, they
fought each other, or broke the ranks in the wildest confusion. Saul, who was
watching from a high eminence, no sooner perceived the enemy beginning to flee
than he hurried to the scene of action, followed by his six hundred warriors,
and completed the defeat of the Philistines. Those Israelites who had until
then been compelled by the Philistines to fight against their own brethren
turned their arms against their oppressors. Others who had hidden themselves in
the clefts and grottoes of the mountains of Ephraim took courage, when they
witnessed the flight of the Philistines, and swelled the ranks of the
aggressors. Saul’s troops, thus increased, numbered ten thousand. In every town
of Mount Ephraim through which the Philistines passed in their flight, they
were attacked by the inhabitants, and cut down one by one. Though tired and
exhausted, Saul’s troops pursued the retreating foe for eight hours.
An
occurrence of apparently slight consequence, but which proved to be of great
importance, put a stop to further pursuit. Saul had impressed on his soldiers
that the destruction of their enemy was not to be interrupted even for food or
refreshment, and he pronounced a curse on him who should take the slightest
nourishment. Jonathan, who was always foremost, had heard nothing of this
curse. Exhausted by the long fight and pursuit he could not restrain himself,
and tasted wild honey into which he had dipped his staff. When his attention
was drawn to his father's peremptory command, he openly avowed his act. Saul,
however, made a serious matter of it, and determined to condemn Jonathan to
death. But the people protested vehemently. “What!” cried the warriors, “shall
Jonathan, to whom the people owes its great victory, be killed? No, not a hair
of his head shall be touched”. The people offered a sin-offering for Jonathan,
and thus released him from death. Through this episode, the pursuit of the
Philistines to the west of Ajalon was suspended. Great was the joy of the
Israelites at the victory they had so unexpectedly obtained. The battle of
Michmash fully restored their reputation. They also had regained their weapons,
and felt strong enough to fight under a king whose firmness of resolve they had
experienced. But Saul returned humbly and modestly to his dwelling place in
Gibeah, and ploughed, as heretofore, his father’s fields. He was not yet
blinded by his new dignity. Meanwhile the hostilities of the Ammonites against
the tribes on the other side of the Jordan had increased. Nahash, king of the
Ammonites, besieged the fortress of Jabesh-Gilead. The inhabitants were unable
to hold out for long, and negotiated with Nahash about a capitulation. He
offered a hard, inhuman condition to the Gileadites of Jabesh. As a disgrace to
Israel, all men should consent to lose their right eye. What were the
Gileadites to do? They treated for a delay of seven days in order to send
messages to their fellow-tribesmen. When Saul was one day returning home with
his yoke of bullocks from the field, he met the inhabitants of Gibeah in great
excitement and bathed in tears. Astonished at this, he asked the cause of their
grief, and the messengers from Jabesh-Gilead related what would befall their
town if speedy assistance were not at hand. Incensed at the disgraceful
condition imposed by the king of the Ammonites, Saul immediately determined to
bring aid to the Gileadites of Jabesh. For the first time he exercised his
royal prerogative by summoning all Israel to take part in the campaign against
the Ammonites.
Samuel
supported this summons by declaring that he too would join in the expedition.
By Saul’s command all the warriors assembled at the meeting-place. The anarchy
of the era of the Judges was now at an end, and a stern will ruled. A large
body of Israelites crossed the Jordan; the Ammonites, attacked on the south,
north, and west, fled in all directions, and no two of them remained together.
The people of Jabesh were saved, and ever after displayed the deepest gratitude
to Saul and his house for the help so quickly and energetically rendered to
them. On his recrossing the Jordan, after his second victory over the enemy,
Saul was greeted with tumultuous joy. Samuel, who was a witness to these expressions
of delight, thought it wise to remind the king and his people that their
triumph should not turn into pride, and that they should not consider the
kingly dignity as an end, but only as a means. He therefore summoned a large
gathering of the Israelites, and determined to call the king’s and the people’s
attention to their duties. Samuel again anointed Saul as king; the people
renewed their homage, and made joyful offerings.
In
the midst of these rejoicings Samuel delivered an address, which bears
testimony to the powers of his mind and to his greatness as a prophet.
Saul’s
two important victories, and the assemblage at Gilgal, where homage had been
rendered to him by nearly all the tribes, confirmed his power, and the royal
dominion was placed on a permanent basis. Although Samuel praised and extolled
the days of the Judges, yet the people felt that it could better appreciate a
king than a hero-judge. The nation willingly exchanged its republican liberty
for the prize of unity and the power obtained thereby. The kingly estate led to
various changes. Saul had to employ responsible men for the execution of his
commands; he required a number of officers and servants. Officers of war were
appointed to rule over hundreds and thousands respectively, and councillors,
who were admitted to the king’s table. A special band of men served as runner, an armed
force who became the obedient instruments of the king’s will. These and their
chief formed the king’s, court. Saul’s leader of the guard was named Doag, an
Idumaean by birth. Owing to the presence of the standing army and attendants,
Gibeah, till then only a small town, now became the capital. Towards Samuel,
Saul at first showed submission. When the prophet, in the name of God,
commanded him to declare war to the death with the Amalekites, Saul immediately
made preparations, and summoned his warriors. The Amalekites were the implacable
and hereditary enemies of the Israelites, and had displayed the greatest
cruelty towards them during their wanderings in the desert, and on their entry
into the Holy Land. These enemies often joined other nations in order to crush
the Israelites. The Amalekite king Agag appears to have caused great trouble to
the tribe of Judah in the days of Saul.
It
was, however, no light task to undertake hostilities against the Amalekites.
Agag was considered a great hero, and inspired all around him with fear; but
although the Amalekites were renowned for their courage and power, Saul did not
hesitate to prepare for this hazardous campaign. He appears to have carried on
the strife with skill and courage, and to have drawn the enemy into an ambush,
by which he was enabled to obtain a complete victory. He took the capital
(possibly Kadesh), killed the men, women and children, and captured the dreaded
king Agag. Only a few of the people who escaped with their lives took refuge in
the great neighbouring desert which leads to Egypt. The Israelite warriors
carried off rich booty, including flocks of sheep, herds of cattle, and camels.
According to Samuel’s command, this spoil was to be destroyed, so that every
trace of the memory of Amalek might be lost. The soldiers, however, did not
wish this rich spoil to be given up to destruction. Saul, ordinarily so rigid
in his discipline, permitted the preservation of the booty, and thus
transgressed the prophet’s directions. Saul was very proud of his victory over
the dreaded Amalekites, and he caused the king Agag to be led in chains as a
living sign of triumph. His success in battle intoxicated him, and caused him
to forget his former humility. On his return he erected a monument of his
victory in the oasis of Carmel. Meanwhile, Samuel, in a prophetic vision, had
learned that the king had not fulfilled the instructions given him, and was
therefore to be punished.
Samuel
had to announce this to the victorious king; but the task was difficult, and he
struggled and prayed a whole night. At last he determined to proceed to meet
Saul. But hearing on the way that Saul was so dominated by pride as to cause a
monument to be raised, he turned back and repaired to Gilgal. When Saul heard
of this journey, he followed him thither. The elders of Benjamin and the
neighbouring tribes also proceeded to Gilgal to salute the victorious king.
Here they were witnesses to a strife which foreboded evil times.
As
though nothing had occurred, the king met the prophet with these words, “I have
fulfilled God’s commands”. On which Samuel sternly replied to him, “What is the
meaning of the bleating of the sheep which I hear?”. “It was the people”,
answered Saul, “who spared the best of the sheep and the oxen, in order to
sacrifice them on the altar at Gilgal”. At these words the prophet Samuel could
no longer repress his anger, and he replied in winged words: “Hath the Lord as
great delight in burnt-offerings and sacrifices, as in obeying His voice?
Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken, than the fat of rams.
For the sin of witchcraft comes from rebellion, and the iniquity of Teraphim
from stubbornness. Because thou hast rejected the word of the Lord, He hath
also rejected thee from being king”.
Saul was
so deeply humiliated by these words and by the stern and austere attitude which
the prophet adopted that he confessed his fault and, in the effort to prevent
him from going away, he seized Samuel’s robe so firmly that it was torn. Samuel
then said, “This is a sign: God will tear thy kingly dignity from thee and will
give it to a better man, even though Israel be torn asunder in the act”. Once
more Saul entreated the prophet. “At least honour me now before the elders of
my tribe and of Israel, and return with me”.
In
consideration of this entreaty, Samuel accompanied him to the altar, where the
king humbled himself before God. Samuel then ordered that the fettered king
Agag should be led forth. The Amalekite king exclaimed in his fear, “Oh! how
bitter, how bitter is death!”. To this exclamation Samuel replied, “As thy
sword hath made women childless, so shall thy mother be childless among women”,
and Samuel hewed Agag in pieces before the king in Gilgal.
After
this scene in Gilgal, the king and the prophet avoided each other. The victory
which Saul obtained over Amalek was a defeat for him—his pride was crushed. The
announcement that God had abandoned him threw a dark shadow over his soul. His
gloom, which later on developed into madness, owed its rise to the threatening
words of Samuel, God will give the kingdom of Israel to a better man. These
terrible words were ever ringing in Saul's ears. Just as he had at first hesitated
to accept the reins of government, so he was now unwilling to let them pass
from his hands. At the same time he felt himself helpless. What could he do
against the severity of the prophet? In order to divert himself, he plunged
into warfare. There were many enemies on the borders of Israel whom he wished
to subdue. He also pursued another course in order to impress the people with a
sense of his importance.
There
still lived amongst the Israelites a few Canaanite families and small clans who
had not been expelled when the country was conquered, and could not be ejected
now. These had led the Israelites to honour false gods, and to indulge in
idolatrous errors. Saul therefore thought that he would greatly benefit the
nation, and serve the law of Israel, if he removed these idolatrous neighbours,
and everything that was foreign. Among the strangers who had been suffered to
remain were the men of Gibeon, they having voluntarily submitted to the
conquering Israelites. Saul did not respect the oath given to the Gibeonites,
but ordered a wholesale massacre amongst them, from which but few escaped.
Together
with the foreign Canaanite nations he also persecuted the sorcerers who took
part in idolatrous practices. Whilst Saul, on the one hand, endeavoured to
acquire the good will of his people, and showed himself the severe champion of
the laws given by God, he tried, on the other hand, to impress the nation with
submissive dread of the kingly power. He wore a golden crown on his head, as a
sign of greatness and exaltation above the masses. His contemporaries, who had
known him as a plough-man, and might have been inclined to treat him as their
equal, were to forget his past and become accustomed to gaze at him with awe as
the anointed wearer of the holy crown. Saul also indulged in the royal luxury
of polygamy. He took wives in addition to his first wife Ahinoam, whom he had
married when he was still a peasant. Among them was the beautiful and
courageous Rizpah.
Saul
showed much energy in his raids against the enemy and, no doubt in order to
dissipate the fears aroused by the prophet’s harsh words, displayed great pomp
and ostentation, until then foreign to his nature. But sooner than he had
anticipated, the evil spirit of his imagination took form in the shape of a
youth that charmed him despite himself.
It
happened during one of the frequent fights with the enemy that Saul's troops
were drawn up in martial array against the Philistines, and the two armies
stood face to face, separated from each other only by a deep ravine. Both were
fearful of taking the first decisive step. At length the Philistines made the
proposal that the battle should be settled by single combat, and they sent
forth as their champion the gigantic warrior Goliath. King Saul would gladly
have seen one of his army go forth to the duel, and he promised the victor rich
presents, exemption from taxes, freedom from compulsory, service, and the hand
of one of his daughters. But not even at such a price did any one of the
Israelite army dare to oppose himself to Goliath. Then, as if by chance, a
shepherd boy of Bethlehem, a town near to the field of battle, presented
himself, and brought about a decisive issue.
This
shepherd of Bethlehem, directly or indirectly, was the cause of a revolution in
the history of Israel, and in the history of the human race. David, then known
only to the inhabitants of the village or town of Bethlehem, has since become a
celebrated name throughout the world. After his disagreement with Saul, Samuel
had received the prophetic mission to repair to Bethlehem in order to anoint
the future king of Israel from amongst the eight sons of the aged Jesse as
successor to Saul. Samuel set out in secret, lest he should be pursued by the
king. The prophet selected David as the future king chosen by God, and anointed
him as king of Israel in the presence of his brothers. This simple but
important act was naturally performed in privacy, and was kept secret by
David’s father and brothers.
Jesse,
the father of David, was not descended from a distinguished house of Judah,
but, like all the inhabitants of Bethlehem, belonged to a very humble family.
David was about eighteen years old when he was anointed, and was not
distinguished either by his experience or by any deed. The beautiful
pasture-land round about Bethlehem had till then composed his world. But
faculties lay dormant in him which only needed to be aroused to make him excel
his contemporaries intellectually as Saul surpassed them physically. David was
pre-eminently gifted with poetic and musical talent, and whilst he yet tended
his, flock, his harp awakened the echoes of the mountains. A single
circumstance, however, sufficed to change this youth into a man.
Samuel
returned to Ramah as secretly as he had left; but he kept an eye on the youth
whom he had anointed, and drew him into the circle of his disciples. Here
David’s poetic talents were developed. Here he was able to perfect himself in
the use of musical instruments. But he learnt something more in Samuel's
surroundings; he learnt “to know God”. His spirit was pervaded with the Divine
presence, and became instinct with that piety which refers all things to God,
and submits in all things to Divine guidance. This reliance on God had been
awakened and strengthened in him by the influence of Samuel. David frequently
journeyed from Bethlehem to Ramah, and from Samuel’s house to the flocks of his
father. The noble courage, with which his anointment and the influence of
Samuel inspired him, did not desert him when he tended his flocks in the
meadows of Bethlehem. When war with the Philistines broke out, in the
neighbourhood of Bethlehem, David could no longer remain a shepherd of his
flocks, and he gladly undertook to deliver a message to his brothers who were
serving in the army, so as to have an excuse for entering the camp. On his
arrival there, he timidly told the bystanders that he was willing to risk an
encounter with the blaspheming Philistine that reviled the army of the living
God. The news soon reached the king’s ears that a youth had offered himself for
the combat. Half convinced, half in scorn, Saul gave him permission to engage
in the duel, and offered him his own armour. The first stone, cast with his skilled
hand from the sling, struck the heavily-armed giant from afar; he fell to the
ground. David threw himself upon Goliath, drew the sword out of the scabbard,
and cut off the giant's head. The Philistines, from the hilltops, had witnessed
the fall of their champion, whom they had thought invincible; they declared
themselves conquered, and no longer sought to prolong the war, but fled to
their fastnesses. The troops of Israel, on the other hand, carried away by
David’s victory, followed their enemy in hot pursuit.
Holding
the bleeding head in his hand, the youthful victor was led before Saul, to
whom he had till then been unknown. He had not the remotest suspicion that this
youth, from whom he could not withhold his admiration, might become a dreaded
rival. He felt great joy at the signal victory. His son Jonathan, who had an
open, tender and unselfish heart, was enchanted with the young victor. His love
and attachment for David became stronger than man’s love for woman. The fame of
David’s name and the victory he had obtained in Ephes-Damim soon resounded
throughout the valley of Terebinths, and in the territories of all the tribes.
David, however, returned to his father's house as though nothing had happened,
and merely took Goliath’s shield and armour with him as memorials. But he did
not long remain at home. The destiny of Saul had begun to be fulfilled, and
David was its chosen instrument. The gloom of dejection, which had obscured the
soul of the king since his breach with the prophet, became still darker. His ill-humour
deepened into sadness and melancholy, and sometimes paroxysms of wild madness
took hold of him. “An evil spirit hath entered the king”, his servants
whispered to each other. Instrumental music alone was capable of rousing him;
his faithful servants therefore proposed that a skilled musician and poet
should come to the court, and they advised him to select the son of Jesse, who
was handsome, brave, eloquent, and a harpist. David came, and his musical
talent, as well as his general bearing, delighted the king. Whenever Saul fell
into melancholy, David touched the harp, and the king was relieved from his
depression. Saul felt himself enchained by David. He began to consider him as a
son, and at length entreated David’s father to leave him permanently at court.
Saul appointed him his armour-bearer, thus securing to himself the cheering
influence of his presence. This was the first step towards David’s rise. But
not only was the king attracted by him, David exercised an influence over the
entire court, and all hearts turned towards him. Jonathan, however, loved him
best of all. Saul’s second daughter, Michal, was also secretly devoted to him.
At the court, David learnt the use of weapons, and exchanged the harp for the
sword. As he was full of courage, he soon distinguished himself in the small
frays in which he took part, and came off victorious and successful. On one
occasion, when David had inflicted a signal defeat on the Philistines, and when
there were great rejoicings throughout the Israelite territory, the women and
maidens of the various cities which he traversed on his return came forth to
meet him with songs, timbrels and cymbals, dancing around him, and joyfully
proclaiming him victor, saying: “Saul has killed his thousands, but David his
tens of thousands”. These honours, unanimously and enthusiastically offered to
the youthful hero, at length opened Saul’s eyes. This was “the better man”, the
one whom God had chosen as king over Israel; the rival with whom Samuel had
threatened him, whom he dreaded so greatly, but who had hitherto only appeared
to him as a visionary being, was now actually before him in the person of his
own favourite and that of his people.
It
was a terrible disillusion for Saul. “To me they give but thousands, and to him
tens of thousands—they place him above me. What is yet wanting to make him
king?”. The joyous shouts of the singing and dancing choruses of women rang in
his ears from that time, and brought to mind the words of the prophet: “You are
deserted of God”. Saul’s love for David now changed to bitter hate, which soon
turned to madness.
On
the very day succeeding David’s return from his triumphal procession, Saul was
seized with frenzy, and twice hurled a spear at David, who skilfully avoided
the thrust. When the mad fit had left Saul, the failure of this attempt seemed
to him a proof that God was protecting his enemy. From that time he sought to
destroy his rival by stratagem. He pretended to honour David; made him the
leader of the picked detachment of a thousand men, ordered him to direct
attacks of great importance and danger, and offered him his eldest daughter,
Merab, as a wife. Saul hoped to bring the man whom he hated to ruin by these
apparent marks of favour. David, however, avoided the danger by refusing to
marry Merab, and, on the other hand, he had the good fortune to defeat the
Philistines. He was to have the king’s second daughter in marriage, if he
brought proofs of having killed one hundred Philistines. He brought evidence of
having slain double the number, and Saul was obliged to keep his promise, and
give him his daughter Michal. She and Jonathan sided with David against their
father, thus incensing Saul still more. He sought to take David’s life, at
first secretly, and then openly by leading his forces against him. David was
proclaimed an outlaw, and became utterly desperate. He was now joined by youths
and men as forlorn as himself, and anxious for war. Chief amongst these was his
kinsman, Joab, who, with his two brothers, formed the nucleus of the body of heroic
warriors (Gibborim), by whose assistance David was to rise step
by step to the throne. A prophet, named Gad, belonging to the school of Samuel,
also joined him. The last representatives of the sacerdotal family of Eli, the
high-priest, were driven by Saul into the arms of his supposed enemy. Saul,
hearing that the priests of Nob, the relations and descendants of Eli, had been
aiding David, caused them to be cruelly murdered, and the priestly city to be
destroyed. One family alone, that of Abiatharescaped
death, and fled to David, who received the fugitives with open arms. Hatred of
his rival made Saul cruel and bloodthirsty. All attempts on the part of
Jonathan, who desired to mediate between his father and his friend, proved
fruitless, and only served to widen the breach. Saul being clearly in the
wrong, a part of the nation sided with David; but unable to assist him openly,
they gave him secret help, by which he was enabled to escape from repeated
persecutions. It is to be deplored that David, in his wanderings and
privations, was obliged to form friendly relations with the enemies of his
country—with the king of Moab, with the Ammonite king, Nahash, and with the
king of the Philistines, Achish. He thus incurred the suspicion of having
become a traitor to his country, and apparently justified Saul’s enmity towards
him. The terms of David’s alliance with Achish, by whom he had been at first
refused protection, but with whom he had, on the second occasion, found refuge,
seemed especially apt to implicate him. Achish granted him protection on the
condition that he would break entirely with Saul and his country, so that, in
case of war, he and his troops, amounting to six hundred men, might join the
Philistines against his own tribe, and, in times of peace, make incursions on
the remote portions of Judah, and deliver up a part of the booty to his liege
lord. David, it is true, appears to have determined to evade these conditions,
and eventually even to join his own people against his allies. But thus he was
compelled to enter upon crooked ways, and to give up the honesty of purpose
which had hitherto distinguished him. It is probable that the wild appearance
of David’s troops did not make a very pleasant impression on the inhabitants of
Philistia. The Philistine chiefs were displeased that their sovereign should
ally himself with a leader who owed his glory to victories over their own
people. King Achish, however, expected so much from this alliance that he paid
no heed to the warning of his counsellors. But David himself felt the
discomfort of living amongst the Philistine population. He therefore begged
Achish to assign to him and his followers a dwelling-place in one of his
citadels. This proposition being agreeable to the Philistine king, he gave
David the town of Ziklag. No sooner had the news spread that a special city had
been appointed for David’s occupation, than warlike men, both strangers and
natives, joined him, many of whom distinguished themselves by their heroism
later on. Achish believed that, in David, he had secured a faithful ally, who
was employing his military knowledge and courage against members of his own
tribe, and who, consequently, could never again make peace with his own people.
Thus
adroitly deluded by David, Achish thought himself secure in undertaking a
decisive war against the Israelites. Saul was sunk in melancholy, and since his
quarrel with his son-in-law had lost his former energy in warfare. The strong
arm which had fought for him, and the quick brain which had planned for him,
were now turned against him. The bravest youths and men in Israel had placed
themselves under David’s command. Achish summoned all his troops, in order to
inflict a decisive blow on Israel. Marching through the plain along the coast
of the Mediterranean (which belonged to the Philistines since their victory
over the Phoenicians), he led his army right into the valley of Jezreel. This
territory, apart from political considerations, offered a better field than the
mountain regions for employing the cavalry and chariots. In consequence of
their treaty, Achish demanded that David should aid him in this great war
against Saul, and unite his troops with the Philistine army. David’s heart must
indeed have been heavy when he joined the army, but he had no choice; he had
sold himself to the enemies of his nation. The Philistine nobles, however,
delivered him from his equivocal position. They loudly and vehemently demanded
that the king should send away David and his soldiers, whose fidelity they
mistrusted. The Philistine king was forced, by their almost rebellious demand,
to dismiss David. After giving him the assurance of his unshaken confidence in
his fidelity, he sent him back to Ziklag. This was fortunate for David, as he
was thus saved from the dilemma of either becoming a traitor to his own people,
or breaking faith with his ally Achish.
The
Philistines meanwhile went forth to the number of thousands, and encamped near
the town of Shunem. Saul, who had received news of the preparations of the
Philistines, and of their final expedition, called together the Israelitish
troops, advanced in forced marches to meet the enemy, and encamped at first at
the foot of Mount Gilboa. He then marched around the opposite heights, and,
having proceeded northward, encamped at the northwest base of the mountain
range near Endor.
Saul
lost heart at the sight of the great number of Philistines, especially when he
beheld their cavalry; the evil days which he had brought on himself had
deprived him of his former courage. He felt himself deserted by God, since
neither priest nor prophet gave an answer to his inquiry as to the result of
the war. Having waited in vain for an inspiration to come to him in a dream, he
finally, in despair, went to a ventriloquist in Endor, who had escaped
persecution, and practised her witchcraft in secret. It was peculiar that Saul
had to have recourse to the arts of jugglery, which formerly he had desired to
banish from his dominions. Discouraged by the ominous predictions of the witch,
Saul went into battle with a heavy heart, and as though his fears had infected
his troops, the result proved disastrous. The Israelites, indeed, fought
bravely, and the battle lasted the whole day, but they could not contend with
the cavalry and war chariots on the plain. They fled to the mountains of
Gilboa, but they were pursued, and routed by the Philistines. Saul’s three
sons, the amiable Jonathan, Abin-adab and Malchishua, all fell, and the father
found himself suddenly alone, attended only by his armour-bearer, whilst the
Philistine bowmen pressed on him. He did not wish to flee, nor to be taken
prisoner, and exposed to the scorn of the Philistines. He, therefore, entreated
his servant to give him the death-blow, and when the latter refused to lay
hands on the king, Saul had no alternative but to fall on his own sword, and
die a death worthy of a king. The destruction was fearful. The flower of the
Israelite troops lay strewn on Mount Gilboa and the plain of Jezreel.
After
resting during the night from their hard day’s work, the Philistines revisited
the battlefield, and stripped the slain of their clothing and ornaments. Here
they found the corpses of Saul and his three sons. The king’s head and his
weapons they sent as trophies to Philistia; the skull they preserved in the
temple of Dagon, and the weapons, in a temple of Astarte to commemorate the
great victory over Israel. They then forced their way into the towns in the
plain of Jezreel, and into those in the northeastern territory near the Jordan
and occupied them. The inhabitants, on hearing of the defeat at Gilboa, had
fled to the opposite side of the Jordan. The Philistines, as an insult to the
Israelites, hung the headless bodies of Saul and his son Jonathan on the walls
of Bethshan. It appears that the Philistines, following up their victory,
turned to the south of Mount Gilboa and Bethshan, and occupied every town of
importance. Saul’s capital, Gibeah-Saul, was filled with terror at the approach
of the Philistines. The inhabitants fled to the mountains, and while attempting
to save Jonathan’s son, Mephibosheth, then five years old, his nurse dropped
him, and he was lamed for life.
At
his death, Saul left the country in a deplorable position, for things were even
worse than they had been at his accession. The defeat was so thorough and
unexpected that, at the moment, there was no thought of resistance, all courage
having vanished. It was even considered an act of daring that some men of
Jabesh-Gilead (from the opposite side of the Jordan), ventured, out of
gratitude to Saul who had brought aid to their town, to rescue the king's body
from its disgraceful exposure. They crossed the Jordan, at Bethshan, by night,
took Saul’s and Jonathan’s bodies from the walls, buried them under a
terebinth, and mourned for them during seven days. The tribes on this side of
the Jordan were not equally courageous, or perhaps felt no gratitude to Saul, who
had brought misery on the land by his persecution of David. Such was the end of
a king whose election the nation had hailed with so much hope and joy.
DAVID AND ISHBOSHETH.
1055—1035
B.C.
DAVID, too, in whom the people had once set high
hopes, seemed to be forgotten by them. What had he done while his fatherland
was bleeding? Whether or not his expedition with the Philistines was known, it
must have appeared strange to all that, in this sad crisis, he was keeping
himself aloof from every danger, only caring for his own safety, and that,
instead of hastening to the aid of his oppressed people, he was holding to his
treaty with the Philistines. It is true, he was himself at that time in
distress, but the events which concerned him became known only later on.
Meanwhile it must have been mortifying to those who cared for the weal of the
kingdom that David was allied with the enemy, and that, during the absence of
king Achish, in the war against Israel, David seemed in a measure to guard the
enemy's frontiers. When David was sent back from his intended expedition with
the Philistines on account of the suspicions of the nobles, he found that his
town of Ziklag had been burnt down, and the women and children and all those
who had joined him had disappeared. The Amalekites, who had suffered from
David’s incursions, had made use of his absence to undertake a raid against
him. The grief of the troops was so great when they found that their belongings
had disappeared and their town had been destroyed that they turned on David in
their anger, and threatened him with death. However, they were encouraged by
the oracular words of Abiathar, the priest, and permitted themselves to be
appeased. Hurriedly David and his men then followed in pursuit. They discovered
the camp of the Amalekites by the aid of an Egyptian slave whom they had found
ill and deserted by the wayside. They pursued the Amalekites, and David's angry
soldiers routed them so completely that most of them were left dead on the
field of battle, and only a few could escape on camels. David and his troops
returned to Ziklag, buoyed up by victory. They commenced to rebuild their town,
and to settle down. Parts of the booty taken from the Amalekites David sent as
gifts to the elders of the people and to his friends in many towns from
Beersheba to Hebron, so as to spread the news of his victory, and, at the same
time, gain partisans for himself. Hardly had he regained a firm footing in
Ziklag, when he heard the evil tidings of the defeat and death of Saul.
The
chief men of the tribe of Judah, at the instigation of those friends whose
interest he had won by his attention, chose David as king. He then entered into
communication with the tribes on the other side of the Jordan, in order to win
also their affection. To the tribes on this side of the river he could not
appeal, as they were still under the yoke of the Philistines. To the
inhabitants of Jabesh-Gilead, he expressed his contentment and his thanks for
having shown their fidelity towards Saul even after his death, and for having
rescued the corpse of the king from ill usage. He also informed them of the
fact that the tribe of Judah had elected him as Saul’s successor.
His
unhappy fate, however, still kept him in alliance with the Philistines, and
his prudence was struggling with his patriotism. The latter incited him to risk
everything, in order to release himself from the fetters which bound him,
whilst the former, on the other hand, warned him not to arouse the anger of his
powerful neighbour. Achish gave David full permission to consider himself king
of Judah, and to make incursions on the border lands of the desert, on
condition that he received his share of the booty. But beyond this David was
not permitted to advance a step. The deliverance of the land from the
Philistines, which David, whose hands were bound, was unable to carry out, was
effected by Abner, Saul’s general. He had succeeded in escaping in the great
defeat at Gilboa, and he did not lose courage, but saved what he could from the
ruin which befell the house of Saul. Attended by some fugitives, he took refuge
on the other side of the Jordan (beyond the reach of the Philistines), where
many hearts were still faithful to Saul and his house. Abner conducted the
surviving son of Saul, Ishbosheth, and the remaining members of the helpless
royal family to Mahanaim, and induced the tribes residing on that side of the
river to acknowledge Ishbosheth as Saul’s successor. Having collected a
powerful force from among the tribes and the Benjamites who joined him, he
commenced his contest with the Philistines. Abner was successful in ousting the
Philistines from the neighbouring border towns, but it was only after a struggle
of four or five years that he was enabled to free the whole country(1055-1051),
so arduous was the contest. The tribe of Benjamin was the most difficult to
reconquer, as the Philistines could most easily march their troops into its
territory. Every tribe which Abner delivered was eager to pay homage to the son
of Saul. Abner achieved great results: he not only regained independence, but
even induced tribes, which had shown themselves unruly under Saul’s government,
to join the commonwealth. He was the actual founder of the kingdom of the Ten
Tribes or Israel, and he firmly welded the links which bound them to one
another. But, notwithstanding his victory and his exertions, the nation was
suddenly divided into two kingdoms—that of Israel and that of Judah—and two
kings ruled them. The tribe of Judah, which the energy of Samuel and of Saul
had drawn from its seclusion, and reunited with the other tribes, was thus
again separated from the whole.
Abner’s
victories aroused no feelings of joy because they led to disunion. The
historian’s pen hurries over his deeds, and touches but lightly on the hero’s
achievements. The state of affairs made an amalgamation of the houses of Judah
and Israel impossible. Not only were the two kings, David and Ishbosheth,
averse to the reunion of the several tribes (as in this case one of the two
would have to resign his kingly dignity), but their adherents, and especially
their respective generals, Joab and Abner, displayed a great degree of mutual
jealousy. The scales were turned by the fact that the house of Judah was led by
a brave and martial king, who had been consecrated by Samuel, and whose person
was therefore considered holy, whilst Ishbosheth, a king only in name, had not
been confirmed in his dignity by the voice of God, and besides, it seems, was
by no means of a warlike disposition. The whole power rested in the hands of
his general Abner, while Ishbosheth remained in some remote corner of his
possessions, whereas David had his dwelling-place in the midst of his tribe,
and thus could direct everything from his residence in Hebron.
After
Abner had won or reconquered all the tribes, with the exception of Judah, a
civil war broke out between the houses of Israel and Judah, or, more correctly
speaking, between the houses of Saul and David. This war lasted two years (1051-1049), and
raged very fiercely. At length Abner called upon Joab to put an end to the
slaughter of the masses. He cried, “Must the sword slay for ever; do you not
know that only misfortune can arise from this warfare? Why do you not command
your people to hold off from their brethren?”. At length Joab also found it
advisable to put aside his weapons, and to proclaim an armistice. He and his
people bore the corpse of his brother Asahel, whom Abner had slain against his
will, to Bethlehem, in order that it might be interred in the ancestral tomb,
and thence they repaired to Hebron. Abner and his followers crossed the Jordan,
and went to Mahanaim. But a tragical destiny threatened the house of Saul.
Abner had cast covetous glances at Rizpah, the beautiful slave of Saul, who
dwelt in Mahanaim with her two sons. Although Ishbosheth allowed his general
many liberties, he could not permit him to maintain intimate relations with his
father’s widow, which implied the intention of laying claim to the throne.
Abner, feeling himself slighted by the rebuke he received, reproached this mock
king with ingratitude, and turning away from him, entered into secret
negotiations with David, offering to secure to him the homage of all the
tribes. In return for this service, he probably stipulated that he should
retain his office of commander-in-chief of the Israelitish tribes. David gladly
entertained his proposition, but demanded, as a preliminary concession, that
his favourite wife Michal, who had been torn from him by Saul, and married to a
Benjamite, should be restored to him. Ishbosheth himself no doubt saw the
justice of this demand, and did not perceive in it any evil intention towards
himself. Thereupon Abner, leaving the king under the pretext of bringing about
Michal's separation from her husband, entered the Benjamite territory,
compelled Phaltiel, Michal's husband, to give up his wife, whom he followed,
with many tears, till Abner’s angry threats compelled him to turn back in
sorrow, and David recovered the beloved wife of his youth. Abner then wandered
about amongst the tribes trying to obtain secret adherents for David. Many
Israelites no doubt privately wished that the luckless civil war would end with
submission to the king of Judah; even some of the Benjamites were not averse to
a union. Attended by twenty trusty followers whom he had secured for David,
Abner secretly entered Hebron; David had succeeded in sending away Joab and his
brothers (the distrustful and jealous sons of Zeruiah) on a predatory
expedition. During their absence, David personally arranged with Abner and his
twenty followers the manner in which the elders of the tribes should be won
over to his side, and how the dethronement of Ishbosheth should then be
effected. Abner had already left Hebron in order to call upon the elders of the
tribes to follow his example, and do homage to the king of Judah. When Joab
returned from his expedition, he heard the astonishing intelligence that
Abner, the enemy of David’s house, had been received, and permitted to depart
in full favour, and that the king had made a secret treaty behind his back. As
it seemed to him inevitable that he must be the victim of such a compact, he
quickly decided on his course, and sent messengers after Abner, who induced him
to return. Joab and Abishai lay in wait for him at the gates of Hebron, and
Abner, unaware and unwarned, was felled to the earth by their swords. David felt the death of Abner acutely. The man who alone was able and willing to
obtain for him the adherence of all the tribes by peaceful measures was thus
foully murdered, on the very eve of the realisation of his plan. David was
placed in an awkward position. In order to destroy any suspicion which might
arise against him, David gave solemn expression to his sincere grief at Abner’s
loss. He commanded a grand, imposing funeral in Hebron for Israel’s fallen
hero, ordered all his followers to attend the funeral procession, and
accompanied it himself. He breathed forth his tearful grief in an elegiac poem,
the beginning of which has been preserved, and which made a powerful impression
on all hearers. All burst into tears, and were convinced of the sincerity of
his sorrow by the manner in which he recited his threnode. On the other hand,
David feared to take the sons of Zeruiah to account, or even to reproach them
for their conduct; he could not spare their assistance. In the circle of his
intimates only, uttering bitter complaints of them, he said, “Know that a great
prince in Israel has fallen today”.
The
news of Abner’s murder made a deep impression on Ishbosheth. He had no
knowledge of his fallen general's treacherous league with David, and he
therefore deeply mourned the death of a hero whom he supposed to be faithful,
and whose loss seemed to be irreparable, for he considered Abner as the chief
support of his throne.
After
Ishbosheth’s death the kingdom of the ten tribes naturally fell to David. Among
them, too, he had adherents of long standing, who remembered his warlike deeds
against the Philistines in Saul’s time, and who honoured him as the chosen one
of God through his prophet Samuel. Others had been won over to his side by
Abner. Even those who took offence at David’s league with the enemies of
Israel, could not hide from themselves the consideration that no choice was
left them but to do him homage. The Benjamites also acknowledged him, but with
a secret grudge, which they could hardly conceal. David’s dearest wish was now
realised; from having been the ruler of a little, insignificant tribe he had
become, after many obstacles and troubles, the king of all Israel. The breach
between the houses of Judah and Israel was healed apparently, and everything
seemed favourable to him. The priesthood and the prophets did not take a
hostile attitude towards him, as they had done towards Saul, but joined with
heart and soul in his cause. A descendant of the house of Eli, named Abiathar,
who had shared David’s troubles, belonged to his court; and the prophets
welcomed in him the man who had been anointed by Samuel, and had belonged to
that great man’s circle of disciples. The prophet Gad was also a member of the
court; and another prophet of the time, named Nathan, was to a certain extent
the keeper of David’s conscience. Thus encouraged in all his undertakings by
his spiritual advisers, everything tended to level the way for him, as far as
the internal government was concerned. But his foreign relations occasioned him
great difficulties, which had to be overcome before he could rule as an
independent king.
In
the first place, David was forced to break with the Philistines, if he wished
to be independent, and to win back the love of his people. He had to prepare
himself for fierce warfare with his former auxiliaries. But he did not
immediately commence hostilities with them; they were too powerful for him. He
wished first to free himself from other bonds. In the midst of the Benjamite
territory was an enclosure, which had remained in the possession of the
Jebusites, because the Israelites, on their entry into the land, had not
conquered it. The high hill of ZION was
rendered inaccessible on three sides by narrow valleys and artificial
fortifications. The most impregnable point was the south side, where the rocky
wall of the hill rose almost in a vertical line from an abyss below. From this
mountain fortress, the Jebusites ruled the entire surrounding territory, and
felt themselves secure from all intruders. They appear to have lived in a state
of peace with the surrounding Benjamites and Judaeans, as even Saul did not
disturb them in the possession of their territory. David, however, considered
it conducive to his interest to obtain possession of this citadel of Zion
before commencing hostilities with the Philistines. He therefore resolved to
storm the citadel, and subdue its defenders. As soon as the Jebusites found all
opposition useless they sued for peace, which was granted them by David. They
were allowed to remain in their city, but not in the fortress; he permitted
them to settle in the east of the town, on Mount Moriah. This victory, which
had appeared so difficult, and had, in fact, been easily obtained, had been
preceded by the boast of the Jebusites about the blind and the lame, which gave
rise to a proverb.
After
its conquest, David removed his capital from Hebron to Mount Zion, and it was
henceforth known as the town of David. The city itself lost its old name of
Jebus, and received the new name Jerusalem, the
meaning of which is not known. Hither David removed with his warriors and their
families, and his courtiers. The spot where the bravest soldiers had their
dwellings was called after them the house of the brave. Such
was the beginning of the place which since then, and for centuries, was to be
known as the “Holy City”. The choice of this spot as a capital was a happy
stroke, as circumstances soon proved. It is true, Shechem would have made a
better metropolis, on account of its position in the midst of the tribes, and
the fruitful territory around it. But David found it impossible to move his
dwelling to the town of the Ephraimites. The inhabitants were not especially
well disposed towards him, and rather unwilling that the half-savage king, who
sprang from Judah, should prescribe laws to them. Besides, he needed the
support of his own tribe, and this he could have in Jerusalem, which was
situated on the boundaries of Benjamin and Judah, and which would serve as a
protection in the event of unruliness on the part of the other tribes. The
territory on which the new capital was erected was not sterile, though it could
bear no comparison with the part of the country in which Shechem lay. In the
valleys flow everlasting springs, the springs of Siloah and En-Rogel in the
south, the Gihon in the west; so that in the dry season the town and fields can
always be supplied with water. On three sides Jerusalem is surrounded by a
range of hills which protect and embellish it. On the east is a high watershed (2724 feet),
Mount Olivet, so named from the olive trees which cover it. In the south the
hills are not so lofty, and the valley dividing them from the city is narrower.
The valley is that of Henna (Gehenna), which was thus named after an individual
or a family, and which was destined to acquire a sad renown, and to supply
another appellation for hell (Gehenna). On
the west the summits are also low, and can hardly be called hills. On the
north, the hills gently slope down to the plain. By these hills and valleys,
which form natural walls and ditches, Jerusalem is sheltered on three sides.
Within Jerusalem, on the high plateau and between the three valleys on the
east, south, and west, there are three ranges of hills rising above the plain.
On the west is Zion, the loftiest summit. On the north is a hill of no great
height; and opposite the third is Mount Moriah, which has an offshoot towards
the south, called “Ophel”. Moriah, though much less lofty than Zion, was
destined to eclipse it and the greatest heights on earth in importance.
The
Philistines could not ignore the fact that the choice of David as king of the
entire Israelite nation had not only greatly loosened the bond which united him
to them, but that it must in the future force him to take up a hostile attitude
towards themselves. They did not, however, wish to break with him. But when the
conquest of Jebus (Jerusalem) took place, they considered the fact of his
removing his dwelling thither as a premonitory sign. They hastened to join with
him in battle, before he had time to arm the available troops of the various
tribes. A Philistine band pressed forward across the plain into the mountains,
and approached Jerusalem. Whether David was surprised by their attack, or
whether he wished to avoid an action near his capital, is unknown, but he left
it with his troops, and moved southwards to Adullam. Encouraged by this
retreat, the Philistines pressed on to Bethlehem, David’s birthplace, where
they encamped, and whence they sent out predatory expeditions to ravage the
land of Judah. David delayed attacking the Philistines; his army was probably
too weak, and he expected reinforcements from the tribes. In order to stimulate
his warriors to trials of strength during the pause before the decisive
contest, David expressed a wish to drink water from a well in Bethlehem, which
was in the possession of the Philistines. Three of the chief warriors,
Jesheboam, Eleazar, and Shammah, immediately set out against the Philistines,
daringly drew water from the well, and brought it to David at Adullam. David,
however, would not drink the water for which his warriors had risked their
lives. He had only put them to the test. At length the
Israelite troops went forth to meet the Philistines, and utterly routed them at
Mount Baal-Perazim. This victory was so decisive that it was compared with
Joshua’s at Gibeon. In their hurried flight, the Philistines left behind them
their idols, which were burnt by the Israelites. The enemy did not, however,
relinquish their intention of subduing David and his people. They made repeated
attacks, once in the valley of Rephaim, another time near
Ephesdammim in Terebinthea; David’s troops and warriors performed
miracles of bravery, they defeated their enemies, and pursued them as far as
Gaza. David did not content himself with mere defence, but he determined on
attacking the Philistines. If he wished to protect his people, it was
necessary either constantly to harass, or to subdue the small but powerful
nation which depended on incursions and warfare for its maintenance. He
therefore proceeded with his soldiers as far as Gath, the former capital of the
Philistines, which was situated nearest to the land of Judaea. The Philistines
made a very obstinate resistance, and violent conflicts arose, in which David’s
heroes had ample opportunity for distinguishing themselves. It appears that the
Philistines suggested, according to their custom, that there should be combats
with the remnant of their Rephaitic giants. Times had changed, however, and
whilst in David’s youth the Israelitish troops had not had among them a single
soldier who would accept Goliath's challenge, there were now more than thirty
who burned with eagerness to take part in the duels. On this occasion the
warriors entreated the king not to expose himself in battle, and, in fact, not
to go to war himself, in order that “the light of Israel” might not be
extinguished.
At
length the Israelites succeeded in utterly routing the Philistines, so that
they were obliged to surrender their capital Gath, and its villages and the
surrounding territory. The town in which the son of Jesse had first appeared,
entreating help in the guise of an imbecile, thus fell before him. One of the
thirty warriors, Sibbechai of Hushah, killed the giant Sippai of Gath; another
man from Bethlehem named Elhanan, killed the brother of Goliath, named Lahmi,
who had sallied forth to the contest like Goliath, laden with armour. David’s
nephew Jonathan killed a giant who had an additional finger on each hand, and
an additional toe on each foot. David himself was once, when exhausted from the
long struggle, in imminent danger of being overcome by the giant Ishbi of Gath;
Abishai, however, Joab’s brother, hurried to his aid, defeated the giant, and
killed three hundred Philistines with his spear. The overthrow of the
Philistines was an event of the greatest importance; it ensured lasting peace
and freedom of action to the people, for none of" the other enemies of
Israel harassed it so persistently. David did not push his victory further; he
left the important cities of Gaza, Askelon, Ashdod and Ekron undisturbed, and
even the town of Gath he appears later on to have restored to its king. No
doubt he had reasons for not using extreme measures with the Philistines. It
appeared to him better to rule them as a tributary power than to drive them to
a war of desperation.
By
his victory over the Philistines, David attained great importance and respect
in the eyes of the neighbouring peoples. Hiram, the king who had transferred
the Phoenician power from Zidon to Tyre, despatched ambassadors to David,
offering to make an alliance with him. He also offered to send supplies of
cedar wood and building materials for adorning the new capital of Jerusalem in
a fitting manner. He rejoiced at the subjection of the Philistines, probably
because they would no longer be able to cast covetous glances at the Phoenician
coast-lands. It was a matter of great interest to the king of Tyre to secure an
alliance with David, in order that the Phoenician caravans might have free
passage, and find protection for their goods when they passed backwards and
forwards between Phoenicia and Egypt. David willingly accepted his advances,
and thus a sort of friendship arose between him and Hiram. He accepted Hiram’s
offer in order to fortify the capital which had been founded by him, and to
obtain materials for adorning it with architectural works, so that Jerusalem
might vie in outward appearance with the other capitals of those times. In the
first place Jerusalem was fortified, especially on the north, where it was most
liable to be attacked. The hill of Zion, or City of David, was, in fact, not
sufficiently extensive to contain all the inhabitants who had already settled
there, and it had become necessary to take measures to provide for the
increasing population. For this reason, the hill which lay to the north of the
town was included in its boundaries. Between Zion and this hillock lay a narrow
valley. The northern elevation of the town was called Millo (border);
it was considered the newer quarter of the town, in comparison with the more ancient
city of David. Mount Moriah and its offshoot Ophel remained outside the circuit
of the city, and in those days was not considered as belonging to Jerusalem,
but was inhabited by the surviving remnant of the Jebusites. David also built a
palace of cedar, the wood for which was procured from Lebanon. To Joab and the
other important personages of David’s court were assigned roomy and well-built
houses, which were not constructed of cedar wood, but of cypress.
David
further sought to make Jerusalem the centre of religious life, in order that
the eyes of the whole nation might be turned towards it. He therefore took
measures to remove the ark of the sanctuary from the house of Abinadab at
Kirjath-Jearim, where it had remained since its recovery from the hands of the
Philistines. A splendid tent was built for its reception in the city of David.
David had vowed not to remain in his house, nor to rest on his bed, nor to
close his eyes in sleep until he had found a resting-place for the ark of the
covenant. Accompanied by a great concourse, the king repaired to Kirjath-Jearim
(which lay at about an hour’s journey to the north-west of Jerusalem), and many
Levites followed in the king's train. The ark of the sanctuary was placed on a
new carriage drawn by bullocks, which were led by two sons of Abinadab. Choirs
of Levites sang hymns, and accompanied themselves on stringed instruments, and
David also assisted them with all his might. An accident, however, occurred on
the road. Uzzah, who walked next to the chariot, suddenly fell down dead. David
was so shocked at this catastrophe that he hesitated to carry the ark of the
covenant into Jerusalem. He feared that it might bring down misfortune on the
people, as it had done in the case of the Philistines. It was therefore placed
in a house for three months, and, seeing that no evil came of it, David
determined on making a second attempt at bringing it to Mount Zion. On this
occasion, however, it was not placed on a chariot, but was carried by Levites.
Followed by a mass of people, and amidst shouts of joy, blasts of trumpets, and
dancing, the ark was conveyed to the tent appointed for it. The king himself,
oblivious of his dignity, sang and danced in exultation before the ark. His
conduct called forth a rebuke from his wife Michal, who scoffingly charged him
with behaving like a public clown.
As it
had done in the case of Shiloh, the arrival of the Ark raised Jerusalem to the
dignity of a holy city. In such a place of public worship, it was necessary to
maintain a priest, or rather a priesthood. Abiathar, David’s faithful follower
in all his wanderings, was, as a matter of course, raised to the office of High
Priest to the sanctuary in Zion. There was, however, another high priest in
Gibeon, whom Saul had placed there after the destruction of Eli’s family in
Nob. David could not entirely displace him, for such a course would have led to
dissensions. He therefore confirmed his predecessor’s appointment, and thus
retained two high priests in office at the same time—Abiathar in Jerusalem, and
Zadok in Gibeon. A former pupil of the Levitical choirs, himself a poet and a
musician, David naturally followed Samuel’s example and introduced choral
singing into the solemn religious services. He also composed hymns of praise at
times, when a victory over the enemy, or some other success filled his heart
with thankfulness, and animated him with poetical fervour. It may be said that
his songs have become the prototypes of this lofty and inspiring style of
verse. Besides the royal psalmist there were other poets and musicians, such as
Asaph, Heman, a grandson of Samuel, and Jeduthun. Their descendants were the
Asaphites and Korachites (Bene Korach), who are named with David as the most
famous composers of psalms. David arranged that Asaph and his choir should lead
the choral service in the sanctuary at Jerusalem, whilst his fellow-musicians,
Heman and Jeduthun, performed the same functions at the altar in Gibeon.
Samuel’s creation of a spiritual divine service was thus firmly established by
David; and though he was an upholder of sacrificial rites, he valued the
elevating and refining influence of psalmody too highly not to make it an
integral element of the public cult. At a time when poetry as an art had hardly
awakened amongst the other nations, it already occupied a prominent place in
the divine service of Israel.
As
David was the actual founder of a sanctifying divine worship, he was also the creator
of a system of government which was based on justice. He presided at the
tribunal, listened untiringly to the disputes of individuals or of tribes, and
administered justice with strict impartiality. His throne was not only the high
seat of government and power, it was also that of order and justice. Succeeding
generations pronounced David the ideal king. His throne was looked upon as the
prop of justice, and his sceptre as the standard of civic peace. Jerusalem was
by him made an ideal city, where a pure worship of God had been established,
and justice, in its most exalted form, had found its earthly resting-place. A
later psalmist says—
“Jerusalem,
that art builded as a city that is compact together,
Whither
the tribes go up, even the tribes of the Lord;
For a
testimony unto Israel,
To
give thanks unto the name of the Lord.
For
there are set thrones for judgment,
The
thrones of the house of David”.
PSALM CXXII. 3-5.
Jerusalem
was considered “a faithful citadel—full of righteousness— where justice had its
dwelling-place”. These circumstances, the deliverance from the yoke of the
Philistines, the universal safety, and the establishment of justice under
David’s rule, rendered him again the favourite of the people, as he had been in
his youth. A feeling of loyalty to him prevailed, which was of spontaneous
growth, and in which force had no share.
David
partly altered the internal arrangements of the country. The constitution of
the tribes remained intact. The elders represented the families, and the head
of the oldest family was also the prince of his tribe (Naszi-Beth-Ab). The
princes were the representatives of the tribes with the
king. But it was necessary to limit the freedom, or rather the
arbitrariness of the tribes, in regard to military arrangements. Each tribe, in
case of war, was bound to contribute a number of capable soldiers (over twenty
years of age) as its contingent to the national army (Zaba). A
special officer was appointed over this contingent, who was called the
enumerator (Sopher), or the keeper of the rolls. He wrote down
on a list the names of the men fit for active service, looked to their
enrolment, and compelled the attendance of all defaulters. This duty David
delegated to a man named Shavsha, from whom it passed on to his heirs. As soon
as the army was assembled, it was commanded by the field officer (Sar-ha-Zaba), who
at this conjuncture was Joab. David also supported a troop of mercenaries whom
he recruited from the heathen soldiery, the Cherethites, who came from a
territory belonging to the Philistine dominions, and the Pelethites, whose
origin is unknown. Benaiah, son of Jehoiada, one of the bravest of David’s
soldiers, was their commander. David also appointed a special officer on whom
devolved the duty of reporting to the king all important, or apparently
important events. He was called the recorder (Maskkir). As
favouritism is inseparable from kingly will, David also had a favourite (named
Hushai the Arkhi) on whom he could rely under all circumstances, especially in
cases requiring discretion. He was also fortunate in having an adviser at hand,
who could give suitable counsel in various emergencies; his name was
Ahithophel, and his birthplace was the Judaean town of Gilo. At that time his
advice was currently said to be as infallible as the oracles uttered by the
lips of the high priest. This wise and overwise councillor of David was
destined to exercise a great influence over his royal master. At one time
David’s judicial conscience was put to a severe test. A famine of long duration
overspread the land on account of a two years’ drought. The distress continued
to grow when, at the commencement of the third year, no rain had fallen, and
the people turned to the king for help. This misfortune, in which the entire
country shared, was interpreted as being God-sent retribution for some secret
and unavenged sin. David therefore inquired of the priest Abiathar what sin
required expiation, and the answer came, “on account of Saul and his ruthless
persecution of the Gibeonites”. David then sent to the remnant of the
Gibeonites, and inquired of them what atonement they desired. Not satisfied
with an expiatory sum of money, they demanded that seven descendants of Saul
should be hanged in Gibeah-Saul. The demand of the Gibeonites seemed just, for
according to the views of the time, only blood could atone for the shedding of blood
and a breach of faith. With a heavy heart David had to comply with the demand
of the Gibeonites, and satisfy the desire of the nation. The two sons of Saul’s
concubine Rizpah, and his grandson, the son of his daughter Merab, were sought
out, handed over to the Gibeonites, and killed by them in cold blood, in
Gibeah-Saul, the town in which their father had won a crown.
David
spared only Mephibosheth, the son of Jonathan, for he remembered the oath made
to his friend, that he would always protect his descendants. The corpses of the
seven victims were to remain on the gallows until rain should fall from the
heavens, but it was long ere the rainfall came. It was in those dire days that
the beautiful Rizpah, for whose sake Abner had quarrelled with Ishbosheth,
showed of what a mother’s love is capable. In order to prevent her sons’
corpses from being devoured by eagles and jackals, she made her couch on the
rocks on which the bodies were exposed, and guarded them with a watchful eye
through the heat of day. Nor did she relax her vigilance in the night, but
continued her work of scaring away the beasts of prey from the dead. When at
length in the autumn the rain fell, the seven bodies were taken down, and at
David’s command the last honours were bestowed on them. He also seized this
opportunity to remove the remains of Saul and Jonathan from Jabesh-Gilead, and
to bury them, together with the remains of their kindred, in the family tomb of
the house of Kish at Zelah. It appears that, on this occasion, David caused his
deeply touching lament for the death of Saul and of Jonathan to be reproduced,
in order to express publicly how deeply the destruction of the royal house of
Benjamin had affected him. He directed that the elegy should be committed to
memory by the youths of the country. Jonathan’s surviving son, Mephibosheth
(who had been living in the house of a much-respected man on the other side of
the Jordan) was brought to Jerusalem, and David received him in his own house,
placed him at his own table, and treated him as one of his own sons. David also
restored to him Saul’s lands in the tribe of Benjamin, and entrusted the management
of them to one of Saul's slaves, named Ziba. Notwithstanding this, the
Benjamites accused David of destroying the house of Saul, and of having preserved
Mephibosheth, because he was lame and unfit to rule. When David’s fortune was
on the wane, the embittered Benjamites cast stones at him.
DAVID.
1035—1015. B.C.
WHEN David
had completed two decades of his reign, he became involved in several wars, which
withdrew him from the peaceful pursuits of regulating the internal affairs of
the country, and of attending to the administration of justice. These wars with
distant nations, forced on him against his will, gave him an immense accession
of power, and raised the prestige of the people in a surprising degree. David
first began a fierce warfare with the Moabites, who dwelt on the opposite side
of the Dead Sea. With them he had been on friendly terms during his wanderings,
and amongst them he had met with a hospitable reception. It is probable that
the Moabites had ousted from their possession the neighbouring Reubenites, and
that David hurried to their rescue. It must in any case have been a war of
retribution, for, after his victory, David treated the prisoners with a
severity which he did not display towards any of the other nations whom he
conquered. The Moabite captives were fettered, and cast side by side on the
ground, then measured with a rope, and two divisions were killed, whilst one
division was spared. The whole land of Moab was subdued, and a yearly tribute
was to be sent to Jerusalem.
Some
time afterwards, when Nahash, king of the Ammonites, died, David, who had been
on friendly terms with him, sent an embassy to his son Hanun, with messages of
condolence. This courtesy only roused suspicion in Rabbath-Ammon, the capital
of the Ammonites. The new king’s counsellors impressed him with the idea that
David had sent his ambassadors as spies to Rabbah, in order to discover their
weakness, to conquer them, and to deliver them over to the same fate that had
befallen the Moabites. Hanun was so carried away by his suspicions that he
offered an insult to the king of Israel which could not be passed over
unnoticed. He obliged the ambassadors, whose persons, according to the laws of
nations, were inviolable, to have their beards shaved off on one side, and
their garments cut short, and thus disgraced he drove them out of the country.
The ambassadors were ashamed to appear at Jerusalem in this guise, but they
informed David of the occurrence. He immediately prepared himself for battle,
and the militia was called out; the old warriors girded their loins, and the
Cherethite and Pelethite mercenaries sallied forth with their heroic leader
Benaiah at their head. Hanun, who feared the valor of the Israelites, looked
around for help, and engaged mercenary troops from among the Aramaeans, who
lived in the regions between the mountains of Hermon and the banks of the
Euphrates. Hadadezer, king of Zobah on the Euphrates, contributed the greatest
number—20,000 men. David did not personally conduct
this war, but left the supreme command with the careful and reliable Joab.
Having led the Israelite army across the Jordan, Joab divided it into two
bodies. With the one he attacked the Aramaeans, the other he left under the
command of his brother Abishai. He aroused the enthusiasm of his army by inspiring
words: “Let us fight bravely for our people and the city of our God, and may
the Lord God do what seemeth good unto Him”. Joab then dashed at the Aramaeans,
and put them to flight. On this, the Ammonites were seized with such fear that
they withdrew from the field, and took shelter behind the walls of their
capital. It was a most successful achievement. Joab hurried to Jerusalem to
report to the king, and to lay before him a plan by which the Aramaeans might
be totally annihilated, and any future interference on their part prevented.
The victorious army, having been recalled from the Aramonitish territories, was
reinforced, and with the king himself at its head pursued the Aramaean enemy on
the other side of the Jordan. King Hadadezer, on his part, also sent fresh
troops to the aid of his defeated forces, but in a battle at Helam, the
Aramaean army was again defeated, and its general, Shobach, fell in the
encounter. The vassals of the mighty Hadadezer then hastened to make peace with
David.
Toi
(or Tou) the king of Hamath, who had been at war with Hadadezer, now sent his
son Joram to David with presents, congratulating him on the victory over their
common foe. David followed up his successes until he reached the capital of
king Hadadezer, situated on the banks of the Euphrates. The Aramaeans were then
defeated a third time; their chariots and soldiers could not withstand the
attack of the Israelite army. The extensive district of Zobah, to which various
princes had been tributary, was divided into several parts.
The
king of Damascus, an ally of the king of Zobah, was also defeated by David, and
the ancient town of Damascus henceforth belonged to the king of Israel. David
placed land-overseers in all the Aramaean territories from Hermon to the
Euphrates, in order to enforce the payment of tribute. David and his army
themselves must have been astonished at the wonderful result which they had
achieved. It rendered the king and his army objects of fear far and wide.
Meanwhile the king of the Ammonites had escaped punishment for his insults to
the ambassadors of Israel. In consequence of the campaign against the
Aramaeans, which lasted nearly a year, the Israelitish army had been unable to
resume the war against Hanun. It was only after the great events narrated above
that David was again enabled to send his forces, under Joab, against Ammon. Yet
another war arose out of the hostilities against this nation. The Idumaeans, on
the south of the Dead Sea, had also assisted the Ammonites by sending troops to
their aid, and these had to be humiliated now. David deputed his second
general, Abishai, Joab’s brother, to direct the campaign against the Idumaeans.
Joab was in the meantime engaged in a long contest with the Ammonites, who had
secured themselves behind the strong walls of their fortified capital, and were
continually making raids on their foes. The Israelitish army had neither
battering rams nor other instruments of siege. Their only alternative was to
storm the heights of the city, and in their attempts to carry out this plan
they were often repelled by the bowmen on the walls. At length Joab succeeded,
after repeated attacks, in gaining possession of one part of the city—the
Water-Town; he reported this victory to David at once, and urged him to repair
to the camp in order to lead in person the attack on the other quarters, so
that the honour of the conquest might be entirely his own. When David arrived
at Rabbah with fresh troops, he succeeded in subduing the whole town, and in
obtaining rich booty. David himself put on his head the golden diadem, richly
adorned with precious stones, which had heretofore crowned the Ammonitish idol
Malchom (Milchom). It appears that David did not destroy the city of Rabbah, as
he had intended. He merely condemned the male inhabitants, or perhaps only the
prisoners, to do hard work, such as polishing stones, threshing with iron
rollers, hewing wood with axes, and making bricks. He treated the other
prisoners from the various towns in a similar manner. Hanun, the original cause
of the war, who had so deeply insulted David, was either killed or driven out
of the kingdom. In his stead David appointed his brother Shobi as king.
Meanwhile Abishai had been engaged in a war against the Idumaean king, and had
utterly routed him in the Valley of Salt—probably in the neighbourhood of the
rock-salt mountain, near the Dead Sea. Eighteen thousand Idumaeans are said to
have fallen there. The rest probably submitted; and for this reason David
contented himself with placing excise officers and a garrison over them, as he
had done in Damascus and the other Aramaean provinces. The Idumaeans, however,
seem later on to have revolted against the Israelitish garrison and the tax
collectors, and to have massacred them. Joab therefore repaired to Idumaea,
caused the murdered Israelites to be buried, and all Idumaean males to be put
to death. He was occupied with this war of destruction during half a year, and
so thoroughly was the task executed that only a few of the male sex could save
themselves by flight. Amongst them was a son or a grandson of the Idumaean king.
By
these decisive victories, in the west over the Philistines, in the south over
the Idumaeans, in the east (on the opposite side of the Jordan) over the
Moabites and Ammonites, and in the north over the Aramaeans, David had raised
the power of Israel to an unexpected degree. While, at the commencement of his
reign, when he was first acknowledged king of all Israel, the boundaries of the
country had been comprised between Dan and Beersheba, he now ruled over the
widespread territory from the river of Egypt (Rhinokolura, El-Arish) to the
Euphrates, or from Gaza to Thapsacus (on the Euphrates). The nations thus
subdued were obliged annually to do homage by means of gifts, to pay tribute,
and perhaps also to send serfs to assist in building and other severe labour.
These
wars and victories were better calculated than his early hardships to bring to
light the great qualities of David’s mind. Strong and determined as he was in
every undertaking in which the honour and safety of his people were involved,
he remained modest and humble, without a spark of presumption, after success
had been attained. He erected no monument to commemorate his victories as had
been done by Saul; like his general, Joab, he was imbued with the thought that
to God alone was to be attributed the victory. The faith in God, to which David
had given utterance when he prepared himself for the duel with the Rephaite
Goliath (1 Samuel XVII. 47), he
preserved in all great contests. David elaborated this guiding thought in a
psalm, which he probably chanted before the ark at the close of the war, and in
which he gives a retrospect of his entire past life.
In
consequence of their great victories, two firm convictions were impressed on
the minds of the people, and these actuated and possessed them in all times to
come. The one idea occurs in various forms: “A king cannot escape by the
multitude of his army, nor a warrior by his power; vain is the horse for
safety”. God alone decides the fate of war, brings it to a close, gives victory
or defeat, and “to Him it is equally easy to conquer with few or with many”.
The other idea, in closest connection with it, is that God leads the armies of
Israel to victory, if they go forth to glorify His name or to save His people.
The God of Israel was, in accordance with this idea, designated by a special
name which fully expresses this thought; He was named the God of hosts (Adonai
Zebaoth), the God who gives victory unto Israel in its conflicts. The King
Zebaoth was invoked before every battle, and the Israelitish troops went forth
with the firm conviction that they could never be defeated. This confidence,
certainly, worked wonders in the course of time.
Severely
as David treated the idols of the nations whom he had conquered, he behaved
with comparative leniency to the conquered idolaters. The Moabites alone were
cruelly punished, and the Ammonites were enslaved, but the other conquered
races were merely obliged to pay tribute. The offences of the former must have
been very great to have deserved so heavy a punishment. The foreign races
residing in the country were not molested; thus we find Jebusites in Jerusalem,
and Canaanites and Hittites in other parts of the country. Hence we find many
strangers and natives not of Israelitish descent enrolled in his corps of
warriors, or leading their own troops in his service. The Hittite Uriah, one of
David’s thirty heroes, who was destined to play a melancholy part in David’s
career, was deeply attached to the Israelitish nation.
The
joy over these great achievements remained, however, but for a short time
unmarred. The happiness of a state, like that of individuals, is but seldom of
long duration, and days of sunshine must be followed by periods of darkness, to
prevent the enervation of the national vigour. By one false step David lost not
only his own inward contentment and peace, but shook the very foundations of
that state which it had cost him such exertions to establish. When David
returned home from the Aramaean war, and was resting from the fatigues of
battle, which Joab and his army were still undergoing in the land of Ammon, he
beheld from the roof of his palace a beautiful woman, who was bathing. She was
the wife of one of his most faithful warriors (the Hittite, Uriah), and her
name was Bathsheba. The houses of the warriors were built on Zion in the
vicinity of the king’s palace, and thus he happened to see Bathsheba. Carried
away by his passion, he sent messengers to command her to repair to the palace,
and Bathsheba obeyed. When David, some time after, found that this violation of
the marriage tie had not been without consequences, his only thought was to
save his honour, and thus he involved himself in deeper sin: He commanded Uriah
to return to Jerusalem from the camp at Rabbah. He received him in a friendly
manner, and gave him permission to rest, and enjoy the company of his wife.
Uriah, however, made no use of this permission, but remained with the guard,
who slept at the entrance of the king's palace, and protected his person. David
was disappointed. He sought an escape from the dilemma, and this led him into a
heinous crime. As he could not save his honour, he determined that Uriah should
lose his life. David therefore sent him to the camp with a letter to Joab, saying
that the bearer should be placed in a post of extreme danger—nay, of certain
death—during one pf the sorties of the Ammonites. This command was fulfilled,
and Uriah fell, struck dead by an Ammonite arrow. Bathsheba fulfilled the
customary time of mourning for her husband, and was then received into the
palace by David as his wife.
In
every other State the court circle would have discussed a king’s fancy with bated
breath; it would hardly have been blamed, and certainly it would soon have been
forgotten. But in Israel there was an eye which could pierce this factitious
darkness, and a conscience which declaimed in a loud voice against the crimes
of even a royal wrong-doer. Prophetism possessed this clear sight which never
failed, and this conscience which never slept. It was its foremost duty not to
allow sin to grow into a habit by hushing it up and screening it, but to expose
it in glaring colors, and brand it with the stamp of public condemnation.
David
no doubt believed that Bathsheba alone was cognisant of his sin, and Joab the
only accessory to the plot against Uriah’s life. But this error was suddenly
and rudely dispelled. The prophet Nathan one day came to David, and requested
permission to bring a certain case to his notice. He then related the following
parable:—In a great city there lived a rich man, who possessed great flocks and
herds; and near him lived a poor man who possessed but one little lamb, which
he had reared for himself. One day, when a guest came to the rich man, he was
too stingy to kill one of his flock for the meal, but he took the lamb of the
poor man to feast his friend. On hearing this complaint, David’s sense of
justice was aroused, and he said indignantly that the heartless rich man
deserved to die, and should pay the poor man four times the value of the lamb.
Then the prophet replied, “Thou art the man!”
Any
other king would have punished the moralist who had dared speak the truth to a
crowned head, to the representative of God on earth. David, however, the pupil
of the prophet Samuel, when the picture of his misdeeds was thus placed before
him, penitently answered, “Yes, I have sinned”. He certainly did not fail to
offer up heartfelt prayers, and to make atonement in order to obtain God's
forgiveness. The child which was born died in early infancy, although David had
worn himself away in fasting and prayers for its life. Bathsheba afterwards had
a second son named Jedidiah, or Solomon (1033), who
became the favourite of his father.
But
though God pardoned the king for his heinous sins, humanity did not forgive
them, and they proved fatal to domestic peace. Bathsheba, the wife of Uriah,
was the daughter of Eliam (one of David’s warriors), and the granddaughter of
his counsellor Ahithophel. The father and grandfather felt their honour
disgraced through their daughter’s seduction, which they could never forgive,
although they kept silence, and did not betray their hatred. Ahithophel
especially nursed his vengeance in secret, and only awaited an opportunity to
wreak it on the king. David did all in his power to appease them. He elevated
Bathsheba to the rank of first queen, promised her secretly that her son should
be his successor, and solemnly swore to fulfil this promise. He wished at any
cost to make peace with Ahithophel, whose counsel was precious to him.
Ahithophel, however, remained immovable. A scandalous event in the house of
David involved matters to a still greater extent, and robbed his remaining
years of all tranquillity. His eldest son Amnon seduced his half-sister Tamar,
and thereby aroused the fierce anger of her brother Absalom, who determined to
avenge her. Each of the king’s sons, six of whom had been born in Hebron, and
eleven, in Jerusalem, had, when he attained manhood, his own house, household
and lands. Absalom’s lands and herds were situated at Baal-Hazor, not far from
the capital. Thither he invited all the king’s sons to the feast of
sheep-shearing. Whilst they and their guests were enjoying the feast, and drinking
freely, Absalom’s servants, at their master's command, attacked Amnon, and
dealt him his death-blow. Absalom served a double purpose by this murder. He
avenged the insult offered to his sister, and hoped to secure his own
succession to the throne by ridding himself of his elder brother. The son of
Abigail, the second in succession, was already dead, and so it seemed
inevitable that he, as the third son, must be the successor. David’s son a
fratricide!—What will be the consequences of this bloody deed? Only his faith
in God saved him from becoming, like his predecessor, a victim to insanity,
although the dire fate which had befallen him was but too real, and not merely
the effect of a distrustful imagination.
David’s
first impulse was to seek out the murderer, who had taken refuge with his
grandfather, King Talmai, of Geshur, on the south-west boundary of Judaea, in
order to deal with him as he deserved, even at the risk of going to war on his
account. But there were various influences at work against such a policy. In
fact, since the affair with Bathsheba, intrigues had been rife at David’s
court. Joab was opposed to the succession of the last-born, Solomon, and was
naturally on the side of Absalom, the eldest surviving son. Ahithophel, David’s
infallible counsellor, also favoured Absalom’s claim to the throne, because he
could use him as a tool against his father. On the other hand, Adonijah,
David’s fourth son, advocated the infliction of condign punishment on Absalom.
Adonijah thought his prospects of displacing the infant Solomon fairer than his
chance with the remorseless Absalom. If the latter were punished for
fratricide, Adonijah would be the next in succession. He and his mother Haggith
may perhaps, therefore, have incensed David against Absalom, but Joab and
Ahithophel were wiser, and knew how to exert their influence in favour of
abandoning all warlike attempts upon him or his grandfather, whose protection
he was enjoying.
When
David had at length decided on seizing or demanding the surrender of his guilty
son (though he had been absent for three years), Joab employed a ruse to turn
the king from his resolve. He sent for a woman living in the adjacent town of
Tekoah, who had a reputation for adroit and clever speech. With her he devised
a plan to make the king realise how horrible it was for a father to be willing
to put to death a son for the not altogether unjustifiable murder of his
brother. The wise woman of Tekoah consequently appeared before the king in
mourning garments, and as though invoking his mercy she called out in an
entreating voice and with deep prostrations, Help! O king, help! When she
stated her fictitious case, the king readily recognised the hidden point of her
story, and the allusion to his own case, and he demanded an open answer from
her as to whether Joab had assisted her in her disguise and invention. When the
woman of Tekoah had confessed the truth, the king. sent for Joab, and assured
him that he no longer entertained evil intentions against Absalom, and assigned
to him the task of conducting his son to Jerusalem. The woman of Tekoah had, in
her ingenious manner, made it clear to him that blood-revenge against his own
son would be a contradiction in itself.
Joab himself
brought Absalom from Geshur to Jerusalem. The son, however, was not permitted
to appear before his father, but was obliged to remain in his own house. By
this means Joab unconsciously sowed the seeds of dissension in the house of
David. Night and day, Absalom, in his isolation and disgrace, brooded over the
vile plan of deposing his father. But he dissembled in order to lull the
latter’s suspicion. To this end it was absolutely necessary that a
reconciliation should be effected. Joab, who earnestly desired peace between
father and son, became the mediator, and David decided that, after a two years'
exile from his presence, his son might now be allowed to return. At this
meeting, Absalom played to perfection the part of the penitent, obedient son;
David then gave him a fatherly embrace, and the reconciliation was complete.
Seven years had passed since the death of Amnon. But now Absalom’s intrigues
commenced. No doubt he had frequent meetings with Ahithophel, and was following
his advice. He obtained chariots and horses from Egypt, procured a guard of
fifty men, and displayed regal grandeur. He arose betimes in the morning,
listened to disputes, and found every one’s case just, but regretted that the
king would not listen to all, and would not give justice to all. He hinted that
were he the judge, no one would have to complain of difficulty in obtaining his
dues. Absalom pursued this course for four years after the reconciliation with
his father. He was the handsomest man of his times. He was then about thirty,
and in the full pride of his strength. His beautiful thick hair fell in waves
over his neck and shoulders, like the mane of a lion. His affability won him
the hearts of all who approached him. David was so blinded that he did not see
how his crafty son was alienating the affections of the people from their
sovereign, whilst Absalom merely awaited a favourable opportunity to proceed
against his father, to dethrone him, and perhaps to attempt his life. This
opportunity soon offered itself.
It
appears that David was occupied, in the last decade of his reign, with a
comprehensive plan, apparently that of a great war which would require a
numerous body of soldiers. He had already enlisted bands of mercenaries, six
hundred Hittites, who, with their general Ittai, (whose admiration for David
secured his unswerving attachment), had arrived from Gath. The king also wished
to ascertain the number of able-bodied men over twenty years of age in all the
Israelitish tribes, in order to determine whether he could undertake with their
aid a campaign which would probably prove severe and tedious. The king
delegated the office of numbering the men who could bear arms to his
commander-in-chief, Joab, and the other generals. The work of enumeration
lasted nine months and twenty days. From the numbers which were handed in,
supposing them to be correct, it appears that, out of an entire population of 4,000,000, there
were 1,300,000 men and youths capable of bearing arms.
This
counting of the nation, however, proved to be a mistake for which David had to
pay heavily. The people were highly incensed against him. In itself the act was
displeasing to them, as they saw in it the preliminaries to enlistments for a
war of long duration; added to this was the fear that the counting itself must
be attended by evil results, for such was the view held in those days. A
fearful pestilence broke out, which carried off great numbers, and confirmed
all minds in the belief that it had arisen in consequence of the numbering of
the people. The capital, being densely populated, naturally suffered the
greatest loss from the pestilence. On seeing the heaps of corpses, or, to speak
in the metaphorical language of those days, at sight of “the angel of
Destruction” that had snatched away so many, David exclaimed:—“I have sinned
and done wrong, but what has my poor flock done? Let thy hand strike me and the
house of my fathers”. The plague having spared Mount Moriah, where the
Jebusites had settled, the prophet Gad bade the king erect an altar, and offer
up sacrifices on that mountain, and he announced that the pestilence would then
be averted from Jerusalem. Without hesitation, David and his entire court
repaired thither. When the chief of the Jebusites, Ornah (Araunah), saw David
approaching, he hurried to meet him, saluted him humbly, and asked what was his
desire. David then informed him that he wished to buy the mountain in order to
build an altar on it. Ornah graciously offered him the spot and all
appertaining to it as a gift, but David refused to accept it. No sooner was an
altar hastily erected there and a sacrifice offered, than the pestilence ceased
in Jerusalem. From that time Mount Moriah was considered a sacred spot, which
destruction could not approach; it was also the mountain on which Abraham was
supposed to have offered his son Isaac as a sacrifice.
In
consequence of this plague the nation conceived a dislike to David; it
condemned him for the loss of the thousands of human beings whom the Angel of
Destruction had snatched away. Ahithophel made use of this dislike in order to
avenge himself on David, and he employed Absalom as his tool, and, with him,
contrived a conspiracy which could not fail to succeed.
Absalom
secretly despatched messengers in every direction, in order to give those
adherents who were already attached to him the necessary signal. The
insurrection was to be set on foot in Hebron, an outpost of the tribe of Judah,
whose elders had already been won for Absalom. The latter invented subterfuges
by which to deceive David as to the true purpose of his visit to Hebron, and
the king permitted him to depart without suspicion.
Absalom
arrived at Hebron, attended by his friends and guards, and by two hundred
prominent men of Jerusalem, whom he had invited under some pretext, and who did
not suspect his real aims. These two hundred men, through their very ignorance
of matters, contributed to the success of the project. The people of Hebron,
seeing that even prominent men had joined Absalom’s party, gave up David’s
cause as lost. Ahithophel, who had likewise invented a pretext to absent
himself from court, openly declared for Absalom, thus giving his cause an
immense accession of power, as he was known to be David’s right hand.
The
traitorous plan succeeded but too well. The Hebronites and others present
saluted Absalom as king, forswore their allegiance to David, and sacrificed
burnt-offerings. Ambition prompted various members of David’s family also to
join Absalom. This was more especially the case with Amasa, his cousin, who
considered himself a great commander, and thought that Joab had unjustly been
preferred to him. The messengers then gave the signal previously agreed upon,
and the conspirators who sided with Absalom gathered together, and shouted
“Long live King Absalom!”. They carried with them all who had been incensed
against David for taking a census of the people, and in fact all who hoped to
gain some advantage from changes and dissension. The Benjamites, whom the accession
of David had deprived of supremacy, and the everdissatisfied Ephraimites, were
more particularly delighted at David’s downfall, and willingly did homage to
the usurper; they hoped to regain their former freedom through David’s
misfortunes. They had greater chances of obtaining power under Absalom, who was
very vain, and not likely to retain the favour of the nation for a long time,
than under the rule of David. The chief towns of all the tribes sent
ambassadors to Hebron to salute the new king, and his adherents daily increased
in number. At first the conspiracy was kept secret from those in authority; no
one was permitted to journey to Jerusalem, lest the news spread. David received
the information of his own dethronement and the accession of his son
simultaneously with the news that the houses of Judah and Israel had renounced
their allegiance to him.
It
was a terrible blow for the king. But his resolve was soon taken; he would not
resort to a civil war, as the sons of Zeruiah and many other faithful followers
probably urged him to do. Deserted by all the tribes, he would be obliged to
shut himself up in his capital. The city would not be able to resist the attack
of so large an army; and he saw, now that he was undeceived, that Absalom would
not scruple to turn Jerusalem into a sea of blood. David felt deeply wounded by
the alliance of Ahithophel with his usurping son, and he was greatly
discouraged by it. He saw, too late, that the conspiracy was of long standing,
that the plan had been maturely considered, and that resistance on his part
would only lead to his own destruction. He therefore announced to his people
that he would depart from Jerusalem in all haste, before Absalom could leave
Hebron with his numerous followers.
This
step was instrumental in proving to David that he still had faithful friends,
who would be true to him till death. When, on leaving his palace, he passed the
Place of the Sellers of Ointment, he observed to his great joy that a great
concourse followed him. Not only his general, Joab, with his brother, Abishai,
and their followers; not only a great number of the warrior-corps (Gibborim),
the hired troops, Cherethites and Pelethites, with Benaiah their leader, but
also the Hittite, with six hundred men, whom David had only a short time before
enlisted. The entire population wept aloud, whilst David withdrew to the Vale
of Kedron, where he mustered his followers before taking the road over the
Mount of Olives to the desert near the Jordan. He did not venture to take
refuge in a city from fear of treachery.
Later
on the two high priests Zadok and Abiathar with all the Levites hurried after
him, bearing the ark of the covenant with them. David, however, urged the
priests to return to Zion with the ark, saying, “If by God’s mercy I shall be
permitted to return to Jerusalem, then I shall again behold the ark of the
covenant and the sanctuary; if not, if God rejects me, I am ready to endure
what seemeth good unto Him”. It also appeared to him that the priests could be
of more service to him if they remained in Jerusalem than if they joined him
in exile. Whilst, then, the priests hastily took the ark back to Jerusalem,
David ascended the Mount of Olives barefoot, his head covered, and his face
bathed in tears. All his attendants wept bitterly. But when his grief and
despair had reached their climax, a friend, who was to give him help, came from
the other side of the Mount of Olives, and met him at its highest point. Hushai
from the city of Erech was a confidant of David, and a counsellor of no less
wisdom than Ahithophel. He advanced in mourning array, his garments torn, and
earth upon his head, prepared to share the king’s flight. David, however,
refused to permit this, because, being an aged man, he would only be a burden.
In Absalom’s vicinity he might do valiant service by counteracting Ahithophel’s
counsels, and by keeping David informed of all that occurred. Hushai therefore
repaired to Jerusalem.
The
first town through which David passed in his flight was the Benjamite city of
Bahurim. Far from meeting with a friendly reception there, he was received with
insult and neglect. A Benjamite named Shimei, of the house of Gera, reviled and
cursed him, saying, “Thou outcast and man of blood, God will repay thee for thy
treatment of the house of Saul, whose crown thou hast stolen”. He followed
David's march for a long distance, throwing stones and earth at him, so that
the soldiers had to shield the king. David, however, had some friends in
Bahurim also. Humbled and exhausted, the king at length accomplished the
journey through the desert, and reached the neighbourhood of Jericho with his
forces.
Here
he could recruit his energies after his recent bodily and mental exertions,
while awaiting the news which his faithful adherents would transmit to him from
Jerusalem.
When
David was approaching the banks of the Jordan, Absalom arrived in Jerusalem
with his traitorous adherents, among them Ahithophel, the faithless counsellor.
Ahithophel urged the usurper to commit ever greater crimes in order to widen
the breach between him and his father, and render a reconciliation impossible;
he advised him to take possession of his father’s harem. It mattered little to
Ahithophel that Absalom would incur the hatred of the people through this fresh
misdeed. His sole object was to revenge himself on David, and to ruin him. The
weakminded sinner who called himself king, and who was incapable of undertaking
anything, unless incited thereto by others, allowed himself to be induced to
commit this crime. But, whilst Absalom was revelling in sin, the man who was
destined to frustrate all his ruthless plans was near at hand. Hushai had
apparently submitted to the new king, and had assured him that he would serve
him as faithfully as he had served his father, and Absalom relied on this promise.
He called a council to consider the most expedient plan for defeating and
ruining his father. The elders of the tribes, who were in the city, were
invited to attend. Ahithophel gave the diabolical advice to attack David that
very night with a strong army, to disperse his following in a sudden onslaught
made by a force its superior in point of numbers, and to capture and slay the
king, whom he imagined to be utterly worn out and dispirited. But Absalom also
consulted Hushai with regard to the campaign against his father, and
Ahithophel’s advice was rejected by him as impracticable. Hushai urged such
plausible objections that Absalom was duped by them; he advised that David
should not be attacked with a small force, but that Absalom should raise from
the entire nation—from Dan to Beersheba— an army whose numbers would render it
irresistible. Hushai’s advice was more favourably received than Ahithophel’s,
and steps were forthwith taken to act upon it. The attack was postponed, and
the campaign was deferred till the numerous forces could be assembled. Hushai
immediately conveyed the results of the meeting to David by means of Jonathan
and Ahimaaz, the sons of the High Priest.
The
first result of these events was favourable to the cause of David, for
Ahithophel departed from Jerusalem, and hanged himself in his native town of
Gilo. He was led to this course either by disgust at Absalom’s conduct in
setting aside his counsel, or by the conviction that Absalom’s cause would be
lost through delay, and that he himself would reap well-deserved punishment.
This suicide was a severe blow to the usurper, for he had no capable man
amongst his followers, and he himself was neither warlike nor prudent. His
general Amasa had but little military genius. The enrolment of soldiers was
actually begun, but before it could be completed David had obtained an
important advantage. He went to Mahanaim, the inhabitants of which town
received him with a welcome as cordial as that which in former times they had
extended to the fugitive son of Saul. All the Israelites on the opposite side
of the Jordan offered their assistance, and placed themselves under his
command. Two men of Gilead outvied each other in attentions to the unhappy king
and father, and provided him and his followers with all necessaries. They were
old men—Barzillai from Rogelim, and Machir from Lodebar—and help came also from
Shobi, king of Ammon, the son of Nahash. When at length Absalom or Amasa had
succeeded in collecting a large force, they crossed the Jordan by means of
rafts, and approached Mahanaim. The Absalomites encamped opposite the wood
without any particular plan or order. David, on the other hand, divided his
army into three divisions, commanded respectively by Joab, Abishai and Ittai,
who were all proved and competent soldiers. David himself was not permitted to
accompany them, as his generals knew too well his love for his wicked son. The
contest cost many human lives. Although Absalom’s forces exceeded those of
David in point of numbers, yet they were defeated, for they were not well
disciplined, and were not able to find their way in the forest. David’s troops,
on the other hand, fought valiantly. The forest was more destructive than the
sword. Twenty thousand warriors are said to have fallen there. The forest of
Rephaim was also the cause of Absalom’s personal destruction. His long hair, of
which he was very vain, caught in the branches of an oak, and the mule he had
been riding galloped away. It seems providential that the death-blow was dealt
by Joab, who had formerly favoured him, and who had thus unwittingly assisted
him in his conspiracy. Joab then sounded the horn as a signal for David’s army
to cease from the contest, and the adherents of Absalom took to flight, and
crossed the Jordan.
Thus
ended the second civil war of David’s reign, a war which was the more unnatural
because of the close relationship between the rival combatants, and the sad
causes which led to the contest. The first duty of the victors was to transmit
the news of their triumph to David. This was in itself a painful office, for
all knew how deeply David would feel the death of his wicked son. David was
terrified at the news, wept and sobbed, and cried repeatedly, “My son, my son,
Absalom; would, I had fallen instead of thee!”. The depths of a father’s heart
are unsearchable. Perhaps, he considered Absalom in the light of a victim whom
Ahithophel had inveigled and urged on to rebellion. The warriors dared not
enter Mahanaim as victors, but repaired homewards stealthily, as though
humiliated after a defeat. David would see and speak to no one, but mourned
continually for his son’s loss. At length Joab took heart, and reproached him
in harsh terms for indulging in continued mourning, and thereby manifesting
ingratitude towards his soldiers. In order to rouse the king, Joab further
threatened that if he did not immediately show himself to his soldiers, and
address them kindly, his faithful followers would leave the same night, and he
would remain alone and helpless. These sharp words of the rough but faithful
Joab induced David to rouse himself, and appear before the people. The corpse
of Absalom was thrown into a cave, and covered with a heap of stones. He left a
beautiful daughter, but his three sons had been snatched away by death before
his revolt, as though it were destined that no son of his should witness the
attempt against his father’s life. During his short reign at Jerusalem, he had
erected a splendid monument in the “King’s Valley”, to perpetuate his own name.
Intended for his glorification, it became the commemoration of his disgrace.
After the close of the war, David contemplated returning to Jerusalem. He did
not wish, however, to force the tribes into submission, he preferred to await
their repentant return to him, and the renewal of their oaths of allegiance. It
was a curious fact that the tribes of the north were the first to take this
course. The voice of the people appealed to the elders to lead them back to
their king. They cried, “The king who delivered us from our enemies, and freed
us from the yoke of the Philistines, was forced by Absalom to flee from his own
country. Absalom is now dead. Why do you not hasten to bring back our king?
Come, let us lead him home”. Thereupon the elders of the tribes invited David
to return to his capital; and thus, a second time, they acknowledged him as
king. Contrary to all expectation, the tribe of Judah, and naturally the tribe
of Benjamin were still holding back. They did not move one step to welcome
their king. Probably the men of Judah felt bitterly ashamed of the revolt they
had started in Hebron, and did not venture to entreat David’s pardon. Perhaps,
too, the discontent which had incited them to forswear their allegiance was
still at work amongst them. It seems that Amasa, who had fled to Jerusalem
after the defeat in the forest of Gilead, still exercised great influence over
the men of Judah.
When
David saw that the tribe of Judah was still holding aloof from him, he
commanded the two priests, Zadok and Abiathar, who had remained in Jerusalem,
to admonish the elders of Judah to invite their king to return. He told the
priests to assure Amasa that he would not only receive a free pardon, but even
retain his rank as general. With this prospect before him, Amasa determined to
accept David’s offers, and he persuaded the elders to accede to the king's
proposal. The men of Judah thereupon sent an invitation to David, and an
embassy went forth to meet the king, and receive him at Gilgal. The men of
Benjamin were sorely puzzled by this conduct. What were they to do? The
Benjamites had publicly shown themselves inimical to David when he had fled
from Jerusalem through their territory; they had not thought it possible that
he would ever return, and reclaim his throne. Now affairs had changed, and not
only the northern tribes, but even Judah was preparing to do him homage. The
Benjamites felt no attachment to David, but they could not isolate themselves,
for then the king’s wrath would fall heavily on them. Shimei, whose insults had
caused David such bitter pain during his flight, and who, in consequence, had
most cause to fear the king’s anger, advised that they should display intense
enthusiasm for David’s cause, exceeding that of the other tribes, since, by
appealing to his generosity, they might incline him favourably towards them. In
obedience to this advice, one thousand Benjamites went forward to meet David,
joined the Judaean embassy, and, on arriving at the bank of the Jordan, threw a
bridge across the river in order to facilitate the king’s transit. Meanwhile
the king had left Mahanaim, and was approaching the Jordan, attended by his
court, his servants, and the faithful followers who had joined him on the
opposite shore. Shimei advanced before all the others, threw himself at the
king’s feet as he was about to cross the river, acknowledged his fault, and
entreated David's forgiveness. David now returned with a larger concourse of
followers than had accompanied him on his flight across the Jordan: he was
attended by the Judaean embassy, by a thousand Benjamites, and by the faithful
friends who formed his guard of honour. The first town reached after crossing
the Jordan was Gilgal. Here the ambassadors of the different tribes on this
side of the river were assembled to renew their homage; they felt surprised and
annoyed that the Judaeans had stolen a march on them by meeting the king at
the very shore of the Jordan. They saw in this eager display of loyalty, which
they could not consider sincere, an effort on the part of the house of Judah to
regain the king’s favour, to the detriment of the house of Israel.
The
elders of Israel made no secret of their displeasure, and gave vent to it in
David’s presence; the Judaeans, however, retaliated on them. The question of
precedency degenerated into a violent quarrel, the Judaeans making angry
retorts, thus offending the northern tribes still more. Bitter animosity arose
between the contending parties; David appears to have inclined to the side of
the Judaeans. Sheba, a Benjamite of the family of Bichri, taking advantage of
the general confusion, sounded the trumpet and cried, “We have no portion in
David, and no share in the son of Jesse; let every Israelite return to his
tent”. Heeding this cry, the elders of the northern tribes withdrew, and
followed Sheba the Bichrite. The men of Judah alone remained faithful to David,
and accompanied him to Jerusalem. The joy of their return was mingled with
annoyance: a fresh breach had arisen, a civil war was imminent. At this sad
juncture David had recourse to a step which may be considered either very wise
or very foolish. Joab had become obnoxious to him since the
king had learned that he had killed Absalom, and David did not wish him to fill
the office of general any longer. Besides this, he desired to keep his word
with Amasa, and to appoint him to the office of commander-in-chief. David,
being now dependent on the tribe of Judah, felt the necessity of retaining
Amasa’s good-will, as the latter's influence had immense weight with the
Judaeans. Without consulting Joab, he commanded Amasa to summon the forces of
the tribe of Judah within three days, in order to proceed against the rebels.
The time expired, and Amasa did not return. David became uneasy; he thought
Amasa might have deceived him, and made common cause with the insurgents. It
was necessary to be expeditious, lest Sheba’s followers increase in numbers,
and also gain time to occupy fortified cities. David had no choice but to turn
to the sons of Zeruiah, who, in their unswerving fidelity, had remained true to
him in spite of frequent slights, and whose skill in matters of war he had
amply tested. David would not, however, give the supreme command to Joab, but
entrusted it to his brother Abishai. He set out with the Cherethites and
Pelethites, who were to form the nucleus of the army which he hoped to collect
on the way. Joab overlooked the insult which had been offered him, and joined
the troops, or rather became their leader. He appears to have issued an appeal
to the people to gather around him. When Amasa joined them in Gibeon, Joab
killed him with one stroke of his sword, and the Judaeans, whom Amasa had
collected, followed the sons of Zeruiah. In all the towns, fresh partisans and
followers attached themselves to David’s cause. Sheba found but few adherents,
the northern tribes being unwilling to begin a civil war for the sake of a man
who was but little known, and who was followed only by a small band of
soldiers. He had thrown himself into the fortified town of Abel, and a part of
his followers occupied the town of Dan, which lay at an hour’s distance from
the base of Mount Hermon, not far from the source of the Jordan. Joab quickly
ordered a trench to be dug round the town of Abel, and without calling on the
inhabitants to surrender, he began to undermine the walls. The inhabitants
became greatly alarmed. Then a wise woman called from the wall to the sappers
below to summon Joab. When he approached, she addressed him reproachfully,
“Thou shouldst have asked first in Abel and Dan that thou mightest have heard,
whether all those who are faithful and peace-loving have departed from Israel.
Why wilt thou slaughter the mothers and the children of Israel? Why wilt thou
destroy the inheritance of Jacob?”. Joab replied that
he did not wish to do this, that he merely desired to capture the man who had
lifted his hand against the king. On this the woman promised that the head of
the rebel should soon be thrown over the wall. She kept her word, for she
secretly persuaded her fellow-citizens to separate Sheba from his few
followers, and to kill him. His gory head was cast over the wall, and Joab
raised the siege, dismissed his soldiers, and returned to Jerusalem with the
news of his victory. The king was obliged, against his will, to leave him in
command of the army.
David
returned to his capital with a purged soul. He had suffered and atoned heavily
for his sins. He had taken away the wife of his faithful servant, and his son
had taken away his wives. He had spilt Uriah’s blood, and the streams of bloodshed in his
own house had almost overwhelmed him. He had found by bitter experience that
even the best king cannot build on his peoples love. His plan of undertaking a
great war against his heathen foes was shattered. He, therefore, in his old
age, during the last years of his reign, confined his attention to the internal
affairs of his kingdom. He wished to carry out, before death overtook him, an
idea he had long cherished. He wished to build a magnificent temple to the God
of Israel, who had rescued him in his many troubles. Before commencing, David
consulted Nathan, the prophet; for in those days the prophet ranked higher than
the priest. He said, “I live in a palace of cedar wood, whilst the Ark of God
is only in a temporary tent. I will build a temple of cedar for it!”. Nathan
approved the plan and said, “Carry out all that is in thy heart, for God is
with thee!”. The next day, however, the prophet came to him, and revealed to
David that he was not destined to build a temple, because he had shed blood,
but that this task would be reserved for his son. At the same time David was
informed that his throne was established for many years to come,—that a long
succession of kings would descend from him, and occupy his throne, provided
that they walked in the ways of God. Much as David had wished to build a
stately temple in Jerusalem, he bowed humbly to the divine decree revealed to
him by Nathan, and gave up his project. Before the ark of the covenant, he
thanked God in a heartfelt prayer for the mercies bestowed on him, who had been
raised up from the dust. His heart was filled with gratitude that his royal
house and his throne were to be established for many years to come. David gave
expression to this feeling in a psalm, which, however, has not the same verve as
his former songs; it was, perhaps, his last poetic prayer.
Although
David did not commence the erection of the temple himself, he began to make the
necessary preparations. He devoted to the sanctuary a part of the booty which
he had acquired from the conquered nations. He also regulated the order in
which divine services were to be conducted, by having, according to Samuel's
method, choirs of Levites to play on the harp and sing psalms, in addition to
the ordinary sacrificial rites. He is also considered the inventor of the
various musical instruments which were later on introduced into the service.
David’s
vital energy began to decrease before he had attained his seventy-first year.
The anxieties of his youth, the constant warfare, the exciting events in his
own family, Amnon’s sinfulness and Absalom’s revolt caused him to grow old at a
comparatively early age. He felt no warmth in his body; he felt cold despite
the torrid heat of Jerusalem, and all the clothes which he could procure did
not seem to supply him with the necessary vital heat.
Adonijah,
the king's fourth son, endeavoured, by taking advantage of David’s failing
powers, to secure the succession. He was the next heir after Amnon and Absalom,
but he feared that he might be passed over if he awaited the death of his
father, and he had probably heard of the secret understanding, according to
which the son of Bathsheba, his youngest brother, was to succeed to the throne.
Adonijah had no desire to rebel against his father as Absalom had done, he
merely wished to have his right to the succession recognised by the chief
dignitaries of the kingdom. He therefore took counsel with those of David’s
court who were opposed to Solomon’s succession. Foremost amongst these was
Joab, who supported him as he had formerly supported Absalom. Adonijah’s other
confidant was Abiathar, the second of the high priests, who seems to have been
placed in an inferior position by David. Zadok, whose family had been appointed
hereditary high priests by Saul at Gibeon, had been retained in that position
by David, who wished to secure his support, and therefore bestowed upon him the
highest rank in the sanctuary. Abiathar may have felt hurt by this neglect, and
perhaps took the part of Adonijah in order to secure the position he could not
hope to obtain under Solomon. The other sons of the king also wished to see the
throne assured to Adonijah, and thus intrigues at the court commenced afresh.
Adonijah was as handsome arid as popular as Absalom had been, and also, it
appears, as thoughtless and as unfit for governing. Like Absalom, he began to
draw the eyes of the people upon himself by a truly royal display; he procured
chariots and attendants on horseback, and kept a guard of fifty runners, who
preceded him wherever he went. David was weak in his behaviour to him, as he
had been to Absalom—permitted him to have his own way, and thus tacitly
acknowledged him as his successor. One day Adonijah invited his confidants,
Joab, Abiathar, and all the king’s sons excepting Solomon, to a meeting. They
offered up sacrifices near a well, and during the feast his followers cried,
“Long live King Adonijah!”.
The
first to take exception to Adonijah’s proceedings was Nathan the prophet. He
knew of the secret promise, given by David to his wife Bathsheba, that Solomon
should inherit the crown. He had also revealed to David that Solomon was
appointed by God to be his successor. He seems to have had confidence in
Solomon's character, and to have expected better things from him than from
Adonijah. Nathan, therefore, went to Bathsheba, and they devised a plan by
which Adonijah’s scheme might be overthrown. Bathsheba then repaired to the
king, reminded him of his oath, and directed his attention to the fact that, in
the event of Adonijah’s succession, she and her son both would be lost, and her
marriage would be branded with ignominy.
Hardly
had she ended the description of the sad fate which awaited her if Solomon’s
claims were set aside, when the prophet Nathan was announced, and confirmed her
assertions. David's resolve was quickly taken, and carried into effect on the
same day, for he was most anxious to keep his oath to leave the sceptre to
Solomon. He called upon the dignitaries who had not conspired with Adonijah, on
Zadok, Benaiah and the warriors, and announced to them his resolve that Solomon
should be anointed king during his own lifetime, and they all solemnly promised
to acknowledge Solomon. Thereupon, David summoned the Cherethites and
Pelethites to attend his son. Solomon then mounted one of the royal mules, and
proceeded to the valley of Gihon, to the west of the town. A crowd of people
joined the procession, and when the high-priest Zadok and the prophet Nathan
had anointed him with oil from the tent of the sanctuary, the soldiers blew
their trumpets, and all the people cried, “Long live King Solomon!”
Great
excitement now prevailed in Jerusalem. While the eastern mountains echoed with
the cry of “Long live King Adonijah!” the western chain was resounding with
shouts of “Long live King Solomon!”. Had both the king’s sons and their
adherents remained obstinate, a civil war must have ensued. But Adonijah was
not like Absalom—he did not wish to excite a rebellion. Nor would his chief
supporters, Joab and Abiathar, have assisted him in such an attempt. No sooner
did Adonijah hear that Solomon had been anointed king by his father’s command
than his courage failed him. He hastened to the sanctuary at Zion in order to
seek refuge in the holy of holies. Solomon, however, who had immediately taken
the reins of government, sent to inform him that he might leave the sanctuary,
that not a hair of his head should be touched so long as he did not attempt any
fresh revolt. Adonijah then repaired to the young king, paid him due homage,
and was dismissed with presents. Thus the contest for the succession ended.
Davi’s
weakness gradually increased, until after a stormy reign of forty years and six
months (1015), he expired peacefully. He was the first to occupy a place in the royal
mausoleum which he had built in a rocky cave on the southern slope of Mount
Zion.
David’s
death was deeply mourned. He had made the nation great, independent and happy,
and death transfigured him. When he had passed away, the nation began to
realise the true value of his work, and what he had been to them. He had
reunited the various tribes, each of which had before followed its own special
interests, and he formed them into one nation. The revolts of Absalom and Sheba
proved sufficiently how strong the feeling had become which bound the tribes
together. The house of Israel did not seize the opportunity offered by his
death of severing itself from the house of Judah, and great as was their
jealousy of each other, they held together. David had removed every inducement
for party divisions, and had knit them together with a kind but firm hand.
During his reign the priesthood and the prophets worked amicably together. Thus
Solomon was anointed by the high priest Zadok in conjunction with the prophet
Nathan. David maintained friendly relations between the priestly houses of
Eleazar and Ithamar, represented by Zadok and Abiathar respectively. The nation
had no reason to complain of oppression, for he dealt justly to the extent of
his ability. By destroying the power of the Philistines, who had so long held
the neighbouring tribes in subjection, and by conquering the nations inhabiting
the banks of the Euphrates, he had not only established internal prosperity,
but had also founded a great empire which could vie in power with Egypt, and
had cast into the shade the Chaldean and Assyrian kingdoms on the Euphrates and
the Tigris. By this means he had roused the people to the proud consciousness
that it constituted a mighty nation of the Lord, the possessor of the law of
God, the superior of the neighbouring nations. David’s sins were gradually
forgotten, for his atonement had been both grievous and manifold. Posterity
pronounced a milder judgment on him than did his contemporaries. The
remembrance of his great deeds, his kindness, his obedience to God, caused him
to appear invested with the traits of an ideal king, who served as a pattern to
all later rulers,—one who had always walked in the ways of God, and never
departed therefrom. The kings of his house who succeeded him were measured by
his standard, and were judged by the extent of their resemblance to him.
David’s
reign shone through the ages as perfect,—as one in which power and humility,
fear of God and peace were united. Every succeeding century added its tribute
to David’s character, until he became the ideal of a virtuous king and sacred
poet.
SOLOMON (970-931 BC)
DAVID had left affairs in Israel in such perfect
order that his successor, unless he were a fool or a knave, or the victim of
evil advice, would have but little trouble in governing. Solomon, however,
carried David's work still further. He shed such lustre upon Israel that even
the most distant generations basked in the light that emanated from his wise
rule. Indeed, a king who solidifies and increases, if he does not actually
found, the greatness of the State; who permits his people the enjoyment of
peace; who sheds the bounties of plenty over his land, driving poverty away
from the meanest hovel; who opens up new channels for the development of his
people's powers, and who thus increases and strengthens them; a king who has
the intelligence to arouse his subjects to exercise their mental gifts, and
cultivate their love of the beautiful; who, by his material and spiritual
creations, elevates his country to the dignity of a model State, such as had
never been before him and scarcely ever after him;—such a monarch assuredly
deserves the high praise which posterity has accorded to him. Carried away by
the greatness of his deeds—for all these grand characteristics were strikingly
prominent in Solomon—men shut their eyes to his weaknesses, and considered them
the inevitable result of human imperfection. In the first place he strove to
preserve peace for his country, though his father had left him ample means for
making fresh conquests. He was called the king of peace—“Shelomo”.
By giving to his people the comforts of prosperity, he widened its horizon, and
raised its self-respect. He ruled it with wisdom and justice, and decided with
strict impartiality all contests between individuals as well as tribes. He
increased the number of towns, and secured the safety of the roads and of the
caravans. He filled the city of Jerusalem with splendour, and built therein a
magnificent temple in honour of God. He himself cultivated the fine arts and
poetry, and thereby endowed them with fresh attractions in the eyes of the people.
Lastly, he set great aims before the nation, and was rightly called the wise
king.
History, the impartial arbitress, cannot, however, be
blinded by his dazzling virtues to the blemishes which attach to his
government, and which must be accounted the cause of the unfortunate breach
which commenced when his grave was scarcely closed. The beginning of Solomon’s
rule was not free from stains of blood, and its end was clouded with mists,
which dimmed its brightness; his love of splendour became injurious to
morality; it made him despotic, and imposed a burden on the people, which it
bore for a considerable time, but shook off at the first favourable
opportunity. Solomon converted the kingly power into an autocracy, under which
every will had to be subservient to his. But these blemishes were entirely
hidden by the greatness of the achievements under his rule. It is impossible
now to decide how far the responsibility of Solomon for these evils goes, how
much of the blame rests with his too officious servants, and to what extent
their existence must be attributed to the irresistible force of circumstances,
to which the exalted and the lowly-alike must submit. It is the curse of
crowned heads that the worthiest wearer of a crown, in order to consolidate his
power, is induced to take steps which his conscience would under other
circumstances condemn, and the misdeeds of his servants are also added to his
account.
Solomon was young—scarcely twenty—when he ascended the
throne. After his accession, whilst visiting the altar at Gibeon, we are told,
he had a vision in which God asked him to express the innermost wish of his
heart, with the promise that it should be fulfilled. He did not choose long
life, nor riches, nor honour, nor the death of his enemies; but he chose
wisdom, in order that he might rule his people with justice. In fact, this
wisdom, this power of entering into the feelings and minds of the dissenting parties
who appeared before him, of seizing on the true state of the case in spite of
exaggeration and subtle arguments, Solomon possessed to an extraordinary
degree. The Solomonic judgment is well known. By giving a verdict which was
well adapted to reveal the real feeling of a mother, he recognised, in a
dispute between two women for the possession of a child, on which side was
truth, on which side falsehood. “Cut the child in half”, he said. But its real
mother could not accept this decision, and offered rather to give up her child.
He was determined that no one in his kingdom should suffer from injustice.
Though he may not have been the first that uttered the saying, “through justice
a throne is established”, yet it was a maxim after his own heart.
The wisdom of Solomon is also displayed to great
advantage in another direction, namely, in his poetic productions. These were
chiefly allegorical poems (Mashal); in them he caused the lofty cedars of
Lebanon, and the lowly creeping wall plants, to appear as the emblems of what
is highest and humblest; quadrupeds, birds of the air, reptiles, and even dumb
fish are given voice and speech. Each of these fables probably ended with an
appropriate moral lesson. It has been related that Solomon composed three thousand
of such fables and five thousand songs or proverbs.
But Solomon was by no means the originator of this
style of fiction. Long before him such compositions had been common among the
Israelites. Standing on Mount Gerizim, Jotham, the son of the Judge Gideon,
addressed the misguided people of Shechem in an ingenious parable. The prophet
Nathan had disguised his exhortation to David respecting his sin with Bathsheba
in the form of a parable. But though not the inventor of this branch of poetry,
Solomon is still deserving of praise for devoting the time left unoccupied by
the cares of government to its further development. His rare qualities of mind
were displayed in yet another direction. In some of his compositions he
delineates types of persons and things by means of allusions, the hidden
meaning of which is. left to guessing. Such enigmas, presented in a poetic
form, were in those days the favourite diversions of social gatherings and
feasts, and Solomon possessed remarkable ingenuity in devising these
recreations of the human mind.
He was, however, guilty of errors, the greater part of
which arose from an exaggerated idea of his royal dignity, and from imitating
the kings of the neighbouring states of Tyre and Egypt, with whom he was in
constant intercourse. He claimed for himself a prerogative almost impious in a
mortal, namely, that of being considered identical with the State,—all
interests were to centre in him, and all else was to be of comparatively little
importance. Solomon's wisdom ran aground on this rock. The truth of Samuel’s
prediction, at the time of the election of a ruler, was better proven by the
wise king than by his predecessors.
Unfortunately Solomon was a younger son, to whom the
throne had been allotted contrary to the ordinary laws of succession, whilst
Adonijah, whom a portion of the people had recognised as king, was considered
the rightful heir. So long as the latter lived, Solomon's government could not
be on a firm basis, and he could never feel himself secure. Adonijah,
therefore, had to be removed; the leader of the body guard, Benaiah, forcibly
entered his house, and killed him. As an excuse for this act of violence, it was
asserted that Adonijah had attempted to win the hand of Abishag, the young
widow of David, and thus had revealed his traitorous intention of contesting
his brother’s right to the throne. No sooner had he fallen than Joab, the
former adherent of Adonijah, feared that a similar fate would overtake him.
This exemplary general, who had contributed so considerably to the
aggrandisement of the people of Israel and the power of the house of David,
fled to the altar on Mount Zion, and clung to it, hoping to escape death.
Benaiah, however, refused to respect his place of refuge, and shed his blood at
the altar. In order to excuse this crime, it was given out that David himself,
on his deathbed, had impressed on his successor the duty of revenging the death
of Abner and Amasa. Joab, who had killed them in times of peace, was not to be
allowed, in spite of his venerable age, to die in peace.
It is uncertain whether Benaiah was Solomon’s evil
adviser, or merely his instrument. Joab’s death was the cause of great joy
amongst the enemies of Israel, and aroused in them the courage to plan a
rebellion. Adonijah’s priestly partisan, Abiathar, whom Solomon did not dare
touch, was deprived of his office as high priest, and Zadok was made the sole
head of the priesthood, and his descendants, invested with that dignity,
maintained it for over a thousand years, whilst the offspring of Abiathar were
neglected.—The Benjamite Shimei, who had pursued David with execrations on
his flight from Jerusalem, was also executed, and it was only through this
threefold deed of blood that Solomon’s throne appears to have gained stability.
Solomon then directed his attention to the formation
of a court of the greatest magnificence, such as was befitting the powerful
king whose commands were obeyed from the boundaries of Egypt to the banks of
the Euphrates. In those days many wives were considered a necessary adjunct to
the king’s dignity; David had about sixteen wives, but this was an
insignificant number as compared with that of the kings of Egypt and Phoenicia,
whom Solomon had taken for his pattern. It was only in compliance with this
common but corrupt practice that Solomon formed an immense harem. His first
wife was Naamah (the beautiful), an Ammonite princess; he also had other
wives from the Moabite and Aramaean courts, and even from those of the Hittite
and Caananite kings; but what most gratified his
pride was that the Egyptian king Psusennes gave him
his daughter in marriage. Solomon thought that in acting thus he had taken a
wise step, and that his country and his dynasty would be benefited by the
alliance. But the result proved the contrary. The daughter of Psusennes was naturally received with every mark of
attention in the Israelitish capital; she became the first queen in Solomon's
harem, but it seemed to him a disgrace that he could not place a magnificent
palace at the disposal of this queen. What was the cedar palace built by David
on Mount Zion, when compared with the gigantic edifices and labyrinthine
palaces of the kings of Egypt? Solomon, therefore, determined to build a palace
worthy of her.
Through the alliance with Egypt, innovations of great
consequence were made in Israel, among them the introduction of horses and
chariots.
Solomon also entered into close and friendly
connection with Hiram, king of Tyre, with whom David had already established a
neighbourly intimacy. He appears to have married a daughter of Hiram, too, and
this close bond between Solomon and Hiram seems to have led to important and
extensive undertakings.
The establishment of a large harem demanded an immense
body of servants. Solomon maintained a most brilliant court. The ambassadors of
tributary and friendly powers had to be received with great pomp, for Solomon
laid great stress on the display of splendour, and the maintenance of his court
demanded the expenditure of large sums of money. As he could not otherwise
obtain means, the royal house not having extensive estates in its own right,
the people had to defray his enormous expenses. The whole land was divided into
twelve parts, and a Governor was placed over each division to see that the
inhabitants contributed one month’s provisions every year; the purpose of this
division seems to have been that the old system of tribal organisation might
cease. A superior, or Vizier, whose duty it was to see that the tribute of
natural products was sent in regularly, was appointed over these twelve
officials. Solomon displayed heightened grandeur in his buildings. He was
anxious in the first instance to raise a splendid temple to the God of Israel
in the capital of his country. It could not be a matter of indifference to him
that in the neighbouring lands of Egypt and Phoenicia, with the rulers of which
he was intimately acquainted, gigantic temples were raised for the various
gods, whilst in his country the sanctuary was merely placed in a tent. Solomon,
therefore, immediately after his accession to the throne, made preparations for
commencing the erection of a sacred edifice; the site was already chosen. It
was to be on Mount Moriah, to the north-east of the city, where David had
raised an altar after the pestilence had ceased. Silver and gold had been
collected for the purpose, but building materials, stones and cedar wood still
had to be procured. Freestones and blocks had to be hewn from the rocks in the
quarries north of Jerusalem, where they were so dovetailed as to be easily
joined after reaching the spot. But whence procure workmen for this troublesome
business of hewing, preparing and conveying the stones? Solomon had learnt from
Pharaoh Psusennes, his father-in-law, the means of
obtaining workmen without incurring heavy expense. He employed the remnant of
the Canaanite population still living in the country. Although Saul had begun
to decrease their numbers, he could not proceed against them with his full
strength, on account of his continual strife with David. David had left them
undisturbed, so that they lived quietly, mixed peaceably with the Israelites,
and served the king faithfully in his wars against the Philistines and other
nations. Solomon, on the contrary, declared the remnant of the Ammonites,
Hittites, Perizzites and Hivites, as well as the Jebusites (whom David had
permitted to live in the outskirts of Jerusalem), to be bondmen, and compelled
them to perform the hardest labour. They numbered 150,000 youths and
able-bodied men, and comprised the working class. More than 3,000
Israelitish superintendents kept the enslaved natives to their work. A superior
officer, Adoniram, watched over the superintendents and the workmen. Eighty
thousand of these unhappy beings worked in the stone quarries day and night by
the light of lamps. They were under the direction of a man from Biblos (Giblim), who understood
the art of hewing heavy blocks from the rocks, and of giving the edges the
necessary shape for dovetailing. Twenty thousand slaves removed the heavy
blocks from the mouth of the quarry, and carried them to the building site.
Hiram, the King of Tyre, Solomon’s friend, supplied
cedar and cypress wood. The trees were felled on Lebanon, for which purpose
Hiram placed skilled workmen at Solomon's disposal. The trunks were forwarded
from Lebanon to Tyre or to the other harbours, whence they were conveyed in
rafts to the port of Jaffa, and from there with much toil over hills and dales
to Jerusalem, a distance of at least a ten hours’ journey. As the Canaanite
slaves were not sufficiently numerous to remove the cedar and cypress trees,
and to convey them to their destination, Solomon employed Israelites to assist
in the work, thirty thousand being impressed for the duty. Each ten thousand
were sent for a month to work in the forests, to fell the trees, and convey
them to their destination. After a month had passed, the workmen were relieved
by another body of ten thousand. These thirty thousand Israelites were not
enslaved—they remained free, and even received wages—but they were not allowed
to withdraw voluntarily from the work.
It was not to be expected that Hiram would cut down
his cedar and cypress forests, or that he would place carpenters and builders
at Solomon’s disposal without receiving some return. So long as the buildings
were in course of erection, Solomon sent him annually a certain amount of corn,
wine and oil, with the raising of which tribute the people were probably taxed.
But Hiram was also obliged to advance gold for the adornment of the interior of
the temple. Solomon’s fleet had not yet imported the precious metal. In return
for the supply of gold, Solomon yielded up to Hiram twenty towns of the
borderland, in the tribe of Asher, between Phoenicia and the territory of
Israel. Though these were not important, and did not please Hiram, still it was
a transference of Israelitish territory to the Phoenicians. Hiram permitted
various races to colonise the towns, from whom the territory received the name
“Gelil Haggoyim” (the
district of nations), later Galilee. As soon as the stones and blocks of wood
had been removed to the building site of the temple, the erection of which was
to occupy three years, the work was commenced.
The temple was built of freestone, and the walls were
covered with cedar planks on the inside. On these were traced designs of palms,
open flower cups, and cherubim (winged heads with human faces), and these
designs were inlaid with gold. The temple was sixty cubits long, twenty cubits
wide, and thirty cubits high. It was divided into the Holy of Holies (Debir,
the inner chamber, a square of twenty cubits), and the Holy Place (Hechal, which was forty cubits long). The Holy of Holies
seems to have been situated on higher ground than the sanctuary. At the sides
were two cherubim of gilded olive wood, each ten cubits high, the wings of
which were five cubits wide. At the entrance of the sanctuary was an open
vestibule (Ulam), which was of the same width as the sanctuary, and ten cubits
in length, and in front of this hall there were artistically wrought columns of
bronze. The artist, Hiram, was a half-Jew, his father being a Syrian and his
mother a Naphtalite. The Holy of Holies was to face
the west, contrary to the custom of the Gentiles, whose temples faced the
rising sun; the gates were of olive wood, adorned with gilded cherubim as well
as with palms and flower-cups. The folding doors of the sanctuary, made of
cypress wood, were ornamented in a like manner, and the floor was of cypress
wood inlaid with gold. In the Holy of Holies nothing was visible but the
cherubim, intended to enshrine the ark of the covenant, in which the tablets of
the law were kept. In the sanctuary there was an altar of cedar wood gilded on
all sides, with five gilded candlesticks at each side, and a large gilded table
for twelve loaves. The temple was surrounded by an extensive courtyard. Inside
the vestibule stood a large iron altar, and a spacious water reservoir, called
the “iron sea”, adorned with a border of open flower-cups and lily-buds, and on
the lower part with colocynths. This reservoir was supported by twelve iron
bulls, each three of which turned in a different direction. The water was
intended for washing the hands and feet of the officiating priests whenever
they entered the sanctuary, the flow of water probably being regulated by a
faucet. Ten small basins on wheels, artistically engraved, could be pushed to
any spot where they might be wanted. Vessels for the sacrificial rites were
cast in large quantities by the order of the king. The whole building inside
and outside was stamped with the impress of wealth and grandeur. At the
completion of the building, it was consecrated (1007) with solemn
rites. The erection of the temple had occupied seven years, and the month
selected for the consecration was that in which the harvest and the vintage
were completed. The chiefs of all the tribes and the elders of families were
invited, and people streamed from every quarter to gaze in astonishment at the
splendours of the temple, and to look upon the unaccustomed spectacle.
The solemnities commenced with the transfer of the ark
from Mount Zion, the town of David, to Mount Moriah. The bars attached to the
ark were those which had been used during the wanderings in the desert. They
were so placed that all present could see that holy relic of past ages, the two
stone tables inscribed with the ten commandments. During the transfer of the
ark of the covenant, and during the consecration, many thousands of sacrifices
were offered, and also psalms were sung. No sooner had the ark of the covenant
been brought into the Holy of Holies than a thick cloud filled the body of the
temple, so that the Aaronites were interrupted in their service. This was
considered a token of God's mercy, and a sign that the consecration had been
performed in accordance with His will. The vast assembly was thus swayed by the
feelings of joy, piety and devotion. The king gave expression to the general
sentiments in a few grave words: “God has promised to dwell in a cloud. I have
built a dwelling for thee, O God—an abode for thee to dwell in for ever”. Mount
Moriah thus appeared like Mount Sinai, where the voice of God had spoken from
out of a dense cloud. The temple became an object of veneration to the people,
who believed that from between the two cherubim, God would make known to them
the ways in which they were to walk. A prophet who was present (perhaps Ahijah
of Shiloh) announced to King Solomon in the name of God, “If thou wilt walk in
my law, and obey my commands, and fulfil my behests, then I will fulfil unto
thee the promise I made unto David, thy father—I shall dwell in the midst
of the sons of Israel, and I will not desert my people”.
The nation celebrated the autumn festivals, which
occurred simultaneously with the consecration, most joyfully. Deep and lasting
was the impression made by this temple, gleaming with gold and bronze,
sumptuous and imposing in its structure, containing no visible image of the
Deity, yet filled with His invisible presence. The house of God offered
something tangible to those whose imaginations could not conceive of the
spiritual, divested of material form. The temple was the pride and strength of
Israel, and the delight of its eyes. At the time of the consecration there was
inaugurated a religious service, such as had been impossible within the narrow
limits of the sanctuary in Shiloh or, during the transition period, in the tent
at Zion. A priesthood had certainly existed even in former times, and belonged
exclusively to the descendants of Aaron. It was, however, only under Solomon
that a high priest was put at the head of the others, and that gradations in
rank were introduced. Azariah, the son of Zadok, was advanced to the office of
high priest after the death of his father, and was assisted by the inferior
priests. A new order of service was arranged for the Levites, who
were subordinate to the priests: A part of them assisted at the sacrificial services.
Another part kept guard at four sides of the temple, and were charged with the
care of the sacred vessels, and with all preparations for the temple service.
Lastly, certain families took part in the singing and the instrumental music
that accompanied the services. It was the temple and the new order of worship
introduced there that actually raised Jerusalem to the position of the capital
of the country. Pilgrims from all the tribes attended the autumnal festivals
there, in order to witness the solemn divine services, such as could be held at
no tribal altar. Jerusalem gradually becoming an important commercial town, in
which foreign goods and curiosities were displayed, attracted ever greater
numbers of visitors from all the tribes. Thus the youngest of the cities in the
land of Israel surpassed and outshone all the older towns. Solomon gave orders
that the capital be fortified on all sides, and that the temple also be
included within the line of fortifications.
The erection of the royal palace occupied a period of
more than thirteen years. It consisted of a series of buildings which extended
over a great area on the northern hill, in the quarter called Millo. Next to
the entrance was the House of the Forest of Lebanon, which took its name from
the numerous pillars of cedar, which were ranged in rows of fifteen each. This
house served as the Armoury for the king’s protection. Here thirteen hundred
guards kept watch; they were provided with spears and shields of gold, and
acted as the king’s attendants when he proceeded to the temple. Great attention
was given by Solomon to the fitting up of the Judgment or Throne Chamber. The
walls from the floor to the ceiling were covered with cedar wood, and adorned
with gold fretwork. In this hall Solomon’s throne was placed. It was considered
a marvel of workmanship. It was ornamented with ivory, and inlaid with gold.
Six steps led up to it, and on each step were two artistically wrought lions,
the symbols of power and of royal dignity. The seat was supported on each side
by arms, and on it also were two lions. In the hall of public justice Solomon
heard contesting parties, and pronounced judgment: he considered his office of
judge one of the holiest and most important connected with his kingly dignity.
Here he also received the ambassadors of the various countries, who attended
his court to offer their homage, or to negotiate new treaties. A special palace
was built for the king, his servants and his wives, a separate house being
reserved for the Egyptian princess. It appears that her removal from David's
house to her own residence was effected with great pomp. Probably Solomon had
also an aqueduct built so as to supply the town of Jerusalem and the temple
with water from the rich spring of Etam, which was at a two hours' journey from
Jerusalem.
The practice of building splendid edifices of cedar
was not confined to Solomon; the great nobles and princes who lived in
Jerusalem, the high officers, and his favourites, all followed his example.
With the wealth that streamed into the land through the opening of three
important channels, the love of show, which spread from the king to the higher
classes, could be freely gratified. Phoenician merchants of high standing, who
carried on a large wholesale trade, money-changers, men of wealth who lent money
on interest, now settled in Jerusalem. They composed a special corporation or
guild, and were under the protection of the treaty between Solomon and Hiram.
They were permitted to live according to their own laws, and were even allowed
to practise their religious or, rather, idolatrous rites. The three great
sources of wealth were the Powerful
Position of the State, the Alliance with Egypt, and
the Indian Trade. Those princes who had entered into treaties
with David confirmed them with his successor, and other potentates sought his
friendship. On swearing allegiance, all these princes and nations sent the
customary tribute and rich gifts, such as gold and silver vessels, valuable
garments, spices, horses and mules. The alliance with Egypt was also the source
of considerable additions to the national wealth, as that kingdom furnished
horses to the mountainous districts, and war chariots, which were in great
demand in foreign parts. The princes of Aram and of the territories on the
Euphrates who had formerly procured their horses and chariots from Egypt, were
to buy these war materials from Solomon’s merchant guild. The latter
established a station for his own riders and horses on the plain not far from
the sea. He kept twelve thousand horses and fourteen hundred war chariots (each
drawn by two horses), and for these he erected spacious buildings, containing
four thousand stalls. Solomon’s greatest gains, however, were acquired in trade
with India. To the Phoenicians the journey to this distant country was attended
with insuperable difficulties, so long as the country near the Red Sea was
rendered unsafe by the uncivilised and predatory bands that dwelt there. By his
alliance with Hiram, Solomon had opened up a safer and nearer route to India.
The strip of land extending from the southern border of Judah to the eastern
coast of the Red Sea, the Points Elath and Eziongeber,
had been rendered accessible. The caravans with their loaded camels could
proceed in safety from Jerusalem and from the coast to the northern point of
the Red Sea. At Hiram's suggestion, Solomon had a fleet of strong and large
ships (ships of Tarshish) built, and equipped on the coast at Eziongeber. Hiram sent his most skilful sailors, who knew
the route thoroughly, to man the vessels. Israelites of the tribes of Asher and
Zebulun, who lived on the coast and were acquainted with the sea, were also
employed.
When the Israelitish fleet was complete, it sailed out
of the harbour of Eziongeber to the Red Sea, which
separates Palestine from Egypt, Nubia, and Abyssinia, and proceeded along the
coast to the Gulf which washes the shores of Southern Arabia, as far as the
mouth of the Indus, in the land of Ophir (now called Scinde). After a period of
two years, Solomon’s fleet returned richly laden with the proceeds of this
first expedition. Vast droves of camels carried the treasures to Jerusalem, to
the great astonishment of the whole population. More than four hundred talents
(kikhar) of gold, silver in great quantities, ivory,
ebony, apes, and exquisitely coloured peacocks, sandal-wood, and sweet-smelling
plants were thus transported. Solomon caused a throne to be made of the ivory,
and the sandal-wood was used for ornamenting the harps and lutes of the
musicians who played in the temple. The palings of the bridge which led from
the palace to the temple were also made of this rare and costly wood. Solomon
sent his fleet several times to Ophir or India, and each time new riches and
curiosities were brought into the country. The port Elath became a place of
great importance. Judaeans settled there, and the land of Israel thus extended
from the extreme end of the Red Sea to the Euphrates. In order to convey horses
and chariots from Aramaea to the Euphrates, as also
the various importations from Phoenicia, roads had to be made, and measures
taken to ensure the safety of the caravans. In a mountainous country it is not
easy for beasts of burden, and certainly not for horses and chariots, to
traverse great distances, obstructed as the way is by steep cliffs, abrupt
precipices, and masses of rolling stones. Solomon, however, had roads made
which led from Jerusalem to the north; these were
the king’s high-roads.
He probably employed the services of the Canaanite
natives, who were obliged as bondmen to take part in this work. Heights were
levelled, depths filled up, and stones removed. The roads were passable by
carriages, which could proceed without hindrance from the south to the north,
and the caravans passing from the Jordan to the sea could travel without
difficulty. A chain of fortresses protected the roadways, and served as resting
places. Besides these stations for riders and carriages, Solomon also founded towns
for storing goods; these were also used to house grain for future years of
scarcity.
Thus Solomon settled the affairs of Israel, and
provided for its future security. He had no sharp-sighted counsellor, such as
David had had in Ahithophel, to assist him in establishing order; his own
wisdom was his sole counsellor. But he had to choose responsible officers, who
would give effect to his instructions, and carry out the plans which he
devised. The great extent of his state and his court demanded the establishment
of new offices. For the better reception of strangers he had placed over his vast
household a majordomo (al-hab-Baith).
Ahishar was the name of this officer. The twelve officials who provided for the
wants of the household were supervised by a chief whose name was
Azariah-ben-Nathan. A high official, Adoniram, the son of Abda, was also placed
(al-ham-Mas) over the many thousand bondmen who worked on the roads and in the
fortresses. Thus three high posts were newly created by Solomon.
Its great extent and the riches which Solomon had
amassed enabled the kingdom of Israel to hold its place amongst the greatest
nations in the ancient world. Princes and nations who lived in strife with each
other sought the aid of the ruler of this mighty dominion, and called upon him
to act as arbitrator, for his wisdom was famed far and wide. The greatest
blessing in Solomon’s reign was the peace and undisturbed quiet which obtained
throughout the land. From Dan unto Beersheba the Israelites could peacefully
enjoy their home, “everyone under his own vine and under his own fig-tree”.
The commercial treaties, the prosperity of the
country, the security to life arising from the long peace maintained in
Solomon’s reign, all contributed to attract the surrounding tribes of Moabites,
Ammonites, Idumaeans, and even Egyptians to the country. It is probable, too,
that the high religious culture of the Israelites, so superior to idolatry, and
its splendid manifestation in the temple at Jerusalem influenced enlightened
foreigners to seek shelter under the “wings of the God of Israel”. The country,
the people, and the God of Israel acquired widespread renown in Solomon's time.
The Israelitish mariners, who visited so many harbours, coast-lands, and marts,
and the Israelitish merchants who entered into connections with foreign parts
carried reports of their fatherland to the remotest climes and nations. The
praise of the wise, mighty, and brilliant king Solomon resounded far and wide
in his times. In the eyes of the world he elevated the name of the God whom he
honoured, and to whose glory he had erected a magnificent temple. The
Israelitish sailors and merchants unconsciously became the first messengers and
pioneers of the religion of Israel among the idolatrous nations.
One day Jerusalem was surprised by an extraordinary
embassy. A wise queen, from the spice-bearing land of Sabia (Sheba), which is
situated on the Arabian coast of the Red Sea, came to visit Jerusalem. As she
had heard so much of the greatness of Solomon, and in praise of the God of
Israel, she wished to see, with her own eyes, how much truth or falsehood lay
in the reports which had come to her ears. She was received with marked
attention by Solomon, and had many interviews with him. The queen (whom tradition
calls Belkis) greatly admired his wisdom, and was much impressed by the temple
which he had erected to God, and by the brilliancy of his court. It is said
that she propounded enigmatic riddles to him in order to test his powers, and
these he answered in a manner which excited her astonishment.
Solomon’s brilliant rule, however, became the source
of a serious division between the tribes, which he had unavailingly striven to
consolidate into one indissoluble whole. Notwithstanding that the temple formed
a bond of union for the whole people, and that Solomon tried to abolish the
tribal isolation which prevailed, he succeeded only in the case of Benjamin,
which became more closely united with Judah. This was owing to the fact that
the temple was built on Benjamite territory, and consequently several Benjamite
families settled in the capital. Probably Solomon also preferred the tribe of
Benjamin and his own ancestral tribe to the other tribes. The mutual dislike of
the houses of Israel and Judah, or the northern and southern tribes, had not
ceased. Among the northern tribes a deep sense of discontent prevailed against
Solomon, despite the prosperity to which he had raised them; they resented the
pressure put upon them to forward regular supplies for the court, and to
perform compulsory service in the erection of public buildings. Their
discontent was not expressed aloud, but it needed only an occasion for it to
vent itself. Wise as Solomon was, he had not sufficient foresight to perceive
that his faults were sure to weaken the future security of the state. Amongst
the officials whom Solomon employed to supervise the buildings was an
Ephraimite, who was clever, courageous and ambitious. This was Jeroboam, the
son of Nebat, from the town of Zereda or Zorathan, on
the other side of the Jordan. He was the son of a widow; thus, free from
paternal restraint, he could follow out his own impulses uncontrolled. Jeroboam
had supervised the erection of the walls of Jerusalem, and had displayed great
skill and firmness in managing the bondmen. Solomon was, in fact, so well
pleased with him that he bestowed on him a high position in the territory of
Ephraim and Manasseh. Here Jeroboam had the opportunity of becoming acquainted
with the discontent of the people, which was probably strongest amongst the
ever-discontented Ephraimites. The popular feeling accorded well with his
ambitious plans, and he decided to utilise it when a favourable
opportunity should occur.
Solomon was guilty of the folly of permitting
sacrificial altars to be built for various idols. It may have been his foreign
wives who induced him to make this concession, or perhaps it was due to the
foreigners, the Phoenicians and other races, who had taken up their residence
in Jerusalem, and had received permission to worship their gods in the land of
Israel according to their custom. However this may have been, altars were
raised on the high northern point of the Mount of Olives, in honour of Astarte
of the Zidonians, Milcom of the Ammonites, Chemosh of the Moabites, and other
idols. The religious convictions of the nation were not so deeply rooted that
the people could witness all kinds of idolatrous practices without falling into
the errors of idol-worship themselves. A prophet, Ahijah of Shiloh, had the
courage to reprimand the king, and to warn him of the danger which his conduct
rendered imminent. Solomon, however, seems to have given little heed to his
representations, and the prophet, indignant at the king’s obtuseness,
determined to use Jeroboam (whose ambitious schemes he had probably divined)
as the instrument of Solomon’s destruction. When Jeroboam left Jerusalem, the
prophet approached him, seized his garment, tore it into twelve pieces, and
handing him ten of them, he said, “Take these ten pieces; they portray the ten
tribes which will separate themselves from the house of David, and recognise
thee as their king”. Jeroboam wanted no further encouragement to mature his
plans, since a prophet had commended them. He hurried to the territories of
Ephraim, and called on the Ephraimites to separate themselves from the house of
David. Meanwhile Solomon had received tidings of the event, and before the
revolution could spread, he sent his guards to kill the rebel. Jeroboam then
fled to Egypt, where a new dynasty now occupied the throne. Shishak (Sheshenk, Sesonchosis, 980-959)
was the first king of the new line. Under his rule was severed the bond which
had united Israel and Egypt since Solomon’s marriage with the Egyptian
princess. Shishak in fact was inimical to the Israelitish nation, which had
become more powerful than was agreeable to him. He therefore received Jeroboam
with kindness, intending to use him against Solomon. Shishak also gave a friendly
reception and protection to an Idumaean prince, who had special reasons for
avenging himself on the Israelitish nation. Hadad (or Adad) was a relation of
the Idumaean king whom David had conquered. He had, when a boy, escaped the
massacre ordered by Joab in consequence of a revolution in Idumaea.
When Shishak ascended the throne, the Idumaean prince hurried to Egypt, and was
graciously received. Shishak gave him the queen’s sister in marriage, and his
first-born son Genubath) grew up among the Egyptian princes. Hadad also
acquired possessions in Egypt, and was honoured in every way; notwithstanding
this, he yearned to return to Edom, and to regain the territories which had
been snatched away from him. He carried this desire into effect with the aid
of Shishak, who was fully aware that the warlike spirit which had obtained
under David and Joab, had diminished under Solomon’s peaceful rule, and that
petty warfare in the mountainous districts would be connected with little
danger, while it might be productive of great benefit to himself. Hadad and the
troops which he had mustered in Idumaea did great
damage to Solomon’s caravans, which carried goods between the bay of Elath and
the Israelitish boundaries; and Solomon’s warriors were powerless to prevent
these attacks.
Unnoticed by Solomon, another cloud, which threatened
Israel with destruction, was gathering in the north. Rezon (of Zobah), one of
the servants of King Hadadezer, whom David had overthrown, had taken to flight
after the defeat of his sovereign; he assembled a predatory troop, and made
raids in the districts lying between the Euphrates and the northern ranges of
the Lebanon. Rezon’s troops gradually increased in numbers, and with their
numbers grew his courage and power. At last he ventured to proceed against the
ancient city of Damascus. He succeeded in capturing it and in having himself
chosen king. Advancing from the north, Rezon also committed hostilities against
the Israelites and their allies, without any opposition on the part of Solomon,
who either had a dislike of war, or had no troops available to ward off the
attacks from the north and the south. Thus arose, from small beginnings, powers
inimical to Israel, which might easily have been nipped in the bud. Besides
this, an internal breach was in store for Israel.
Solomon, however, did not live to see the development
of the impending evils and the decay of his kingdom. He died in peace at the
age of about sixty years (in 977). His body was buried, no doubt with great
pomp, in the rocky mausoleum of the kings which David had built on the south of
Mount Zion. It was said later on that Solomon, as well as his father, had
heaped up untold treasures and wealth in these vaults and cells, which were
discovered many centuries after by the later Jewish kings.
Although Solomon had numerous wives, it appears that
he left but few children, a son named Rehoboam and two daughters, Taphath and
Basmath, whom their father married to two of his officers. Posterity, which has
greatly exaggerated Solomon’s wisdom and ability, has also attributed to him
power over mystic spirits and demons, who, obeying his will, could be invoked
or dismissed as he chose. Even a ring on which his name was engraven was supposed to exercise a mighty spell over the demons, and keep them in subjection.
The power to which Solomon had elevated Israel
resembled that of a magic world built up by spirits. The spell was broken at
his death.
|