READING HALLTHE DOORS OF WISDOM |
THE
HISTORY OF THE POPES FROM THE CLOSE OF THE MIDDLE AGES
PIUS III. 1503
JULIUS II. 1503-1513.Restorer
of the States of the Church and Patron of the Fine Arts.
CHAPTER
I
The
Conclaves of September and November, 1503.— Pius III. and Julius II.
In a Despatch
of 15th August, 1503, when the condition of Alexander VI was rapidly becoming
hopeless, the Venetian Ambassador, Antonio Giustinian,
reports that Cardinal Caraffa had said to him in conversation, “There is every
prospect of war. I greatly fear that the coming Conclave will result in an
appeal to arms, and prove most disastrous for the Church”. A sonnet, published
in Florence about that time, describes the divisions in the Sacred College, the
machinations of the Kings of France and Spain to secure the election of their
respective candidates, and the probability of a simoniacal election, and even of a schism.
The situation
was, indeed, fraught with peril on all sides. In the North the French army
under Francesco Gonzaga lay at Viterbo, the Spaniards under Gonsalvo de Cordova were advancing from the South, Rome resounded with party cries,
Orsini, Colonna, and Borgia. Cardinal Aegidius of
Viterbo says “the whole city was in a ferment; the confusion was such, that it
seemed as if everything was going to pieces.” Under such circumstances it was
obvious that Caesar’s presence in Rome could not be a matter of trifling
importance. The Spanish Cardinals were as absolutely subservient to him “as if
they had been his chaplains,” and he had under his command an army of not less
than 12,000 strong. It was certainly quite in his power to force another
Rodrigo Borgia on the Church.
One cannot but
regard it as a direct interposition of Providence that precisely at this
critical time he was crippled by a serious illness, from which he was only
beginning to recover. He said himself afterwards to Machiavelli, “I had
counted on the death of my father, and had made every preparation for it, but
it never occurred to me that I should have at the same time to fight with death
myself.”
But the fact
that both France and Spain, who had quarrelled with each other over the
Neapolitan spoils, were trying to secure his friendship, shews what was the
strength of Caesar’s influence in spite of his bodily weakness. They evidently
thought that the result of the coming election depended largely upon him. It
was only natural that the Duke should exert himself to the utmost to control
it. The unexpected death of Alexander VI had been the signal for a general
uprising of all the enemies of the Borgia family, and his very existence
depended upon the outcome of the election. The Venetian Ambassador writes on
21st August: “I am assured on the best authority that last Sunday no less than
eleven Cardinals swore to Caesar to have Cardinal Giovanni Vera elected, or
else to bring about a schism. They are also trying to win over the Cardinals
Caraffa, Raffaele Riario, and Pallavicino to their
side, and I myself know for certain that the Duke has taken precautions to
prevent the arrival of Cardinal Giuliano della Rovere, either by sea or land”.
However, it
soon became evident that Caesar’s power was over-estimated. He himself felt his
inability to withstand the popular hatred, or to make headway against the
Barons, who were threatening him with vengeance, while all his efforts to
obtain possession of the Castle of St. Angelo by bribery failed to overcome the
integrity of its custodian, Francesco Roccamura.
Hitherto he had
but to command and be obeyed, but now he found himself obliged to enter into a
treaty with the Colonna faction and with the Cardinals. Burchard notes with
surprise his submissiveness towards the Sacred College, to whom he swore
obedience on the 22nd of August. In consequence, he was allowed to retain his
appointment as a Captain-General of the Church until the new Pope had been
elected; but the unanimous decision of the Cardinals to hold the Conclave in
the Castle of St Angelo plainly shews how little they trusted him. Even there,
however, many did not consider themselves safe, for Caesar continued to exert
himself to the utmost to secure the election of a Spanish Pope who would be
favourable to him.
If the election
was to be free, it was absolutely necessary to get the Duke out of Rome. The
Cardinals, especially the Italian Cardinals, laboured assiduously to effect
this, and were supported by the Ambassadors of Germany, France, Spain, and
Venice. The negotiations lasted from the 25th August to the 31st September,
when Caesar finally consented to withdraw from Rome within three days, the
Cardinals on their side engaging to protect him against all attacks, and
granting him a free passage through the States of the Church. They also
promised to warn Venice against any attempts to get hold of his possessions in
the Romagna. The Ambassadors of Maximilian and Ferdinand pledged themselves
that neither Caesar, the Spanish army, nor the Colonna should approach from
within 8 to 10 miles of Rome as long as the Papal Chair remained vacant, and
those of France and Venice entered into a similar engagement in regard to the
French army and the Orsini.
On the
following day a part of the Duke’s artillery left Rome by the Trastevere; the news had just reached him that Piombino, Rimini, and Pesaro had thrown off his yoke. He
himself was carried in a litter from the Vatican to Monte Mario; at the Porta Viridaria, Cardinal Cesarini wished to speak to him, but
was told that “the Duke gave no audiences.”
It soon became
known that Caesar had placed himself under the protection of the French army at Nepi. He had already, on the 1st of September,
entered into a secret agreement with the representatives of Louis XII, in which
he promised to place his troops at the disposal of the King, and to behave
towards him as an obedient vassal and help him against all his enemies, the
Church only excepted; Louis on his part guaranteed to Caesar all his present
possessions and engaged to assist him to recover those which he had lost at the
death of Alexander VI.
The maintenance
of order having been already secured by the hire of a sufficient force in the
pay of the College of Cardinals, they could now proceed to make arrangements
for the Conclave. Under these more favourable circumstances it was decided that
it should be held in the Vatican.
Public opinion
was very much divided as to the probable result of the election. Antonio Giustinian writes on 19th August: “The better minded would
like to have Caraffa or Piccolomini, though Costa would make an excellent Pope;
only his age and his Spanish name are against him”. A few days later
Pallavicino and Podocatharo were also mentioned; of
the latter it was said that he would have the votes of all the Spaniards.
On the 4th
September the obsequies of the late Pope began and lasted nine days. Meanwhile
many of the absent Cardinals had arrived in Rome. Soderini came on the 30th of August, Cornaro on the 1st of
September, Trivulzi and Giuliano della Rovere on the 3rd (the latter had been an exile for nearly ten years). On the
6th Colonna arrived, on the 9th Riario, and on the
10th George S. d’Amboise, Luigi d’Aragona, and
Ascanio Sforza. The latter had led Louis XII to believe that if he would allow
him to take part in the Conclave he would vote for the French candidate,
Cardinal d’Amboise.
Through their
treaty with Caesar Borgia the French party thought they could count on the
support of the eleven Spanish Cardinals, and d’Amboise himself did not scruple
to use every means in his power, flattery, promises, and even covert threats,
in order to win over the remainder. In employing the latter he counted, of
course, on the influence which the proximity of the French troops must exert.
In case of need, as the Mantuan Ambassador said, it had been decided to have
recourse to arms. No means were to be rejected that could possibly obtain the
Tiara for the favourite of the King of France, and thus secure French
ascendency in Italy and the world.
Ferdinand of
Spain was naturally the chief opponent of these plans. From the very beginning
his Ambassadors were doing their utmost to secure the election of a Spanish
Pope. His candidates were Piccolomini, Castro, and Carvajal; the one whom above
all he wished to exclude was Giuliano della Rovere,
whom he regarded as a partisan of France.
As long as
Caesar Borgia had remained in Rome he had exercised a strong influence on the
Spanish Cardinals. As soon as he had left the city and was known to have gone
to the French camp, this was of course at an end. Bernardino Carvajal became
the leader of the Spanish Cardinals, and they held together as closely as
possible, knowing that they had all the detestation which the Borgia had
brought upon themselves on their shoulders. In the face of the storm of hatred
which had burst forth from the populace of Rome on the death of Alexander the
election of a Spaniard was out of the question. The reaction against the late
Pope was too strong. This made the loss of the eleven Spanish votes all the
more vexatious for the French. Their prospects declined at once. The Mantuan
Ambassador, writing on the 12th of September, to a vivid description of the
excitement amongst the electors, “who are running hither and thither like bees
and intriguing in all directions”, adds significantly, “but d’Amboise will not
be Pope.”
Giuliano della Rovere, however, was for the French the most
dangerous of all their opponents. It was he who made it plain to all the world
how disastrous would be the consequences if the man who was Louis’ all
powerful minister, and had been Caesar Borgia’s friend, were elected.
Giuliano’s
arrival in Rome completely changed the whole state of affairs. He was as
outspoken as if his election were already an accomplished fact. On the 5th
September he said to the Venetian Ambassador: “I have come here on my own
account and not on other people’s. I shall not vote for d’Amboise. If I fail to
obtain the Tiara myself, I hope whoever succeeds will strive to maintain peace
in Italy, and to promote the interests of religion.” He took pains to point out
to the Cardinals that if a French Pope were elected it was extremely probable
that the seat of the Papacy would again be transferred to France. These
representations naturally carried great weight with the Spanish and Italian
members of the College. As the Italians were largely in the majority (they were
twenty-two out of thirty-seven) they could easily have made Giuliano Pope had
they been unanimous. This, however, was far from being the case. Some were for
Caraffa, others for Pallavicino, others again for Giuliano. Cardinal Giovanni Colonna
held with the Spaniards, while the Florentine Cardinals, Medici and Soderini, were on the French side.
The divisions
among the Italian Cardinals threw the casting vote into the hands of the united
Spanish party. Giuliano saw this at once and consequently from the first
devoted himself to the work of winning the Spaniards. On the 12th September the
Mantuan Envoy writes: “Neither d’Amboise, Giuliano, Caraffa, nor Riario will be Pope; Podocatharo,
Piccolomini, or Pallavicino have the best chance, for they are favoured by the
Spaniards; but the common opinion is that the Cardinals will not be able to
agree.”
Thus, from the
very beginning of the Conclave, the representatives of the three great Latin
nations stood opposed to each other. Not one of the few representatives of the
non-Latin nationalities was in Rome, when, after the Chair of S. Peter had been
vacant for thirty days, the Conclave at last began on 16th September. The
number of Cardinals who took part in it, thirty-seven, was much larger than had
been present at any former Conclave. Even as late as the 12th of September
there had been protracted discussions whether it should not be held in S.
Marco under the protection of the Roman people, but the final decision was in
favour of the Vatican. Immediately before the opening of the Conclave,
d’Amboise decided to pay visits to his two rivals, Caraffa and Giuliano della Rovere. The Mantuan Envoy, who reports this, adds,
there was no exchange of visits between d’Amboise and Piccolomini, Pallavicino,
and Podocatharo. The Tiara will fall to one of these
three; if to the last, because he is a good man, if to either of the others,
because they are neutral and favoured by the Spaniards. Four days later the
Venetian Ambassador says that Piccolomini or Pallavicino will probably be
elected.
The first thing
the Cardinals did, was to draw up a new Election-capitulation to supersede that
of 1484. One of its provisions was that the Pope should summon a Council for
the reform of the Church within two years after his election, and that then a
General Council should be held every three years.
On the 17th of
September d’Amboise had proclaimed, in his usual swaggering manner, that either
he or another Frenchman would certainly be chosen. Five days earlier he had told
the Venetian Envoy what he really thought He said, “I have heard that several
Cardinals have bound themselves by an oath not to elect any Cardinal who is a
Frenchman or a friend of the King of France. This has greatly incensed me. I
see no reason why the French nation should be shut out from the Papacy, and if
my King, who is the first-born son of the Church, and has done more than any
other Prince for the Apostolic See, is trying to promote the election of a
French Pope, I do not think he can be blamed, when he has seen how unworthily
one Spaniard and two Italians have ruled her. Our generals are aware of these
intrigues, and will not patiently endure such a slight to their King”. Then he
complained of various simoniacal negotiations, and
added: “If I perceive anything of this kind you may be sure that I shall not
let it pass; and my protest will be such that none shall fail to hear it”.
“Evidently,” the Envoy continues, “the Cardinal sees that his cause is lost. He
already says that he has been betrayed. He has just found out that Ascanio
Sforza, far from troubling himself about him, is working hard to secure his
own election.”
Such indeed was
the case. On the 13th of September the Venetian Ambassador writes, “Ascanio
Sforza makes no secret of his intentions; he says he had promised his vote to d’Amboise
and he shall have that, but nothing else.” The acclamations with which Ascanio
had been greeted when he entered Rome had naturally encouraged him to think
well of his chances. Burchard, after narrating the hearty welcome he had
received, adds in his Diary, “God alone knows what these cries were to
Ascanio.”
The hopes which
d’Amboise had built on Cardinal d’Aragona were
equally doomed to disappointment. He, like Ascanio, was not disposed to seal
the ruin of his house by forwarding the election of a French Pope.
But, though
forced to give up all hopes for himself, d’Amboise none the less did his best
to secure the election of one or other of the French candidates. All his
efforts, however, were in vain, owing to the firm front presented by the Spanish
Cardinals, none of whom could be won over.
The prospects
of Giuliano della Rovere rose in proportion as those
of d’Amboise declined. At first we are told he wanted but two votes to make up
the two-thirds majority. But at the last moment he found himself foiled by his
old enemy Ascanio.
The strength of
the various parties, and also their inability to bring matters to a conclusion,
were manifested in the vote that was taken on the 21st September. Giuliano della Rovere had the highest vote, fifteen (still far below
the requisite majority of two-thirds); Caraffa came next with fourteen,
d’Amboise had thirteen, Carvajal twelve, Riario eight.
Thus no party
was in a position to carry the election, and yet the situation was one that
demanded a speedy settlement Both Burchard and the Venetian Ambassador agree in
saying that, under these circumstances, Cardinal d’Amboise preferred a
candidate whose age and weakness marked him out as a temporary Pope. Antonio Giustinian writes, “As soon as d’Amboise perceived that his
own election was out of the question, he determined at any rate to prevent the
election of any one not of his choice.” Like a prudent man, he swam with the
stream, and on 21st September, acting in concert with Ascanio Sforza, Soderini, and Medici, he proposed the name of the old and
ailing Cardinal Francesco Piccolomini.
As the Spanish
Cardinals agreed to support him, the matter was decided at once. On the
following morning (22nd September) the election took place, and Piccolomini was
made Pope, taking the name of Pius III in honour of his uncle.
“It is
impossible to express the joy of the people of Rome at Piccolomini’s election,” writes the Mantuan Envoy on the 22nd September, and the
representative of Venice says, “The previous life of the new Pope, marked by
numerous deeds of kindness and charity, lead the people to hope that his
Pontificate will be the exact opposite to that of Alexander VI, and thus they
are beside themselves with joy.” This general rejoicing was fully justified.
All his contemporaries agree in saying that the personal character and
abilities of the new Pope were of the highest order. He was made a member of
the Sacred College in 1460, at an early age, by his uncle Pius II, and the
Cardinal of Siena, as Piccolomini was then called, had always distinguished
himself by his cultivation of mind, his great ability, and his blameless life.
Under Pius II he had successfully governed the March of Placentia, and in the
time of Paul II had filled the difficult post of Legate in Germany with
consummate tact, to the great satisfaction of the then Pope; the knowledge of
German which he had acquired while living in the household of Pius II being
naturally of great assistance to him there. Afterwards, when, owing to the
influence of the nephews of Sixtus IV, a worldly spirit predominated at the
Court, he, like others of a pious and serious turn of mind, kept away from Rome
as much as possible, and still more so in the time of Alexander VI. Like his
uncle Pius II. Cardinal Piccolomini was tormented with gout, and was
prematurely old and decrepit, although he had led a very regular life.
Sigismondo de’ Conti especially praises his scrupulous love of order. “He left
no moment in the day unoccupied; his time for study was before daybreak, he
spent his morning in prayer, and his midday hours in giving audiences to which
the humblest had easy access. He was so temperate in food and drink, that he
only allowed himself an evening meal every other day.”
It is therefore
not surprising that all good men were filled with the brightest hopes. “A new
light has shone upon us,” writes Peter Delphinus, the General of the Camaldolese, “our hearts rejoice, and our eyes are filled
with tears because God our Lord has had mercy on His people and has given them
a Chief Shepherd who is a holy man, innocent, and of untarnished name. Our deep
sorrow has been turned to joy, and a day of sunshine has followed a night of
storm. We are all filled with the highest hopes for the reform of the Church,
and the return of peace”. “God be thanked that the government of the Church has
been entrusted to such a man, who is so manifestly a storehouse of all virtues
and the abode of the Holy Spirit of God. Under his care the Lord’s vineyard
will no more bring forth thorns and thistles, but will stretch out its fruitful
branches to the ends of the earth.”
“The misery of
the past, the marred countenance of the Church, the scourge of God’s righteous
anger, are still before my eyes,” writes Cosimo de’ Pazzi,
Bishop of Arezzo, on the 28th of September, 1502, to the newly-elected Pontiff.
“When all hope of release seemed shut away, God has given us in you a Pope
whose wisdom, culture, and learning, whose religious education and virtuous
life, has filled all good and God-fearing men with consolation. Now we can all
hope for a new era in the history of the Church.”
The earliest
acts of Pius III, corresponded with these expectations. In an assembly of the
Cardinals, which took place on the 25th of September, he made it clear that his
chief aim was to be the reform of the Church and the restoration of the peace
of Christendom. He said the reform must extend to the Pope himself, the
Cardinals, the whole Court and all the Papal officials, and that the Council
must be summoned to meet at the earliest date possible. The news soon spread
through all the countries of Europe, and in Germany encouraged the Archbishop
of Mayence, Berthold von Henneberg,
to draw up a memorial, setting forth the reforms that he considered necessary
for the Church in that country. The Pope also made excellent regulations for
the better government of the immediate possessions of the Holy See, and was
extremely economical in his expenditure.
Pius III was
eager to secure peace at any cost, and precisely for that reason he did not succeed
in doing so. The inheritance bequeathed to him by the Borgia was of a nature to
frustrate all his endeavours. On the 26th of September the Pope said to the
Venetian Envoy, “In consequence of the pressure put upon me by the Spanish
Cardinals, I have been compelled to issue some Briefs in favour of Caesar
Borgia, but I will not give him any further help. I do not intend to be a
warlike, but a peace-loving Pope.” He certainly had no sympathy for the Borgia
family, especially for Caesar, and he found that the Vatican had been robbed on
all sides, and that the Apostolic Treasury was grievously in debt. But hatred
was utterly foreign to his mild and gentle temper. “I wish no harm to the
Duke,” he said, “for it is the duty of a Pope to have loving-kindness for all,
but I foresee that he will come to a bad end by the judgment of God.”
He was not
wrong in his forecast. The whole power of the Borgia family, built up by
cunning, treachery, and bloodshed, which threatened at one time to swallow up
the States of the Church, came to an untimely end.
With the
departure of the French army for Naples, Caesar lost his last refuge.
Bartolomeo d’Alviano was hurrying from Venice with
fierce threats of vengeance, and the Orsini and Savelli were preparing to close
upon him at once. He saw that it was impossible for him to remain at Nepi. Not yet completely recovered from his illness, he
entreated the gentle Pius to allow him to return to Rome. “ I never thought,”
said the Pope to the Ferrarese Envoy, “that I should feel any pity for the
Duke, and yet I do most deeply pity him. The Spanish Cardinals have interceded
for him. They tell me he is very ill, and wishes to come and die in Rome, and I
have given him permission.” When Caesar arrived there on the 3rd of October his
entire army had dwindled down to 650 men. The state of his health was certainly
not satisfactory, but by no means so bad as had been represented to the Pope.
Many people in Rome, especially the Cardinals , Giuliano della Rovere and Riario, were exceedingly dissatisfied with
Pius for having allowed him to come back. On. the 7th of October, speaking to
the Venetian Envoy, the Pope apologised for his leniency by saying, “I am
neither a saint nor an angel, but only a man, and liable to err. I have been
deceived.”
The date of the
Coronation of the new Pope was fixed for the 8th of October; it was attended by
a vast concourse of people. Before the Coronation, Pius, who hitherto had only
been a deacon, received priestly and episcopal Orders. The long ceremonies were
a great strain on the strength of the Pope, who was suffering from gout, and
had only lately undergone a painful operation on his leg. He said Mass sitting,
and on account of his weakness the formal entry into the Lateran was put off
till later.
Although the
state of the Pope’s health in the next few days got rather worse than better,
he still held numerous audiences, took counsel on the 9th of October with the
various Ambassadors, as to the measures to be adopted in case of an invasion of
the States of the Church by Bartolomeo d’Alviano, and
held a long Consistory on the nth of October, in which he went carefully into
the questions of the appointment of new Cardinals and the unquiet state of the
city. Bartolomeo d’Alviano, Giampaolo Baglione, and
many of the Orsini were there, and, together with the Cardinals Giuliano della Rovere and Riario, were
insisting on the disbandment of Caesar’s army; otherwise, they said, they would
take up arms themselves. Overtures to the Orsini were made both by the French
and the Spaniards. With the single exception of Giovanni Giordano they decided,
out of hatred to the Duke, to treat with the Spanish party, and allied
themselves with the Colonna. On the 12th of October the reconciliation between
these two houses, hitherto always at enmity, was openly announced. Caesar was
now at the end of all his resources. It was rumoured that he had fled with
Cardinal d’Amboise, but the latter showed no inclination to drawdown on himself
the hatred attached to the Borgia family, and on the 15th of October, forsaken
by all, he attempted to flee from Rome to escape the vengeance of the Orsini.
Hardly, however, had he left the precincts of the Vatican when the greater part
of his men deserted him, and with a following of not more than seventy he had
to return to his house. The Orsini demanded that the Pope should have him
arrested, in order that he might not elude the results of the legal proceedings
about to be instituted against him. The Venetian Ambassador describes
Bartolomeo d’Alviano as raging like a mad dog; he had
set a guard at every gate that the Duke might not escape him.
But the Pope
was not in a state to comply with the demands of the Orsini, for on the 13th of
October he was lying on his deathbed. Hence the Orsini determined to take the
matter into their own hands, and arrest him themselves. Caesar fled, by means
of the secret passage, to the Castle of St Angelo as they were storming the
Borgo. The Spanish Cardinals had planned his escape disguised as a monk, but
the Orsini had completely invested the Castle. Here where once his enemies had
trembled before him, sat the man whose hand, a few months earlier, had been
almost within grasp of the crown of Central Italy, cowering in hopeless terror
with only two or three servants by his side.
In the meantime
the Pope’s end was approaching. On the 15th of October the doctors had thought
his case serious, on account of his weakness and his great age. As the fever
never for an instant left him, by the 17th his condition was hopeless.
His faculties
remained clear, and his mind calm. Although he did not himself believe the end
to be so near, yet he received the Viaticum on the 17th of October for the
second time during his illness, and on the following night the Sacrament of
Extreme Unction. All who surrounded him were touched and edified by his devotion.
Tranquil and resigned, he fell asleep on the evening of the 18th of October.
“The death of
this Pope” wrote the Ambassador of Ferrara on 19th October, “will be lamented
at all the courts of Europe, for he was by universal consent held to be good,
prudent, and pious. In spite of the rainy weather at the time all Rome hastened
to kiss the feet of the dead Pope, whose features were quite unaltered. People
think that he died of the labours of the Pontificate, which were too heavy for
his already enfeebled health. The night before his election he did not sleep at
all, and since then he has had no rest. He was continually giving audience to
the Cardinals; then came the fatiguing ceremonies of his consecration and
coronation. On the previous Wednesday a long Consistory was held, the Pope
remaining conscientiously to the end. On the Friday he gave some very tong
audiences; kept the abstinence and ate fish, although he had taken medicine
only the day before. Then he got the fever, which never left him till he died.”
As the Siennese, Sigismondo Tizio,
says, “The death of Pius III was a great loss to the Church, to the city of
Rome, and to us all, but perhaps we deserved no less for our sins.”
“We hear of nothing
but the election of the new Pope,” wrote the Mantuan Ambassador on the day of
Pius III’s death, “but it is very difficult to say which name will come out of
the urn”. Eight days later the question was decided.
Burchard
relates that one Sunday, the 29th of October, 1503, Cardinal Giuliano della Rovere and the other Spanish Cardinals with Caesar
Borgia assembled in the Papal Palace, and drew up an Election-capitulation in
which, among other things, Cardinal Giuliano undertook if he were made Pope to appoint
Caesar standard-bearer to the Church, and to allow him to retain all his
possessions, Caesar on his part undertaking to support the Pope in all things.
All the Spanish Cardinals promised to vote for Giuliano at the election.
Thus, by means
of Caesar’s help, against whom the Orsini now no longer dared to attempt
anything, and supported by the Spanish Cardinals, Giuliano, according to the
best informed diplomatists, was nearer than ever to attaining the highest
dignity. All that was now needed was to secure the majority of two-thirds.
Giuliano, whom the popular voice seemed to indicate as the only possible Pope,
was as unscrupulous as any of his colleagues in the means which he employed.
Where promises and persuasions were unavailing, he did not hesitate to have
recourse to bribery.
Before the
Conclave began Giuliano already had on his side the majority of the Italian
Cardinals, the Venetians in compliance with the wishes of their government,
Caesar Borgia, and the Spaniards, and, what was still more important, the
French party and d’Amboise with them, who before had threatened to create a
schism, yet now, like Ascanio Sforza, turned to adore the rising sun.
When, on the
30th of October, the Orsini and Savelli had been induced to withdraw from Rome,
the preparations for the Conclave were complete and it began on the following
day. On the 31st of October, Giuliano, with thirty-seven other Cardinals,
entered it, practically as Pope-elect. Not many hours later his election was an
accomplished fact, and on the following morning, 1st November, the decision of
the Conclave, which had been the shortest known in all the long history of the
Papacy, was formally announced.
Contemporary
writers without exception express the greatest astonishment at the almost unanimous
election of one who, like Giuliano, was hated by many and feared by all.
Sigismondo de’ Conti notices as a curious fact that the second successor of
Alexander VI was a Cardinal who had been persecuted by the Borgia. The Roman
people accorded a hearty welcome to the new Pope, who took the title of Julius
II, and still greater was the rejoicing in Liguria, his native province.
Francesco Guidiccioni, writing on 2nd November, 1503,
from Rome to Ferrara, says: “People here expect the reign of Julius II to be
glorious, peaceful, genial, and free-handed. The Roman people, usually so
addicted to plunder, are behaving so quietly that everyone is in astonishment
We have a Pope who will be both loved and feared.”
After his
election the Pope confirmed once more the Election-capitulation. Amongst its
conditions were the prosecution of the war against the Turks, and the
restoration of discipline in the Church. To this end it stipulated that a
General Council should be summoned within two years, that the Pope should not
make war against any of the Powers without the consent of two-thirds of the
Cardinals, and that the Sacred College should be consulted on all important
occasions, especially in the choice of new Cardinals. In order to secure the
freedom and safety of the next Council the place of meeting was to be
determined by the Pope and two-thirds of the Cardinals, and in case any
hindrance to its meeting should be alleged, this must be proved to the
satisfaction of a similar majority.
The motives of
the Cardinals in framing this capitulation, which so unduly and unlawfully
limited the rights of the Pope, were no purer than formerly. Certain of its
provisions, as for example the one requiring the consent of two-thirds of the
Cardinals before a declaration of war, were utterly unreasonable and
impracticable, as a glance at the political state of Italy at the time will
shew. In the South, Spain had taken possession of Naples and Sicily; in the
North, France was constantly struggling to extend her influence, while Venice
at the same time was attacking the possessions of the Holy See in the Romagna.
“Both as a Pope and as an Italian, Julius II found himself in a most difficult
position. To remain a passive spectator of this scene of seething confusion
would have been a clear dereliction of duty in a ruler and still more in a
Pope. To prevent himself from being overwhelmed by circumstances and falling
helplessly into the clutches of one or other of the great Powers, it was
indispensable that Julius should act at once and with decision, and if
necessary take the sword into his own hands”; and for this he was admirably
fitted.
The Pope’s
countrymen were wont to say that he had the soul of an Emperor, and his outward
appearance was distinguished, grave, and dignified. The deep-set eager eyes,
compressed lips, pronounced nose, and massive, rather than handsome head,
denoted a strongly-marked and powerful personality. His scanty hair was nearly
white, but the fire of youth glowed beneath the snows of age. From his florid
complexion and erect carriage, no one would have guessed that the new Pope was
already on the threshold of old age. Still less was there any trace of
declining years in his general demeanour. Restless, and ever in motion,
ceaselessly active and perpetually occupied with some great design, self-willed
and passionate to the highest degree, he was often extremely trying to those
who were brought in contact with him.
The Venetian
Ambassadors speak of the Pope as extremely acute, but terribly violent and
difficult to deal with. “He has not the patience to listen quietly to what you
say to him, and to take men as he finds them. But those who know how to manage
him, and whom he trusts, say that his will is always good. No one has any
influence over him, and he consults few, or none. One cannot count upon him,
for he changes his mind from hour to hour. Anything that he has been thinking
of overnight has to be carried out immediately the next morning, and he insists
on doing everything himself. It is almost impossible to describe how strong and
violent and difficult to manage he is. In body and soul he has the nature of a
giant. Everything about him is on a magnified scale, both his undertakings and
passions. His impetuosity and his temper annoy those who live with him, but he
inspires fear rather than hatred, for there is nothing in him that is small or
meanly selfish.” Everything had to bow to his iron will, even his own poor
gout’ tormented body. “He had no moderation either in will or conception; whatever
was in his mind must be carried through; even if he himself were to perish in
the attempt.”
The impression
produced on his contemporaries by this mighty scion of the Renaissance is
summarised by them in the Italian word “terribile”,
which could only be rendered in English by a string of adjectives. Julius II
applied this term himself to Michael Angelo, but it suits the Pope quite as
well as the painter. Both were extraordinary and Titanic natures, in stature
beyond that of ordinary men, and such as no other age has produced. Both
possessed an unusual strength of will, indomitable courage arid perseverance,
and great strategic abilities.
The life of
Julius II had hitherto been one of incessant combat and hard work, and these
things had become necessary to him. He belonged to that class of men who cannot
rest, whose natural element is perpetual activity. At the same time, he was by
no means unsusceptible to feelings of a gentler kind. He was deeply affected
and shed tears as he watched the funeral procession of his sister Lucchina in May, 1509.
Julius II can
only be called a diplomatist by using the word in a very restricted sense. If
he did not altogether despise the arts of statecraft so universally practised
in his day, and could at a pinch resort to dissimulation, he was by nature
sincere and plain-spoken, and often his language overstepped all due bounds in
its rudeness and violence. This fault increased perceptibly as he grew older.
In the beginning of his Pontificate he was able to restrain his expressions
within the limits of diplomatic form; later on, in speaking of the Emperor
Maximilian, he permitted himself to use the most contemptuous and injurious
terms without the least reserve. Disguise of any kind was contrary to his
nature. Any idea which laid hold of his mind engrossed him entirely; you could
see it in his face, his lips quivered to utter it. “It will kill me,” he would
say, “if I don’t let it out.”
Paris de Grassis, his Master of Ceremonies, who has handed on to us
so many characteristic features of his master’s life, says that he hardly ever
jested. He was generally absorbed in deep and silent thought, and thus Raphael
has painted him. The plans concocted in these uncommunicative hours were
announced with volcanic abruptness and carried out with iron determination. His
bitterest opponents could not deny his greatness—he was a man of spontaneous
impulses carrying everything before them, himself and others, a true Roman.
Doubtless such
a nature was in itself more suited to be a King or a warrior, than a priest,
but he was the right Pope for that time, to save Rome from becoming a second
Avignon with all its disastrous consequences for the Church.
To Julius II
the restoration, consolidation, and extension of the temporal possessions of
the Church presented itself as the prime necessity of the moment, and to this
he devoted himself with all the energy of his choleric temperament and strong
practical genius. A new monarchy must be created which should command respect
abroad, be the rallying point of the Italian States, and secure the freedom and
independence of the Church. The Pope must no longer be dependent upon the
support of this Power or that, but must be able himself to control the
political situation.
The aim which
he set before himself from the first was to revive the temporal power of the
Papacy, and to establish the independence of the Holy See on a firm basis by
the creation of a strong ecclesiastical State. Fearlessly confronting the
hindrances which the evil rule of the Borgia had put in his way, shrinking from
no sacrifices, and ready to employ any means, he threw the whole strength of
his will into this one endeavour. This he pursued with unwearied persistence
and clear insight to his very last breath, and thus became the “Saviour of the
Papacy.”
Even
Guicciardini, much as he hated the state policy of Julius II, is forced to
admit that he had no private or selfish desires. “Although in his youth he had
lived very much as the other prelates of that day did, and was by no means
scrupulous, he devoted himself to the exaltation and welfare of the Church with
a whole-heartedness and courage which were very rare in the age in which he was
born. Without neglecting his relations, he never sacrificed the interests of
either the State or the Church to them, or carried his nepotism beyond due
bounds. In all his ways and aims, as well as in his stormy and fervid
character, he was the exact contrary of the Borgia.”
His dislike of
this family was so strong that on the 26th of November, 1507, he announced that
he would no longer inhabit the Appartamento Borgia,
as he could not bear to be constantly reminded by the fresco portraits of
Alexander of “those Marañas of cursed memory.” The
Bull in which, in the year 1504, Julius II took the Duchy of Sermoneta away from Rodrigo Borgia and restored it to the
Gaetani, contains even more severe language than this in condemnation of his
predecessor. In the same year he reinvested Giovanni Sforza, who had returned
to Pesaro immediately after Alexander’s death, with the fiefdom of that place.
He also gave back their castles to the Colonna and Orsini.
The contrast
between Julius II and Alexander is equally manifest in the way in which the
former treated his relations. He wholly repudiated the system of nepotism, and
though he was not free from a natural partiality for his own blood,
comparatively speaking he did very little for them. Even on his deathbed he
steadily refused to admit a near kinsman to the College of Cardinals, whom he
did not consider worthy. “His nephew Francesco Maria was heir presumptive of
Urbino and to him he granted, with the consent of the College of Cardinals, the
Vicariate of Pesaro, formerly a fief of the Sforzas (Giovanni Sforza died in 1510), and this was the only portion of the States
which he ever withdrew from the immediate rule of the Holy See.” On the 2nd of
March, 1505, Francesco Maria was married by procuration to Leonora, daughter of
the Marquess Francesco Gonzaga. Julius took no part in the wedding festivities
at the Vatican, excusing himself on the ground of decorum.
Out of the
twenty-seven Cardinals whom Julius II created, only a very small number were
relations of his own, and none of these had any influence, although the Pope
was extremely fond of Galeotto della Rovere. This Cardinal was a man of refined culture, the son of the Pope’s
sister Lucchina by her first marriage with Franciotto of Lucca. He was raised to the Cardinalate on
the 29th of November, 1503. At the same time Francois Guillaume de Clermont,
Archbishop of Auch, Juan de Zuñiga, and Clemente
Grosso della Rovere were nominated. Galeotto, who was Vice-Chancellor from 1505, held a large
number of benefices in accordance with the evil custom of the times, “but he
made a noble use of his large revenues”. Artists and men of learning found in
him a most generous patron. “He understood how to soothe his uncle in his
violent moods by his tact and gentleness”. He was an intimate friend of
Cardinal Medici (afterwards Leo X), whose tastes were similar to his own, and
who, even as Cardinal, was lavish in his liberality to artists and scholars.
The second
nomination of Cardinals under Julius II was preceded by tedious negotiations,
for the majority of the College, from self-interested motives, did not wish
their number to be increased. The Pope, however, insisted, and the Cardinals
then endeavoured to persuade him at least to defer it. But Julius held that it
was absolutely necessary to fill up the vacancies, as in the year 1504 alone
six had died. The College still continued its resistance, but the Envoys were
convinced that the Pope would conquer. They thought the creation would take
place on the 28th of November, 1505.
On the 1st
December, after a long and stormy discussion, the Consistory having lasted
eight hours, Julius carried his point so far as to have it arranged that in the
approaching Ember week nine out of ten candidates whom he had proposed should
receive the Red-hat. The official nomination and publication took place in the
Consistory of the 12th of November.
The new
Cardinals were: Marco Vigerio, Bishop of Sinigaglia; Robert Chailand,
Bishop of Rennes, and French Ambassador in Rome; Leonardo Grosso della Rovere, the brother of Cardinal Clementi; Antonio Ferreri, Bishop of Gubbio;
Francesco Alidosi, Bishop of Pavia; Gabriello dei Gabrielli,
Bishop of Urbino; Fazio Santori, Bishop of Cesena;
Carlo Domenico di Carretto, Count of Finale; and
Sigismondo Gonzaga. With the exception of the last named, they were all in Rome
at the time, and on the 17th of December they each received their hats and
titular churches. The ascendency of Julius II over the Cardinals was now
secured, although all opposition was not wholly overcome till somewhat later.
To the great
grief of the Pope and the Roman people, Galeotto della Rovere died on the 11th September, 1508. Julius
transferred his Cardinal’s hat and all his benefices to Sixtus Gara della Rovere, Galeotto’s half-brother, who unhappily was far from
resembling him in character, either intellectually or morally.
Besides these
three creations, Julius II in the year 1507 nominated four Cardinals, eight in
1511, and one in 1512, but none of these were in any way related to him. Thus
the historian of the city of Rome only states the exact truth when he says,
“Alexander VI aimed at nothing but the aggrandisement of his children; the one
care of Julius II was to build up the States of the Church, he spent nothing on
his nephews”. He was also moderate in his personal expenditure, though he kept
a better table than Alexander VI; the monthly bill for this was between 2000
and 3000 ducats, that of his successor was 8000. His expenditure for plate was
by no means extravagant.
Julius II was
so economical in his house-keeping that he was, quite unjustly, accused by many
of being a miser. It is quite true that he was very careful to keep his
treasury always well filled. He quite realised the futility of any pretensions
that had not physical force to back them, and knew that an efficient army meant
plenty of money. In the beginning of his reign, Julius II had great financial
difficulties to contend with, in consequence of the extravagance of his
predecessor. He had to borrow money, and to pay Alexander’s debts, even down to
the medicine which he had required in his last illness.
Some of the
means which he adopted for the replenishment of his treasury were of a very
objectionable kind. His subjects were certainly not oppressed with taxation, but
it cannot be denied that he not only sold offices, but also benefices. This
formed a serious hindrance to the reform which was so much needed; for if that
were carried out, it would mean the abolition of all such sales. It is true
that under Julius II the money was employed for the interests of the Church,
and not for the enrichment of his family; but this is no justification for
persistence in simony. The complaints of contemporaries both in Italy and
abroad shew how strongly this abuse was resented. Another great evil was that
grants of occasional Indulgences were so often employed as a means of obtaining
money. In the case of the Jubilee Indulgences, powers for which were conceded
by the Pope to the German Orders, the Chapter of Constance, and the Augsburg
Dominicans, the half of the proceeds were to be handed over to Rome.
The Pope’s
fixed income in the year 1510 was estimated by the Venetian Ambassador at
200,000 ducats, and his floating income at 150,000, a very small sum for one in
the position of Head of the Church. The accounts of the treasure in the Castle
of St. Angelo during the reign of Julius II are of such a nature that it is
impossible to arrive at any certain conclusion as to the exact amount; but we
know that at his death it was more than had been left by any previous Pope
since John XXII.
By his good
management in matters of finance, Julius II was enabled not only to carry on
his wars for the reconstruction of the States of the Church, and to carry out
many noble artistic undertakings, but also to be very generous in the matter of
alms-giving, and amply to provide for all necessary works in the city and in
the States of the Church. Perfect order reigned in Rome under the strong hand
of Niccolò de’ Fieschi of the family of the Counts of Lavagna, who was Captain of the Watch. The murderous
outrages which had become so frequent in the reigns of Innocent VIII and Alexander
VI had entirely ceased. The streets of Rome, which the Pope was constantly
widening or embellishing, could now be traversed in peace and security.
Raphael’s fresco of the Mass of Bolsena has made us
familiar with the outward appearance of the Swiss Guards; they numbered 200
men, upon whom the Pope could absolutely depend. They also formed a permanent
central body, serving as a nucleus for a larger army when more troops were needed,
and their officers brought the best families in Switzerland into close and
confidential relations with Rome. The regulations of Julius II defining the
authority of the Judges of the Capitol, and also of the Vicar, Governor, and
Senators, in cases of disputes and quarrels within the city, were of great
service. Still more valuable was the work of reorganising the coinage which he
carried through, correcting the discrepancies between the nominal and real
value of the different kinds of money, and introducing into the currency the
silver coins, originally called Giuli, but afterwards
known as Paoli. Both trade and the revenue were immensely benefited by these
operations. The Jewish coiners of counterfeit money were put down by him with a
strong hand.
The misrule in
the Campagna, where the turbulent Barons and landowners made it impossible for
the farmers to cultivate their fields, repeatedly caused a great scarcity of
corn in Rome, especially in the years 1504 and 1505. Julius II, always careful
that the city should be well supplied with provisions, at once came
energetically to the rescue. In 1504 the dearth was so great that he had not
only to apply to Ferdinand of Spain for leave to import grain from Sicily, but
also to obtain a similar permission from the Kings of France and England. The
purchasable office of agent for the importation of grain was created by this
Pope.
The dangers
which in those days beset the channels of traffic, whether by land or sea,
explain the anxiety of all the Popes to promote tillage in the Campagna, in
spite of manifold hindrances, in order to depend as little as possible on
imports for the necessaries of life. Julius II achieved considerable success in
this direction. Under him the conditions of life in the Campagna improved so
much that agricultural operations could be carried on steadily and methodically.
He found means to prevent the passage of large bodies of troops through the
country in the neighbourhood of Rome, and greatly to moderate the feuds of the
Barons. Under those more favourable circumstances, the ordinances of Sixtus IV
were revived with much better effect, and the amount of land under cultivation
increased. He also inflicted severe penalties on all landowners who in any way
hindered the cultivators from carrying whatever grain they could spare to the
Roman market.
The
commencement of a stable and uniform system of administration in the States of
the Church dates from the reign of Julius II, though, of course, it would not
bear, at that early period, to be judged in these respects by a modern
standard. A Brief of 22nd July, 1506, dealing very severely with all
malversations or acts of oppression on the part of either secular or
ecclesiastical authorities within these provinces, and requiring all state or
communal officials to submit their accounts annually to the Commissioners of
the Roman Treasury for revision, was an important step in this direction.
Constantly
harassed as he was by political or ecclesiastical anxieties, Julius II. always
found time to attend to the government of his States. In 1511, in spite of the
war, and in detestable weather, he went to Cervia, to
see for himself how the salt works there were going on. Whenever he had the
power he looked after the welfare of his subjects, put down abuses and
oppression, and did all he could to improve the administration. Nothing escaped
his notice; he issued enactments against thefts of wood and cattle, against the
exactions of the judges, faction fights, pirates, robbers, and murderers; he
endeavoured to adjust long standing boundary disputes and promoted public
works, such as the building of bridges and the control and utilisation of
rivers.
Like the great
mediaeval Popes, such as Gregory IX, whose last Brief was written for the
protection of a poor Polish peasant, Julius II was always on the alert to
shield the humblest of his subjects from oppression. Thus, on the 7th January,
1507, a time when he was heavily burdened with political cares, we find him
writing to the governor of Cesena and Bertinoro: “A
citizen of Bertinoro has complained to the Pope that
the Castellan has taken wood from him and injured him in other ways. Let the
Castellan and his abettors be punished without fail, and take care that, no
harm comes to the complainant.”
In order to form
a just estimate of the merits of Julius II in regard to the government of the
States of the Church, it is necessary to realise the state of utter confusion
in which he found these provinces when they came into his hands. It required a
man of first-rate powers to bring order into such a chaos. Julius II has been
justly likened to Virgil’s Neptune overawing and calming the turbulent waves by
his majestic countenance. He won the devoted affection of the whole population.
He granted large liberties to the municipalities in the towns. “The Pope,” says
Guicciardini,“ took pains to attach the people to the representatives of the
Church, so that when the oath of fealty was taken at Bologna, the change was
described as a passing out of the state of serfdom under the Bentivogli into that of a free commonwealth, in which the
citizens had their share in the government, and in the revenues.” In spite of
some mistakes which Julius made in the selection of his Legates, the conditions
of life in the States of the Church were such, that even such a bitter foe of
the temporal power of the Papacy as Machiavelli is forced to admit that the
inhabitants had no desire to throw off its yoke.
CHAPTER II.
Difficulties in the position of Julius II on his Accession.
—Fall and Death of Cesar Borgia.—Disputes with Venice.
The position in
which the new Pope found himself on his accession was one of singular
difficulty. Disorder and confusion prevailed on all sides and he had no money
and no army worth mentioning.
In the Patrimony
itself the state of things was so bad that on the 8th of November, 1503, Julius
was obliged to issue a severe edict against Barons and municipalities who did
not put down robbery and brigandage in their districts. The States of the
Church were hardly anything more than a name. On all sides the towns were in
revolt, and the old dynasties which had been driven out by the Borgia were
returning. In the South, war was raging between the Spaniards and the French,
and in the North, where their policy had completely upset the relations
hitherto subsisting, Venice was taking advantage of the confusion to enlarge
her borders at the expense of the possessions of the Church.
Even during the
short reign of the gentle Pius III, she had already contrived, partly by force
and partly by diplomacy, to obtain possession of Bertinoro,
Fano, Montefiori, and other places. It soon became
evident that the Venetians were forming connections in all quarters throughout
the Romagna, with a view to getting the whole province under their power. If
they succeeded in this, Caesar would soon be a landless Duke. Already things
had gone so far that the only castles still remaining in the hands of his
captains were those of Forli, Cesena, Forlimpopoli,
and Bertinoro. Everything depended on the attitude
taken up by the new Pope, whose coronation took place with great pomp on 28th
November, 1503.
Unfortunately,
Julius II was greatly indebted to Caesar Borgia and Cardinal d’Amboise, as well
as to the Republic of Venice, for his election, and this still further
complicated the situation. He satisfied the claims of d’Amboise by bestowing on
him, in spite of the opposition of many of the Cardinals and of the citizens of
Rome, the legations of Avignon, Venaissin, and
France, and a Cardinal’s hat on one of his relations, Francois Guillaume de
Clermont. The Pope hoped by this means to secure France as reserve force
against Venice.
To shake off
his connection with Caesar Borgia was, however, a more difficult matter.
Heartily as Julius II hated the Borgia, he did not wish openly to break through
the engagements he had made with the Duke, nor did it seem wise “to throw away,
unused, so valuable a tool as Caesar could be, while the Holy See in the
Romagna , was in such, danger from her powerful neighbour, that the most
unsatisfactory Vicariate would be preferable to the present situation.”
At first it
seemed as if the Pope had quite forgiven the Borgia. “Cardinal Borgia”, writes Costabili on November 1st, “has been given the
Penitentiary. I understand, too, that one of the Rovere family is to marry
Cardinal Borgia’s sister. All the other Spanish Cardinals have been rewarded,
and they seem for the moment to stand in higher favour than ever.” In his
relations with Caesar himself the Pope maintained considerable reserve, but in
such a way as not to deprive him of all hope, while still allowing him to feel
that his position was precarious.
The first and
greatest danger to the States of the Church came, not from Caesar, but from
Venice, which was trying to obtain the same command of the Italian sea-board as
she had of that of Dalmatia. The gravity of this danger was brought forcibly
home to Julius II by the tidings of Venetian intrigues which reached him on 7th
November, 1503, through his old friend Gabriele da Fano. He at once sent a
strong remonstrance to the Republic, and declared that he had no intention of
permitting territories which were properly in immediate subjection to the
Church, and had now returned to their obedience, to be filched away from her.
On the 10th of November Machiavelli reports that Julius had said to Cardinal Soderini, “I always have been, and still am, a friend of the
Venetians, as long as they do not hanker after things to which they have no
right. But if they persist in robbing the Church of her property, I shall take
the strongest measures, and call upon all the Princes of Christendom to help me
in resisting them”. On the following day, he spoke in a very friendly manner to
the Venetian Ambassador and expressed great affection for the Republic, but at
the same time repeated that he was determined to restore the dominion of the
Church in the Romagna.
On the 18th of
November the Venetian Ambassador, Antonio Giustinian,
had a long conversation with the Pope, chiefly about the Romagna. Julius, in
language which left nothing to be desired in the way of directness, announced his
firm determination to restore to the Church all the possessions there which she
had lost; they must not remain under the power of Caesar or of anyone else, and
it was for this purpose that he had on the previous day sent the Bishop of
Tivoli, Angelo Leonini, as Nuncio, to Venice. “Words
fail me,” adds Giustinian, “to describe with what
resolution he spoke, and that not once, but again and again.” Nevertheless the
Ambassador did not give up the attempt to change the Pope’s mind. It was not
from the Church, he represented, but from an enemy of hers, and a bitter enemy
of the Pope and of the Republic, that Venice had taken these places. His
Holiness must see that it would be impossible for the Church herself to
administer this territory; he would have to give it to someone else. This would
be hard upon Venice, and she had not deserved to be so treated. When the Pope
was a Cardinal, he had himself encouraged the Republic to undertake an
expedition against the Romagna. Julius replied that this was against Caesar
Borgia, not against the Church; with all his love for the Republic, he said, he
could not in honour consent to any curtailment of the States of the Church.
However
strongly the Pope might feel about the Venetian encroachments, in his present
helpless state, as Machiavelli well knew, he could only temporise. This was
equally the case in regard to Caesar Borgia. He had sent the promised Briefs in
the Duke’s favour to the cities of the Romagna, but with a secret hope that
they might arrive too late, and did not bestow on him the coveted post of Standard-bearer
to the Church. This disappointment, together with the bad news from the
Romagna, seem to have produced an extraordinary effect on Caesar; he was
completely altered. The Envoys found him utterly dispirited and broken.
Machiavelli describes his vexation and despair. The Pope told the Venetian
Ambassador that he had become so changeable and incomprehensible, that he could
not say anything for certain about him. Cardinal Soderini found him irresolute, petulant, and feeble; he thought he had been stunned by
the disasters of the last few weeks. The Spanish Cardinal Iloris,
said the Duke, seemed to him to have lost his senses; he did not know what he
wanted, and was confused and uncertain. In Rome all sorts of strange reports
were current about him. Everyone agreed that he was ruined; “not from any
faithlessness on the part of the Pope, but by the force of circumstances which
no one could alter”. Julius would not do anything against Caesar while the fate
of the Romagna was still pending, but he was determined, when he could, to
place these territories under the immediate government of the Church. Caesar
held frequent conversations with Machiavelli, the representative of Florence in
Rome; and on the 18th of November he despatched an Envoy to that city, offering
his services as a captain, and begging them to supply him with troops for the
conquest of the Romagna; he would come to Leghorn to complete the negotiations.
With the permission of the Pope, who was only too glad to get him out of Rome,
he started for that place on the 19th November. He embarked before day-break,
“to the joy of every one,” in a boat on the Tiber, and went down to Ostia,
whence he intended to sail.
Shortly
afterwards the news arrived that another important town, Faenza, had surrendered
to the Venetians. Julius II, already unable to sleep from anxiety, became
violently excited, and sent the Cardinals Soderini and Remolino to Caesar, to require him to deliver up
all the other strong places in the Romagna to him, so as to prevent any more
from falling into the hands of the Venetians. This the Duke resolutely refused
to do.
Meanwhile,
tidings reached Rome that Venice had also got possession of Rimini by an
agreement with Malatesta. Evidently the only chance of saving what remained lay
in prompt action. The Venetians declared that their only object was to get rid
of their enemy Caesar. On this the Pope resolved to compel him to relinquish
the forts of Forlí and Cesena. He sent orders that
the Duke should be arrested and brought to Rome. Caesar appeared utterly
overwhelmed; the Mantuan Envoy reports that he wept. He “had every reason to
expect a dungeon and death, and in fact Guidobaldi of
Urbino and Giovanni Giordano Orsini advised the Pope to put an end to him.”
Julius II
scorned these counsels. Caesar was treated with the greatest consideration, and
apartments in the Vatican were assigned to him. The Pope hoped by this means to
obtain the peaceable surrender of the keys from his governors. Caesar
apparently sent the requisite orders, but, according to Sigismondo de’ Conti,
this was only a feint. Though there is no proof of it, it seems very probable
that he was endeavouring to hoodwink the Pope, who had broken his promises to
him. At any rate the governor of Cesena declared that he would not take any
orders from Caesar while he was a prisoner, and detained the Papal messengers.
When Julius heard this, his first thought was to throw the Duke into one of the
dungeons in St. Angelo, but yielding to the Duke’s urgent entreaties, he sent him
to the Torre Borgia instead. All his property, however, was confiscated. A
contemporary remarks that the Divine justice, no doubt, decreed that he should
be imprisoned in that very chamber which he had stained with the blood of his
brother-in-law Alfonso. All the adherents of the Borgia were filled with
terror, expecting that the vials of the Pope’s wrath would be poured out upon
them also. The Cardinals Remolino and Lodovico Borgia
fled from Rome on the night of the 20th December.
The succeeding
weeks were occupied with negotiations between Julius and Caesar, which, owing
to the well-founded distrust which prevailed between the two parties, were
extremely complicated. In the beginning of the new year the Pope began to think
of possessing himself by force of Cesena.
On the 3rd of
December, 1503, Machiavelli had said that Caesar was nearing the edge of the
precipice. At this juncture an event occurred which at once immensely raised
the prestige of the Duke’s friends, the Spanish Cardinals. On the 28th of
December, Gonsalvo de Cordova obtained a complete
victory over the French at Garigliano. On the first
day of the new year Gaeta capitulated, and on the 4th the news reached Rome.
The French had lost Naples.
Under the
influence of this occurrence, on the 29th of January, 1504, the negotiations
between Julius and Caesar were at last brought to a conclusion. It was agreed
that the Duke was to surrender the Castles of Cesena, Forli, and Bertinoro to the Pope within forty days. When this
condition was fulfilled, he would be free, but till then was to remain at
Ostia under the surveillance of Cardinal Carvajal; if he failed to carry out
his agreement he was to be imprisoned for life.
On the evening
of the 16th February, while the Carnival was being celebrated in Rome, Caesar
Borgia, accompanied by only a few servants, embarked in a boat from the Ripa Grande, and was taken down to Ostia.
The
negotiations for the surrender of Cesena, Bertinoro and Forli caused the Pope a great deal of vexation, and the Archbishop of
Ragusa, Giovanni di Sirolo, was sent to the Romagna
to hasten their conclusion.
The governors
of Cesena and Bertinoro at first insisted on Caesar’s
liberation. The Pope in a rage drove the bearers of this message out of his
room; in the end, however, he found himself compelled to come to terms with
them. On the 10th of March, 1504, he concluded a new agreement with the Duke,
by which Caesar bound himself to obtain the evacuation of Bertinoro and Cesena, and made himself responsible for a sum of money which the Castellan
of Forli demanded as the price of his surrender. As soon as these conditions
had been fulfilled, and Bertinoro and Cesena
delivered over to the Pope, Carvajal allowed his prisoner to depart, on the
19th of April, without asking any further leave from Rome.
Caesar had
already provided himself with a letter of safe conduct from Gonsalvo de Cordova, and hastened to Naples, to the house of his uncle, Lodovico Borgia.
Here it soon became evident that he had by no means relinquished all hope of
eventually recovering his possessions in the Romagna. Gonsalvo received the Duke with all due marks of respect, apparently entered into his
plans, and even agreed to furnish him with troops. In this way he managed to
keep his dangerous guest quiet until he had received instructions from King
Ferdinand. Then, however, he acted promptly. On the 27th of May, 1504, Caesar
was arrested and taken to the Castle of Ischia. The Spaniards announced that
they intended to keep this firebrand in their own hands. So says the Spanish
historian Zurita, and Guicciardini corroborates him.
According to Jovius, Julius II had advised that
Caesar should be imprisoned to prevent him from invading the Romagna. This is
confirmed by documents in the Secret Archives of the Vatican. There is a letter
there from Julius II to Gonsalvo de Cordova dated
11th May, 1504, in which the Pope requests the Spanish General to keep guard
over the Duke, so as to hinder him from undertaking anything against the
Church, and to induce him to give up the Castle of Forli.
On the same day
Julius wrote a letter to Ferdinand and Isabella complaining of the conduct of
both Carvajal and Gonsalvo; the former had let Caesar
go free on his own responsibility and not in the manner agreed, the latter was
allowing him to hatch plots against the Church in Naples. He accused the Duke
himself of having sent money to the Castellan of Forli and encouraged him to go
on holding the castle. This remarkable letter closes with a request that their
majesties would not permit a person who was under their control to disturb the
peace of the Church. In regard to Forli the appeal to Spain was effectual, and
Julius II at last obtained possession of the fortress. Gonsalvo promised Caesar that he would release him if he would order the Castellan to
hand it over to the Pope’s Lieutenant. Upon this the Duke yielded, and on the
10th of August the castle was given up. But now it was Gonsalvo’s turn to break his word; and instead of regaining his liberty, Caesar was sent
off to Spain on the 20th of August.
From this
moment Caesar Borgia vanishes from the stage of Italian history, and by the
beginning of May most people in Rome seemed to have quite forgotten him.
Ferdinand sent him first to the Castle of Chinchilla and then to that of Medina
del Campo. Here the former lord of Rome, bereft by his political shipwreck of
all his luxuries, was kept in close confinement in a room in the tower, with
only one servant. No one was allowed to see him. “All his plans had failed,
nothing remained of all that he had sought to achieve by his crimes, his
cruelties, and his murders”. In this miserable life his only occupation consisted
in flying his falcons, his only joy was to see them catch a helpless bird and
tear it to pieces with their talons. In spite of the strict guard kept over
him, on the 25th of October, 1506, Caesar succeeded in escaping from his prison
and fled to his brother-in-law, Jean d’Albret, King
of Navarre. Julius II was greatly disturbed when the news reached him, for he
was well aware that the Duke still had many adherents in the Romagna. But his
anxiety was not destined to last long, for on the 12th May, 1507, Caesar died
“honourably, a soldier’s death ” at Viana in Navarre, fighting for his brother-in-law
against the Count of Lerin. He was only in his
thirty-second year. The greatness of the House of Borgia had come and gone like
a meteor flashing across the sky.
There is no
contemporaneous account of the effect produced on Julius II by the tidings of
Caesar’s death; but he must have rejoiced to find himself relieved of an enemy
who still could have been extremely dangerous to him and to the Church. Caesar
had many faithful adherents in the cities of the Romagna, and he could never
have felt quite secure there while the Duke still lived.
It is a curious
coincidence that the man who, if Alexander VI had lived, would have done the
most of all others to secularise the States of the Church, and with whom
Machiavelli in consequence was secretly in full sympathy, should,
unintentionally of course, have been the founder of the revival there of the
Papal authority. Most people are familiar with Machiavelli’s opinion on this
point expressed in the Prince, where he says: “The Duke by no means wished to exalt
the Church. Nevertheless all that he did tended to her advantage; when he was
gone, his heritage fell to her”. That this was the case was no doubt greatly
due to the character of Julius II, who never for a moment lost sight of the one
object that he had proposed to himself, and made use of every means that came
to hand for attaining it. When, on the 11th August, 1504, the news of the
surrender of Forli at last arrived, and he was asked whether orders were to be
given for the public demonstrations of joy usual on such occasions, his reply
was characteristic. “No,” answered the Pope, so the Florentine Ambassador
reports, “we will put off all rejoicings until we have much more important and
difficult successes to celebrate.” “Julius meant,” the Ambassador adds, “the
reconquest of Faenza and Rimini.” The relations between Venice and Rome had
from month to month been growing more and more unsatisfactory owing to the
obstinate refusal of the Republic to give back these cities which had been
taken by force from the Church. The conduct of the Venetians on this occasion
shows that the invariably astute diplomacy of the Republic was utterly at fault
in regard to the character of Julius II.
As Cardinal
Giuliano della Rovere had always been friendly to
Venice, and the Venetians, out of dread of a French Pope, had heartily
supported him in the Conclave, they fully believed that he would in return
leave them a free hand in the Romagna. This of course was an utter delusion, as
from the first Julius was firmly determined not to permit the Church to be
despoiled of a single rood of her possessions. He never for a moment gave the
Republic any reason for doubting that he meant to insist on the restoration of
the stolen property of the Church in the Romagna. Nevertheless the Venetians
thought they could do as they liked and need not be afraid of a Pope who had
neither money nor troops. “Ambition and greed of land” says the contemporaneous
Venetian chronicler Priuli, “were so strong in them
that they were resolved at any cost to make themselves masters of the whole of
the Romagna”. When, on the 22nd of November, 1503, the news of the investment
of Faenza arrived in Rome, the Pope at once sent for the Venetian Ambassador
and repeated that all the Church’s possessions must come back to her, and that
he hoped the Republic would not carry matters to extremes. Three days later the
report was current in Rome that Rimini also was in the hands of the Venetians.
The Ambassador was in despair, for his government had given stringent orders
that this should be kept secret. “Thus, even before his Coronation, Julius saw
two of the jewels with which he desired to adorn the Tiara snatched away by the
Signoria”. On the 28th November, at a meeting of the Cardinals, he complained
of the proceedings of the Venetians; on the 29th a Consistory was held. The
Venetian Ambassador reports that the Pope spoke very angrily of the Republic in
Consistory; he had previously told Cardinal Cornaro that he meant to appeal to France and Spain for the protection of the interests
of the Holy See. In a conversation with the Venetian Ambassador on the 30th of
November Julius spoke more gently, and dwelt on the friendly feelings he
entertained towards the Republic; for he was well aware of his weakness, and
for that reason most anxious for a close union with France. On the 10th of
December he again remonstrated with the Ambassador against the proceedings of
Venice in the Romagna. The tidings which came from Angelo Leonini,
Bishop of Tivoli, who had been sent to Venice, only increased the Pope’s
displeasure. Leonini was commissioned to demand the
withdrawal of all the Venetian troops from the Romagna and that the Republic
should desist from any further conquests from Caesar Borgia, as the whole of
his possessions belonged to the Church. “The answer was far from satisfactory.
Venice promised to make no further acquisitions in the Romagna, but she would
not withdraw her troops.” She was determined to keep Faenza, Rimini, and all
the other places on which she had so unjustly laid hands.
The Venetian
Envoy Giustinian said everything he could to induce
the Pope to see things in a different light. He proposed that the conquered
territories should be bestowed on Venice as a fief. To this Julius II replied
that the governorships in the Romagna had always been bestowed on captains who
had deserved well of the Church, but not upon powerful chiefs; it was
impossible to put Venice in this position, she would never let them out of her
hands again. He would rather not be Pope at all than endure such a curtailment
of the States of the Church at the very beginning of his reign. Giustinian made no answer to these sort of expressions,
talked vaguely of false reports circulated by the enemies of the Republic, and
avoided as far as possible all direct negotiations in regard to the evacuation
of the conquered territories. He seems to have been possessed with the delusion
that Venice had no cause to apprehend any serious resistance from the new Pope;
and not in the least to have understood the character of the man with whom he
was dealing. He was incapable of conceiving a Pope devoid of selfish ambition
and really aiming at nothing but the exaltation of the Church, and had no
suspicion of the dangers of the game that his Government was playing. On the
contrary, he flattered himself that he could easily succeed in mollifying
Julius II with fair words and promises.
The Ferrarese
Agent understood the situation far better. “The Pope,” he reports on the 25th
November, 1503, “is far from satisfied with the way things are going in the
Romagna; where he had hoped to see light, he finds nothing but darkness. I know
his nature and am well assured that he will not submit patiently to this;
though other people imagine that they will be able to deceive him”. Giustinian ought to have been able to see how impossible this
would prove. When, on the 23rd of December, he again repeated his tale of
slanderous reports set afloat by the enemies of Venice, the Pope replied, “My
Lord Ambassador, you always bring me fair words, and the Signoria foul deeds.
We have accurate information of all that goes on in the Romagna, and know how,
one after another, places are being occupied that have hitherto always been
under the direct rule of the Church; today we have heard that the Venetians are
endeavouring to induce Cesena to submit to them, and have occupied Sant’
Arcangelo. Can we be expected to look quietly on when those who ought to be
supporting us are daily robbing us? At present we have not the means to defend
ourselves by arms and can only remonstrate; but we mean to turn to the Christian
Powers for aid, and trust that God will protect us.”
The Ambassador
had no answer to give except that this was unnecessary; if Cesena wished to put
herself under Venetian rule it was because the government of the Republic was
just and beneficent. As to Sant’ Arcangelo, the Pope had nothing to complain
of, as that place was already in the hands of Venice before Leonini was sent.
Three days
later Julius II again sent for Giustinian and said to
him: “We have still to complain of the state of things in the Romagna. Letters
arrive daily telling us of the intrigues of your agents in Cesena, Imola, and
other places. Throughout the whole country efforts are being made to seduce the
people from their obedience to the Church and persuade them to place themselves
under the rule of Venice. Our worst enemy could not do more against us. When we
ascended the Chair of S. Peter we did so with the full purpose of being a
father to all as a Pope should be, and observing strict neutrality; but we now
fear that we shall find ourselves forced to entertain other thoughts.”
The Ambassador
tried to make the usual excuses for his government, but could not conceal in
his report the fact that they were not accepted. It ends with the words:
“Julius II requires that all the places that have been occupied in the Romagna
shall be restored to him. Possibly events might occur which would induce him
and the Sacred College to leave Faenza and Rimini in the hands of the Republic,
but he will not consent to anything until all the other places are evacuated.”
On the 10th
January, 1504, Julius addressed the following letter to the Doge :—
“To our beloved
Son,—Greeting and apostolical benediction: Through Our Reverend brother the
Bishop of Tivoli and by various letters We have announced to your Serene
Highness Our firm resolution to demand the restoration of Our cities of Faenza
and Rimini, together with their castles and the other places which your
Highness has occupied since the death of Alexander VI; and We have repeatedly
made the same demand to your Ambassador. Therefore We cannot sufficiently
express Our surprise at not having yet received any definite answer. Since We
now learn from the aforenamed Bishop, Our Envoy, that the subject is again to
be laid before the Senate, it will be plain, We trust, to your own wisdom and
that of the assembly, that it is not permissible to keep unlawful possession of
that which belongs to the Holy Roman Church, and that We are bound to use all
the means in Our power to obtain its restoration. From the beginning of Our
reign it has been Our steadfast purpose to restore to the Church the
territories of which she has been despoiled; to this We hold fast, and ever
shall do so. If your Highness’s Ambassador or anyone else has written anything
different to your Highness or held out any hopes that We shall come to an
agreement on this point, he has written falsely; for it is Our duty not to
permit such an injury to be done to God and to the dignity of Our position. We
have always entertained a just love and esteem for your Highness and the
Republic, in the belief that, especially during Our Pontificate, you would
prove the defenders and not the usurpers of the rights of the Church. Now,
since nothing shall induce Us to desist from demanding the restitution of these
places, since God and our Saviour Jesus Christ, who has committed the care of
His Church to Us, and Our office, impose this duty upon Us, We declare that
anyone who writes or thinks otherwise, writes and thinks falsely. Therefore We
again admonish your Highness with all paternal kindness, and command you in the
name of the Lord to do freely and at once that which in justice you are bound
to do.”
All was in
vain; the Venetians were determined not to part with their spoils. Secure of
their strength, they mocked at the Pope’s threats. Sooner or later, the battle
would have to be fought out.
In Venice there
were stormy passages of arms between the Papal Nuncio Leonini and the Doge. The French Envoy vainly tried to act as a peacemaker. In Rome Giustinian continued with his “courteous importunity” to
press the Pope to bestow the unjustly gotten lands on Venice as a vicariate.
The exasperation of Julius at this persistence increased from day to day,
especially as he now thought he perceived that the Republic was beginning to
aim at Forli also. The Doge in conversation with Leonini denied this, but admitted that the Venetians would never give up the
territories that they had once occupied. They would sacrifice everything they
had, sooner than do this. In Rome, Julius said plainly to the Venetian
Ambassador that he would never rest till he got back his lost possessions, and
as he was not strong enough to conquer them himself, he would seek for help
abroad.
He kept his
word; but he was well aware that, beset and unarmed as he was, there was great
risk of finding himself under galling bondage to the allies whom he might call
in against Venice. Still he trusted to be able to find means to escape, and he
was convinced that there was no other way open. A State so powerful and
unscrupulous as Venice could only be mastered by a coalition; and from the
Spring of 1504 the Pope directed all his efforts to bringing this about. He
addressed himself to Louis XII of France, and to Maximilian, as King of the
Romans and Protector of the Church. On the 2nd of March, 1504, Mariano
Bartolini of Perugia was sent to the German Court. The Nuncio was charged to
urge Maximilian to help the Church against Venice, because it would be impossible
for the Pope to refrain any longer from laying the Republic under ban. The
instructions of the Nuncio in France, Carlo de Carretto,
Marquess of Finale, dated 14th May, 1504, were of wider scope. He was to
propose the formation of a League between France, Maximilian, and the Pope. In
the early spring Cosimo de’ Pazzi, Bishop of Arezzo,
had been sent to Spain, but his mission proved a total failure. Ferdinand
refused to receive him on the ground that he was a Florentine and a partisan of
France, so that Julius II was obliged to recall him in November, 15044 How
unfriendly Ferdinand’s sentiments towards the Holy See were at that time, may
be gathered from the fact that in the Spring of 1504 his representative in Rome
made overtures to the Venetians for an alliance with them. Julius II also
endeavoured to induce Hungary to put a strong pressure upon Venice to constrain
her to give up her booty.
Meanwhile the
missions to France and Germany had produced some good results. On the 22nd of
September, 1504, an agreement directed against Venice had been concluded at
Blois. In Rome, in November, it began to be said that the Pope was going to
pronounce the censures of the Church on the Republic. It was quite true that he
was fully determined to cut the claws of the Lion of S. Mark. On the 4th of
December he put a long list of grievances before the Consistory, and remarked
that, all else having failed, it would be necessary to have recourse to
spiritual weapons.
Alarmed by the
clouds which now seemed gathering on all sides, the Venetians at last made up
their minds to give way to a certain extent. Hitherto they had “put off the
Pope with words and nothing else,” now they endeavoured to conciliate him “by
some concessions which were of real practical value”. Meanwhile it was of great
advantage to them to have been able to procrastinate for so long. The agreement
of Blois broke down, Spain was not to be won, Maximilian and Louis XII fell out
with each other. In March 1505, Venice at last withdrew from several of the towns
in the Romagna, amongst others from Sant’ Arcangelo, Montefiori, Savignano, Tossignano, and
Porto Cesenatico. The Duke of Urbino assured the Doge that the Republic would
not be troubled any more about Rimini and Faenza. “No doubt,” says Sigismondo de’
Conti, “the Duke wished that this might be the case; but he had little
knowledge of the mind of Julius II, who had no notion of relinquishing these
places.”
In recompense
for this act of partial restitution effected in March 1505, Julius now
consented to receive the Venetian profession of obedience, but still only under
protest (May 5, 1505). Hieronymus Donatus pronounced the oration; it was full
of the usual extravagant phrases of the new style of oratory. The Pope’s reply
was brief and formal.
The Venetian
Envoys for the profession of obedience entered Rome with great pomp, and
flattered themselves with the hope of persuading Julius to consent to the
retention by the Republic of Faenza and Rimini, but had not the smallest
success. “The Pope,” writes the Florentine Envoy, “holds fast to his rights,
and every one thinks that he will get them.”
CHAPTER III.
Subjugation of Perugia and Bologna.—Downfall of the Baglioni
and Bentivogli.
JULIUS II was
not so absorbed in his efforts to regain all that the Church had lost in the
Romagna, as to neglect the equally necessary work of restoring her authority
in the other provinces. In February 1504, he induced the Florentines to give
back Citerna in the neighbourhood of Perugia, which
they had occupied after the death of Alexander VI. In May of the following year Anticoli and Nepi were
again brought under the immediate rule of the Church; f but the reconstitution
of the States of the Church could never be solidly effected until the feuds of
the Roman Barons were appeased and their adhesion secured. This Julius II
sought to accomplish by means of family alliances.
In November
1505, Niccolò della Rovere, a younger brother of Galeotto, was married to Laura Orsini, only daughter and
heiress of Orso Orsini and Giulia Farnese. A month
later the Mantuan Agent announces the approaching betrothal of Madonna Felice,
natural daughter of Cardinal Giuliano della Rovere,
with the youthful Marcantonio Colonna, This project, however, as well as some
others of the same nature, was given up. On the 24th of May, 1506, Felice was
married to Giovanni Giordano, the head of the Orsini of Bracciano,
in the Vice-Chancellor’s Palace. The Venetian Ambassador remarks on the contrast
between the ways of Julius II and those of Alexander VI on this occasion. The
wedding was privately celebrated, all public tokens of rejoicing being
forbidden; the wedding festivities were deferred till the arrival of the young
couple at Bracciano, where they spent their
honeymoon. Felice’s dowry also was by no means a large one. Two months later,
another alliance between the Colonna and Rovere families took place, in the
marriage of Marcantonio Colonna to a niece of the Pope’s. Frascati was given to
Marcantonio, together with Julius II’s former Palace of the SS. Apostoli. By
these means Julius trusted that he had now secured the loyalty of the most
powerful of the Roman families, and could turn his attention without danger
from that quarter to the restoration of the authority of the Holy See in
Bologna and Perugia.
Without any
legal title, and simply by force of arms, the Baglioni had made themselves
masters of Perugia, and the Bentivogli of Bologna;
the only trace of the Pope's authority that still remained was an insignificant
toll on the revenues of these two wealthy cities. In Bologna especially, which
was the largest city but one of the States of the Church, and its bulwark on
that side, all power was practically entirely in the hands of Giovanni
Bentivoglio. His government, though not so bad as that of the licentious
Giampaolo Baglione in Perugia, was anything but satisfactory. His haughty
consort, and more especially his four sons, had made the name of Bentivoglio
thoroughly detested in the city by their tyranny and violence. Numbers of
exiles from Bologna and Perugia, who had taken refuge in Rome, were perpetually
urging the Pope to intervene and deliver their cities from the tyrants who
oppressed them. Julius II listened to all their representations, but took his
time. He made his preparations quietly, collecting money and troops. At last,
when a favourable turn in the political situation seemed to promise success, he
resolved to make the attempt.
It was not till
March 1506, that news first reached Venice that the Pope was seriously
considering plans for bringing Perugia and Bologna back again under the direct
government of the Church. At first this was not believed; but later accounts
left no room to doubt its truth. It appeared that Julius II expected the
co-operation of France, and counted on a neutral attitude on the part of the
Republic. The Signoria did their best to dissuade him from this undertaking,
repeatedly urging the danger that Maximilian might enter Italy, a possibility
that had been already a good deal talked of. In Rome several of the Cardinals,
and especially Caraffa, were against it but the Pope was not to be moved. It
seemed to him that the favourable opportunity had now arrived for getting rid
of the Bentivogli, who had given him much cause to
complain of them when he was Bishop of Bologna. “Rome,” says Paris de Grassis, the Papal Master of Ceremonies, “was quiet, the
preparations for war were completed. Julius II himself headed the expedition,
accompanied by all his Court and nearly all the Cardinals; only such members of
the Sacred College as were incapacitated by age or sickness were permitted to
remain behind. The Legation of Rome was given to Cardinal S. Giorgio.”
In order to be
prepared for all contingencies, Julius II had concluded alliances with
Florence, Siena, Mantua, Ferrara, and Urbino. Still the expedition was “a bold
undertaking, and would be a master-stroke if it succeeded. Now that the Papacy
was hemmed in on the South by Spain in Naples, it was essential to provide for
greater expansion cm the northern side; the fulcrum of politics for the States
of the Church was pushed upwards into Central Italy; and Umbria, Tuscany, and
the Romagna acquired a new importance for the Holy See.”
The hazards of
the enterprise were increased by the attitude of Venice and France, from
neither of whom could the Pope obtain any certain answer.
In France the
difficulties came chiefly from Cardinal d’Amboise. Julius II had hoped to
conciliate his former rival by making him, soon after his election, not only
Legate of France, but also of Avignon and Venaissin;
he trusted by this means to put an end to the perpetual wranglings between the vassals of the Papacy and those of France. But the conduct of
d’Amboise as Legate was far from satisfactory; he embezzled the money that he
had to collect, and took no pains to conceal that he wished and hoped to be the
next Pope. Julius II was well aware of all this, but in his present position he
could not afford to engage in an open conflict with the all-powerful minister,
or his master. He continued, therefore, on friendly terms with both, and
endeavoured to meet their wishes in everything, as far as he could. But it was
not possible that this state of things should be of long duration. In the
Summer of 1505 serious differences with France arose in connection with the allotment
of the benefices which had been held by Cardinal Ascanio Sforza, and to these
were added disputes about appointments to Bishoprics. The creation of Cardinals
which took place on the 12th of December, 1505, in which the Ambassador of
Louis, Robert Chaland, received the purple, gave rise
to new misunderstandings. The King was extremely annoyed because the Archbishop
of Auch and the Bishop of Bayeux had not also been admitted into the Sacred
College. Alluding to the dangerous illness which he had had in the Spring he
exclaimed, “In Italy they think I am dead; but I will show the Holy Father that
I am still alive.” To revenge himself, he confiscated the revenues of all
benefices belonging to the Pope’s nominees in the Milanese. Julius II, whose position
in the States of the Church was still very insecure, was obliged to control
himself. He tried to conciliate the King, and on Christmas Day sent him a
consecrated sword by the hands of Pierre le Filleul,
Bishop of Sisteron. This accomplished diplomatist succeeded
in establishing better relations between Rome and France. In matters concerning
the Church, Louis XII gave in to the Pope, and in April 1505, negotiations
commenced for obtaining the assistance of France in the expedition against
Perugia and Bologna. The King began by endeavouring to persuade Julius to
relinquish his plans, and tried, in June, to take advantage of the situation by
requesting that two French prelates should be made Cardinals. The negotiations
dragged on interminably, without any result, and the patience of the Pope was
sorely tried. Venice reiterated her Warnings against the expedition in a
menacing tone. At last the brave old Pontiff determined to try the effect of
the accomplished fact. The step he took “furnished Machiavelli with a proof of
his thesis, that what never could have been accomplished by ordinary means, is
often achieved by precipitation and daring.” “The Pope,” writes the famous
Florentine politician, “ knew that it was impossible for him to drive the Bentivogli out of Bologna without help from France and
neutrality on the part of Venice. When he saw that he could get nothing from
either but uncertain and evasive answers, he resolved to bring both to the
point by giving them no time to deliberate. He started from Rome with as many
soldiers as he could collect, sending word to the Venetians that they were not
to interfere, and to the King of France that he must send troops to support
him. Thus they had hardly any time to consider, and as it was plain that if
they hesitated or refused the Pope would be extremely angry, they did what he
wanted ; the King of France sent him help, and the Venetians remained neutral.”
In a Secret
Consistory on the 17th August, 1506, Julius II after enumerating the crimes of
Giovanni Bentivoglio, mentioned for the first time his intention of taking the
field in person against him. On the 21st it was decided that the expedition
should start from Rome on the 24th. On the following day Briefs were despatched
to the allied Princes of Mantua and Urbino, desiring them to join the Papal
army on its march. Eventually its departure was put off to the 26th.
To avoid the
midday heat the start was made before sunrise. The Pope first heard a low Mass,
and gave his parting blessing to the people at the Porta S. Maria Maggiore. He
was accompanied by nine Cardinals and 500 fully armed knights, who, with their
retainers, made up a much larger farce than the number mentioned. Their first
halting-place was Formello, where the Pope was
received by Giovanni Giordano Orsini and his wife. On the following day Julius
went on to Nepi, where three more of the Cardinals
joined him. The march was always begun before sunrise. On the 28th August they
arrived at the little town of Civita Casteliana, which possesses a noble castle with which
Julius was delighted. Here a halt was made on account of the Feast of S. John
the Baptist; and Machiavelli, then Florentine Envoy, promised the support of
his government towards the subjugation of Bologna. On the way from Nepi to Civita Casteliana good news had arrived from the French Court,
which greatly rejoiced the Pope. On the other hand, he also heard that Giovanni
Bentivoglio was determined to resist.
It was still
quite dark when on Sunday, the 30th August, after hearing Mass, the Pope set
off for Viterbo. At Fabrica refreshments were
provided by Cardinal Girolamo Basso della Rovere. In
the evening a solemn entry was made into Viterbo, which was decorated for the
occasion. According to the usual custom the Blessed Sacrament was carried
before the Pope, who was attended by seventeen Cardinals. During his stay in
this place Julius II. drew up further regulations for the maintenance of the
reconciliation between the contending parties there which he had succeeded in
effecting in the previous year. The Legation was given to Cardinal Leonardo
Grosso della Rovere. At the same time the Archbishop
of Siponto was despatched as Nuncio to Bologna with a
stern message, and the Archbishop of Aix to Milan, to lead the French army of
assistance against Castelfranco; the Pope also sent money for the hire of a
troop of Swiss foot-soldiers.
On the 4th
September Julius II hurried on to Montefiascone, where he inspected the castle
and stopped for the mid-day meal. The house in which this was provided was in
such a rickety condition that the floor had to be supported with props. With a
playful allusion to the famous wine of the place, Julius II observed, “These
are wise precautions lest we should fall through, and people might say we had
had too much Montefiascone.” On the 5th he set off again for Orvieto, as usual
two hours before sunrise. It was so dark, says Paris de Grassis,
who accompanied the expedition as Grand-Master of Ceremonies, that nothing
could be distinguished. A number of people had spent the night in the open air
in hopes of seeing the Pope, who had to have torches carried before him.
Orvieto gave him a festive reception. An oak tree, to correspond with the arms
of his family, adorned the principal square. Instead of acorns, little boys
dressed as angels were perched on the extremities of its branches and on its
topmost boughs. Orpheus leant against the trunk and recited Latin verses in
praise of the Pope, to which the angels responded in chorus. A girandola was lighted to greet him on his return
from the Cathedral, whither he had gone to venerate the famous Corporal and
give his blessing to the people. Here also an immense crowd from the
neighbourhood had assembled to receive his blessing. The Duke of Urbino and
Antonio Ferreri, the Legate of Perugia, arrived at
Orvieto on the same day as the Pope. Both had been negotiating with Giampaolo
Baglione, who had hesitated for some time as to whether, considering the
strength of his citadel and the troops that he had with him, it might not be
worthwhile to resist. But he had little confidence in the loyalty of the
citizens, who, he knew, preferred the Papal government to his, and also feared
the hostility of the Oddi party. He knew, too, the character of his adversary
and that he was not one to do anything by halves. Hence he finally resolved to
accept the conditions proposed by the Papal Envoys and to submit. He came
himself to Orvieto and promised to hand over all the defences of Perugia and
the fastnesses in the neighbourhood to the Papal commanders, to recall most of
the exiles, to send his two sons to Urbino as hostages, and finally to join the
expedition against Bologna with 150 men. On the 8th September he returned to
Perugia, accompanied by the Legate and the Duke of Urbino, to prepare for the
entry of the Pope.
On the
following day Julius II left Orvieto. On his journey he received a letter from
the Marquess of Mantua announcing that he would arrive at Perugia on the 12th
of September and take part personally in the expedition against Bentivoglio.
When they came to the little village of Castiglione on the Lake of Thrasimene, which contained neither accommodation nor food
enough for the Pope’s retinue, to the dismay of his suite he announced his
intention of remaining there some days. He did this, Paris de Grassis says, in order to give Baglione time to organise
his men. But the commissariat at Castiglione presented such difficulties that
on the nth Julius was obliged to move on across the lake to the Isola Maggiore,
and thence to Passignano.
On the 12th
they proceeded to Corciano. They were joined on the
way thither by the Condottiere Giovanni Soffatelli with 700 men. At Corciano Cardinal Francois Guillaume
Clermont arrived with a letter from Louis XII about Bologna. It was soon known that
he was charged with the hopeless task of trying to persuade Julius to give up
his enterprise.
On Sunday, the
13th September, Julius made his entry into Perugia with great pomp. The eight
Priors in gala dress met him at the Porta San Pietro with the keys of the city.
All the bells were rung, the streets were thronged with people and decorated
with triumphal arches. Twenty Cardinals, the Duke of Urbino, Giovanni Gonzaga,
and many of the Roman Barons accompanied the Pope. He went first to the
Cathedral, where the Papal choir sang the Te Deum, which was followed by the solemn Benediction of the people and the
proclamation of an Indulgence. Julius II took up his abode in the Palace of the
Priors. On the 17th, the Marquess Francesco Gonzaga arrived. Three days hater
the Pope celebrated a solemn High Mass in the church of the Franciscans; he had
commenced his studies in early youth as a poor scholar in this convent; now he
wished to thank God and S. Francis for his elevation to the highest dignity in
the world.
The Pope was so
much inspirited by the success which had thus far attended his expedition that
his thoughts soared now to higher flights. He began to talk of setting forth to
deliver Constantinople and Jerusalem out of the hands of the unbelievers as soon
as things had been set in order in Italy; not of course, however, until the
Church had got back her States—that, he said emphatically, was an indispensable
preliminary. He commanded the celebrated preacher Aegidius of Viterbo, of the Order of the Hermits of S. Augustine, to deliver a sermon on
this subject while he and the Cardinals were at Perugia; and again later at
Bologna he desired him to preach in a similar sense. In his review of the reign
of Julius II. Aegidius says that it was generally
thought that the Pope would have carried out this project if he had not been
hindered by the blindness of men.
Julius remained
eight days in the newly-won city. He spent this time in labouring earnestly to
bestow on its unfortunate inhabitants the blessings of a settled peace. The
baneful and detested rule of the Baglioni was at an end. From henceforth the
beautiful city was again to enjoy its municipal liberties and republican
constitution under the sovereignty of the Church. The exiles were allowed to
return, with the exception of those only whose hands were stained with the
blood of their fellow-citizens. The magistracy of the Ten was abolished. Julius
left the old liberties untouched. Cardinal Antonio Ferreri was appointed Legate.
The ardent
spirit of the Pope was too much occupied with Bologna to remain any longer in
Perugia. On the 21st of September he started for Gubbio,
which he reached on the 22nd; on the 23rd he was at Cantiano,
and on the 25th entered Urbino, crossing the Appenines by the pass of Furlo. The gates were taken down by
the Duke, while the Prefect presented the keys of the city to the Pope. Julius,
from the artistic side of his nature, was charmed with the Palace of Montefeltro; but his mind was too full of the negotiations
with Bologna and France to give much attention to anything else.
He had sent
Antonio da Monte San Savino, Archbishop of Manfredonia,
to Bologna to endeavour to arrange terms for its return to its allegiance to
the Church, but Giovanni Bentivoglio had anticipated the Archbishop and completely
frustrated his mission. At first, Sigismondo de’ Conti says, he had been
disposed to submit, but the consciousness of his many misdeeds led him
eventually to change his mind. He succeeded in cajoling the citizens into
assuring the Papal Envoy that their Prince was no tyrant, but a true father to
his people. All the Archbishop’s kindly admonitions proved unavailing, and when
at last he threatened them with the censures of the Church, Bentivoglio and the
magistrates appealed to a General Council.
The Pope had
intended to await the result of the Archbishop’s mission at Urbino, but the
moment he heard that he was on his way back, in spite of the dissuasions of the
Duke and others, he determined to set out to meet him.
In the early
morning of the 29th September he started for Macerata. The roads were mere
bridle paths, the weather had broken, and the hills were covered with snow, so
that it was not possible on the 30th to set out till after midday. The rain fell
in torrents and the sumpter-mules stumbled and fell on the slippery paths, but
the Pope struggled on with passionate haste towards San Marino. He halted for
the night in the suburb of Borgo, and here a letter reached him from the King
of France promising to send troops and announcing his intention of coming himself
in Advent to Bologna, where he hoped to meet the Pope. This set Julius II free
from his greatest anxiety. The support of the French Government had been
delayed as long as possible, but now that he was assured of this the fall of
Bentivoglio was certain. There was nothing now to fear from Venice.
Nevertheless, “he still felt it prudent to take pains to conciliate the
Venetians”. He proposed to the Signoria to permit them still to retain Faenza and
Rimini as a fief. Though this offer was refused, he still continued to treat
the Republic with all possible consideration. “He strictly forbade his troops,
in their necessary march through Venetian territory, under pain of death to
take anything from the inhabitants, and emphatically assured their Envoy D.
Pisani, that the Signoria had nothing to fear from him. He was most anxious not
to afford the least shadow of excuse to Venice for her conduct”.
Instead of
taking the high road from San Marino to Rimini Julius chose the more difficult
mountain way, in order to avoid passing through the country occupied by the
Venetians. On the 1st October he spent the night in the miserable little
village of Savignano, and on the following day
crossed the Rubicon and entered Cesena, where he took up his quarters for the
night in the castle. Meanwhile the Bolognese Envoys had arrived. They besought
him “not to throw a peaceful city, which was thoroughly loyal to the Church,
into confusion by demanding novelties”. Julius answered, I know that what you
are now saying is not what you really think; you cannot be so foolish as to
prefer the rule of a cruel tyrant to mine”.
On the 5th of
October a Consistory was held, at which there were twenty Cardinals present
During the midday meal the news arrived that the French troops were on the road
with sixteen cannon and would be at Modena on Saturday. The following day
brought tidings of the death of King Philip of Castile. On the 7th October it
was determined in a Secret Consistory that an Interdict should be laid on
Bologna. A review of the troops took place in Cesena; the army consisted of 600
horsemen, 1600 footsoldiers, and 300 Swiss.
The persistent
rain had made the roads almost impassable; but Julius would brook no delay.
Early on the 8th October he moved onwards from Cesena to Forlimpopoli,
and on the following day to Forli. In entering the city, he and his suite had a
taste of the wild character of the people of the Romagna, who forcibly
possessed themselves of the Pope’s mule and baldacchino.
Meanwhile there
could no longer be any doubt that Bentivoglio had no intention of relinquishing
his usurped authority without a struggle. “He trusted in the strength of the
city, the number of his adherents, his high position, and his stalwart sons.”
According to Sigismondo de’ Conti, Bentivoglio demanded that the Pope should
enter Bologna without troops, and make no change in anything. These pretensions
so enraged Julius that he at once proclaimed the excommunication of Bentivoglio
and an Interdict on Bologna unless the city returned to its obedience within
nine days. On the 11th of October these Bulls were affixed to the doors of the
Cathedral of Forli. The Bolognese were thoroughly frightened, says Sigismondo
de’ Conti, but Bentivoglio was not yet subdued. He had sent large bribes to the
French commanders, and in their greed of gain they tried for a time to play
fast and loose between him and the Pope. Julius, however, threatened Louis that
if he did not keep his word he would publish his faithlessness to the whole
world; and at last the King commanded his generals to advance. The alarm
produced by their approach in Bologna determined the Pope to begin his march
from Forli; but instead of taking the easy road through the fertile country of
the Aemilia, he chose for his own party the one which
led across the mountains. This, Sigismondo de’ Conti says, was partly because
he did not trust the Venetians, and partly because he could not endure to look
upon Faenza, torn away from the Church as it now was. Thus, leaving the bulk of
the army and the Cardinals to take the direct road by that place, he with a
small retinue turned aside to the left towards Castrocaro,
a place which had once belonged to the Church but was now in the hands of the
Florentines. This was on the 17th October. Beyond Mutilano the road became extremely difficult; ten times it was crossed by a mountain
torrent; in one place the Pope had to dismount and clamber up the steep ascent
for a mile with the assistance of his servants. He was half-dead with fatigue
when in the evening he arrived at the little village of Marradi in the valley of Lamone, but he only allowed himself
a short night’s rest, and was off again before daybreak to Palazzuolo.
There he halted for a light meal in the afternoon, and then hurried on to Tossignano, which he reached in the evening. This place
belonged to the States of the Church; still he would not tarry, but went on at
once to Imola.
Though the Pope
was now sixty-four years of age, and suffering at the time from gout, he had
borne the fatigues of the mountain journey as if he had been quite a young man.
His attendants had to follow him whether they liked it or not. Paris de Grassis, the Master of Ceremonies, travelled by the easier
road by Faenza, but before they parted Julius II made him hand over to him his
costly cope, and his mitre and pectoral cross, “For fear,” he said, “they
should be stolen by the Venetians or the people of Faenza.” When his followers
were almost in despair at the difficulties of the road to Tossignano,
the Pope smilingly quoted Virgil’s lines:
Per varios casus, per tot discrimina rerum,
Tendimus in Latium.
—Aeneid.,
I., 204, 205.
In the little
town of Imola, which they reached on the 20th October, and where they were
received with festal honours, it was impossible to accommodate the whole of the
Pope’s suite. In consequence, all the officials and many members of the Court
remained at Castro Bolognese, and the army (2000 men) was encamped in the
neighbouring country. The Duke of Urbino being laid up with an attack of gout,
Francesco Gonzaga was appointed Commander-in-Chief on the 25th October. On the
same day Julius received a visit from the Duke of Ferrara. On All Souls’ Day,
just as the Pope was going to Mass, the tidings of the flight of Bentivoglio
arrived. The tyrant now saw the impossibility of making a defence, as he had
made himself utterly detested by his subjects. He therefore entered into a
compact with the French Commander-in-Chief, Chaumont, and fled to Milan with a
safe conduct from him. According to Sigismondo de’ Conti, as soon as the
Interdict was laid upon Bologna, the citizens completely deserted him. One by
one, all the priests left the city, and even his most trusted friends began to
say that the Pope was in the right. But Bentivoglio still held out until he
heard that Charles d’Amboise had actually arrived at Modena with an army of 600
lancers, 3000 horsemen, and a large number of guns.
The Bolognese
now sent Envoys to the Pope, begging for the removal of the Interdict, and
protection against the French army. The French troops were already under the
walls, and the soldiers were hoping for a rich booty from the pillage of the
city; they were encamped along the canal which conducts the water from the Rend
into the city. The citizens had taken up arms to defend themselves, and had
flooded the French camp by opening a sluice, which forced the enemy to retire,
leaving their baggage and heavy artillery behind them. They were furious, and
bent on vengeance; the city was only saved from being sacked by the prompt
action of the Pope, who bought them off with a present of 8000 ducats to the
generals and 10,000 to the soldiers. Thus the splendid reception, which was
accorded to him when he entered Bologna, was well earned. The triumphal entry
was to take place on the Feast of S. Martin.
But it was not
in Julius II. to endure such a long delay. “On the 10th of November,” says the
Master of Ceremonies, “his Holiness commanded me to look for a suitable and
safe residence for him within the city. This I found in the house which had
formerly belonged to the Templars, which was only a stone’s throw from the
gate, and the Pope took possession of it at once, bringing only a small number
of his suite with him. He would not listen to the dissuasions of the
astrologers, despising their science, and saying, ‘We will go in in the name of
God.’ Meanwhile it became known in the city that the Pope was within its walls,
and the ringing of bells and thunder of cannon soon announced the news to the
whole country round.”
The triumphal
procession to San Petronio, the Cathedral of Bologna,
took place on the nth November in lovely summer-like weather; the roses were
still in bloom. The pageant was of unusual magnificence, a perfect specimen of
the festive art of the Renaissance. The Master of Ceremonies, Paris de Grassis, has described all its details in his own pedantic
fashion; other contemporaries, such as the Venetian Envoy, Francesco Albertini,
and the Bolognese chronicler Ghirardacci, have
painted it in a broader style. Cardinal Adriano of Corneto celebrates it in a Latin poem. The Pope’s humanistic secretary, Sigismondo de’
Conti, gives a very good description of it in his great historical work.
“Thirteen triumphal arches”, he says, “were erected, bearing the inscription in
large letters: ‘Julius II, our Liberator and most beneficent Father! A hundred
young noblemen formed a cordon to keep the people back. First came a number of
horsemen as outriders to clear the way, then the light cavalry, the infantry in
glistening armour, the baggage of the Pope and the Cardinals, and finally the
bands of the regiments. These were followed by sixteen Bolognese and four Papal
standard-bearers with their banners, the ten white palfreys of the Pope with
golden bridles, and lastly the officials of the Court. Next to these came the
Envoys, Duke Guido of Urbino, the Marquess Francesco Gonzaga, Francesco Maria,
the Prefect of Rome, Costantino Areniti, the Duke of
Achaia and Macedonia, fourteen lictors with silver staves to keep the crowd
back, and the two Masters of Ceremonies, the first of whom, Paris de Grassis, was the organiser of the whole pageant. The Papal
Cross was carried by Carlo Rotario; he was closely
followed by forty of the clergy with lighted candles and the Papal choir
accompanying the Sacred Host. The Cardinals walked immediately in front of
Julius II, who was carried in the Sedia Gestatoria; his purple cope, shot with gold thread and
fastened across the breast with the formale pretiosum set with emeralds and sapphires, was a splendid
work of art. On his head he wore an unusually large mitre glistening with
pearls and jewels. He was accompanied by his two private chamberlains, his
secretary Sigismondo de’ Conti, and his physicians, the Roman Mariano dei Dossi, and the Sienese
Arcangelo dei Tuti. He was
followed by the Patriarchs, the Archbishops and Bishops, the Protonotary, the
ecclesiastical Envoys, the Abbots and Generals of religious orders, the
Penitentiaries and Referendaries. The whole
procession was closed by a body of the Papal guard. It moved very slowly, owing
to the immense concourse of spectators, all decked in holiday garb, who had
come in from the country round to receive the Pope’s blessing. Gold and silver
coins, struck for the occasion, were scattered by servants amongst them. At the
Cathedral the Pope first made his act of thanksgiving and then solemnly blessed
the people. It was dusk before he got back to the palace, now attended by the
magistrates of the city, who joined the procession after it left the
Cathedral.”
The work of
reorganising the Government of the city was begun by Julius II as soon as
possible after his arrival. “He was anxious to make the government of the
Church popular at Bologna, and for this end he confirmed their ancient
liberties and gave them a new constitution which left a large measure of
autonomy to the municipality, and also considerably lightened the burden of
taxation which had pressed on them so heavily of late.” The Council of Sixteen
was abolished, and on the 17th of November a Senate, consisting of forty
members, chosen for the most part from amongst the best burgher families of
Bologna, was appointed in its place. This Senate was to act as the Legate’s
Council, “but was granted far greater and more independent powers by Julius II
than the city had ever enjoyed under the Bentivogli”;
and he also diminished the taxes. “He wished to create a really free city which
should be loyal to him out of gratitude for his protection”. On the 26th of
November the anniversary of the Pope’s Coronation was celebrated with great
pomp. On this occasion, by his special desire, his favourite nephew, Galeotto della Rovere, was the
celebrant at the High Mass.
Louis XII and
his minister d’Amboise demanded an exorbitant price for the assistance they had
rendered. In addition to a large payment in money, they demanded the right of
appointing to benefices throughout the Milanese territory, the confirmation of
Cardinal d’Amboise’s Legation, and the nomination of three French Cardinals,
all near relations of his. The last condition was the hardest for the Pope; for
the Cardinals strongly objected to this increase of French influence in the
Sacred College, with the consequent enhancement of d’Amboise’s prospect of some day obtaining the Tiara, and the danger of the Court
being transferred to Avignon. This creation, the third in the reign of Julius
II, took place on the 18th December, 1506, in a Secret Consistory and was not
published at first. The three Cardinals were: Jean Francois de la Trémouille,
Archbishop of Auch; René de Prie, Bishop of Bayeux;
and Louis d’Amboise, Archbishop of Alby. They were not published until the 17th
May, 1507, after the Pope’s return to Rome, and at the same time as the
nomination of Cardinal Ximenes to the Sacred College.
In spite of
these concessions sharp dissensions, principally on account of the affairs of
Genoa, soon broke out between Louis and the Pope. “It was an open secret in
Rome that d’Amboise was working to obtain the Tiara at any cost, while, on the
other hand, at the Court of France every one said that the Pope was privately
encouraging and even helping the Genoese in their resistance to Louis XII”. In
the middle of February, 1507, the King said to the Florentine Envoy: “I have
sent word to the Pope that if he takes up the cause of the Genoese I will put
Giovanni Bentivoglio back in Bologna. I have only to write a single letter in
order to effect this, and Bentivoglio will give me 100,000 ducats into the
bargain. The Rovere are a peasant family: nothing but the stick at his back
will keep the Pope in order.”
When there
could no longer be any doubt that Louis XII was coming to Italy, Julius II felt
that it would be better to leave Bologna and so avoid a meeting. The French
King was collecting such a large army that it was impossible to think that its
only employment was to be the reconquest of Genoa. The Pope apprehended that
there might even be personal danger for him in remaining at Bologna, and
therefore at last decided on returning to Rome, to the great satisfaction of
his Court On the 12th of February, 1507, he informed the Cardinals in a Secret
Consistory of his intention. The Bolognese were completely taken by surprise
when they heard of this unexpected decision, and at first extremely
dissatisfied, as the work of reorganising the affairs of the city was not by
any means concluded. This feeling, however, was soon dissipated when they found
that the Pope was prepared to confirm the liberties granted to the city by
Nicholas V, and to divide the executive power between the Legate and the
Council of Forty. Nevertheless he had so little confidence in the unruly
citizens that he ordered a new fort to be built at the Porta Galiera. On the 20th of February he laid its first stone.
The day before this he had appointed Antonio Ferreri,
Legate of Bologna; an unfortunate selection, as soon appeared. Cardinal
Leonardo Grosso della Rovere took Ferreri’s place in Perugia, and was succeeded in Viterbo by Francesco Alidosi.
On the 22nd
February, 1507, as soon as the Bull appointing the Council of Forty had been
published, the Pope left the city to the great regret of the Bolognese, and on
the same day the new Legate entered it.
Julius II
stopped first at Imola to make further arrangements for the maintenance of
peace in that city. He then proceeded to Forli and Cesena, again avoiding
Faenza, visited Porto Cesenatico, Sant’ Arcangelo, and Urbino, and made his way
back to Rome by Foligno, Montefalco, Orto, Viterbo,
and Nepi. On the 27th of March, the Saturday before
Palm Sunday, he reached the Tiber at Ponte Molle where
he was welcomed by a crowd of people. He spent the night in the Convent of
Santa Maria del Popolo. On Palm Sunday he celebrated
High Mass in that church, and this was followed by his triumphal entry into the
city and procession to the Vatican.
Rome had
adorned herself for the occasion in that curious mixture of Christian and Pagan
styles which characterised the taste of the period. The streets were profusely
decorated with hangings and garlands, and bristling with inscriptions in praise
of the victor. Triumphal arches, covered with legends, were erected in all
directions; some of these, as for instance the one put up by Cardinal Costa on
the Campo Marzo, were also decorated with statues and
pictures. Opposite the Castle of St. Angelo was a chariot with four white
horses and containing ten genii with palms in their hands, welcoming the Pope;
on the prow of the chariot a globe rested, from which sprang an oak bearing
gilt acorns and rising to the height of the Church of Sta. Maria Traspontina. In front of the Vatican a copy of the Arch of
Constantine was erected representing the whole history of the expedition. By
order of the Legate, Cardinal S. Giorgio, an altar was prepared before every
church along the route of the procession, attended by the clergy and choir,
that the religious element might not be eclipsed by all the worldly pomp. An
eyewitness says that this triumphal entry was even more magnificent than the
coronation. Twenty-eight Cardinals accompanied the Pope, the procession took three
hours to pass from the gate of the city to S. Peter’s. The Master of
Ceremonies, Paris de Grassis, says that Julius knelt
longer than was his wont at the tomb of the Apostles, and as he entered his
apartment he said: “Since we have returned in safety, we all have indeed good
cause to chant the Te Deum.”
In truth Julius
II had achieved a great success. It was enthusiastically celebrated by the
poets of the time. In his address in the Consistory, Cardinal Raffaele Riario said: “When your Holiness first announced your project
of bringing Bologna back to a true obedience under the Holy See, the excellence
of the object that you had in view was plain to us all. Hence we rejoice with
our whole hearts now that this noble and glorious end is attained. The success
of your Holiness has immensely increased the honour and consideration in which
the Holy See is held, and covered your own name with a glory that will never
perish. Your Holiness has deserved to be ranked among those illustrious Popes
who, casting aside all personal considerations or family interests, proposed no
other end to themselves but the care of preserving and augmenting the authority
and majesty of the Holy See.”
CHAPTER IV.
Changes in the Political Situation in Europe between 1507 and
1509.—Julius II threatened by Spain and France.—The Venetians seek to
Humiliate the Papacy both Ecclesiastically and Politically. — Resistance of
Julius II. — League of Cambrai and War against Venice.—The Pope’s Victory.
The rapid
subjugation of two such important cities as Bologna and Perugia to the
government of the Church had immensely enhanced the prestige of Julius II in
the eyes of his contemporaries; but he had no notion of resting on his laurels,
knowing how far he still was from the goal which, from the first moment of his
elevation, he had proposed to himself. The “largest and by far the most
difficult portion of his task, the wresting from Venice of the towns and
territories belonging to the States of the Church which she had appropriated,
lay still before him.”
The settlement
of the year 1505 was of such a nature as, in the words of one of Julius II’s
bitterest opponents, to set a seal on the helpless condition of the Papacy. Even
a less energetic ruler than this Pope would have been driven to strive for the
evacuation of the Romagna.
But meanwhile
other events occurred which forced all Julius II’s plans for repelling the
usurpations of the Venetians into the background. He found himself seriously
threatened by both France and Spain.
The first dispute
between the Pope and King Ferdinand of Spain arose out of the suzerainty of the
Holy See over Naples and the feudal dues; to this, others were soon added by
the encroachments of the King on the right of the Church in the appointments to
Bishoprics in Castile. The tension produced by their differences went on
increasing, although on the 17th May, 1507, Julius had bestowed the Red-hat on
the King’s trusted minister Ximenes, the distinguished Archbishop of Toledo,
who was also an ardent advocate of reform. When, in June, 1507, Ferdinand was
on his way from Naples to Savona, Julius hastened to Ostia in hopes of
obtaining an interview; but the King discourteously sailed past Ostia without
stopping. At Savona, towards the end of June, he met Louis XII, and there a
reconciliation between the two Kings took place.
The
disproportionate strength of the army sent by the French King to quell the
rebellion in Genoa made the understanding between the two great powers appear
all the more ominous for the Pope, since it seemed to point to some further
design. Another remarkable thing was the number of Cardinals at his Court
First, there were the three French Cardinals (including d’Amboise), then the
Cardinal d’Aragona, who had been on the French side
ever since the death of Alexander VI, and Cardinal Sanseverino,
who afterwards lapsed into schism. In May 1507, Julius II had sent Cardinal
Antonio Pallavicino, a Genoese, to the King’s camp and he too was now in
Savona. The object of this Legation, according to Sigismondo de’ Conti, was to
persuade Louis to deal leniently with the Genoese, and to disband his army. The
magnitude of the French force had aroused alarm in Germany as well as in Italy,
as we see from the resolutions of the Diet of Constance.
According to
the statements made by Pallavicino to the Florentine Envoy in Savona, his
instructions were, first, to defend the Pope against the false accusation of
having invited Maximilian to invade Italy, and here, it seems, he was
successful. In the second place, he was to ask that the Bentivogli should be delivered over to Julius II, and here he failed. Louis XII denied
that Giovanni and Alessandro Bentivoglio were implicated in the plot against
Bologna; and said he could not in honour give them up. From expressions let
fall by one of the Cardinals who was present it appeared that Pallavicino had
several long conversations with Louis XII and d’Amboise, in the course of which
he met with but scant courtesy, especially from the latter.
In connection
with the meeting of the Kings at Savona, some things soon transpired which led
the Pope to apprehend that an attack on his spiritual power was contemplated.
Ferdinand himself admitted that the reform of the Church had been discussed. It
is also certain that here again, as formerly, he encouraged d’Amboise in his
aspirations after the Tiara.
Guicciardini
says that Julius II, in his extreme need, turned for help to Maximilian. This
is not confirmed by any recent investigations. “On the contrary, it is
demonstrable that the primary object of his policy was to effect a
reconciliation between Maximilian and Louis XII and to unite their forces
against Venice. From the end of the year 1506 Costantino Areniti had been working by his orders in this direction.”
The Pope’s
anxiety in regard to Maximilian’s proposed visit to Rome is a clear proof how
far he then was from thinking of applying to him for assistance. When in the
Summer of 1507 it was announced on all sides that Maximilian was certainly
coming to Italy, Julius resolved to send a Cardinal as Legate to Germany. He
selected a man who was one of Maximilian’s most faithful friends at the Roman
Court, Cardinal Bernardino Carvajal. Furnished with ample powers, the Cardinal
left Rome on the 5th of August, 1507, and passing through Siena met the King at
Innsbruck in the middle of September.
Carvajal was
charged to endeavour to dissuade the King from coming to Italy with an army,
and to propose instead that he should be crowned Emperor in Germany by two
Cardinals who would be sent for this purpose. Besides this, he was to make two
other propositions to the King, one for a universal League amongst all
Christian Princes against the Turks, and the other for a special alliance
between him and the Pope against Venice. The first proposal was rejected but
the second was accepted. This success, however, was of little use to Julius II
as long as Maximilian persisted in rejecting all overtures for a reconciliation
with France. Carvajal, however, remained with the King, and did not relinquish
his purpose. When he found that the Venetians obstinately persisted in refusing
to allow him to pass through their territory on his way to Rome, Maximilian
began to lend a more favourable ear to the persuasions of the Legate. “In
February, 1508, he made secret overtures for an offensive and defensive
alliance against Venice to the Court of France, which corresponded in all
essentials with the future League of Cambrai.”
At this time
Maximilian did a thing which was completely at variance with all previous
mediaeval custom. On the 4th February, 1508, through his counsellor Matthaeus
Lang, Bishop of Gurk, he solemnly proclaimed in the
Cathedral of Trent that he had assumed the title of “Emperor-elect of Rome”. He
took pains to explain, however, in a letter to the Empire, and by his Envoys at
Rome, that this proceeding was not in any way intended to contravene the Pope’s
rights in regard to his Coronation. On the contrary, he was as determined as
ever to come to Rome to be crowned there by Julius II as soon as he had
conquered the Venetians. The explanation thus given, safe-guarding the right of
the Holy See, enabled Julius II to declare himself perfectly satisfied, as in
fact he had reason to be, with an act which, at any rate, put off for a time
the dreaded visit to Rome. On the 12th of February, 1508, he addressed a Brief
to “Maximilian, Emperor-elect of Rome,” in which he recognised and praised the
correctness of his attitude towards the Holy See, and added that, as the Church
already prayed for him on Good Friday as Roman Emperor, he was fully justified
in assuming the title. The remaining contents of this Brief lead us to infer
that the Pope’s affability was not quite unmotived.
It impressed upon Maximilian the expediency of coming to terms with France, and
of making his visit to Rome without the accompaniment of an army.
On the day
after his proclamation, Maximilian commenced hostilities against Venice, and
his troops at first achieved some successes. On the 1st of March he wrote in
the highest spirits to the Elector of Saxony: “The Venetians portray their Lion
with two feet in the sea, one on the plain country, and one on the mountains.
We have all but conquered the foot on the mountains; one claw only holds fast,
which will be ours, with the help of God, in a week. Then we hope to tackle the
one on the plain.” But in a very short time the tables were turned. Supported
to the great annoyance of Julius II, by the French, the Venetians carried everything
before them. The victorious army overran Tivoli and Istria; in May they
conquered Trieste and Fiume, and by the beginning of June they had penetrated
into Carniola. On the 5th June the Emperor was only too glad to conclude,
through Carvajal’s mediation a truce for three years, which left to Venice
nearly everything that her arms had won. The Venetians, quite unaware of the
dangers of the path they were treading, were full of joy and triumph.
The land-hunger
of the Republic is described by Machiavelli in his verses:
San Marco impetuoso, ed importuno,
Credendosi aver sempre il vento in poppa,
Non si curò di rovinare ognuno;
Ne’ vide come la potenza troppa
Era nociva : e come il me’ sarebbe
Tener sott’ acqua la
coda e la groppa.
Asino d Oro.
In consequence
of this “land-hunger”, by this time there was hardly one of the great powers
which had not something to demand back from the Republic, and this it was which
brought about her ruin. Greedily anxious to come to terms with the Emperor, the
Venetians, in their haste, had taken no heed of the interests of their ally.
This produced a complete revolution in the policy of France.
Towards the
close of November, Maximilian’s confidential counsellor Matthaeus Lang, one
English and one Spanish Ambassador, Louis XII’s all-powerful minister
d’Amboise, and the Emperor’s daughter Margaret met together at Cambrai.
On the 10th of
December, 1508, the compact known as the League of Cambrai was here concluded.
The only portion of it that was destined for publication was the treaty of
peace between the Emperor and the King of France, which, among other things,
bestowed Milan as a fief on Louis XII and his descendants. The object of the
League was ostensibly the Crusade against the Turks; but before this could be
commenced Venice must be constrained to give back her spoils. A second and
secret treaty, to which the Pope and the King of Spain might be parties if they
chose, was drawn up, binding the contracting powers to oblige the Republic to
restore all the cities of the Romagna to the Pope; the Apulian sea-board to the
King of Spain; Roveredo, Verona, Padua, Vicenza,
Treviso, and Friuli to the Emperor; and Brescia, Bergamo, Cremo,
Cremona, Chiara d’Adda, and all fiefs belonging to
Milan to the King of France. If the King of Hungary joined the League he was to
get back all his former possessions in Dalmatia and Croatia; equally the Duke
of Savoy was to recover Cyprus, and the Duke of Ferrara and the Marquess of
Mantua all the territories wrested from them by the Venetians if they too
joined the League. France was to declare war on the 1st of April, the Pope was
to lay the ban of the Church and an Interdict on Venice, and to call on
Maximilian, as the lieutenant of the Holy See, to come to his assistance. Thus,
at the end of the forty days, the Emperor would be released from his treaty
obligations towards the Republic, and able to join the French.
Even down to
the present day Julius II continues to be blamed in unmeasured terms for having
brought the foreigner into Italy. As a matter of fact at this decisive moment
the Pope held back, and “it was Venice herself who drove him into joining the
League, which he cordially disliked, angry as he was with the Republic. He knew
France and her King well, and thoroughly mistrusted both, and this feeling was
amply reciprocated by Louis XII. and d’Amboise, even while the League of
Cambrai, in which no Papal plenipotentiary took part, was being negotiated.”
Julius II did
not join the League till the 23rd March, 1509, after he had exhausted all other
means of inducing Venice to acknowledge his temporal and spiritual authority.
In her dealings with Rome the foresight and penetration which usually
characterised the policy of the Republic seemed to have completely forsaken
her; she appeared not to have the faintest presentiment of the storm which her
high-handed conduct was conspiring to raise up against her.
It was not only
in her policy in the Romagna that Venice persistently trampled on the clear
rights of the Pope. Following her traditional practice she arrogated to the
State in purely spiritual matters a supremacy which would have made the
government of the Church by Rome an impossibility. The Government repeatedly forbade
and even punished appeals to Rome in ecclesiastical matters; ecclesiastical
persons were brought before secular tribunals without the permission of the
Pope; for this the deplorable corruption of many of the clergy might have
afforded some excuse. But there could be no justification for the conduct of
the Senate in giving away benefices and even Bishoprics on their own authority.
Even staunch friends of the Republic blamed these outrageous violations of
Canon-law, which no Pope could afford to tolerate. The consequence was a never
ending series of misunderstandings and disputes on ecclesiastical matters
between Rome and Venice. One of the most serious of these was that about the
appointment to the Bishopric of Cremona, which had been held by Ascanio Sforza.
After his death, in the Summer of 1505, the Senate immediately selected a
devoted adherent of their own, a member of the Trevisano family. Julius II refused to confirm this appointment, as he had intended to
give it to the excellent Cardinal Galeotto della Rovere. The Venetians maintained that it had always
been customary for the Senate to elect the Bishops for all the important cities
in their dominions and for Rome to confirm their choice, as if the Holy See was
bound in all cases to accept their nominations. The negotiations on this
subject dragged on for two whole years, until at last Julius II yielded, a sum
of money being handed over to the Cardinal as compensation. This dispute had
hardly been settled when a new and more violent one arose over the Bishopric of
Vicenza, rendered vacant by the death of Cardinal Galeotto della Rovere. Julius II had given Vicenza, together
with all the other benefices which had been held by the deceased Cardinal, to
Sixtus Gara della Rovere,
while the Venetian Senate determined to appoint Jacopo Dandolo. In spite of the
Pope’s refusal to confirm his nomination, Dandolo took possession of the See
and had the insolence to style himself “Bishop-elect of Vicenza by the grace of
the Senate of Venice”. He answered the Pope’s citation with a defiant letter,
knowing that he had the support of the Republic.
It will be seen
that the Venetians were steadily pursuing their aim of making the Pope, as
Machiavelli puts it, “their chaplain”, while Julius II as resolutely resisted.
He told the Venetian Ambassador that if necessary he would sell his mitre
rather than relinquish any of the rights that appertained to the successor of
S. Peter.
Side by side
with these incessant ecclesiastical difficulties the political ones still
remained unaltered. Julius II did everything he could to bring about an
amicable solution. Towards the end of the year 1506 he sent the celebrated
Augustinian Aegidius of Viterbo to Venice to offer,
if the Venetians would give up Faenza, to say no more about their other
conquests. But this proposal was also rejected. Then, replied the Pope, since
the Venetians refuse my request for one city only, they shall now be obliged by
force of arms to give back all they have taken. He took no pains to hide his
indignation from the Venetian Ambassador. The Republic, however, still
persisted not only in defying the Pope but in irritating him as well.
In the
insolence of their triumph after the defeat of Maximilian, the Signoria went
out of its way to make troubles in Bologna, the place of all others about which
Julius would be most sensitive
The position of
the Legate there was a difficult one, as the Bentivogli,
favoured by France, never ceased conspiring against the Government Ferreri kept them down with an iron hand, and, in addition
to this, behaved in so greedy and extortionate a manner to the Bolognese, that
they appealed to Rome against his exactions. Julius II had enquiries made, and
finding that the Legate was in fault, at once acted with his wonted energy. On
the 2nd of August, 1507, Ferreri, on whom larger
powers had been conferred in the previous month of May, was deprived of his
post and recalled to Rome. Meanwhile the discovery had been made that Ferreri had employed illegitimate means to obtain the
increase of his powers in May, and in consequence he was imprisoned in the
Castle of St. Angelo, and afterwards interned in the Convent of S. Onofrio (he died in 1508).
The government
of Bologna was then carried on by the Vice-Legate Lorenzo Fiesco,
while the Bentivogli continued to prosecute their
intrigues. In September it was discovered that they had been plotting to have
the Pope poisoned. Julius II sent the documentary evidence of this conspiracy
by Achilles de Grassis to Louis XII, begging him to
withdraw his protection from this family. On the 20th of September he sent 5000
ducats to the Bolognese to help them to defend themselves against the Bentivogli. In the beginning of 1508 one of the family made
a fresh attempt to get possession of the city. Julius burst into a violent rage
when he heard the news.
He failed, but
tried again in the Autumn of the same year. Meanwhile Cardinal Alidosi had been made Legate of Bologna. Alidosi’s ruthless severity had caused great irritation in
Bologna of which the Bentivogli sought to take
advantage; but their main hopes were founded on the support of Venice. However,
they were again unsuccessful. Julius II indignantly remonstrated with the
Venetian Government for harbouring in their territory the rebels whom Louis XII
had expelled from Milan, and “looking on with folded arms while these men
endeavoured to undermine the Papal authority in Bologna and made war upon the
Church”. The Venetians’ answer sounded like a gibe. They said that, far from
harbouring the refugees, they had done their best to get rid of them; but they
hid. themselves in the convents, and the Republic, of course, was powerless
against the Church’s right of asylum. To do away with this pretext the Pope on
the 22nd August despatched a Brief to the Patriarch of Venice, desiring him to
issue strict orders to all the convents in Venetian territory to refuse shelter
to all bandits and rebels; all such evil-doers must be driven from the gates.
In spite of all
that had happened, even now, at the last hour, an accommodation between Rome
and Venice might still have been possible if the Republic had not obstinately
persisted in all her most unreasonable demands. In the Autumn of 1508, when the
alienation of France had already definitely begun, and the anti-Venetian League
was under consideration, the Pope still held aloof. The selfish aims of France
and the ever increasing concessions that she demanded were no doubt the cause
of this.
It was far from
desirable in the eyes of Julius II that the power of the King of France should
increase, or that the Emperor should obtain a footing in Italy. He would have
gladly come to terms with Venice if she would have withdrawn her unjust
pretensions in both temporal and spiritual affairs. Bembo says that the Pope privately sent Costantino Areniti to Badoer, the Venetian Ambassador in Rome, to tell him of the formation of the
League of Cambrai, and to propose an arrangement if Venice would restore Faenza
and Rimini to the Church. Badoer at once wrote to inform the Council of Ten,
but received no answer. The whole influence of the numerous class of needy
nobles whose interests were involved in keeping the conquests in the Romagna
was against their restitution, and this prevailed. The Venetians trusted that
a League composed of such heterogeneous elements would not last long.
This view was
conceivable; but the infatuation of Venice in still continuing at this critical
juncture to flout and irritate the Pope in every possible manner in spiritual
as well as in temporal matters, is truly incomprehensible. “Those even who are
friendly to Venice blame her insolent and domineering behaviour towards the
Holy See, not only in regard to the cities of the Romagna, to which she has not
the smallest right, but also in matters concerning benefices and ecclesiastical
jurisdiction.”
The manner in
which the testy Venetian Envoy Pisani answered Julius II’s complaints on these
subjects is something quite unique in the whole history of diplomacy. When the
Pope protested to Pisani against the encroachments of the Republic on his
ecclesiastical rights, and added that the Signoria would some
day have cause to repent of their conduct, the Envoy replied: “Your Holiness
must grow a little stronger before he can expect much from the Republic”.
Naturally incensed, Julius answered, “I will never rest until you are brought
down to be the poor fishermen that you once were”. “And we”, said Pisani, “will
make a priestling of the Holy Father unless he
behaves himself”.
Such was the
manner in which the Venetian Envoy thought fit to behave towards the Pontiff in
whose power it lay to have stifled the League of Cambrai at its birth. Even yet
the Pope did not permit himself to be goaded into any hasty action. He still
hoped to succeed in “alarming the Venetians enough to induce them to comply
with his demands”, and then to break up the dangerous League. Pisani fully
realised the Pope’s apprehension in regard to Louis XII and Maximilian, and saw
clearly that greater forbearance on his part might have prevented Julius from
joining the League. Yet he continued to behave as before.
When in
February, 1509, the question of the Bishopric of Vicenza had reached the point
at which a definite answer could no longer be deferred, that which the Pope
received sounded like a sarcasm. “The contemptuous insolence of the language
employed by the Venetians requires to be known in order fully to understand the
injustice of those who reproach Julius II with his participation in the League
of Cambrai. It was not until every means of persuasion had been tried, and the
last hope of an amicable settlement had vanished, that he made up his mind to
join it.”
The change in
the Pope’s mind was probably finally caused by the fear lest France should
unite with Venice to overpower him. His decision was taken soon after a
conversation which he had with Pisani in the middle of March at Civita Vecchia. It was a lovely
spring day; all nature seemed to breathe nothing but peace and harmony, and the
clear blue sea was like a sheet of glass. The Pope, who was very fond of
sailing, was on the water, accompanied by Pisani, and turning to the Envoy,
“How would it be,” he said, “if you were to advise the Signoria to propose to
me to grant Faenza and Rimini as a fief to one of your citizens? That would set
everything right.” Pisani answered coldly, “Our State is not in the habit of
making kings of any of her citizens.” The Pope’s proposal was never mentioned
either to Pisani’s gentler colleague, Badoer, or to the Senate. Immediately
after his return from Civita Vecchia,
Julius joined the League.
On the 22nd of
March a Consistory was held, to which the Venetian Cardinals Grimani and Cornaro were not
summoned. On the following day Julius II signed the Bull announcing his
adhesion to the League, but with the condition that he was to do nothing
against Venice until after hostilities had been commenced by France. Meanwhile
the Venetians had begun to see that they had been premature in their hopes that
the League would dissolve itself. On the 4th of April they determined to give
up Faenza and Rimini, but this offer, which was made to the Pope on the 7th, came
too late; to have accepted it now would have involved him in a war with the
allies. The adherents of the Republic in Rome now allied themselves with the
Colonna and Orsini, and tried to induce them to rise against the Pope by offers
of money to both, and by promising Urbino to the Colonna. When Julius heard
this, he threatened to excommunicate the Orsini, and sent word to Pisani, who
had been stirring them up to revolt against the Church under his very eyes,
that he would thrust him into the deepest dungeon in Rome. The situation
appeared so menacing that the Palace guard was doubled. Meanwhile Felice Orsini
succeeded in breaking off the bargain between Venice and the family.
On the 27th of
April the greater excommunication was pronounced against Venice unless within
twenty-four days all the possessions of the Church in the Romagna, and the
revenues derived from them, were restored to her. This document was drawn up in
the clearest and strongest terms, describing the outrageous proceedings of the
Republic in both temporal and spiritual affairs, and 600 copies were at once
printed and circulated. The Venetians forbade the publication of the Bull in
their dominions under stringent penalties. They had already prepared an appeal
to a future Council. This was now posted during the night on S. Peter’s and the
Castle of St. Angelo; the Pope had it torn down at once. The appeal was sent in
the beginning of May to the ambitious Cardinal Archbishop of Gran and Patriarch
of Constantinople, Thomas Bakocs, as one of those
Princes of the Church who was entitled under the old, though now obsolete,
constitutions to join in the summoning of a General Council. The Hungarian
Primate was, however, too prudent to respond to this invitation.
Meanwhile the
war had been begun by the members of the League, which was now joined by
Ferrara and Mantua. The Venetians had, at an enormous cost, got together an
army of 50,000 men, a large force for those times; their war-cry was “Italy and
Liberty!”. The Republic bent herself bravely to the task of resisting the
enemy, overmatched as she was; but the traditional pride of her citizens high
and low sustained her. The ban of the Church, it was maintained, had lost much
of its power; it was no longer so dangerous as it used to be. Ferdinand of
Spain had been forced to join the League against his will; the Emperor had no
money; the Pope’s mercenaries were of no account; the League was too numerous,
the interests of its various members were too divergent for it to hold together
for long; the Republic would ride safely through the storm this time, as she
had ever done.
But one day
sufficed to annihilate all the proud hopes of the Venetians, and nearly all
their power upon the mainland. The decisive battle was fought on the 14th of
May on the plain of Agnadello near Vailate in the province of Cremona; it ended in the complete
rout of their army. The undisciplined mercenaries of the Republic were
scattered like chaff. While the French pursued the fugitives, the Papal troops,
under the Duke of Urbino, overran the Romagna. All the country up to Verona,
including that strongly fortified city itself, was subdued; town after town
fell into the hands of the conquerors.
The Venetians
now no longer scorned the Pope’s excommunication. A contemporary writer
compares the battle of Agnadello with the defeat of
the Romans at Cannae. The position of Venice was rendered still more critical
by the blow which the recent development of maritime enterprise had inflicted
upon her commerce. If in this particular the disadvantages with which they had
to contend were not of their own making, so much cannot be said of the causes
which mainly contributed to bring about their discomfiture on the mainland.
Machiavelli’s penetrating glance discerned, and has described, these with
admirable insight and clearness. He takes as the text for his criticism the
saying of Livy, that the Romans were never depressed by misfortune or elevated
by success. “The exact reverse of this,” he writes, “was the case with the
Venetians. They imagined that they owed their prosperity to qualities which, in
fact, they did not possess, and were so puffed up that they treated the King of
France as a son, underrated the power of the Church, thought the whole of Italy
too small a field for their ambition, and aimed at creating a worldwide empire
like that of Rome. Then when fortune turned her back upon them, and they were
beaten by the French at Vailate, they not only lost
the greater part of their territory by the defection of their people, but, of
their own accord, out of sheer cowardice and faint-heartedness, they gave back
most of their conquests to the Pope and the King of Spain. In their
discouragement they even went so far as, through their Envoy, to offer to
become tributaries of the Emperor, and to try to move the Pope to compassion by
writing to him in a tone of craven submissiveness. This reverse befell them
when the war had only lasted four days, and the battle itself was only
half-lost; for only half their troops were engaged and one of their Proveditori escaped. Thus, if there had been a spark of
energy or enterprise in Venice, they might have marched on Verona with 25,000
men to try their fortune again, and await any favourable turn that might give
them a chance of victory, or at any rate of a less ignoble defeat, and of
obtaining honourable terms; but by their unwarlike spirit, the natural result
of the absence of all military organisation, they lost both heart and land at a
single throw. The like fate will befall all such as behave themselves as they
have done, for this arrogance in prosperity, and cowardice in adversity, are
the effect of the spirit in which a man lives and the education he has
received. If these are vain and frivolous he will be the same; if the reverse,
the man will be of a different stamp, and will know enough of the world not to
be over elated when good befalls him, or too much cast down when he meets with
reverses. And what holds good in regard to individuals also holds good in
regard to those many individuals who live together in the same Republic; they
will attain to that measure of perfection which the life of the State, as a
whole, has attained. It has often been said before, that the chief support of
all States consists in a strong army, and that no system of laws and no
constitution can be called good which does not provide for this, but I do not
think it superfluous to repeat it; for all history proves its truth, and shews
also that no army can be strong that is not well disciplined, and that it is
impossible to secure good discipline unless the State is defended by her own
subjects.” The Venetian aristocracy had purposely abstained from giving
military training to the people; they expected to conquer Italy with hired
troops”.
The first thing
which the Venetian Government did when the news of their defeat at Agnadello arrived, was to evacuate all the places which
they had occupied in the Romagna. Ravenna, Cervia,
Rimini, Faenza, and several smaller places were at once handed over to the
Legate of the Romagna and the Marches to Cardinal Francesco Alidosi.
The cities on the Apulian coast were also restored to the Spaniards. They were
anxious beyond everything else to win the Pope, and now wrote in the humblest
and most submissive terms. On the 5th of June the Doge wrote an appealing
letter to Julius II, “The hand that struck,” he said, “could heal if it would.”
At the same time, six Envoys were sent to Rome to sue for peace. Being
excommunicated, they could only enter the city at night. After all that had
happened, they were not likely to find men’s minds in Rome very favourably
disposed towards them. “If the rebellious children who, a few weeks before, had
been insultingly defying the Pope to his face, and now came to proffer
obedience only under the stress of extreme need, asked to be received at once
with open arms, the request could only be deemed diplomatically permissible
because the person to whom it was addressed was the Holy Father”.
On the 8th of
July one of the Envoys, Girolamo Donato, whom the Pope had known in former
days, was personally absolved from excommunication and granted an audience.
Julius, deeply incensed at the appeal of the Venetians to a General Council
which had just been published, proposed crushing conditions. The Republic must
make complete restitution of all her spoils, she must give up Treviso and Udine
to the Emperor. “She must renounce her possessions on the mainland, and all
pretensions to interfere in matters connected with benefices, or to impose taxes
on the clergy. She must equally renounce her claim to exclusive rights of
navigation in the Adriatic, which from Ravenna to Fiume she had hitherto
regarded as a Venetian lake. When she had agreed to these things he would begin
to speak of absolution. The Senate was furious when these demands were
communicated to it. The Doge exclaimed that “he would rather send fifty Envoys
to Constantinople to beg for help from thence, than comply with them”. In fact
the Sultan was asked whether the Republic might count upon his assistance.
Just at this
time events on the scene of the war began to take a more favourable turn for the
Venetians. Padua was recovered on the 17th of July, and a month later news came
to Rome that they had captured the Marquess of Mantua. The Pope was deeply
moved with vexation, and gave passionate vent to his feelings. When, later in
the Autumn, they had also been successful in repelling Maximilian’s attack on
Padua, their old arrogance began to revive. It was decided to break off the
negotiations with Julius. “All the Venetian Envoys, with the exception of
Donato, who was still to remain at the Court, were recalled. When the Pope
heard of this (Cardinal Grimani applied on the 5th
November for permission for departure of the five to leave Rome), he exclaimed:
All the six may go home; if the Republic wants to be released from the ban, she
must send twelve.” Such and similar things were said in moments of excitement;
in calmer seasons, Julius must have said to himself that it would be necessary
to come to terms with the Republic; Louis XII. and Maximilian could not be
allowed to carry the war to a point that would involve her destruction. If
Venice were annihilated, not only the freedom of Italy, but also the
independence of the Holy See would fall with her. The enormous preponderance
which the course of recent events had conferred on the King of France showed that
it was absolutely necessary that the Republic should be rehabilitated. Louis
XII was absolute master of Northern Italy, Ferrara and Florence were his
allies, he was sure of the Emperor, and the King of Spain having got what he
wanted from the League, would be satisfied now to stand aside and let things
take their course.
Just about that
time, in the month of October, the King of France had made the Pope painfully
sensible of his power by obliging him by force to give way in a dispute about a
Bishopric. In addition to these considerations, Julius was at heart an Italian
patriot, and keenly felt, from this point of view, the disgrace of foreign
domination. Hence he was bent on a reconciliation with Venice, and all the
efforts of the new French Ambassador, Alberto Pio, Count of Carpi, and of the
French Cardinals to hold him back were unavailing. After a long struggle with
difficulties of the most various kinds, the peace negotiations were at last
brought to a successful issue on the 15th February, 1510. Venice withdrew her
appeal to a Council, admitted the right of the Pope to pronounce ecclesiastical
censures, the immunity of the clergy from taxation, and the jurisdiction of the
ecclesiastical courts, recognised the liberty of the Church in regard to appointments
to benefices, renounced all pretensions to interfere in the affairs of Ferrara,
and granted free navigation in the Adriatic to all the Pope’s subjects and to
the Ferrarese; she also repudiated all treaties concluded with towns belonging
to the Pope, and promised not to afford protection to rebels against the
Church, and to restore all goods that had been wrested from religious associations.
The solemn
absolution of the representatives of Venice, shorn of most of the customary
humiliating adjuncts, took place in the Court of S. Peter’s on the 24th
February. The Pope himself held the Gospel, the Envoys laid their hands on it
and swore to observe all the conditions of the treaty. In Rome demonstrations
of joy were universal, and in Venice also public thanksgivings were celebrated;
but on the 15th February the Council of Ten had secretly drawn up a protest
against the conditions of the absolution, declaring them null because the
Republic had been driven by force to sign them.
The Venetians,
however, found means to revenge themselves on the Pope who had so humbled them
and had forced them to yield on all the important points. They began to
disseminate pamphlets and libels against Julius II. The first of these, in the
form of letter from Christ to the Pope, was still couched in fairly temperate
language it mourned the horrors of the war, as if Julius, in merely demanding
what was, by every title, simply his own from Venice, was responsible for
these.
CHAPTER
V.
Wars
of Julius II. to secure the Independence of the Holy See and to deliver Italy
from the French.— Alliance with the Swiss, and War with Ferrara.—Schism in the
College of Cardinals.—Sickness of the Pope and Perilous Situation in
Bologna.—His Winter Campaign against Mirandola.—Loss
of Bologna. — Attempts of Louis XII. and Maximilian I. to create a Schism.—PseudoCouncil at Pisa and General Council in Rome.
The Peace
concluded by Julius II with Venice, consequent on the danger to the
independence of the Holy See and the freedom of Italy caused by the increasing
preponderance of France in the Peninsula, brought the Pope at once into
collision with Louis XII and Maximilian I, who both desired the complete ruin
of the Republic. The estrangement between him and these two powers was further
intensified by his determination to resist all their efforts to increase their
possessions in Italy. He now addressed himself with characteristic energy to
the second great task of his Pontificate: that of shaking off the yoke of
France which pressed so heavily on the Holy See and on his native land, and
driving the foreigner, “the barbarians,” out of Italy. “His great soul was
filled with plans for the welfare of his country.”
The
difficulties and dangers of the undertaking were plain enough. Julius had
understood from the first that it would be no easy task to lay the spirits
which he had invoked in his time of need. His thoughts were perpetually
occupied in devising ways and means for freeing Italy from the French; he knew
well enough both the strength of France and her love of glory. He saw her
influence paramount in Florence and Ferrara, Milan subjugated, a new fortress
erected in the midst of his own Genoa to hold her down, Venice humbled to the
dust at a single stroke. “Had he not cause enough to tremble for the See of
Rome, which certainly could not be saved if Italy were subdued?”
From the first
moment that Julius II recognised the necessity of breaking the power of France
in Italy, he gave his whole mind to the task with the inflexible will and
indomitable courage that characterised him and all his actions; it was not in
his nature to hesitate or delay. Thus in the eyes of Italian patriots he is the
hero of his century.
From the outset
Julius had one great advantage over his opponent in the swiftness with which he
saw and resolved upon the measures to be adopted. On one day Louis XII would
break out into violent diatribes against the Pope, who, in the words of the
French Cardinal, had plunged a dagger into his heart by making peace with
Venice, and on the next he would again talk of a reconciliation with Rome. On
the 25th May, 1510, Cardinal d’Amboise, Louis’ ablest councillor and the most
dangerous enemy of Julius, whom he was burning to supersede, died. The effect
of his death was greatly to increase the vacillations of the French King.
For Julius this
event was a fresh incentive to pursue with redoubled energy the noble aim
“which it is his greatest glory to have succeeded in achieving even partially.”
The first necessity was to find coadjutors interested like himself in checking
the predominance of France in Italy. The Pope sent out feelers in all
directions and entered into relations with Maximilian, with Henry VIII of
England, with the King of Spain, and with the Swiss. He met with many bitter
disappointments. The negotiations with Germany and England failed completely.
He had counted on securing the open support of the King of Spain by bestowing
on him in the beginning of July, 1510, the investiture of Naples without any
regard to the claims of the Valois, but here, too, he was unsuccessful at first
On the other hand, he was successful in obtaining the help of the Swiss. Here
Louis XII’s want of tact in his conduct towards the Swiss Federation came to
his assistance, and also the exertions of the Swiss Bishop of Sitten, Matthaeus Schinner, who had always been a
determined opponent of the French policy. This remarkable prelate had great
influence over his fellow countrymen on account of his blameless life and his
strictness in all ecclesiastical matters. He was a man of immense energy, one
of the greatest his country has ever produced. “His eloquence stirred all
hearts in a wonderful way”. His love for the Church and her visible head was
the mainspring of his life, which was in great part devoted to persevering
efforts to enlist the whole martial spirit and power of his nation in her
defence. He always disliked the French; in the year 1501 he preached with such
vigour and effect against France that those who belonged to that party tried to
have him silenced. He was penetrated with the old mediaeval idea of the two
swords: the spiritual sword wielded by the Pope, Christ’s Vicar on earth, and
the temporal by the Head of the Holy Roman Empire, the protector of the Church.
Thus he considered that it was the first duty of Switzerland, and would be the
path of glory for her, to stand by the Emperor in defending the Roman Church
against France, whose predominance in Italy was a permanent danger to the
freedom and independence of the Holy See.
Julius II
quickly recognised the valuable qualities of the Swiss prelate, and on the 10th
September, 1508, made him a Cardinal, though his proclamation was deferred for
the present. The Swiss had withdrawn from the League with France in the Summer
of 1509, and now Julius turned to Schinner for assistance. In the close of that
year the Bishop, not without personal risk, hastened to Rome to arrange the
details of an agreement between the Pope and the Swiss Federation. In February,
1510, as Papal Legate, he laid the proposals of Julius II before his countrymen
at Schwyz, and then at Lucerne on the same day. His enthralling eloquence
overcame all objections. On the 14th of March, 1510, the district of Wallis and
all the twelve Cantons ratified a treaty for five years with the Pope. “The
Federation undertook the defence of the Church and of the Holy See. They
promised, whenever the Pope should require their help, to furnish 6000 men to
meet the foe, provided they were not themselves engaged in war. Further, for
the term of their agreement they engaged not to ally themselves with any third
power without the Pope’s permission, nor to supply any other power with troops.
The Pope on his part bound himself to consult the interests of the Federation
in any treaties of peace or alliances that he might make, to defend them with
his spiritual weapons against their enemies, to pay to each Canton and to
Wallis a yearly sum of 1000 florins, 6 francs monthly to each soldier in the
army, and twice that sum to each officer”.
Trusting to his
alliance with the Swiss and to the support of Venice, Julius II. made no secret
of his intention of going to war with France. “These French,” he said on the
19th June to the Venetian Ambassador, “are trying to reduce me to be nothing
but their King’s Chaplain : but I mean to be Pope, as they will find out to
their discomfiture.” He spoke in similar terms to the Florentine Envoy.
Cardinal Clermont, who attempted against the Pope’s wishes on the 29th June to
escape to France, was arrested and taken to the Castle of St Angelo. Other
Cardinals who were, as Julius II. knew, secretly working on the French side,
were threatened with a similar fate. When the Cardinals Briçonnet,
Louis d’Amboise, de Prie, and Sanseverino interceded with the Pope for his release, he told them to their faces that it
looked as if they too wished to be provided with lodgings in St. Angelo.
At the same
moment Louis XII attacked the Pope in his spiritualities by reviving a
considerable number of the provisions of the Pragmatic Sanction, especially those
relating to benefices. In the beginning of July a sharp exchange of high words
took place between Julius and the French Ambassador. Carpi remonstrated with
the Pope on his intention of helping the Genoese to shake off the yoke of
France, which he said was a line of conduct on the part of Julius that his King
had not deserved. The Pope replied, “I look upon your King as my personal
enemy, and do not wish to hear anything more.” The Ambassador was shown to the
door and Julius refused to hear any further explanation. The rupture with Louis
XII was now definitive. The Venetian Envoy writes that “the French in Rome
stole about looking like corpses.”
The Pope’s plan
was to attack the French in Italy on all sides at once; in Genoa, Verona,
Milan, and Ferrara, The Venetians were to throw themselves on Verona, the Swiss
to invade Milan, the Fregosi in Genoa, supported by
Papal and Venetian troops, were to rise against France, and Francesco Maria della Rovere, also in combination with Venice, was to march
against Duke Alfonso of Ferrara.
Julius II was
especially exasperated against the Duke of Ferrara, who had thrown himself
completely into the arms of France and continued to harass Venice in spite of
the Pope’s repeated commands. The Prince was not only his own feudatory vassal,
but was also bound to him by ties of gratitude for quite recent services.
During the past Winter he had restored Comacchio to
Alfonso, and prevented the Venetians from attacking him. Now, protected by
Louis XII, in defiance of that monarch’s treaty with Julius II, the Duke went
on with the war against Venice, and did everything in his power to injure the
Holy See. He harried the inhabitants of the States of the Church, ignored the
Pope’s authority even in ecclesiastical matters, and persisted in working the
salt marshes of Comacchio to the detriment of the
Papal monopoly at Cervia, asserting that he held this
town in fief from the Emperor and not from the Holy See. All the Pope’s demands
were either “evaded or met by a direct refusal or an evasion; Alfonso was
determined not to obey him”. Finally Julius II commenced legal proceedings
against his insubordinate vassal. A Bull of 9th August excommunicates Alfonso
as a rebel against the Church, and declares him to have forfeited all his
dignities and fiefs. In it he is severely blamed for his adhesion to Cardinal
d’Amboise, who, it says, was plotting to obtain the Tiara during the lifetime
of the lawful Pope, and sowed dissension between France and Rome.
The Pope’s
attempt to wrest Genoa from France was violently resented by Louis XII.
Machiavelli, who was then an Envoy at the French Court, describes the
exasperation of the King and his courtiers. “As regards the Pope,” he writes
from Blois on the 21st July, “ you can imagine what is said of him; obedience
is to be renounced and a Council hung upon his neck. The complete annihilation
of his power, both temporal and spiritual, is the least of the penalties with
which he is to be visited. Louis is determined to vindicate his honour even if
he loses everything he possesses in Italy.” Machiavelli gratified his hatred of
Popes by fanning the flame with all his might He advised the King to set the
Roman Barons on Julius; he would then be fully occupied at home and have to let
the King of France alone.
Fortunately for
the Pope, Louis did not follow this advice, but resolved to attack his enemy
just where he was invincible—in his purely spiritual power. This Pope, who was
such an obstacle to French domination in Italy, was to be hurled from his
throne by means of a Synod creating an ecclesiastical revolution. Thus, “the
great tournament of the European powers was transferred from the field of
battle and the realm of diplomacy to that of the life of the Church”.
On the 30th of
July, Louis XII issued a summons to all the Bishops in his kingdom to send
representatives of their Dioceses in September to Orleans, there to meet
together and hold a consultation on the liberties and privileges of the
Gallican Church. By a royal ordinance of 16th August, 1510, all French subjects
were forbidden to visit the Court of Rome. The Assembly met at the appointed
time, not, however, at Orleans but at Tours, whither Louis also betook himself,
forbidding the Papal Nuncio Leonini to follow him.
The French Court-Bishops answered the questions set before them in the sense
desired by their master. The Pope did wrong in making war on any Prince who was
not one of his vassals, and such a Prince had a right to defend himself with
arms, and even to invade the States of the Church if necessary, and to withdraw
his kingdom from its obedience to such a Pope. The term at which the
renunciation of obedience should take place must be decided by ancient custom
and the provisions of the Pragmatic Sanction, founded on the decrees of the
Council of Basle. It was further declared that a King when thus attacked had a
right to protect his allies against the Pope, and to hold all his censures as
null and void. At the same time it was agreed that before taking any farther
steps the Gallican Church should send Envoys to the Pope to warn him not to
proceed in his present conduct, and to demand a General Council. When this had
been done, they would have a right to take other measures. Finally they granted
a considerable subsidy to the King for the prosecution of the war in Italy. On
that point Louis XII’s plans were of a very extensive character. “He intended
to create a new heaven and a new earth in Italy”. He proposed to lead an army
to Rome and himself depose the Pope. “But his mood varied from day to day; one
day he seemed quite determined to begin at once, the next he shrank back
alarmed at some apprehended danger, or at the expenses of the war. The
Ferrarese Envoy complained that he changed his mind every morning. He allowed
the precious time in which action was possible to slip away, while he amused
himself with the fatuous contemplation of the power which he possessed, but did
not know how to use”. Finally he decided upon waiting till the Spring, and till
he could be sure of Maximilian and Henry VIII.
Not so Julius
II. He knew nothing of fear or irresolution, and difficulties only roused him
to greater exertions. His character corresponded curiously with his family
crest, which was the unbending oak,—the resolution which he now formed was in
complete harmony with his fearless and eager temperament. Though he was far
from well he determined to accompany his army in the campaign against Ferrara,
the most advanced outpost of the French in Italy, and thus hold his
untrustworthy and irresolute generals to their work. By superintending the
whole enterprise in person he hoped “to decide everything himself, and get his
decisions promptly carried out, and to be again as successful as when he had
boldly taken his own line against the Bentivogli, and
refused to be intimidated by any warnings or prognostications of evil. He had
no presentiment that he was going forth to meet one of the most terrible trials
of his whole life.”
The Pope’s
irritation with Louis XII increased from day to day. He began to talk of excommunicating
the King, and the Cardinals of the French party were threatened with the
severest penalties if they took any part in the calling of an anti-Papal
Council. Cardinal Clermont was kept in strict confinement in St. Angelo, and
Cardinal de Prie only escaped the same fate by
swearing, at the Consistory of 18th August, not to leave Rome; if he did, he
would at once be deprived of his cardinalate. These severe measures seemed to
be rendered necessary by the conduct of Cardinal d’Este,
who, though summoned on the 27th July, with all the other absent Cardinals
belonging to the Court, to return to Rome, had not come back. On the 17th of
August the Pope went down to Ostia and thence to CivitaVecchia,
where he inspected the ships destined for Genoa, and celebrated the conquest of
Modena. All the Cardinals, with the exception of the aged Caraffa, were
summoned to join him at Viterbo, but Briçonnet and de Prie took no notice of the command. From Viterbo
Julius went to Montefiascone, and started from thence for Bologna with 400 men
on the 1st September, making his way to Ancona through Orvieto, Assisi, Foligno, Tolentino, and Loreto, where he said Mass on the
Feast of the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin (8th September).
At this place
some attempts were made by Cardinal Fiesco and Lionello da Carpi to persuade him to enter into diplomatic
relations with France, but were angrily repulsed. From Ancona, Julius II
proceeded to Rimini by water, and thence pressed on to Cesena by the ancient
Via Emilia, in spite of the rain which poured down like a waterspout. Paris de Grassis, who travelled with the Pope, says, “When the
people saw our train toiling along in such weather, they burst out laughing,
instead of greeting the Pope as they ought to have done. Although the following
day was just as bad, he insisted on going on to Forli, whither the rain
perseveringly accompanied us.” Here they only spent the night, and then
proceeded at once to Bologna, which they entered on the 22nd of September.
Everywhere along the road ample provision was made by the inhabitants for the
wants of the Pope and his people; at his desire all remains of food were
distributed to the convents and the poor.
Even during the
course of his hurried journey, tidings had reached Julius which filled him with
anxiety; he heard from Verona that the expedition against Genoa seemed likely
to break down. In Bologna itself he found great dissatisfaction with Alidosi’s government. He was already suffering from fever, and
found it hard to bear up against all these cares; but anything in the way of
better news revived him at once, and his resolution never failed for a moment,
not even when there could no longer be any doubt that the King of France meant
to summon a Council, and the Swiss, after having come as far as Chiasso, yielding to French and imperial intrigues,
suddenly turned back and gave up the campaign. But still worse news was yet to
come. On the 30th September he had made the Marquess of Mantua Standard-bearer
to the Churchy and on the 14th October had excommunicated the French general.
Now, on the 17th, tidings arrived from Florence that the Cardinals Carvajal,
Francesco Borgia, Briçonnet, René de Prie, and Sanseverino, instead of
obeying the Pope’s command to join him at Bologna, had betaken themselves to the
camp of the enemy in Milan. For various reasons these men were all dissatisfied
with Julius II and his policy. They cared for nothing but their own
aggrandisement, and hoped to secure that by helping the King of France to
depose the Pope, whom he rightly considered the chief obstacle to the
establishment of his supremacy in Italy. “Thus a schism in the Sacred College
was added to Louis’ threatened Council”. Julius had long been mistrustful of
the French Cardinals; but it was a terrible blow to him when the two Spaniards,
especially Carvajal, who was so highly thought of, went over to the French;
nevertheless he still by no means lost heart.
At this
critical moment, when nothing but the greatest prudence could have saved him,
the Pope committed a fatal error in allowing himself to be completely deceived
by Cardinal Alidosi. This worldly and greedy prelate
was accused by his enemies of the worst vices—whether justly or not we have no
means of determining. He had cruelly oppressed the Bolognese and was suspected
of conspiring with the French. In consequence, the Duke of Urbino had him
arrested as a traitor and carried in chains from Modena to Bologna on the 7th
of October. The Bolognese now hoped that their hated tyrant would pay for his
misdeeds with his life. But in his very first conversation he contrived, by
insinuating manners and plausibility, so to get round the Pope that not only
was he at once released, but very shortly after, on the 18th October, made
Bishop of Bologna. The citizens, irritated to the highest degree, were
preparing to give vent to their anger, when suddenly the French army under the
command of the excommunicated Chaumont appeared at the gates of the city,
which was inadequately garrisoned with only 900 men. With the French were the Bentivogli, thirsting for revenge. The people now, says
Paris de Grassis, took up arms, not to defend the
Legate or the Pope, but their own liberty. Alidosi thought of nothing but his personal safety, and said openly that he was arming
his people not against the French but to protect himself against the Bolognese.
To make matters
worse and add to the general confusion, Julius II now broke down under the long
continued strain, and, as the astrologers had predicted, fell seriously ill of
fever; so seriously that negotiations for the supposed impending election were
set on foot. Now at last for a moment his indomitable spirit seemed to falter.
On the 19th of October he sent for the Venetian Ambassador and told him that if
the troops of the Republic had not crossed the Po within twenty-four hours, he
would come to terms with Chaumont. The Ambassador relates how, on the following
night, tossing on his sleepless bed, he declared in his feverish wanderings
that he would rather kill himself than fall into the hands of the French. With
the dawn of the 20th October the fever subsided, and the sick man recovered his
self-command with a celerity which shows the extraordinary elasticity of his
temperament. When he heard that the armed citizens were calling his name he
sprang from his bed and had himself carried out on one of the balconies of the
palace, from whence he gave his blessing to the people, whose temper, owing to
a variety of circumstances, had undergone a favourable change during the
preceding days.
Paris de Grassis, as an eyewitness, narrates how Julius, after
having blessed the people, crossed his arms upon his breast, as though
confiding his person to their honour and care. The action met with a
sympathetic response, and a shout went up from the crowd with a promise to
stand up against the fee as one man. “Now,” exclaimed the Pope, as they carried
him back to his bed, “we have conquered the French.”
The hopes of
Julius II were justified by the conduct of the French commander, who, instead
of pressing forward at once, began to negotiate, and thus gave time for the
Venetian and Spanish troops to arrive. Soon the French army, encamped on the
Reno three miles from the city, began to suffer severely from want of provisions
and the inclemency of the weather, and was forced to retire to Castelfranco.
Julius, who had broken off his negotiations with Chaumont, was now anxious that
his troops should sally forth and fall upon the French, who were retiring
slowly, plundering as they went. His vexation at not being able to get this
done was so great that it brought on a dangerous relapse on the 24th. Again the
worst began to be feared, but again also his iron constitution was victorious.
In two days he began to improve, and by the end of the fourth day the danger
was over. His recovery, however, was retarded by his obstinacy in refusing to
spare himself in any way or to follow the advice of his physicians. In
consequence, he had many relapses. “The Pope's constitution,” writes the
Venetian Ambassador on the 25th November, “is marvellous; if he would only take
care of himself he would soon be able to get up.”
Far from
attending to his health, the mind of the Pope was occupied day and night with
his plans for subduing Ferrara and driving back the French. He caused a
circular letter to all the Christian Princes of Europe to be drawn up, in which
he accused Louis XII of thirsting for the blood of the Roman Pope and sending
his army to Bologna to destroy him. He declared that until Ferrara had
capitulated he would listen to no more overtures. He urged the Venetians with
redoubled energy to join their forces to his and at once commence the siege of
that city. But his impatience was doomed to disappointment. The union of the
two armies took place in due course, but the combined forces waited in vain for
the Marquess of Mantua. At the same time the Venetian fleet met with a reverse.
Julius II had on the 11th December appointed Cardinal Marco Vigerio,
Legate of the Papal troops; eight days after, news came of the conquest of
Concordia. His Master of Ceremonies reports that on the 15th December he had so
far recovered as to be able to leave the house of his friend, Giulio Malvezzi,
where he had been staying since the 6th November, and return to his own palace.
Externally he was very much altered in appearance, as during his illness he had
grown a long beard. At Christmas he was able to say Mass, but only in his
private chapel and sitting. On S. Stephen’s Day he wished to attend’ the High Mass
at the Cathedral, but heavy snow and a slight return of fever obliged him to
give up his intention. It can therefore be imagined what the amazement of his
Court must have been when he informed them on the 29th of December that he
intended to join the army before Mirandola, in order
to see why his troops were putting off their attack in spite of his repeated
commands. Although every one, the Cardinals, the Prelates, the Bolognese, and,
at first, even the Venetian Envoys, did their utmost to dissuade him, they
could not alter his determination; he was convinced that nothing but his
presence in person could defeat the machinations of those who were hindering
the progress of the campaign.
On the 2nd of
January, 1511, the world was called upon to witness the strange spectacle of a
Pope, regardless of his dignity, his advanced age, his health, and the rigours
of an unusually severe Winter, setting forth to join his army in their camp
before Mirandola. Amongst those who accompanied him
were the Cardinals Isvalies, d’Aragona,
and Cornaro, and the famous architect Bramante. The
Venetian Envoy, Girolamo Lippomano, who had attached
himself to the Papal train, gives utterance in his Reports to the universal
astonishment. “Julius II,” he writes on the 6th January, “has appeared,
contrary to all expectation. He hates the French worse than ever. Apparently he
has quite recovered; he goes about in all the wind and weather, and watches the
clearing away of the snow from his balcony; he has the strength of a giant
Yesterday and today the snow has been falling without intermission, and is half
the height of a horse, and yet the Pope is in the camp. Our Republic is being
splendidly served. His Court, who have no heart for Italy, and think of nothing
but their money, are dying to get back to Rome; but they are quite helpless;
Julius II thinks, dreams, and talks to satiety of nothing but Mirandola.” In a Report on the following day he says,
“Today the Pope reviewed the troops in the snow. His spirit and courage are
marvellous, but he is not supported by his people”. The consciousness of this
sometimes angered him almost to madness, and he would storm and rave at his
generals for their tardiness.
At first Julius
II had taken up his abode in a farmhouse; when the batteries opened fire, he
withdrew to Concordia, but his impatience soon became so great that in a few
days he returned to take up his quarters in the Convent of Sta Giustina, which was quite close to the battery and nearer
to the fortress than the farm-house. His Court were lost in wonder: “His
Holiness lives in the kitchen of the Convent” writes the Venetian Paolo Capello
on the 13th January, “and I inhabit an open stable that anywhere else would not
be thought fit even for a servant; but here it is so much prized that Cardinals Cornaro and d’Aragona have
been asking for it. The weather is detestable; today we have a furious snow
storm, and yet the Pope has gone out. His health and spirit are superhuman,
nothing seems to hurt him.” The Venetian Envoy Lippomano said to Cardinal Alidosi, who was also in the camp,
“It ought to be recorded in all histories that a Pope, only just out of his
sick-bed, has taken the field himself in January and in the midst of such snow
and cold. The rivers are all frozen; it is Winter with a vengeance.” A report
of the 17th January states that on that day a cannon-ball had entered the room
where the Pope was lying asleep, and had wounded two of his servants. After
this Julius moved into the house of Cardinal Isvalies.
But here too he found that shots were occasional visitors, and so, in spite of
the remonstrances of his people, he returned to his former quarters. “The Pope
displays extraordinary courage,” writes the Venetian Envoy. “He is burning with
impatience to march on Ferrara.” The long sustained resistance of the defenders
of Mirandola so enraged Julius that he rated his own
generals in violent terms, and talked of giving the town over to pillage. When
at last, on the 20th of January, it capitulated, his people succeeded in
persuading him to grant milder terms. He was in such a hurry to set foot in his
new conquest that he would not wait to have the gates unbarred, but clambered
in through the breach on a wooden ladder. On the following day he declared that
he would at once proceed to Ferrara, and appointed Count Gianfrancesco Pico, Lieutenant of the conquered fortress.
His personal
experience of the difficulties which he would have to encounter in subduing
Ferrara induced Julius to enter into communication with Alfonso in order to
persuade him to abandon his alliance with France. He also endeavoured to detach
Maximilian from Louis XII, by handing Modena over to the imperial commander.
The Duke of Ferrara let the Pope know through an indirect channel that he would
not treat with him, and so the war had to go on.
For a time
Julius still clung to his purpose of personally pursuing the campaign; but the
representations of his Court, and his dread of being taken prisoner by the
French, induced him for the present to return to Bologna until he could collect
a larger army. When he found that his return to Bologna (on the 6th-7th
February) had at once encouraged the French to advance again, he proceeded on
the nth by Imola to Ravenna in order to attack Ferrara from that side. In
Ravenna, which he reached on the 18th of February, the Pope on the 10th of March
created several new Cardinals, “to strengthen himself against the schismatics
and to fulfil his engagements to certain powers.” Two of those nominated were ultramontanes, the Englishman Bainbridge and the Swiss
Bishop, Matthaeus Schinner, the other six were Italians: Antonio Ciochi di Monte Sansovino, Archbishop of Liponto; Pietro Accoli of Arezzo,
Bishop of Ancona; Achilles de Grassis of Bologna;
Francesco Argentino of Venice; Bandinello Sauli of Genoa; and Alfonso Petrucci of Siena.
The College of
Cardinals had strenuously resisted these fresh nominations, but, as the
Venetian Envoy had predicted, Julius carried his point The same Envoy says that
some of the new Cardinals had to pay large sums for their elevation. The
nomination of de Grassis was obviously made to please
the Bolognese; the English Cardinal Bainbridge was appointed Commander-in-Chief
of the troops, which caused great surprise.
Besides these
eight Cardinals another was nominated, but reserved in petto. This was
Maximilian’s confidant, Matthaeus Lang, Bishop of Gurk,
who just at this time had arrived in Mantua, where the Envoys from England,
France, and Spain were also present He brought proposals of peace from his
master.
Julius II
wished to treat with Lang personally. As Ravenna was too insignificant a place
to make it possible there to receive the representative of the Emperor with
fitting honours, the Pope, though extremely dissatisfied with the slackness of
his generals in their way of carrying on the war, had to leave that city on
April 3 and return to Bologna, which he reached on the 7th of April, 1511. On
the 10th of the month, Matthaeus Lang and Giovanni Gonzaga, as Envoys from the
Emperor, and James Conchilles representing Ferdinand
of Spain, entered the city in state, having previously had a private audience
with the Pope. It was observed with dissatisfaction that even in this
procession Lang appeared in secular dress. The pedantic Master of Ceremonies,
Paris de Grassis, characteristically relates: “I
entreated Lang in vain to attire himself as an ecclesiastic, especially in view
of his approaching admission to the Sacred College, but he put me off by saying
that he would appear in the garb which he wore when the Emperor sent him. When
I asked the Pope about it he said that it was his wish that I should let the
matter rest, and this I did, although many were displeased with me on this
account, and still more with Lang.”
When, on the
following day, the Envoys had their public audience, Lang, at the Pope’s
express command, was given the place of honour immediately below the CardinalDeacons. This and other marks of distinction were
received by the Envoy with such unmannerly arrogance, that he appeared to the
courteous Italians a perfect savage. “He is a barbarian”, de Grassis writes in his Diary, “and behaves like a
barbarian.” At the audience he curtly explained that Maximilian had sent him to
Italy because he preferred to obtain his rights by peaceful means rather than
by war, but that the only conditions under which he would treat were, that the
Venetians should restore everything that they had taken on any title whatever,
whether these lands belonged to the Empire or were hereditary possessions of
Austria. When three Cardinals were deputed by Julius II to carry on the
negotiations, Lang declared it to be beneath his dignity to deal personally
with anyone but the Pope himself, and commissioned three of the nobles who
accompanied him to meet the Cardinals. Julius had hoped to win him by bestowing
on him the highest dignity and rich benefices, but all these favours seemed
only to encourage him to greater insolence. He behaved as though his imperial
master had already donned the Tiara. The Venetian Envoy reports with amazement
with what pomp the Bishop of Gurk surrounded himself,
and how seldom he visited the Pope. “At the audience he conducted himself as if
he were a King rather than an Ambassador, and claimed the right of conversing
with the Pope, sitting, and with his head covered”. It is not surprising that
these never very promising negotiations should have come to nothing. On the
16th April all Louis XI.’s adherents had been excommunicated, and the views and
desires of both the parties concerned were diametrically opposed to each other.
On the 25th of
April the Bishop of Gurk left the Papal Court
suddenly, “almost without taking leave, and with an angry mien”. The Venetian
Envoy reports that Lang’s followers cried out as they were passing through the
city gates, “Long live the Emperor, long live France, long live the Bentivogli.” It is not wonderful that it was commonly said
in Bologna that the Pope was at daggers drawn with all the Powers, and that he
was to be called before a Council and deposed.
Lang’s threats
were something more than empty words, for the French, who had suspended their
hostile operations while the negotiations were going on, at once recommenced
them. It now became plain that Chaumont’s death, which took place on the 11th
February, was a godsend for them. He had allowed Modena to fall into the hands
of the enemy, had not attacked Bologna in time, and had not relieved Mirandola. On his death the command was assumed by the
veteran Trivulzio. The first thing he did was to
reconquer Concordia, and the next, to advance against Bologna. As soon as
Julius heard this, he started in haste for the camp, in order to stir up his
generals and set the army in motion. He meant to have slept the first night at
Cento, but was obliged to stop at Pieve, as a troop
of 1,000 foot soldiers who were encamped in the former place refused to leave
it until they were paid. He was so much annoyed at this, that on the following
day he returned to Bologna; but it was evident that if he remained there, he
would again run the risk of being captured by the French. He resolved therefore
to return to Ravenna. Before his departure he called the Council of Forty
together, laid before them all the advantages which Bologna had derived from
belonging to the Church, and admonished them to remain faithful to him. On their
solemn promise to be always true to him, he confided the defence of the walls
and gates to the citizens.
The fate of
Bologna after the Pope’s departure, which took place on the 15th May, did not
depend so much upon the conduct of her citizens as upon that of Alidosi and the Duke of Urbino, who, with his army, lay
encamped before the city. The enmity between these two made all co-operation
between them impossible; the hatred which Alidosi had
drawn upon himself, and the consequent disloyalty of the inhabitants, did the
rest. The moment the Pope was gone, the Bentivogli party began to stir and was joined by all who disliked the government of the
Church. The city was soon in a turmoil, and Alidosi,
without striking a blow, at once fled in disguise, first to the fort, and then,
when he heard that the Sanfelice gate had been
traitorously given up to the Bentivogli, to Castel
Rio near Imola. The Duke of Urbino behaved no better. When the news reached him
of what was going on in Bologna he gave the signal for a retreat which soon
degenerated into a flight. All the artillery, and most of the baggage and
colours, fell into the hands of the enemy. On the 23rd May Trivulzio entered Bologna, and the Bentivogli resumed the
government of the city. They at once began, with brutal vandalism, to destroy
all reminiscences, however valuable, of the Papal occupation. The bronze statue
of the Pope, a splendid work of Michael Angelo’s which was placed over the
doorway of the Cathedral in 1508, fell a sacrifice to this bitter spirit.
The loss of
Bologna, which, next to Rome, was the most beautiful and the wealthiest of all
the cities in the States of the Church, was “the hardest blow of fate which had
ever fallen upon Julius II. He now found himself in the eighth year of his Pontificate
and the sixty-eighth of his life with all his hard-won conquests torn from his
grasp and everything that he had built up thrown down.” Nevertheless, when the
news came, he received it without losing his self-command for a moment. In a
brief address, he informed the Cardinals that the place had been lost through
the treachery of the citizens and of the Duke of Urbino, who should pay for it
with his life. He then at once gave the necessary orders for the concentration
and reorganisation of the army.
Alidosi and the Duke
of Urbino, perhaps with equal justice, each laid the blame on the other; both
hastened to the Papal Court to justify themselves. Alidosi’s friends had done their best to strengthen the Pope’s conviction that the fault
lay with the Duke, and he overwhelmed his nephew with violent reproaches. As he
left his uncle’s presence, furious and smarting, under these, he met Alidosi, who was on horseback, coming to visit the Pope.
The Cardinal saluted him smilingly, but the young Duke, with the passionate
blood of the South boiling in his veins, drew his sword, and exclaiming,
“Traitor, art thou here at last! Receive thy reward!” stabbed him mortally, and
fled. Alidosi only lived an hour: his last words
were, “I reap the reward of my misdeeds.”
The fact that
everyone except Julius II rejoiced at the Legate’s death shows how universally
detested he had made himself. He was regarded by all as a traitor, and the
person who was really responsible for the fall of Bologna. “Most righteous
God,” writes Paris de Grassis in his Diary, “how just
are Thy judgments! Thanks are due to Thee from all for having punished this
traitor as he deserved. The hated villain has indeed been removed by a human
instrument, but not, as we believe, without Thy concurrence, and for this again
we thank Thee.”
At the very
time that the crime was committed, a meeting of the Cardinals was taking place,
at which Cardinal Isvalies, who was universally
beloved, had been appointed Legate of Bologna. To add to the sorrow caused by
the murder of his favourite, Julius II deeply resented the outrage committed
against the highest dignity in the Church. He left Ravenna at once and went to
Rimini. There another, and perhaps a still more painful, surprise awaited him.
On the 28th of May a citation to the Council of Pisa, to be opened on the 1st
of September, was found affixed to the door of the church of S. Francesco,
close to the Pope’s residence. The document was dated 16th May, 1511. It stated
that the delegates of the Roman and German Emperor and the most Christian King
proposed to summon a universal Council. This action on their part had become
necessary in order to comply with the decree Frequens of the Council of Constance, owing to the negligence of the Pope, who had not
kept the oath which he had sworn to in the Conclave. They declared that Julius
II’s opposition to the Council fully justified the Cardinals in thus taking the
matter into their own hands. They also declared that the majority of the
members of the Sacred College who were free to do so, supported their action, and
entered a protest beforehand against all censures that he might pronounce upon
them. The Pope was requested to give his consent to the calling of this Council
and also to attend it either personally or through a representative. All
Cardinals, Bishops, Chapters, and Universities, as well as all secular Princes,
were summoned and invited to take part in it. Meanwhile the Pope was not to
create or promulgate any new Cardinals, to abstain from instituting proceedings
against any of the older Cardinals or the Prelates who favoured the Council,
and also from doing anything to hinder it from meeting, and further from any
alterations or alienations in regard to the possessions of the Roman Church;
any such acts would be invalid. As the Pope gave no safe-conducts, and often
resorted to force, the publication of the summons in Modena, Parma, and Reggio
must be deemed sufficient.
The Council was
to be convoked in the names of Cardinals Carvajal, Briçonnet,
Philip of Luxemburg, Francesco Borgia, Adriano da Corneto,
de Prie, Carlo del Carretto,
San Severino, and Ippolito d’Este. The summons was to
be published “throughout the four nations”; on the 23rd of May letters were
sent to each of the several Princes calling upon them to send their Ambassadors
and Prelates to the Assembly.
“The objects of
the Council or, more correctly, the banners under which the forces of hypocrisy
and ambition were to be marshalled, were the pacification of Christendom, a
crusade against the infidels, and the reform of the Church in its Head and in
its members.”
The convocation
of a Council under these futile pretexts by a body of schismatic Cardinals was
an act of open rebellion, a daring attack upon the most indisputable
prerogative of the Supreme Head of the Church. At first no one ventured to tell
the Pope, but of course it was not a matter of which he could long be kept in
ignorance. From the Report of the Venetian Ambassador we can see how deeply he
felt this blow. Bereft of almost all his political power—for the States of the
Church were lying open at the mercy of the French army—he now saw his spiritual
authority threatened and in the greatest danger; for behind the disloyal
Cardinals stood not only the King of France, but also the Emperor, both bent on
completely crushing his power and annihilating Venice. The ill-success of the
war against Venice had thrown Maximilian into the arms of Louis XII. Since then
he had sought his fortune, both in secular politics and in his dealings with
the Church, in those “tortuous foreign ways” which had formerly been so
distasteful to him. In many circles in Germany a distinctly anti-Roman spirit
reigned and vented itself in constant complaints of the conduct of the Roman
Court, both in politics and in Church affairs. As long ago as the year 1495,
shortly before the Diet of Worms, inspired by a somewhat groundless fear that
Alexander VI was purposing to bestow the Imperial Crown on Charles VIII of
France, Hans von Hermanngrün, a Saxon nobleman,
published a pamphlet which aptly mirrors the ferment of the time. He proposes,
in case the Pope should take this step, to make a formal renunciation of
obedience for the time, to appoint a German Patriarch in his place, and to
arrange with Poland, Bohemia, and Hungary to summon a Council and cite the Pope
to appear before it.
The Emperor
gave vent to his grudge against Julius II for having made peace with Venice, by
following the example of France and attacking the Pope on the spiritual side.
In September, 1510, at the same time that Louis XII. was consulting his courtier
Bishops, Maximilian sent his Secretary Spiegel with a copy of the French
Pragmatic Sanction to the learned Jakob Wimpheling.
Spiegel’s instructions state that the Emperor is resolved to take measures to
deliver Germany from the tyranny of the Roman Court, and to prevent large sums
from being sent to Rome which are employed by the Pope merely in injuring him. Wimpheling is to give his opinion on three special points:
the best way of defeating the quibbles and tricks of the Roman Court officials,
the abolition of Annates, and the appointment of a permanent Legate, who should
be a native of Germany, to adjudicate on all affairs and grievances there, and
the advantages that would accrue from such an appointment.
The Emperor’s
last proposition was a very far-reaching one, and went beyond anything that had
been thought of in France. The appointment of a permanent Legate for Germany
meant “a permanent change in the organisation of the Church, a sort of national
independence for the German Church.” This plan, in combination with the
introduction of a Pragmatic Sanction, was the first step towards a severance of
the German Church from Rome, in other words, towards a schism. Wimpheling, who was a loyal son of the Church, at once
recognised this ; his answer was prudent and reserved. He gave his opinion
distinctly against the introduction of the Pragmatic Sanction, and in regard to
the Legate, he spoke mistrustfully and doubtingly. On the other hand, he laid
great stress on the necessity for an improvement, on conservative lines, in the
relations of the German Church with Rome. He enlarged on the injuries inflicted
on Germany by the members of the Roman Court, and recapitulated, with some
alterations, the well-known gravamina of 1457. He dwelt principally on the financial
side of the question, “and from his point of view he had every right to believe
that a thorough administrative reform would do away with the necessity for a
Council and probably make it possible to diminish pleadings before Roman Courts
and improve the inner life of the Church.”
But at that
time the Emperor took very little interest in the reform of abuses ; his only
object was the political one of forcing Julius II to join the League of
Cambrai. Every means was tried, negotiation, threats of schism and of a General
Council. In regard to the Council, at first, in January 1511, Maximilian
stipulated that the consent of the Pope and Cardinals must be obtained; but
when the negotiations with Lang had proved a failure, and Louis XII in his
anger had issued his citation, the Emperor, on the 5th of June, 1511, threw
himself unreservedly into the French plans. Soon after, he forwarded the letter
of invitation to the Queen of Hungary and Poland, begging her to send
representatives to the Council and enable her Prelates to attend it.
In the year
1511 Louis carried his hatred against Julius II so far as to permit the
representation on the stage of a satirical play directed against the Head of
the Church. One of his political pamphleteers, Pierre Gringoire,
composed a burlesque, for the production of which in the principal market place
in Paris (Aux Halles) a Royal privilege was granted.
The Prince of Fools appears on the boards with his Court, fools of all sorts,
current events are discussed, the disputes with England, the conflict with the
Church, and one of the fools assures the public that
Le Prince des sotz ne pretend
Que
donner paix a ses suppotz,
to which
another replies:
Pource que l’eglise entreprent
Sur temporality
et prent
Nous ne pouvons avoir repos.
Amongst the
courtiers is the Général d’Enfance.
He prances on to the stage on a hobby-horse brandishing a mock battle-axe, and
shouting, “Hon, hon, men, men, pa, pa, tetet.” When
the council are all assembled, the Prince appears, and the Seigneur de la Joie gives the password:—
Arriere bigotz et bigottes,
Nous n’en voulons point, par ma foy.
La “ Sotte commune”, supposed to represent the views of the mass
of the people, is allowed to take part in the council, but gets nothing but
jibes and jeers from the fine gentlemen. When she complains that they are
always interfering and manage everything, while she has to suffer and pay, they
simply laugh her down.
Suddenly a new
figure appears on the scene, a woman in ecclesiastical attire and calling herself
Mother Church. She is accompanied by two other female fools, “Confiance” and “Occasion”, the latter of whom specially
supports and aids her. The great lady is very truculent, flings curses and
anathemas at every one, and declares
Bien j sais qu’ on dit que je radotte,
Et
que suis fol en ma vieillesse;
Mais grumeler vueil à
ma porte
Mon fils le Prince, en telle sorte,
Qu’ il diminue sa noblesse.
She tries to
get the nobles and prelates on her side and to persuade them to desert the
Prince. The prelates follow her, and finally they come to blows in which the Sotte Commune gets the worst of it. In the mêlée Mother
Church’s mantle is torn off, and she is discovered to be an impostor. She is
not the Church at all, but only la Mere Sotte, and is
deposed and driven out with indignity.
The meaning of
this was plain, but the after-piece made it still clearer. The French and
Italian nations appeared on the stage, and with them “l’homme obstiné” with two female companions, Simony and
Hypocrisy. L’homme obstiné was Pope Julius II, “the sword of divine justice was hanging over his head, he
consorted with robbers and murderers, and could not refrain from crime and rapine.”
In May 1511, at
Louis XII’s desire, a pamphlet was written to pave the way for the Council. Its
title was: “The difference between divisions in the Church and Assemblies of
the Church, and the advantages of Synods of the Gallican Church”. The writer
was a Belgian, Jean Lemaire. He endeavours to prove that all divisions are
caused by the Popes, and all dissensions healed by means of general assemblies
convoked by secular Princes. It was divided into three parts. The first tries
to shew that the donations of temporal possessions have been the source of all
those corruptions in the Church which had necessitated the calling of the
earlier Councils to remedy them.
The second is
devoted to pointing out the great services rendered to the Catholic faith by
the Synods of the Gallican Church. The third treats of the divisions in the
Church in general, and the coming schism, which, according to prophecy, is to
be the worst of all. These things, Lemaire says, have injured the Church more
than anything else; the desire for power, which is the mother of greed, the
neglect of Councils, and the compulsory celibacy of the priests of the Latin
Church.
Lemaire is
never weary of denouncing the arrogance, greed, and wickedness of the bad
Popes. He is unsparing in his satire of the “present Pope, who rigs himself out
in martial attire, and tries to pose as a warrior, but only looks like a monk
dancing in spurs. All the same he will not succeed in creating the new and
abnormal world that he hopes for, for pigs will always eat acorns, and oaks
will shed their leaves at the proper time, and where wood is wanted, wood will
be used.” The pamphlet contains many other similar passages all directed
against Julius II. It was written in the vulgar tongue with the object of
giving it as wide a circulation as possible.
Louis accepted
the dedication of the work, and also permitted the publication of caricatures
of the Pope. One of these represents him standing surrounded by corpses with
his flag lying on the ground. Close by is the empty Papal throne, over which
France, depicted as a crowned warrior, keeps guard. The figure holds a banner
with the oriflamme and the inscription, “Louis is
master”. Another picture, in a book in the private library of the King,
represents the Church as a desolate woman in a Basilica; not far off is a
figure wearing a Tiara with the inscription “Dissolution,” who is knocking down
a pillar so that the roof seems in danger of falling. Another figure,
“Charity,” lays her hand on the shoulder of the King of France, who is
supporting the tottering edifice. Thus the French painters and the
pamphleteers, such as Lemaire, Jean d’Auton, de Seyssel, and others, who were in the pay of the King, all
combined to tell the same story; Louis was to be the reformer of the Church,
and that without delay.
Though thus
attacked and threatened with a schismatic Council by the two chief powers of
the West, while in addition France and the revolted Cardinals were doing their
utmost to obtain the adhesion of Henry VIII of England and the King of Hungary,
Julius II did not lose heart. On the contrary, misfortune seemed only to
stimulate his powers and rouse all his energies. He saw at once the weak points
in the citation, and before he left Rimini he had issued a declaration exposing
it. The schismatical Cardinals had had the audacity
to issue the summons in the name of the Sacred College, and on their own
authority to affix to the document the names of several absent members. Julius
affirmed that two of these latter had expressly told him that this had been
done without their sanction. To this serious charge Carvajal and his associates
significantly answered that their powers without the others were amply
sufficient to make the act valid.
Bowed down with
sickness and anxiety, Julius II left Rimini on the 3rd June, 1511. On the 5th
he was at Ancona, on the 11th he arrived at Loreto, on the 20th at Terni, where
to his great vexation he witnessed a fight between its inhabitants and those of
Spoleto. Torrents of rain forced him to halt for a time at Civita Castellana. Here a deputation arrived from the people
of Rome begging him to return without delay. On the 26th of June he entered the
city by the Porta del Popolo and on the following day
under a burning sun proceeded in full pontificals to
S. Peters, where he arrived completely exhausted. “This was the end of our
toilsome and useless expedition”, writes Paris de Grassis.
An utterly broken man, both in health and in power, Julius returned to the
palace from which he had started nine months before full of brilliant hopes and
confident that the French would be driven out of Italy. The Papal and Venetian
troops were now completely dispersed and there was nothing to hinder the enemy
from taking possession of the Papal States and of Rome, and deposing him. In
this extreme need, with no one to rely on but himself, Julius again showed how immensely
superior he was in genius and character to his enemies. While they were
“hesitating, irresolute and divided, he, fully knowing his own mind, firmly
refused to give himself up for lost.” His chief hopes of assistance rested on
the King of Spain, to whom a special Envoy was sent with a long letter.
Guicciardini
writes that Italy and the whole world were watching with trembling anxiety to
see what use Louis XII was going to make of his victory. Julius II had
absolutely nothing to protect him except the dignity of the Papacy. Whether
from religious awe or from the fear of rousing the whole world against him, the
King of France resolved not to go all lengths. He desired Trivulzio to retire on Milan and made overtures of peace to the Pope; if Julius would
pardon the schismatical Cardinals he would give up
the proposed Council; and he induced Bentivoglio to declare that he had never
thought of wishing to throw off the suzerainty of the Church.
The schismatical Cardinals were equally wanting in that resolution
and union amongst themselves which alone could have secured a victory. For one
thing Cardinals Philip of Luxemburg, Adriano da Corneto,
and Carlo del Carretto, whose names had been affixed to
the citation without consulting them, protested loudly against the
unwarrantable proceeding, and declared they would have nothing to do with the
anti-Papal Council. Cardinal d’Este adopted an
ambiguous attitude which finally led to his reconciliation with the Pope.
Cardinal Gonzaga, whom the schismatics had made great efforts to win, had
already joined Julius II at the end of May. The Venetian Envoy, a man of
considerable penetration, wrote on the 3rd of July, 1511, that the Council of
Pisa was at an end.
While the
negotiations with France were going on, Julius II determined to deprive the
revolted Cardinals of all pretext for keeping up the schism by turning their
own weapon against them. On the 25th of July, 1511, a Bull dated the 18th was
affixed to the doors of S. Peter’s summoning a universal Council to assemble in
Rome on the 19th of April, 1512. In the preamble the Pope set forth the supreme
dignity of the Roman Church, sanctified by the blood of martyrs, preserved from
all error, and endowed with the primacy over all other Churches, which entailed
upon her and her Head the duty of withstanding all schismatical attempts to destroy her unity. He then described the proceedings of the
revolted Cardinals, denying their statements, and refuting their arguments; he
declared that, both as Cardinal and Pope, he had done his best to further the
assembling of a Council, and it had not been his fault that it had been so long
delayed. The Bull goes on to emphasise the point that a Council can only be
lawfully summoned by the Pope. Any that is not so called must be held of no
account. This was especially the case in regard to the pretended Council at
Pisa; the mere impossibility of its assembling within the specified term
(September 1st) deprives it of all authority.
The Pope then
declares that, in order to withstand these dangerous schismatical tendencies and defend the rights of the Holy See, he, with the approval of the
Cardinals and in the plenitude of his apostolic power, pronounces the edict of
convocation dated Milan, 16th May, 1511, to be in both its contents and effects
illegal, null and void; all who adhere to it bring upon themselves the severest
penalties of the Church, its authors and their abettors are deprived of all
their dignities, and all cities and districts which harbour and support them
are laid under Interdict. On the other hand, the Pope, desirous of fulfilling
his engagements, and further, wishing to make a complete end of heresy, and
stifle the beginnings of schism, to bring about a reform of morals both in the
clergy and laity, union and peace in Christendom, and a holy war against the
Turks, now calls an Ecumenical Council to meet in Rome at the Lateran Church
after Easter, on the 19th April of the year 1512.
CHAPTER
VI.
Julius
II. forms Art Alliance with Spain.—His dangerous Illness.—His Recovery.—The
Holy League of 1511.— Deposition of the Schismatical Cardinals.—Maximilian endeavours to possess Himself of the Tiara.—Failure of
the French Pretence of a Council at Pisa.—The Battle of Ravenna on Easter
Sunday, 1512.
JULIUS II, by
issuing his summons for a General Council, had effectually checkmated the schismatical Cardinals even before they had begun their
game. This bold stroke was entirely the Pope’s own idea. From the reports of
the Venetian Envoys we find that the plan was already in his mind when he was
at Bologna in the Spring of 1511, and the resolution to carry it out was taken
at Rimini on the appearance of the citation of the Cardinals. During his
journey to Rome the details of the plan were thought out and discussed with
Cardinal Antonio de Monte and the Dominican, Thomas de Vio.
A report from Tolentino of the Venetian Envoy on 14th June, 1511, says that the
draft of the proclamation had already even then been laid before the
Consistory, and the posting up of the schismatical citation in Rome on the 9th June naturally only had the effect of strengthening
his resolve. But he was determined to do nothing hastily; and the Bull was not
allowed to appear till the 18th of July, when it had been thoroughly considered
and thought out in substance and in form. Whatever successes might be achieved
in this direction would, however, have no effect on the other, and equally
serious, danger arising from the preponderating power of France in Italy. Here,
for Julius II, everything depended upon the interest which Spain had in
checking this power.
The Pope’s
confidence in Ferdinand’s perception of what the situation required was not
disappointed. In this case, where the King’s interest coincided with that of
the Church, he was perfectly willing to accept the honour of posing as the
defender of the Holy See. With the consent of his Grandees and with the
approval of Cardinal Ximenes summoned to Seville, it was decided to suspend the
military operations in Africa, and send the army that had been employed there
to Italy. In compliance with the Pope’s request, the rebellious Cardinal
Carvajal was deprived of the Bishopric of Siguenza;
and a considerable sum of money was forwarded to Rome in aid of the war.
Immediately
after Julius’s arrival in Rome the Spanish Ambassador was desired by Ferdinand
to offer him the assistance of Spain for the reconquest of Bologna. He also
offered to endeavour to influence England to join in an alliance against
France, and this Louis knew.
It appears,
however, that it was only with much hesitation and against his will that Julius
II finally brought himself to accept the alliance with Spain. He continued his
negotiations with Louis XII as long as he could, and only broke them off at
last when the King refused to comply with the indispensable condition that the
revolted Cardinals should obey their citation to Rome. In the early part of
August the provisions of the League between the Pope, Venice, Spain, and England
were substantially agreed upon, and all that was wanting to its conclusion was
the arrival of the necessary powers from England and Spain. The Swiss were also
being approached to obtain help from them. At this moment an event occurred
which seemed likely to upset everything.
Entirely
absorbed in the labour and cares of the last few months, the Pope had wholly
neglected the most ordinary care of his health. He trusted to his iron
constitution without considering that there is a limit to everything. Since the
end of July he had been incessantly at work, preparing for the Council, sending
Briefs and Nuncios in all directions; he had begun legal proceedings against
the Duke of Urbino and gone on personally conducting the negotiations with
Spain and England in spite of an attack of fever in the beginning of August. On
the 17th he had another, but would not desist from his work, and saw the
Ambassadors while in bed. On the 20th it came on again with such violence that
his physicians declared that the next attack must prove fatal. The news spread
like lightning throughout Rome that the Pope was dying. The Cardinals began at
once to prepare for the approaching Conclave. The Spanish Envoy summoned the
Colonna to Rome, saying that the Pope was in extremity and that there was great
danger that the Orsini, supported by France, would get possession of the city.
On the 23rd of August the Venetian Ambassador Lippomano reports that “the Pope is passing away; Cardinal Medici tells me he cannot live
through the night. Medici is trying for the Tiara, but it is thought that it
will fall to one of the French party. Raffaele Riario and Fiesco are named. The city is in a turmoil;
everyone is armed.” On the 24th Julius received the Holy Viaticum, removed the
Interdict from Ferrara and Bologna, absolved the Duke of Urbino, and made all
his dispositions for death. Paris de Grassis writes:
“I think I may close my Diary here; for the Pope’s life is coming to an end
through his obstinacy in refusing to follow the advice of his physicians. He
has commended his servants to Cardinal Raffaele Riario and given him 34,000 ducats to divide amongst them. After he had taken a little
food he seemed better. But on Monday the 25th he refused all nourishment, he
had a relapse and his condition became hopeless. On Wednesday there was still
no change; and as he had eaten nothing for four days, everyone, including his
physicians, gave him up. The doors of his chamber were opened and some of the
people made their way to his bed-side. He lay on his couch with closed eyes and
seemed barely alive. Disturbances began in the city, many outlaws returned,
confusion prevailed everywhere. All the public officials, even those in the
courts of law, left their work, the Governor of the city took refuge in the
Palace, and the Minister of Police in the Castle of St Angelo. The Sacred
College met and desired me to make arrangements for the funeral obsequies and
for the Conclave. Then it occurred to the Pope’s relations and servants to send
for a very indulgent physician and suggest to him that he should give him
permission to eat whatever he liked. By agreeing to this he succeeded in
persuading his patient to consent to take some food. The Pope asked for
peaches, nuts, plums, and other fruits, which he chewed but did not swallow.
After that he had small onions and strawberries, which he likewise only chewed.
But presently he swallowed several peaches and plums and then fell into a light
sleep. This state of things went on for two days, during which those who
attended him alternately hoped and despaired. Great apprehension was felt for
the future; dangers of all sorts seemed hanging over our heads, disturbances,
war, and scarcity”. The reports of the Envoys then in Rome show that the
account of the Master of Ceremonies is not by any means exaggerated.
“Never,” writes
the Venetian Ambassador Lippomano, “has there been
such a clang of arms round the deathbed of any former Pope; never has the
danger been greater than it is now. May God help us.” Some of the nobles
endeavoured to take advantage of the turmoil in the city to bring about a
rising against the Government of the Church. The ambitious Pompeo Colonna,
whose relations had forced him into Holy Orders against his will, was at the
head of the revolutionary party. Not content with the dignities of Bishop of
Rieti and Abbot of Grottaferrata and Subiaco, Pompeo
aimed at the purple and felt confident of obtaining it after the deaths of
Cardinals Orsini, Colonna, Savelli, and Cesarini. But he was disappointed, and
was now bent on making Julius II pay for this neglect of a member of one of the
great Roman families. He hastened to the Capitol and from thence harangued the
mob, urging them to cast off the domination of the priesthood and restore the
republican constitution and liberties. It was resolved at the next election to
demand many concessions from the new Pope, and amongst others insist on the
nomination of a Roman Cardinal.
Julius now
began to recover from his state of death-like prostration. The free use of
fruit and liquids, which it had been supposed would have killed him, had really
been his salvation. The fever was gone and by the 28th he was completely
convalescent.
Deadly fear
seized upon all those who had been reckoning on his death, the Cardinals who
had been busy about the Conclave, and the Roman revolutionists. On the 28th the
nobles assembled in the Capitol, and there, in order to make their former
proceedings appear innocent, concluded one of those pacific conventions which
were so familiar and so transitory. Then they parted : Pompeo Colonna fled to
his fastness in Subiaco, the others to France; for the Pope who had been
thought to be dead began at once to talk of retribution.
The recovery of
Julius was somewhat retarded by his perverseness in the matter of diet, but he
at once turned his attention to the resumption of the negotiations for the
League against France. An alliance of all the Christian Princes was to be
formed, to take the Pope, the Council, and Rome under their protection. The
intrigues of the schismatical Cardinals, the refusal
of Louis XII to dissociate himself from the Bentivogli,
and his threats of setting up an anti-Pope filled Julius II with anxiety. On
the 1st of October he had appointed Cardinal Medici, Legate of Bologna and the
Romagna, and now he awaited with trembling impatience the definite formation of
the League which was to protect him from his enemies and recover the lost
States for the Church.
The League was
finally arranged and signed on the 4th October, 1511, and on the following day
was solemnly announced in Rome in Sta Maria del Popolo.
The primary contracting parties were Julius II, Ferdinand of Spain, and the
Republic of Venice, but it was expressly provided that the Emperor and the King
of England were at liberty to join it if they wished. Europe was invited to
rally round the Pope, and all Kings and Princes were asked to unite for one
common object, namely, the preservation of the unity of the Church and of the
integrity of her patrimony. The adhesion of Henry of England, which actually
followed on the 17th November, was regarded at that time as certain, and the
Swiss could also be counted upon to invade Milan.
Now that his
position was so far secured, Julius II was able to take the last step in regard
to the schismatical Cardinals. When the term appointed
in the letter of citation had expired, in an open Consistory held on 24th
October, at which there were eighteen Cardinals present, he pronounced the
sentence of excommunication and deposition on Cardinals Carvajal, Briçonnet, Francesco Borgia, and de Prie,
as rebels. Cardinals Sanseverino and d’Albret were threatened with the same punishment if they
continued disobedient.
Thus before the
Council had met, the Cardinals who had convoked it had been deposed. It is true
that the day fixed for its opening had been the 1st of September, but they had
themselves put off their arrival. Their prospects were about as bad as they
possibly could be. Spain and England would have nothing to say to them, and in
Italy and Germany the Council called forth no enthusiasm. Even in France they
met with so little sympathy that on the 20th of September Cardinal de Prie wrote to Louis XII to say that, unless he would exert
his royal power in favour of the assembly at Pisa, it would be a complete
failure and effect nothing. “Thus at its very inception the free Council was to
owe its existence to State despotism.” On the 1st September the number of those
who were prepared to attend it was so small that it had to be put off till the
1st November.
From the first
even its originators had no confidence in the success of their undertaking. In
the beginning of September, the Spanish Cardinals knowing the position that
their King was taking up, were prepared to repudiate it if the Pope would have
allowed them to remain at Siena.
To the hostile
attitude of the King of Spain was now added an unfavourable change in that of
Maximilian. From the first the Emperor had disapproved of the choice of Pisa as
the place for holding the Council. In July he said very decidedly that it could
only be held in some town belonging to the Empire; Verona and Constance were
mentioned. Also, not only Hungary and Poland but the Empire itself hung back
from committing itself to an anti-Papal Council, and the Emperor received
letters from various quarters warning him against it, amongst others from his
daughter Margaret and from the learned Abbot Trithemius.
The latter strongly urged him to have nothing to do with an assembly which was
unlawfully convoked and must necessarily lead to a schism, and assured him that
Germany would not follow him in this path. The attitude of the German clergy
shewed that the Abbot of Sponheim was not mistaken on
this point; and in addition to all this there was the difference between him
and the King of France as to the place of meeting. It is not surprising,
therefore, that the Emperor’s interest in the Council began to slacken.
When Julius II
was so dangerously ill in August 1511, Maximilian, like every
one else, supposed the Pope to be dying. He at once nominated three
Envoys for the Conclave, and also intended to send his trusty Lang to Rome to
unite with Cardinal Adriano Castellesi in looking
after his interests in the new election. He told the English Ambassador that
this Cardinal was his candidate. At the same time, Carvajal also hoped this
time to attain the object of his ambition.
At first no one
at the Imperial Court could believe in the reality of the Pope’s sudden and
rapid recovery. They were still convinced that his days were numbered, and it
was in this conviction that Maximilian wrote those much discussed letters in
which he expressed his visionary notion of adding the Tiara to the Imperial
crown. In one of these letters addressed to his daughter Margaret, Regent of
the Netherlands, and dated 18th September, 1511, he says:
“Tomorrow I am
going to send Mattaeus Lang, Bishop of Gurk, to Rome to arrange with the Pope about choosing me as
his coadjutor with the reversion of the Papacy on his death, and allowing me to
take holy orders, so that I may possibly be canonised and you may have to
revere me as a saint after my death, which I should value much. I have sent an
Envoy to the King of Spain, asking him to support me; which he has willingly
promised to do on condition of my abdicating the Imperial crown in favour of my
grand-son Charles, to which I cordially agree. The people and nobles of Rome
have entered into a compact with each other against the French and Spaniards;
they can arm 20,000 men, and have assured me that they will never consent to
the elevation of a Frenchman, a Spaniard, or a Venetian, but will choose a Pope
who shall be dependent on me and acceptable to the German nation. I am already
beginning to canvass the Cardinals, for which purpose from 200,000 to 300,000
ducats would be very useful. The King of Spain has sent word to me through his
Envoy that he will desire the Spanish Cardinals to support my candidature. I
beg you to keep all this profoundly secret, although I fear that in a very
short time the whole world will know it, as too many people have to be employed
in the business and too much money is required. I commend you to God. Written
by the hand of your good father, Maximilian, future Pope. September 18th.
“P.S.—The Pope
has had a return of fever; he cannot live much longer. ”
This letter might
quite possibly have been meant as a playful refusal of a project for a fresh
marriage presented to him by Margaret, as he had been a widower since the 31st
of December; for he was fond of writing jesting letters to her. But another
addressed to the Tyrolese Land-Marschall, Paul von
Lichtenstein, and dated 16th September, 1511, cannot be thus humorously
interpreted. Maximilian writes:—
“Most noble,
beloved, and faithful friend! We do not doubt that what we have imparted to you
at various times as to our reasons for intending and desiring to obtain the
Papacy is still fresh in your memory; as also we ourselves have never ceased to
keep this purpose in mind. Moreover we feel in ourselves, and in fact it is so,
that there can be no aim more noble, loftier, or better than that of attaining
to the said dignity.
“And as the
present Pope Julius has lately been dangerously ill, so much so that, as our
Court Chancellor for the Tyrol, Cyprian of Serentin,
has informed us, everyone in Rome thought that his last moment had come, we
have resolved to take the necessary measures for carrying out our intention,
and to act in such a manner as shall win for us the Papacy. Consequently we
have laid these matters before Cardinal Adriano who, as you know, has been for
some time past with us in Germany; who, when he heard it, wept for joy, and
advised us strongly to proceed, and thinks that there are many Cardinals who
will be of the same mind. And since, as you yourself also must see, it is very
likely that the Pope will die (for he eats little, and that nothing but fruit,
and drinks so much more that his life has no substance in it), if he does die,
we have prepared the Bishop of Gurk to post at once
to Rome to help us in this affair of the Papacy; but, as this cannot be done
without a considerable sum of money which we must provide, we have promised the
Cardinals and several other persons, to expend 300,000 ducats for the needs of
our undertaking and to arrange that this money shall be obtainable from the
Fugger Bank at Rome. As you know, at the present time we have no money, and the
only way in which it will be possible for us to satisfy Fugger in regard to
this sum will be by pledging our jewels.”
The Emperor
then proceeds to give detailed instructions as to the negotiations for the
loan; the jewels that are to be pledged, to which the feudal mantle worn by
Charlemagne is to be added, which, he says, does not belong to the Empire, but
is an Austrian heirloom, the property of the Hapsburgs, and will be no longer
wanted by him when he is Pope; the manner in which, and the persons to whom,
the money is to be paid, and how and when the articles pledged are to be
redeemed. Von Lichtenstein is admonished to use all possible diligence to get
the matter arranged quickly and secretly, to take no denial, but persist, even
if at first he is met by a refusal, and to keep the Emperor thoroughly informed
of every step in the proceedings, and is assured that his faithful service will
be remembered and amply rewarded.
In the
concluding paragraph the Emperor says: “We also wish you to know that today we
have heard by a private post from our secretary John Colla,
that the Orsini, Colonna, and the populus Romanus are quite resolved, and have engaged, not to accept any Pope who is
a Frenchman or a Spaniard, or a candidate of either of these nations. And they
have sent an Envoy privately to ask us not to fight with the French, so that
they may be induced to remain neutral in regard to the Papal election. Given at Brixen, September 16, Anno 1511.”
There can be no
doubt that “in the letter there is no trace of banter of any sort. Also, it is
not conceivable that Maximilian should have amused himself by mystifying his
confidential servant, to whom he had quite lately given instructions in regard
to his purposes, and whom he habitually employed in conducting his political
affairs in Italy. The letter must be understood in its plain meaning.”
It is true that
we are confronted here by another difficulty which cannot be held to be
unimportant The original letter to Lichtenstein has never been found, and the
historical trustworthiness of the author who published it a hundred years after
the Emperor’s death without indicating the source from which he obtained it, is
open to grave doubts.
In the present
state of our knowledge it is impossible to say with certainty that Maximilian
did seriously think of uniting the Imperial and Papal crowns in his own person,
and thus realising his aspirations after complete sovereignty in Italy. Many
things seem to indicate that this dream did actually cross his mind for a short
time as a practical possibility; but all plans founded on the expected vacancy
of the Chair of S. Peter were soon dissipated by the complete recovery of
Julius II.
Maximilian was
growing daily more and more dissatisfied with the conduct of Louis XII, and
alarmed at his increasing preponderance in Italy, and the Pope now strove to
win him to his side by the offer of an advantageous peace with Venice. He was
not, however, immediately successful, for “on the 21st of October, 1511, the
Emperor desired the Papal Envoys who were on their way to several of the
electoral Princes to be stopped at Innsbruck and other places; but when, in
November, England also definitely joined the League for the protection of the
Church and her possessions, Maximilian began to change his policy.” On the
12th, at the instigation of the King of Spain, he asked Julius to act as
intermediary between him and Venice. He began also to cool towards the
anti-Papal Council. No doubt the adverse attitude of the German Episcopate had
much to do with this. The Bishop of Brixen refused to
act as Imperial representative at the Council, on the ground that he was more
bound to the Pope than to the Emperor. The Archbishop of Salzburg declared
himself precluded by his ecclesiastical oath from sending even one of his
Counsellors to it. Now that England and Spain also had pronounced against it,
while Hungary held aloof for the present from the opponents of the Pope, the
schismatics had no power but France to support them. The Court Bishops, of
course, followed the King; but all who could, as the Flemish clergy, who, in
spite of Louis’s complaints never appeared at Lyons, tried to keep clear of the
Council. The French disliked the Italian policy of their King, the people and
the nobles objected to the cost of the war, and the Queen implored her husband
to withdraw from a conflict with the Pope which might be extremely prejudicial
to the interests of the future heir to the throne.
The Italian
clergy as a body were faithful to the lawful Pope. The exceptions consisted
only of a few such men as the restless Abbot Zaccaria Ferreri and Cardinal Sanseverino, who was so deeply
compromised. Many warning voices were heard from amongst them. The pious hermit
Angelo of Vallombrosa adjured Carvajal not to rend the unity of the Church ;
what he was doing, he said, was like the crime of Lucifer and would draw down
God’s judgments upon him. Angelo, like many other Italians, as Francesco
Poggio, was diligent with his pen in defence of the rights of the Holy See
against the schismatics. The most eminent of these writers were Domenico Jacobazzi and the celebrated theologian and philosopher,
Thomas de Vio of Gaeta, better known as Cajetanus, who, since 1508, had been General of the
Dominicans. In several works which obtained the honour of being publicly burnt
by Louis XII, Cajetanus dealt in a masterly and
classical style with the false Conciliar theory of which the Council of Pisa
was the latest offshoot He maintained that the power of the Pope in the Church
was supreme and monarchical, demonstrated the difference between the authority
of Peter and that of the other Apostles, denied the superiority of Councils
over the Head of the Church, and refuted the objections drawn from the Councils
of Constance and Basle. The theses which he defended were the following:—(1) A
Council does not derive its authority immediately from Christ. (2) It does not
represent the whole Church unless it includes the Pope. (3) A doubtful Pope,
such as the one who presided at Constance, holds a very different position from
one whose legitimacy is certain.
In Italy the
only writers who advocated the schismatic Council and the oligarchical
revolution in the constitution of the Church at which it aimed, were the
Milanese jurist Decius and Zaccaria Ferreri. This latter,
a learned but restless and changeable man, had first been a Benedictine monk,
and then joined the Carthusians. Here too, he could not bear the quiet of the
cloistered life, and threw himself eagerly into politics, labouring to enlist
public opinion in support of the League of Cambrai and turn it against the
Venetians, whom he hated, and continued to oppose even after the Republic had
been absolved. He wrote poems in praise of the French and was thus brought into
connection with Marshal Trivulzio, and initiated into
the anti-Papal plans of Louis XII. As Carvajal and he had always been close
friends, he was now completely drawn into the schismatical camp. Later he fought so energetically by letters, addresses, and tracts on the
side of the mock Council, that he came to be regarded as its chief literary
champion.
The character
of Carvajal very much resembled that of Ferreri. He
had early adopted the false theory of Councils; in addition to which he could
not forget that he had once very nearly obtained the Tiara. “He had been forced
to yield to Julius II, but he did not relinquish his ambitious plans.”
Especially since the death of d’Amboise, he had become more engrossed with the
hope of attaining the highest dignity. He threw himself into the French movement
entirely, because he thought it might be serviceable to him. He had long ago
quarrelled with the Pope; he loved pomp and show, and cared for reform as
little as his associates did. Like Ferreri he was
utterly untrustworthy. Zurita relates that he simultaneously
asked Ferdinand for a safe-conduct for Naples, wrote to the Spanish Envoy in
Germany to use all his influence to prevent any German prelates from coming to
the Council, and begged the Emperor to send them. “He was sincere in nothing,
and it was this hypocrite who was the President of the Council, to which he was
only held by the impossibility or extreme peril of drawing back.” He was so
much alarmed at the small amount of sympathy which the Council had evoked, that
even at the last moment he made an attempt to be reconciled with the Pope. He
had broken with Cardinal Briçonnet, whose heart like
his own was set on obtaining the Tiara; but both he and his companions were too
ambitious and too proud to bring themselves to comply with the stern requisitions
of Julius II., who insisted on their coming to Rome and asking for absolution.
The prospects of the schismatics, “not one of whom possessed the support of a
genuine conviction,” were rendered still more gloomy by the behaviour of the
Florentines. Florence had for many years been the ally of France and at first
agreed to the choice of Pisa as the meeting place for the Council, but very
soon she began to hesitate. Machiavelli was commissioned to persuade the schismatical Cardinals to delay, and to represent the true
state of things to the French. His instruction of the 10th December says: “No
one seems to wish to attend the Council; it therefore only serves to set the
Pope against us, and we must consequently request that it may either not be
held in Pisa, or at least may be put off Not a single prelate is coming from
Germany and only a few from France, and these are lingering on the way. People
are surprised at the announcement of a Council consisting of only three
Cardinals, while the others who were given out as supporting them hide
themselves and do not appear.” Louis XII was, however, determined to have the
Council at Pisa, and the Florentines were forced to yield, though much against
the grain. Meanwhile their vacillating conduct did not satisfy France, and
incensed the Pope. He laid an Interdict on the city, against which the
Florentines appealed to a Council, but did not make it clear whether to that of
Pisa or of Rome.
It was not till
the middle of October that some Frenchmen began to appear at Pisa, as yet they
were not the Bishops, but only the Bishops’ officials. They found the popular
feeling so much against them that no one would let lodgings to them and they
had to seize their quarters by force.
Further
difficulties arose when the Cardinals proposed to come to Pisa escorted by
French troops. Florence now announced that if they came with armed men they
would be treated as enemies. Upon this they consented to be satisfied with a
small company of archers commanded by Odet de Foix
and Chatillon. It was on the 30th October that Cardinals Carvajal, Briçonnet, de Prie, and d’Albret arrived in Pisa with this small escort, and in
pouring rain. They were provided with powers from Francesco Borgia, Sanseverino, and, they asserted, from Philip of Luxemburg.
The proxy for Borgia lapsed almost immediately through his death.
In the course
of their journey the schismatical Cardinals had
encountered so much hostility on the part of the population, that they arrived
much discouraged and with little confidence in the success of their
undertaking. “In Prato and in Pistoja”, the
Florentine chronicler Cerretani says, “they found the
churches and inns closed, every one fled from them. In Pisa itself they could
only get lodgings at the command of the Florentine Commissioners.”
On the 1st
November the Council ought to have commenced its sittings in the cathedral, but
in accordance with the Pope’s commands the Canons had locked all the doors.
They therefore betook themselves to the Church of S. Michele, close to which
Carvajal was lodged. It was a small building, but contained room and to spare
in it for the accommodation of the “General Council.” The assembly consisted of
the four Cardinals, the Archbishops of Lyons and Sens, fourteen French Bishops,
five Abbots, all French except Ferreri, and a small
number of theologians and jurists. The citizens of Pisa held almost entirely
aloof; according to an eyewitness there were not more than ten present. Ferreri delivered an address on the necessity that a General
Council should be held for the reform of the Church, and announced at its close
that the proceedings would begin on the 5th of November. All who failed to
present themselves were threatened with the censures of the Church. Finally an
individual who announced himself as the Procurator of the King and the Emperor
came forward as notary to execute the deed of constitution. The whole city was
searched in vain for two citizens to act as witnesses; none would consent to
officiate, and two unknown persons had to be taken.
Meanwhile
orders had been sent from Florence that the use of the cathedral was to be
granted to the Council, but that none of the clergy need attend if they were
not so inclined. Thus the General Council was opened in the cathedral as
announced, on the 5th November, in the presence of the four Cardinals and about
eighteen Bishops and Abbots. Of the inhabitants of Pisa, about fifty appeared.
The ceremonies were well carried out, we are told by an eyewitness, but the
attendance of Prelates was so miserable, that many who had hitherto been
sanguine of its success, now gave up all hope. Carvajal said the Mass, and
then, as President of the assembly, seated himself on the semi-Papal throne
prepared for him. Odet de Foix was declared Custos.
It seems almost incredible, but nevertheless it is a fact, that this gathering
had the audacity to declare solemnly that it was a lawfully convoked General
Council and to proclaim all the censures and measures taken against it by
Julius II to be null and void. In the second sitting on the 7th of November a
resolution was passed which sheds a curious light on the amount of confidence
which the schismatics entertained in each other. It was decided that the
Council could not be dissolved by the withdrawal of any individual Prelates
whoever they might be.
The hopes
cherished by some that the Council might, as time went on, increase in numbers
were not fulfilled, and Cardinals d’Este and Sanseverino gave no sign. However earnestly the Pisan
assembly might contend that it was the “salt of the earth, and the light of the
world”, history had accustomed Christendom to see the Church represented after
a very different fashion. The indifference of all from whom they hoped for
support, including the Florentines, their unprotected situation in Pisa, and
the marked hostility of the population had from the first seriously alarmed the
schismatics. Now, in addition to this, on the 9th of November a sanguinary
conflict broke out between the Florentine troops combined with the Pisans on
one side, and the French soldiers and the servants of the Cardinals on the
other. A crowd assembled under the windows of the palace inhabited by the
President of the Council, where the schismatics were gathered together,
shouting “kill them.” The terrified reformers held a hasty sitting on the 12th
instead of the 14th, which had been the day appointed for the next meeting, and
passed three resolutions:—(1) The Synod was not to be dissolved until the whole
Church had been reformed in faith and morals, in its head and members, all
heresies and divisions purged away, and all impending strife between Christian
Princes appeased. (2) The decrees of the fifth sitting of the Council of
Constance were to be confirmed and made more stringent (though they did not
apply to the present situation, as there was no question of the legitimacy of
the Pope, nor, strictly speaking, any schism). (3) The Synod, without being
dissolved, was to be removed from Pisa, where a hostile spirit has been
displayed and it has not the requisite security, to Milan, where its fourth
sitting was to be held on the 13th of December.
In Milan, even
under the shelter of the French cannon, the same general dislike of the Council
was displayed as in Pisa; both people and clergy kept away and could not be
constrained to receive the schismatics with any tokens of respect. When they
made their entry into the city on the 7th of December no Bishop or Prelate of
any importance appeared on the occasion. In spite of the threats of the French
Governor, the majority of the clergy observed the Interdict and the populace
openly jeered at the "Anti-Papal masqueraders!”.
Nevertheless, these latter, if less confidently, still obstinately persevered
in their enterprise. The ambition of the Cardinals and the fanaticism of Ferreri seemed proof against all rebuffs. Neither the scorn
of the Milanese, nor yet a fresh and sterner admonition from the Pope on the
3rd of December, nor even the abstention of a large portion of the French
Episcopate, could make them pause or consider. They still continued to call
themselves a General Council, hoping everything from the victorious arms of
France and the strong hand of Louis XII. A letter from Cardinal de Prie, of 12th January, 1512, to the King asking him to
confiscate the revenues of all the “papistical” Bishops, is very significant of
this attitude. At the same time the French members of the Council also
addressed Louis, claiming the reward of their services in cash. He does not
seem to have had much confidence in the honesty of the reformers, for he
refused to pay without a voucher attesting that they had been present both at
Pisa and Milan.
The piteous
failure of the pseudo-Council, which from the first seemed at the point of
death from sheer anaemia, was an immense gain for the spiritual authority of
Julius II. It was universally recognised that the motives of the schismatical Cardinals were purely personal and ambitious,
and that in combination with the French Court Bishops it was the interests of
Louis XII and not those of the Universal Church that they were serving. “The
Pope could afford to wait without any great anxiety” for the inevitable
collapse of this little band of “ambitious hypocrites, in whom no one believed
and whom no one respected, thus masquerading before the world while in daily
fear for their lives.” “ But he showed his penetration and prudence in not
overprizing the success which their wretched failure had prepared for him. This
triumph was only a negative one; to turn it into a real victory, it was
necessary to oppose to this effete assembly a Council at the Lateran which
should be universally recognised as truly oecumenical. To this achievement the
Pope devoted himself with all his might, and in the wisest and most practical
manner.” To meet the pressing need of the moment it had to give way to the
political and military measures which claimed immediate attention. No effort
was spared to equip a sufficient army. Julius II strained his financial
resources to their utmost limit to accomplish this, but his efforts to be ready
in time were frustrated by the “tardiness of the Spaniards, which made it
impossible for him to strike at the right moment.” As Venice, also, was too
late, and allowed the opportunity to pass, the French succeeded in repelling
the attack of the Swiss on Milan. The hardy mountaineers, however, whom Louis
had treated with the utmost contempt, announced their intention of returning in
the Spring. They had got the French into Italy, they said, and they would drive
them out of it. On the 7th January, 1512, Julius nominated Cardinal Schinner as
Cardinal-Legate for Lombardy and Germany with extraordinary powers. In an open
Consistory he gave him his Legate’s-cross with the words, saying, “In this sign
of the Holy Cross mayest thou begin, prosper, and vanquish.”
In the same
month the Pope decided on taking further measures against the rebellious
Cardinals — “the sect of Carvajal,” as they were called. Almost anything might
be apprehended from the sort of blind fury which possessed these Cardinals, and
it was seriously feared in Rome that they might set up an anti-Pope. On the
30th of January a Consistory was held, at which Cardinal Bakocs was not present, though he had lately arrived in Rome. At this meeting the
deprivation of Cardinal Sanseverino, who still persisted
in his revolt, and had even sent agents to Rome to endeavour to stir up an
insurrection there, was pronounced. In February several of his benefices were
given to others, Cardinal Schinner received the Bishopric of Novara. On the
13th of February, Zaccaria, Ferreri, and Philip
Decius were also condemned as schismatics. At the end of January the League at
last commenced operations, attacking simultaneously in different places. On the
25th of January the Venetians appeared before Brescia, and on the 26th the
combined Spanish and Papal army, commanded by Raymond of Cardona, Viceroy of
Naples, invested Bologna. On the 2nd of February Brescia fell, and it seemed as
if Milan would be lost to France. At this critical moment Louis’s nephew Gaston
de Foix appeared on the scene as the saviour of the French. Young as he was in
years he was already an experienced general. With that marvellous promptitude
which won for him the sobriquet of “foudre de ritalie,” he swooped down, not upon Modena where the enemy
was waiting for him, but seawards on Finale. By forced marches he led his
troops through deep snow and over frozen marshes and streams to Bologna, in a
space of time hitherto unparalleled for shortness. In the night of 4th-5th
February, under cover of a snowstorm, he slipped into the city unobserved by
the enemy. On hearing that he and his troops were actually within the walls the
besiegers broke up their camp. Gaston immediately took advantage of this to
march rapidly on Brescia, which, after a sanguinary conflict in the streets,
was taken on the 18th of February.
Bembo says that the
Pope flew into a violent rage when he heard of the withdrawal of the troops
from before Bologna, but was calmed by the news of the taking of Brescia.
Though the night was cold and stormy, he immediately sent for the Venetian
Ambassador and kept him in conversation for two hours, shedding tears of joy.
How great therefore must have been his distress when he heard of its loss only
a few days later. To add to his vexation at the torpor of the Spaniards, fresh
troubles now sprung up in Rome itself. The intrigues of Cardinal Sanseverino amongst the Roman Barons found the soil only
too well prepared, and set up a ferment which seemed likely to become very
dangerous. Julius II was most afraid of the Orsini party who were devoted to
France. He strengthened the city guard at the gates, and himself withdrew for a
time to the Castle of St. Angelo. Many arrests were made, and it was said that
a plot had been discovered for getting possession of the Pope’s person. But
there was worse to come.
Louis XII saw
that everything depended on striking such a blow as would paralyse the Papal
and Venetian army before the Swiss had time to invade Milan, and King Ferdinand
to attack Navarre, and before Henry VIII could land in Normandy, or the Emperor
distinctly declare against him. A victory should be immediately followed up by
the dethronement of the Pope, the occupation of the Papal States by Cardinal Sanseverino, and the expulsion of the Spaniards from Naples.
At the end of March, Gaston de Foix left Brescia and began to march southward
on the Romagna. Raymond of Cardona prudently retired before his too able
adversary, but the latter succeeded in forcing a battle by turning aside to
besiege Ravenna. At any cost this city, which contained the magazines for
supplying the army, had to be defended. Thus, on Easter Sunday, the 11th of
April, 1512, the two hosts met on the banks of the Ronco about two miles from Ravenna. “This battle was the most sanguinary that had been
fought on Italian soil since the days of the Huns and Goths”. Gaston’s infantry
was composed of German and Italian as well as French soldiers; his army
numbered about 25,000, that of the League 20,000.
The fight was
begun by the artillery, the Duke of Ferrara’s guns especially doing splendid
service. Jacopo Guicciardini, writing to his brother Francesco, then Florentine
Envoy in Spain, says: “It was horrible to see how every shot made a lane
through the serried ranks of the men at arms, sending helmets and heads and
scattered limbs flying through the air. When the Spaniards found themselves
thus being blown to pieces without breaking a lance they dashed forward, and
then the hand to hand fight began. It was a desperate one, and lasted four
hours. When the first onset of the men at arms had been repulsed and those
behind them had suffered severely, the rest turned and fled with the light
cavalry. The Spanish foot soldiers held their ground alone and made a stubborn
resistance, but they were for the most part ridden down by the heavy cavalry.
On the French side the men of Gascony and Picardy fought badly, the Germans
very well.”
The battle
lasted from 8 a.m. till 4 p.m. and was finally won by the Ferrarese artillery
and the steady endurance of the German troops. Of the 10,000 corpses left on
the field, one-third belonged to the French army, and the other two- thirds to
their enemies. The Papal Legate, Giovanni de’ Medici, and two generals,
Fabrizio Colonna and the Marquess of Pescara, were taken prisoners, and the
whole army train of the League with their artillery and banners was captured.
But the shouts of triumph from the French ranks were quickly silenced when it
became known that Gaston de Foix had fallen on the battlefield. The corpse of
the young hero was brought into Ravenna on the following day; eighteen captured
banners were borne before it. In a few more days the whole of the Romagna was
in the hands of the French. The warlike Cardinal Sanseverino entered Flaminia bent on the conquest of Rome and the
deposition of Julius II. The coalition against France, from which such great
things had been expected, had utterly broken down. The greatest excitement
prevailed throughout the whole of Italy. It was said that various monstrous
births had taken place in Ravenna, which were supposed to denote that the
French had been sent into Italy by God as a punishment for the sins of the
Italians.!
On the 14th of
April the news of the disaster at Ravenna reached Julius II.; when it became
known in Rome the whole city was terror-stricken. Everyone knew that Gaston had
threatened to conquer Rome and have a new Pope elected, and it seemed as if the
enemy might at any moment appear at the gates, for all had heard of the
lightning-like swiftness of his movements. The Florentine chronicler Cerretani states that it was feared that Rome would be
sacked and the Prelates murdered. For a moment, even the Pope’s courage gave
way and he talked of flight, which the Spanish Envoy strongly advised. But
while the terror of the Cardinals and Romans continued and could not be
tranquillised, Julius II recovered himself immediately and showed his usual
resolution and the resourcefulness which he always displayed under misfortune.
On the 15th of April he told the Venetian and Spanish Ambassadors that he would
spend 100,000 ducats and pledge his crown to drive the French out of Italy.
Orders were at once issued for the equipment of fresh armaments. The news
brought to Rome on the 15th April by the Knight of S. John, Giulio de’ Medici,
who had been sent thither with a French safe-conduct by the captive Cardinal
Legate, had no doubt much to do with the “marvellous elasticity” displayed by
Julius II after such a crushing blow. Giulio reported that the French loss had
been enormous and that the army was completely demoralised by the death of its
ablest leader. The new commander, La Palice, was, not
in the King’s confidence and was at daggers drawn with the haughty Cardinal Sanseverino. It would be quite out of the question for the
French to march immediately upon Rome and there was a rumour that the Swiss
were on their way to Italy. It was becoming more and more evident that the
battle of Ravenna was a Pyrrhic victory for France. It was significant of the
change in the situation that the Duke of Ferrara had retired into his own
territory and the Duke of Urbino had offered to send troops to the Pope. In
compliance with the wishes of the Cardinals, who still continued to urge the
Pope to make peace, he commenced negotiations with the French; but it is hardly
conceivable that a statesman like Julius II could be seriously anxious to come
to terms just then when he would have had to purchase peace at the highest
price. He himself admitted that his only object in these negotiations was “to
quiet down the French.” If Spain and England remained faithful he had still
resources enough to prosecute the war, and every motive for desiring to do so,
against an enemy who had wounded him both on the temporal and spiritual side
where he was most susceptible, and mocked him on the stage and in satirical
poems.
At the same
time the Pope’s difficulties at this particular time were increased by the
unsatisfactory state of his immediate surroundings; but Julius II faced this
additional peril with unflinching courage, and in a wonderfully short space of
time succeeded in winning one-half of the Roman Barons with the Colonna, and
overawing the others, as was the case with the Orsini.
CHAPTER
VII,
Arrogance
and Downfall of the Schismatics.—Success of the Fifth Ecumenical Council at the
Lateran.—The Swiss as the Saviours of the Holy See. — Annihilation of the Power
of France in Italy. -
The issue of
the battle at Ravenna gave fresh courage to the schismatics at Milan. While the
fortunes of war seemed still hanging in the balance they had been chary of
carrying their proceedings against the Pope too far. Now, on the 21st April,
1512, it was resolved that he should be suspended from all spiritual or
temporal administration and threatened with further punishments. His powers were
held to have lapsed to the “Holy Synod.” “But even the magic halo of victory
which now encircled the French arms had not power enough to infuse life into
the still-born offspring of the schismatics.” The aversion and scorn of the
Milanese was not lessened, and even Louis XII admitted to the Spanish Envoy
that the Council was a mere farce, a bogey set up to intimidate the Pope. The
schismatics had to endure the humiliation of seeing the Milanese in troops
throwing themselves on their knees before the captive Cardinal Medici, and
imploring him to absolve them from the censures they had incurred by their
participation in the war against the Pope.
Meanwhile in
Rome Julius II pursued his task with unwearied energy and undaunted courage.
The preparations for the Ecumenical Council were never interrupted even for a
moment by all the alarm and anxiety caused by the disaster at Ravenna. The war
had obliged him to put off its opening to the 3rd May, and although the
situation was still full of difficulties, it took place at the appointed time.
The Lateran
Council forms a landmark in the history of the world. More than eighty years
had elapsed since the opening of that of Basle, which, instead of effecting the
hoped for reforms in the Church, had proved a source of revolutionary movements
and endless confusion throughout all Christendom. Now another lawful Council
was assembling in Rome, in the first place to defend the liberties of the
Church against the revolutionary pretensions of France, and after that to deal
with the great questions of the century, the reform of the Church and the war
against the Turks.
A triduum of impetratory processions was held on the preceding days, and
on the evening of the 2nd May the Pope went in solemn state, surrounded by the
Swiss guards and with a strong military escort, to the Lateran Palace,, where
he spent the night. As disturbances from the French party were apprehended, the
whole of the neighbourhood was occupied by a detachment of troops. On the
following day, the Feast of the Invention of the Holy Cross, the Council was
formally opened in that venerable Basilica which bears the honourable title of
“Mother and Queen or all Churches”. Besides the Pope, 16 Cardinals (two had
been prevented from attending by sickness) were present, 100 Prelates (mostly
Italian), of whom 70 were Bishops, 12 Patriarchs, and 3 Generals of religious
Orders; in addition to these were the representatives of Spain, Venice, and
Florence, and of the Roman Senators and Conservators, and finally a number of the
Roman nobles. The office of guard of honour to the Council was undertaken by
the Knights of Rhodes. They formed an imposing body in their splendid uniform,
embroidered with gold and silk and with the white cross on their breasts. An
immense crowd filled the church. The Mass of the Holy Ghost was said by
Cardinal Riario; after which an address in classical
Latin was delivered by the General of the Augustinians, Aegidius of Viterbo, which was universally admired. He began with a frank exposition of
the great evils prevailing in the Church, and the benefits to be derived from
General Councils. The preacher explained the overthrow of the troops of the
League at Ravenna as a Divine providence, intended, by allowing the Church to
be defeated when she trusted in alien arms, to throw her back on her own
weapons, piety and prayer, the armour of faith and the sword of light. With
these she had conquered Africa, Europe, and Asia; since she had taken up with
strange adornments and defences she had lost much. It was the voice of God
which had summoned the Pope to hold the Council, to renovate the Church, to
give peace to the nations, to avert further blows and wounds in the future.
“Thou,” said the Lord to Peter, “being once converted confirm thy brethren”.
“Hear ye this, most illustrious Princes of the Apostles, protectors and
defenders of the city of Rome. Hearken to the sighs and moanings of the Church which You founded with your blood, which now lies prostrate,
overwhelmed beneath a flood of calamities. Have you not seen how in this very
year the earth has drunk more blood than rain? Bring us help and lift her up
out of the waves under which she is submerged. Hear the supplications of all
the peoples of Christendom, prostrate at your feet .The Pope unites with the Fathers,
the Senate and the whole world to implore your assistance for himself, for the
Church, the city of Rome, these temples, these altars which enshrine your
sacred relics, this Council which is taking up arms with the support of the
Holy Ghost for the salvation of Christendom. We beg of you to obtain the
reconciliation of all Christian Princes with each other, so that all may turn
their swords against Mahomet the enemy of Christ, and that the charity of the
Church, instead of being extinguished by all these waves and storms, may,
through the merits of the Holy Cross and the inspiration of the Holy Ghost,
which are commemorated together in the festival of today, be cleansed from all
stains and glow again in all its pristine purity and splendour”.
When Aegidius had concluded, the Pope, having taken his place
with the Cardinals in the Choir of the Basilica, bestowed the solemn
Benediction and announced a plenary indulgence. He then intoned the first line
of the “Veni Sancte Spiritus” and proceeded to the tribune for the Council which was erected in the
nave. There the Litanies of the Saint were sung with the usual prayers, and the CardinalDeacon Luigi d’Aragona read the Gospel which narrates the sending forth of the disciples. To spare the
Pope’s failing strength, Cardinal Alessandro Farnese read his address for him.
In it he briefly set forth the reasons for summoning the Council and the
advantages that were to be hoped for from its assembling. He had long been
desirous, he said, of calling a Council, but had deferred it on account of the
incessant wars between the Christian Princes; now, however, the need for it
seemed to him to have become urgent, in order to prevent the division which
Satan had caused in the House of God from spreading further and infecting the
whole flock of Christ He prayed that all might have the fear of the Lord before
their eyes, express their opinions freely, and seek rather to please Him than
man. He hoped that, with the assistance of Almighty God, all evil customs might
be amended, peace be re-established among Christian Princes, and, under the
banner of the Cross, all the artifices of the ancient enemy be brought to
naught. He now declared the Council opened and fixed the 10th of May for its
first sitting.
When the
ceremonies were concluded the Pope made his thanksgiving in the Church of S.
Pietro in Vincoli. He was delighted at the way in which
the solemnities had been carried through, referred laughingly to his anxiety
beforehand lest there should be disturbances, and promised de Grassis a Bishopric as a reward for the admirable way in
which he had organised and conducted the whole function.
The first
sitting took place as arranged, under the presidency of the Pope, on the 10th
of May. Cardinal Grimani sang the Mass of the Holy Ghost,
and Bernardino Zane, also a Venetian, was the preacher. In his sermon he first
touched briefly on the Turkish danger and then proceeded to treat of the unity
of the Church. This he defined as consisting: (1) in the union of the members
with each other; (2) in their subordination to the Head, the Vicar of Christ;
hence all who do not obey the Head, and who separate themselves from the other
members of the body, are schismatics. As it is a law of justice, both human and
divine, that offenders should be punished according to the nature of their
offences, schismatics fall under a double penalty; they are cut off from the
communion of the faithful, and they lose all their apostolical privileges,
offices, and dignities. It is the duty of the Pope and the Fathers in Council
to suppress heretics and schismatics, and render them powerless to do harm, so
that the evil may not spread nor the spark burst into a flame. The Pope then
delivered a short address, reminding those present of what were the objects of
the Council. He described these as the rooting out of schism, the reform of the
Church, and the Crusade. Then the Bulls of July 1511,and April 1512, were read,
and the officers of the Council appointed and sworn in by the Pope himself.
The second
sitting, at which the Council of Pisa was pronounced null and void, was held on
the 17th. Over 100 Prelates were present at it. The High Mass was sung by the
Hungarian Cardinal, Thomas Bakocs. The sermon,
preached by the General of the Dominicans, Thomas de Vio (Cajetanus), was a very remarkable one. The subject
was the Catholic doctrine regarding the Church and Synods. He described the
Church as the Holy City of Jerusalem seen by S. John with her healing powers
(the Sacraments), her apostles, pastors, teachers, and gifts, and the close
mutual union subsisting between her inhabitants, like that between all the
members of the same body. He pointed out how the Church was a city, how she was
holy, the city of peace, Jerusalem, how, unlike the synagogue, she remains ever
new and strong, how she has come down from Heaven and is built after the
pattern of the heavenly kingdom. This Church, he went on to say, is governed by
the Vicar of Christ, to whom all the citizens owe allegiance, not only each
individually but as a body. The Pisan Synod possessed none of the notes of the
true Church, and appeared rather to have risen up out of Hell than descended
from Heaven. It represented only one nation and that but partially, was not
universal, could not claim to be the city to which the strength of the Gentiles
had come, or the multitude of the sea had been converted. This assembly was
neither holy nor lawfully convened, was stained with error, subordinated Peter
to the Church, the Pope to the Council, set the members above the head, and the
sheep before the shepherd. It cannot be called Jerusalem, for it possesses
neither peace nor order, but on the contrary aims at undermining the noble
order of the Roman Church and wages war against her; and is like the city and
tower of Babel, generating nothing but confusion. She is new, but in a very
different sense from the newness of the true Church; she is the offspring of
Constance and Basle. The Pope should be the mirror of the Power, the
Perfection, and the Wisdom of God. He manifests the power of God when he girds
himself with his own sword, for he possesses two swords, one which he shares
with temporal princes and another which is reserved to him only. This latter is
the sword of the spiritual power for the destruction of errors and schisms. The
power of the Pope should be combined with the image of the Divine Perfection,
which consists in loving-kindness. To this must be added wisdom, and this
wisdom is specially displayed in the calling of the present Council, which
should manifest it more and more by realising the hopes that are entertained of
it and making the Church such as the spirit shewed it to the beloved disciple.
It is
significant of the change which had come about in the views of the majority of
theologians at that time, that this outspoken condemnation of the false
Conciliar theory called forth no contradiction. The evils which this theory,
the offspring of a period of almost boundless confusion, had brought upon the
Church and the world had come to be very widely recognised. The weakness of the
schismatics and the success of the Lateran Council shewed how completely the
Catholic view, that no Council could be salutary for the Church that was not
held with and under the Pope, had gained the upper hand.
At the
conclusion of Cajetan’s address, a letter from the King of England on his
alliance with the Pope was read; and then another from the King of Spain,
accrediting his Counsellor, Hieronymus de Vich, as
Envoy from himself and his daughter Joanna, Queen of Castile, to act as their
representative at the Council, and support Julius, the rightful Pope, against
the schismatics. Next followed the reading of the Papal Bull confirming and
renewing the censures pronounced against the pseudo-Council. At the same time,
in view of the political situation, and the probability that representatives of
other nations might be expected later, and also the coming Summer heats, the
next sitting was adjourned to the 3rd of November.
While England
had now definitely joined the League against France, the Emperor of Germany
also was gradually drawing nearer to the Pope, who held out hopes of an
advantageous peace with Venice. That Julius should have been successful in
persuading Maximilian to conclude an armistice with the Republic for ten months
“was a great step in advance. The Emperor did not join the League, and his
friendship with France remained ostensibly intact; but the position he now took
up was unfavourable to her and advantageous for the allies.” In April, through
Cardinal Schinner, he gave permission to the Swiss, who were marching to help
the Pope, to pass through his dominions and supplied them with provisions.
At the end of
May, the Swiss contingents, numbering in all 18,000 men, met in Verona, where
Cardinal Schinner presented to his countrymen, “as loyal and chivalrous
defenders and protectors of the Holy Church and the Pope”, a cap of honour adorned
with gold and pearls, and an ornamented sword, as gifts from Julius II and
symbols of the political independence of the Confederation. This acknowledgment
was well-deserved, for it was reserved to these brave mountaineers to strike
the final blow which decided the issue of the war in Italy; they were the
saviours of the Holy See. Though, no doubt, political and financial
considerations had their weight in determining this expedition, a spirit of
very genuine religious enthusiasm was by no means wanting amongst the Swiss.
Zwingli, the openair preacher of Glarus, writing to
his friend Vadian in Vienna, says: “The Swiss have
seen the deplorable state to which the Church of God, the mother of
Christendom, has been reduced, and they think it both wrong and dangerous to
permit this rapacious tyrant to remain unpunished.”
Almost
simultaneously with the arrival of the Swiss in Italy, Maximilian recalled the
German foot-soldiers, which formed practically the core of the French army, and
had materially contributed to its victory at Ravenna. At the very moment that
it was thus weakened it found itself threatened by four armies at once—the
Papal troops under the Duke of Urbino, and the Spaniards, Venetians, and Swiss.
No reinforcements could be hoped for from France, as the army at home had not a
man to spare from the defence of the frontiers against the attacks of England
and Spain. Since the death of Gaston de Foix, the French force in Italy had
been left without organisation, spirit, or plans. The Romagna was first
evacuated, and soon Upper Italy was also abandoned. On the 14th June the Swiss
sat down before Pavia, which capitulated after a short siege. Upon this the
whole Duchy of Milan rose against the French, who had made themselves
universally hated.
Now that it was
becoming more and more evident that the battle of Ravenna had been but a
Pyrrhic victory, the schismatics found their position untenable. On the 4th of
June they decided to remove to Asti. Their departure was more like a flight
than anything else, and gave Cardinal Medici the opportunity of escaping. But
even at Asti they found it impossible to remain, and soon had to move on to
Lyons. Here the only act of the assembly was to demand a subsidy from the
French clergy and the University of Paris, and thus “without any formal
dissolution, the French Council disappeared from the scene.”
Genoa also had
cast off the yoke of France, chosen Giovanni Fregoso as Doge, and declared herself independent. Rimini, Cesena, and Ravenna returned
to their allegiance to the Pope. On the 13th of June the Duke of Urbino took
possession of Bologna in the name of the Church. The Papal troops now turned
back to subdue Parma and Piacenza, which Julius II claimed as heir to the
Countess Matilda. On the 20th, Ottaviano Sforza,
Bishop of Lodi, entered Milan as the Pope’s lieutenant. On the 28th, La Palice, with the remnants of his army, arrived, broken and
hopeless, at the foot of the Alps. Thus Louis XII, after having stirred up a
schism and striven to annihilate the Pope, ended by losing in ten weeks not
only all the fruits of his victory at Ravenna, but also all his possessions in
Italy, including even Asti, which belonged to his own family. “The soldiers of
Louis XII have vanished like mist before the sun”, writes Francesco Vettori, without having fought a single battle, and almost
without having defended a single town. That which Julius had been striving with
all his might for years to achieve, was now brought about by a sudden turn of
events, so unexpected, that Raphael in his fresco in the Vatican has
symbolically represented it as a miracle.
It was on the
22nd of June that Julius II received the first detailed account of the rout of
the French in a letter from Pavia from Cardinal Schinner. He read the whole
letter through first in silence; then, turning with a beaming countenance to
the Master of Ceremonies, “We have won, Paris”, he exclaimed, “we have won!”.
“May God give your Holiness joy of it,” answered de Grassis,
to which the Pope immediately added, “And to all the faithful souls whom He has
at last deigned to deliver from the yoke of the barbarians.” Then he unfolded
the letter again and read it from beginning to end to all who were present.
Immediately afterwards he announced his intention of going on the following day
to his former titular Church, S. Pietro in Vincoli,
to give thanks there to God. Though far from well, he had himself carried
thither on the 23rd and remained for a long time absorbed in prayer before the
High Altar. How wonderfully everything was changed. S. Peter’s chains were
indeed broken; the Italian poets sang of Julius as the liberator of Italy. On
the 27th he received four delegates from Bologna, who had been sent to sue for
pardon. In the evening the whole city suddenly burst into a flood of light.
This was to celebrate a fresh victory, the liberation of Genoa, his own native
city. Cannon thundered from St Angelo and fireworks blazed all over the city.
The Pope returned to the Vatican in a solemn triumphal procession, accompanied
by his whole Court and all the officials, carrying torches. The cry of “Julius,
Julius,” rose on all sides. “Never,” says the Venetian Envoy, “was any Emperor
or victorious general so honoured on his entry into Rome as the Pope has been
today.” A universal amnesty was proclaimed and alms distributed to all the
convents. “Now God has left us nothing more to ask from Him,” he said, “we have
only to pour forth our gratitude for the splendour of our triumph.”
Commands were
issued for a triduum of processions of thanksgiving and other rejoicings to be
held throughout the States of the Church as well as in Rome. On the same day,
27th June, Briefs were despatched to all parts of Christendom desiring the
faithful to celebrate the liberation of Italy and of the Holy See. As a
lasting memorial of these events the Pope presented to the Church of S. Peter
some splendid vestments and a golden altar-frontal with an inscription, saying
that it was a votive offering to God and the Princes of the Apostles in
thanksgiving for the “liberation of Italy.” At the same time Julius was far
from forgetting to whom next to God he was most indebted for his victory, and
showered rewards on the stalwart Swiss. In a Bull of 6th July, 1512, he
bestowed on them in perpetuity the title of “Protectors of the liberty of the
Church,” and also sent them two-large banners. One of them bore the Papal tiara
with the keys and the inscription, “Pope Julius II, nephew of Sixtus IV, of
Savona”; on the other the family arms of the Pope were depicted with the keys
and the motto: “The Lord is my helper; I will not fear what man can do unto
me”. Every township which had sent a contingent to the army received a silken
banner, with the arms of the place and a religious picture, the subject of
which they were permitted to choose, embroidered or painted upon it. These
gifts admirably corresponded with the character of the people, at once martial
and pious. Many of these banners have been preserved to the present day. In
addition to these marks of honour, Julius granted several spiritual favours to
the Swiss, and bestowed the Countship of Vigevano on Schinner.
To no one was
the complete discomfiture of the French so crushing a blow as to Duke Alfonso
of Ferrara. It left him absolutely helpless at the mercy of the Pope whom he
had treated with such insolence. Trusting to the friendship of the Colonna and
of his brother-in-law Gonzaga of Mantua, and also armed with a safe-conduct
from Julius, he came to Rome on the 4th of July to endeavour to save what he
could. The Pope willingly absolved him from all ecclesiastical censures, but
insisted on his giving up Ferrara and accepting Asti instead. The Colonna
strove in vain to mediate in his favour; and soon he began to feel that he was
not safe in Rome. In this he was not mistaken, for Julius would have had no
scruple in detaining and imprisoning him. He resolved, therefore, to fly, and
with the help of the Colonna succeeded in getting away on the 19th of July. The
Pope was extremely indignant and instituted proceedings against him as a
rebellious vassal.
A Congress of
the interested powers was held in Mantua in August for the reorganisation of
political relations which the war had left in utter confusion. Here it soon
became plain that victory had sown dissension amongst the members of the
League. There was only one point upon which all the allies were agreed, and
that was that Florence must be punished for holding to France as she had done
and refusing to join the League, and for harbouring the schismatics. It was
resolved that the Medici should be restored, and a combined Papal and Spanish
army was despatched to effect this. On the 30th August the Spaniards conquered
Prato, and cruelly sacked it. Upon this the Florentines yielded, and in
September the Medici returned, first the gentle and attractive Giuliano, later
the Cardinal, and took the government of the city into their hands. The
question as to who should have the Duchy of Milan was decided at the Congress
of Mantua. Ferdinand of Spain and Maximilian desired to secure it for their
grand-son Charles, but the Swiss and Julius II, who did not wish to see any
foreign power established in Lombardy, succeeded in arranging that it should be
bestowed on Massimiliano Sforza, the son of Lodovico Moro; who became a fast
friend of the Swiss Confederation. On the 8th of October, however, Parma and
Piacenza were separated from the Duchy and included in the States of the
Church. Reggio had already, on the 4th of July, submitted to the Pope; and sent
Envoys later to Rome to make their profession of obedience, expressing
themselves in very humble terms. A contemporaneous historian remarks that this
was the first time since the donation of King Pepin that a Pope had possessed
this city.
But in spite of
all these successes there was still a reverse side to the medal. “With the
exception of the Pope and the Swiss none of the allies were completely
satisfied. The Emperor, whose chief object had been to push a formidable rival
out of Italy, now realised with dismay that he had only succeeded in
substituting the Pope for France”. The appropriation of Parma, Piacenza, and Reggio
by Julius was felt as a blow at the Imperial Court, and it is not surprising that
Maximilian’s attitude was far from friendly when the Pope’s further wishes came
to be dealt with. The feeling in Spain was very much the same as in Germany.
Under these circumstances Ferrara had to be left alone, especially as the
behaviour of the Duke of Urbino did not inspire confidence in his intentions.
The power of the Swiss also somewhat weighed on the Pope; but his greatest
anxiety was the uncertainty as to the intentions of King Ferdinand. He heard
with alarm that the Spanish army was marching from Tuscany towards Lombardy.
“If, as rumour now whispered, and as indeed became partially the fact
afterwards, he was going to embark in a private war of acquisition here without
troubling himself about the rights of the League or the claims of Venice, he
would then obtain a point of vantage in the north of the peninsula from which,
in combination with his legitimate claims in the south, he could stretch out
his arms over the whole, and have the Holy See entirely at his mercy.” This
made it of the highest importance for Julius to be on the most friendly terms
with the Emperor in order to counterbalance the power of Spain. To ensure the
complete success of the Lateran Council, also, the co-operation of the Emperor
was most necessary. The majority of the Christian Princes (Spain, Portugal,
England, Scotland, Hungary, Norway, and Denmark)! had all declared in its
favour, and France had been laid under Interdict in August; but to complete her
isolation and that of the Council of Lyons, the adhesion of the Emperor was
essential. Thus, when in the late Autumn of 1512 Matthaeus Lang, Maximilian’s
most trusted and influential adviser, appeared in Rome, the Pope’s joy knew no
bounds. The haughty prelate assumed the air of an emperor, but every effort was
made to satisfy and win him. In all the cities of the States of the Church he
was received with honours, and the Pope gave special orders to his Master of
Ceremonies that in Rome his entry should be accompanied with every possible
manifestation of consideration and welcome.
Lang is
described by contemporary writers as a handsome man with fair hair, looking
about forty years of age. He arrived in Rome on the evening of the 4th November,
and sent his people to the apartments prepared for them, while he himself went
at once incognito to the Vatican, where Julius II was burning with impatience
to meet him. That no manifestation of regard might be wanting in the welcome of
the man upon whom so much depended, the Pope came out as far as the first
antechamber to receive him. On the same evening they had a long private
interview, and Lang spent the night in the Vatican. On the following day he
made his official entry into Rome with all possible pomp. “During my whole term
of office,” writes the Papal Master of Ceremonies, “I have never seen a more
splendid pageant: it was like a triumphal procession.” At first it was proposed
that the College of Cardinals and the whole of the clergy should meet him
outside the gates. But the majority of the Cardinals objected to this as an
honour which had never been accorded to any but crowned heads; but in every
other particular his reception was that of a King. Cardinals Bakocs and Leonardo Grosso della Rovere met him at the foot of Monte Mario, and placed him between them, a token
of respect which he at first declined with affected humility. At the Ponte Molle the Senator of Rome and his officials awaited him. At
the Porta del Popolo, in accordance with the usual
etiquette, the Cardinals took their leave, and were replaced by the Governor of
Rome and the Maggiordomo of the Palace. The streets
were lined with spectators, all the Envoys took part in the procession, and the
guns of St Angelo shook the old building to its foundation with their noisy
welcome. Night had fallen before the procession reached the Vatican, which was
illuminated, and where Lang’s official reception by the Pope now took place.
The principal
difficulty in the negotiations of the first few days lay not in the relations
between the Pope and the Emperor, but in those of the latter with Venice.
Throughout the Summer Julius had been labouring to induce the Venetians to
yield as far as possible to the Emperor. But the negotiations had all failed,
for Maximilian required the Republic to give up Verona and Vicenza, and to pay
down a sum of 250,000 ducats for the fiefship of
Padua and Treviso, with the addition of a yearly toll of 30,000 ducats. The
Venetians refused to accede to these terms, and demanded the retrocession of
Verona, for which, however, they were willing to pay an annual tribute to the
Emperor during his life. When, on the 7th November, the Venetian Envoys gave to
the Pope, who had acted as intermediary between them and Maximilian, their
final answer declining to accept his terms, Julius II for the third time
reversed his political course. In spite of the urgent remonstrances of the
representatives of the Republic and many of the Cardinals and the efforts of
the Spanish Envoy, who tried to induce him to defer his decision, the Pope
determined at once to conclude a close alliance with the Emperor. He was firmly
convinced that both ecclesiastical and political considerations imperatively
demanded this measure, and on the evening of the 29th of November the agreement
between Julius II and Maximilian was signed. The Emperor engaged to defend the
Pope against all attacks, repudiated the schismatics, acknowledged the Lateran
Council, washed his hands of the Duke of Ferrara and the Bentivogli,
and handed over Reggio and Modena for the present to the Pope. Julius II
promised to support Maximilian against Venice with both spiritual and temporal
weapons if she persisted in her refusal to relinquish Verona and Vicenza, and
to pay tribute for the other imperial fiefs; to assist him with spiritual arms
against the Flemings, and to grant him in Germany a tax of a tenth on the
clergy if the electors would also consent.
On the same
day, in a Secret Consistory, Lang was admitted into the College of Cardinals;
but, at his own express wish, his nomination was not yet published, and the Pope
also dispensed him from the obligation of wearing a Cardinal’s dress. On the
24th of November an open Consistory was held, at which the Swiss Envoys were
received, and Lang’s elevation to the Cardinalate was also announced, although
he still refused to assume the insignia of his rank. The reason which he gave
for this was that he was anxious “that the object of his mission should not be
misunderstood.” On the 25th of November the new alliance was formally announced
in Sta Maria del Popolo. Ferdinand of Spain also
promised to help against Venice if she refused to yield.
The answer of
the Republic consisted in entering into close relations with France, which led,
in March 1513, to a definite alliance. The Pope had been anxious to prevent
this, and in consequence had not as yet pronounced the censures of the Church
against Venice. The result of this union with France was again to prevent the
allies from doing anything against Ferrara.
The price which
Julius II consented to pay in order to secure the adhesion of Maximilian to the
Council, shows how far this Pope was from being the mere politician that many
have tried to make him out. Anyone who had counted on finding him so absorbed
in politics as to be indifferent to the intrigues of the schismatics, would have
been utterly mistaken. On the contrary, there is no doubt that the revolt in
the Church was a heavier blow to Julius II. than any of his political reverses.
Although it was plain that the attempts of the schismatics had completely
failed, he could not be satisfied till the movement was entirely extirpated.
The winning
over of the Emperor was the crowning victory in the rapid succession of the
Pope’s triumphs, and was to be published, to all the world. The third sitting
of the Council was held on the 3rd of December. Though the Pope had long been
ailing, and the weather was stormy and rainy, he was determined to be present
at it. One hundred and eleven members attended it. The High Mass was sung by
Cardinal Vigerio and the usual sermon preached by the
Bishop of Melfi, the subject being the unity of the
Church. After this the Secretary of the Council, Tommaso Inghirami,
then read the letter from the Emperor accrediting Lang as his plenipotentiary
and procurator at the Council, and denouncing the Conciliabula set up by the King of France at Tours and at Pisa. Lang, who appeared in lay
attire, read a declaration from the Emperor repudiating the schism of Pisa, and
announcing his adhesion to the Lateran Council, and at the same time made his
profession of obedience to the Pope in his own name and that of his colleague
Alberto da Carpi. At the close of the proceedings the Bishop of Forli read a
Papal Bull again declaring all the acts of the Pisan Council null and void,
laying France under Interdict, and appointing the 10th of December for the next
sitting.
Encouraged by
his recent successes, the Pope now determined to lay the axe to the root of the
schismatic movement in France. It was decided that proceedings should be
commenced against the Pragmatic Sanction. It had, in fact, become urgently
necessary to do away with this law, which had been revived by Louis XII. No
lasting triumph of the Church over these schismatic tendencies was possible as
long as it remained in force.
The fourth
sitting of the Council was held under the presidency of the Pope himself on the
10th of December. Nineteen Cardinals, 96 Patriarchs, Archbishops, and Bishops,
4 Abbots, and 4 Generals of religious Orders were present, besides the
representatives of the Emperor, the King of Spain, the Florentines, and the
Swiss Confederation. The first business was the reading of the letter from the
Venetian Government of 10th April, 1512, accrediting Francesco Foscari as their
representative at the Council; and after this Louis XI.’s letter of 27th
November, 1461, on the abolition of the Pragmatic Sanction. Upon this a
monition was issued, summoning all upholders of the Sanction in France, whether
laymen or ecclesiastics, to appear before the Council within sixty days to give
an account of their conduct The fifth sitting of the Council was fixed for the
16th February, 1513, at the close of this term, and at it the Pragmatic
Sanction would be dealt with and resolutions in regard to it adopted, in
accordance with Canon Law. A special commission was appointed to institute the
necessary preliminary investigations. Then a Bull was read confirming former
Papal decrees on the Pragmatic Sanction, the nullity of the acts of the Pisan
Council, and the reform of the Court officials. The address at this Council, the
last at which Julius II was present, was delivered by the Apostolical Notary
Cristoforo Marcello of Venice. It substantially consisted of an enthusiastic
panegyric on the Pope. “Julius II”, the speaker said, “in a most just war
against an enemy far stronger than himself, had personally undergone the
extremes of heat and cold, all sorts of fatigues, sleepless nights, sickness,
and even danger of death without flinching. At his own expense, with unexampled
generosity, he had equipped an army, liberated Bologna, driven the enemy (the
French) out of Italy, subdued Reggio, Parma, and Piacenza, brought joy and
peace to his country, and earned for himself an immortal name. Still greater
was the glory that awaited him at this present time in the works of peace, the
reform and exaltation of the Church, which was groaning under so many evils and
threatened by traitors within and enemies without; which had brought up children
who despised her, and had so often poured forth her complaint in mournful
chants, but now raised her eyes full of joy and hope to the bridegroom who had
come to deliver her. The Pope would be her physician, pilot, husbandman, in
short, her all in all, almost as though God were again on earth.”
Certainly
Julius II had good cause to be satisfied with the splendid successes of the
last half-year. Nevertheless, both as an Italian and as a Pope, the
preponderance of Spain in Italy could not but fail to be a source of anxiety
and vexation to him. The knowledge that this was “largely due to his own action
must have made the trial all the greater, and the prospect for the future was
not improved by the fact that the heir-presumptive of the King of Spain was also
heir-presumptive of the Emperor in whose hands so large a portion of Venetian
territory was now gathered.” In his near surroundings on all sides Julius could
not escape from the consciousness of Spanish influence. He felt it in his
dealings with the Colonna, at Florence, in Siena, and in Piombino,
and an utterance of his, preserved by Jovius, shows
how it galled him. Cardinal Grimani, in conversation
with him one day, made an allusion to the foreign sovereignty in Naples, and
the Pope, striking the ground with his stick, exclaimed: “If God grants me life I will free the Neapolitans from the yoke which is
now on their necks.” No doubt his restless spirit was again meditating new
efforts and enterprises when the body at last finally broke down.
For a long time
past Julius II had been ailing. He had never wholly recovered from his serious
illness in August 1511, although his iron will enabled him to conceal his
sufferings so effectually that even those who were constantly in contact with
him were for some time deceived. At last, however, he had to confess to himself
that his days were numbered. On the eve of Pentecost, 1512, he felt so weak
after Vespers that he told his Master of Ceremonies that in future he would not
attempt to officiate in solemn functions, he had not strength enough to go
through the ceremonial. When some of the Cardinals congratulated him on the
freshness of his complexion and said he looked younger than he had done ten
years earlier, he said to de Grassis: “They are
flattering me; I know better; my strength diminishes from day to day and I
cannot live much longer. Therefore I beg you not to expect me at Vespers or at
Mass from henceforth.” All the same he took part in the procession on Good
Friday. On the eve of the Feast of S. John the Baptist he made a pilgrimage to
the Church of S. Pietro in Vincoli, which brought on
an attack of fever.
At the end of
November he paid one of those short visits to Ostia, which he always thoroughly
enjoyed, and returned so much refreshed that he was able to attend the third
and fourth sittings of the Lateran Council. But even then it was observed that
the Pope was singularly restless. On the second Sunday in Advent he went to his
Palace at S. Pietro in Vincoli because he could go
out walking there with greater freedom; but from that time forth he changed his
residence almost daily. One day he went to S. Croce, the next to Sta Maria
Maggiore, then back to S. Lorenzo fuori le Mura, or
S. Eusebio; striving in vain to escape from the sense of distress which always
pursued him. On Christmas Eve, when Paris de Grassis came to tell him that it was time for Vespers, Julius said: “You had better
tell the Sacred College and the Sacristan of the Palace to bring me the
holy-oils, for I feel very ill. I shall not live much longer”. The Master of
Ceremonies could not believe that he was so ill as he thought himself, but others,
as the Venetian Envoy, saw plainly that his condition was serious, though his
strong will upheld him and enabled him still to attend to affairs as usual. At
the end of December one of the Captains of the Swiss Guards predicted that the
end was not far off. The health of the aged Pontiff was no doubt unfavourably
affected by the constant vexations and anxieties caused by the Spanish
preponderance in Italy. After Christmas he was unable to leave his bed. He
could not sleep and disliked all food. He was attended by eight physicians
considered the ablest in Rome, but none of them could find out the cause of his
malady. “The Pope is not exactly ill,” writes the Venetian Envoy on the 16th
January, 1513, “but he has no appetite ; he eats nothing but two eggs in the
whole day; he has no fever, but his age makes his condition serious; he is
harassed with anxieties.” In addition to his uncertainty as to what King
Ferdinand meant to do, Julius II had reason to fear that the Swiss were
preparing to ally themselves with France.
All the efforts
of the physicians failed to relieve the sleeplessness and want of appetite.
Though they recommended as much rest as possible, the Pope, trusting in the
strength of his constitution, would not give up his work, and received both
Cardinals and Envoys while in bed; but he did not conceal the truth from
himself that he was slowly passing away. On the 4th of February he called Paris
de Grassis to his bed-side and told him with great
seriousness and resignation that his end was very near; he put himself into
God’s hands, recovery was out of the question; he thanked God for not taking
him away suddenly, as had been the case with so many of his predecessors, and
giving him time to recollect himself and die like a Christian and make his dispositions
for time and eternity. He had confidence, he said, in de Grassis and believed that he would faithfully carry out all his wishes. In regard to
his funeral, he desired that it should not be penurious, but at the same time
that there should be no pomp or display. He did not deserve honours, for he had
been a great sinner; but, nevertheless, he wished to have all things ordered
decently and not to be treated in the unseemly manner that some of his
predecessors had been. He would trust all these matters to the discretion of
his faithful servant He then gave orders on all necessary affairs, entering
into the minutest details, and bequeathed a sum of money to be given to needy
priests to say Masses for his soul.
On the 10th
November the Venetian Envoy reports that “the Pope has shivering fits, and
negotiations are already beginning for the choice of his successor.” The city
was in a ferment, but the Cardinals took stringent precautions to preserve
order. In the following days the Pope grew worse, but still did not quite give
himself up. He was able to give orders for everything which concerned the fifth
sitting of the Council (on the 16th February), and made it a special point that
in this sitting the ordinances for the prevention of simony in Papal elections
should be re-enacted and made more stringent. On the 19th de Grassis came to him to learn his wishes as to the date of
the next sitting. “I found his Holiness,” he says, “looking quite well and
cheerful, as if he had had little or nothing the matter with him. When I
expressed my surprise and joy at this, and congratulated him, he answered
smiling, ‘Yesterday I was very near dying, today I am well again’. He replied
to all my questions as far as he could. He was anxious that the Council should
be held on the appointed day, whatever might happen, in order not to put off
the term fixed for the submission of the King of France and his adherents; but
the Assembly was not to deal with any matters except those which had been
arranged for at the preceding session. Cardinal Riario was to preside as Dean of the Sacred College. He then granted Indulgences to me
and mine, and, to shew me how well he felt, asked me to drink a glass of
Malvoisie with him. When I told this to the Cardinals, who were weeping, thinking
him at the point of death, they could hardly believe me.”
The
improvement, however, was only transitory, and the faithful de Grassis now rendered to his master the last and kindest of
services. Hitherto the Pope’s attendants, in dread of alarming him, had put off
sending for the Holy Viaticum. De Grassis now
insisted that this should be done, and he relates how the Pope, having
previously made his confession, received the Holy Eucharist on the 20th of
February with the greatest devotion. After this, Julius II had all the
Cardinals summoned to his bed-side, and begged for their earnest prayers as he
had been a great sinner and had not ruled the Church as he ought to have done.
He admonished them to fear God, and observe the precepts of the Church. He desired
them to hold the election in strict accordance with the law and the
prescriptions in his Bull on the subject. The election belonged to the
Cardinals only, the Council had nothing to do with it. All absent Cardinals,
with the exception only of the schismatics, were to be invited to take part in
the Conclave. In his own person he forgave these latter with his whole heart,
but as Pope it was his duty to exclude them from the Conclave. He said all
these things in Latin, in a grave and impressive manner, as though he were
addressing a Consistory. Then, in Italian, he expressed his wish that the
Vicariate of Pesaro should be granted in perpetuity to the Duke of Urbino.
After this he bestowed his Blessing on the Cardinals; all were in tears,
including the Pope himself. He met death with wonderful calmness and
steadfastness of soul. He refused to accede to some other wishes expressed by
his relations ; thinking only of the good of the Church. In his last hours his
attendants gave him a draught containing a solution of gold, which had been
pronounced to be an unfailing specific by one of the quacks of that day. During
the night of the 200th-21st February, 1513, his strong spirit passed away,
clear and conscious to the last.
The body was
immediately laid out in S. Peter’s, and afterwards placed beside the remains of
Sixtus IV. We are told that the people flocked to S. Peter’s in extraordinary
numbers, and an eyewitness says that as much honour was paid to the corpse as
if it had been the body of S. Peter himself. “Rome felt that the soul which had
passed from her had been of royal mould”. Paris de Grassis writes in his Diary : “I have lived forty years in this city, but never yet
have I seen such a vast throng at the funeral of any former Pope. The guards
were overpowered by the crowds insisting on kissing the dead man’s feet.
Weeping, they prayed for his soul, calling him a true Pope and Vicar of Christ,
a pillar of justice, a zealous promoter of the Apostolic Church, an enemy and queller of tyrants. Many even to whom the death of Julius
might have been supposed welcome for various reasons burst into tears,
declaring that this Pope had delivered them and Italy and Christendom from the
yoke of the French barbarians.”
The chronicler
Sebastiano de Branca speaks of Julius in the same
tone. But it was not in Rome only that Julius II was popular; the great
services which he had rendered to the Holy See were largely appreciated in the
States of the Church also, as may be seen from the enthusiastic praises
bestowed on him by Bontempi of Perugia.
At the same
time, there were many who judged him very differently. A man who had played
such an energetic and effective part in the affairs of his time could not fail
to have bitter opponents, who, as was the custom of the day, assailed him after
his death with stinging satires; but setting aside this and similar ebullitions
of party hatred, there is no doubt that the verdict pronounced by many serious
historians on Julius II has been the reverse of favourable ; while it is also extremely
questionable whether this verdict has been well-grounded.
It is certain
that the very general acceptance of Guicciardini’s dictum, that Julius II had nothing of the priest in him but the cassock and the
name, is an injustice. When the Florentine historian made use of the phrase, he
was telling the story of the Pope’s winter campaign against Mirandola.
Undoubtedly at that time Julius II was carried away by his eager temperament to
violate the decorum clericale in a scandalous
manner, and deserves grave blame for this as also for the violent outbursts of
anger to which he so often gave way. But to assert in a general way that Julius
was “one of the most profane and unecclesiastical figures that ever occupied
the Chair of S. Peter,” that “there was not a trace of Christian piety to be
found in him”, and that he was so utterly worldly and warlike that he cared
nothing for ecclesiastical obligations or interests, is quite unwarrantable and
untrue.
The Diary of
his Master of Ceremonies, Paris de Grassis, who was
by no means blind to his master’s failings, shows in numberless places how
faithfully Julius II fulfilled his ecclesiastical obligations. As far as his
health would allow he was regular in his attendance at all the offices of the
Church; he heard Mass almost daily and often celebrated, even when travelling
and when the start took place before daybreak. After his illness in 1510, when
still unable to stand, he did not permit his weakness to prevent him from
saying Mass on Christmas’ Day, and celebrated sitting, in his private chapel.
However occupied he might be with political affairs, Church functions were
never neglected. In everything that regarded the government of the Church he
was equally exact. His name is connected with a whole series of ordinances and
administrative enactments, some of them of considerable importance.
Amongst them
one that specially deserves mention is his severe Bull against simony in Papal
elections, designed to prevent the repetition of the disgraceful practices
which were resorted to at the election of Alexander VI. This document is dated
the 14th January, 1505. It declares all simoniacal elections from henceforth null, and pronounces the severest penalties of the
Church on all guilty of such practices. Further, it ordains that all
intermediaries and agents, whether lay or clerical, and whatever their rank,
whether Prelates, Archbishops or Bishops, or Envoys of Kings or States, who are
implicated in a simoniacal election are to be
deprived of their dignities, and their goods are to be confiscated. The Bull
forbids all promises or engagements to be contracted by Cardinals or any other
persons in connection with a Papal election and declares them null and void.
This Bull was not published till October 1510, from Bologna at the beginning of
the war with France, and when it had been approved of by all the Cardinals then
present: it was then sent to nearly all the Princes of Christendom. At the
Lateran Council it was again approved, re-enacted, and published as is stated
in the Bull of 16th February, 1513.
In order to
carry out more effectually the measures taken by Alexander VI in 1501 for
providing the new American Colonies with Bishops, Julius II in 1504 created an
Archbishopric and two Bishoprics in Española (Hayti)
and nominated prelates to these sees; but the fiscal policy of Ferdinand placed
all sorts of difficulties in the way of the sending out of the newly-appointed
Bishops, and after long delay and much tedious negotiation Julius at last gave
way in order not to interrupt the work of conversion. By a Papal Brief of the
8th of August, 1511, the arrangements made in 1504 were cancelled, and two new
Bishoprics erected in S. Domingo and Conception de la Vega in Española, and in
S. Juan in Porto Rico, and placed under the Archbishop of Seville, which was
the seat of the administration for the colonies. When in 1506 Christopher
Columbus the great discoverer who had done so much to enlarge the sphere of the
husbandry of the Church died, Julius II interested himself in favour of his son
Diego at the Court of Spain.
The Pope
equally took pains to promote the spread of Christianity in the regions
discovered and acquired by the King of Portugal beyond the seas, to which many
missionaries were despatched. Preachers were sent to India, Ethiopia, and to
the Congo. In the year 1512, Envoys from the latter place arrived in Rome. For
a short time Julius II cherished magnificent hopes of the conversion of Ismail
the Shah of Persia, and tried to induce the King of Hungary to interest himself
in the question, but these bright dreams were soon dispelled.
The Pope showed
his interest in the maintenance of the purity of the doctrines of the Church by
appointing Inquisitors for the Diocese of Toul, for the kingdom of Naples, and
for Benevento, and admonishing them to act with decision.
He interested
himself in the conversion of the Bohemian sectaries, and to facilitate this
permitted them to take part in Catholic worship. On the other hand, he took
strong measures to put down the Picards. A new
doctrine, put forward by Piero de’ Lucca, on the Incarnation of Christ, was
carefully examined by the Pope’s orders, with the result that it was solemnly
condemned on the 7th September, 1511. In Bologna in 1508 a heretical monk who
had been guilty of sacrilege was burnt. In Switzerland four Dominicans who had
imposed on the people by false miracles were executed by his orders; and in
Rome in 1503, and again in 1513, he took measures to repress the Marañas. In Spain and elsewhere he did his best to put a stop
to unjust or too severe proceedings on the part of the Inquisitors.
In Sicily the
Spanish Inquisition had been introduced in 1500, and in 1510 Ferdinand tried to
establish it in Naples, but met with a determined resistance. Serious
disturbances ensued; the nobles and citizens combined together in opposing it,
and the King, not feeling himself strong enough to carry the matter through,
gave way. Julius IL tans in their opposition.! He resisted the encroachment of
the State on the liberties and rights of his Church, not only at Venice, but in
many other places also, and in consequence came into collision with the
Government in England, in the Netherlands with the Regent Margaret, in Spain
with Ferdinand, with Louis XII in France, and with the rulers of Hungary,
Savoy, and others.
Julius II was
by no means blind to the need for reform within the Church. On the 4th
November, 1504, the subject was discussed in Consistory, and a Commission of
six Cardinals appointed to deal with it; but those who were behind the scenes
were of opinion that the only practical point to which the Commission meant to
give their attention was the prevention of any fresh creation of Cardinals! The
exceptional difficulties, both political and ecclesiastical, with which Julius
was beset on all sides throughout the whole of his reign, drove the larger question
of reform into the background; but they did not hinder him from instituting
many useful and salutary changes in individual cases, especially in convents.
The Pope shewed his strong interest in the Dominican Order by a series of
enactments for the renovation of their convents in Italy, France, and Ireland.
He forbade Dominican and Franciscan friars who were pursuing their studies in
Universities to reside out of their convents. He established the Congregation
of S. Justina on a new footing, which was of the greatest advantage to it. The
venerable mother-house of the Benedictines, Monte Cassino, which had been
bestowed in commendam, was returned to the
Order during his Pontificate. In the year 1504 he ordained that the
Congregation of S. Justina should from henceforth bear the name of Congregatio Cassinensis : and in 1506 he affiliated the Sicilian Congregation also to Monte Cassino.
His plan for
reuniting the separated branches of the Order of S. Francis into a single body
was one which also tended in the direction of reform. The difficulties,
however, in the way of carrying this out proved so great, that he was forced to
content himself with obliging all the smaller separate communities to unite
themselves with one or other of the two main stems, the Conventuals or the Observantines. At the same time he expressly ordained that
those which affiliated themselves to the Conventuals should have power to
retain their stricter rule. Though most of the smaller communities very much
disliked this measure still all finally submitted to the Pope’s command. A Bull
was issued on the 16th June, 1508, dealing with the reform of the Carthusians,
and another on the 24th March, 1511, with that of the Italian Cistercians.
In England
Julius II took measures for remedying the abuses connected with ecclesiastical
immunities, and in Basle he instituted proceedings against the Augustinian nuns
of Klingenthal for immorality. Many enactments were
issued to put a stop to the proceedings of unauthorised persons who went about
demanding money in the name of the Church. He also did what he could for the
cause of morality in general, by the unfailing support and encouragement which
he bestowed on the outspoken mission preachers, who did so much good amongst
the mass of the people.
All the
religious orders found in him a kind and helpful friend. The Order of S. John Gualbert of Vallombrosa, the Benedictine Congregation of
the Blessed Virgin of Monte Oliveto, the Augustinian
Hermits and the Regular Canons of S. Augustine were specially favoured by him,
and received many privileges. He confirmed the rule of the Franciscan Society
of S. John of Guadalupe in Granada and the new Statutes of S. Francis de Paula,
and settled many disputes between various religious congregations. He had a great
liking for religious orders generally. During the Lateran Council many of the
Bishops strongly urged him to take away some of their privileges, but this he
steadily refused.
Amongst other
ecclesiastical acts of Julius II, we may mention here the revival of the
constitutions of Boniface VIII, Pius II and Innocent VIII forbidding persons
appointed to benefices to exercise any rights of ecclesiastical jurisdiction or
administration until they had received their Apostolic Letters; his ordinances
against duelling; and for promoting devotion to S. Anne, the Holy House at
Loreto, the Passion of Christ, and the Blessed Sacrament; and the introduction
of the Processes for the Canonisation of Bishop Benno of Meissen and S. Francis
de Paula.
Another work of
his which was of great value in enhancing the solemnity and beauty of the
Divine Offices in S. Peter’s, was the endowment of the Papal Choir Chapel
there, which from his time has in consequence been known as the Cappella
Giulia. “The motives which induced Julius II to found the ‘Cappella Giulia’
were partly the desire not to depend on foreign talent, but to train native
Romans as singers, and partly his wish to create a preliminary school in S. Peter’s
for the Papal Chapel, and finally, in order to ensure that the offices in that
great sanctuary should be performed in a manner befitting its dignity.”
From all these
things it is clear that the reproach that Julius II was so absorbed in the
building up of the external power of the Holy See as to pay hardly any
attention to the internal affairs of the Church, is wholly unjust and untrue.
But at the same time he cannot be exonerated from blame for having granted
undue ecclesiastical concessions to various Governments under the pressure of
political considerations. Such was the nomination of Cardinal d’Amboise as
Legate for the whole of France in order to conciliate him and the King; the
granting to the Spanish Government the patronage of all the churches in the
West Indies, and to the King of Portugal the appointments to benefices in his
kingdom. Concessions of a different kind, but many of them far from
unobjectionable, were granted to Poland, Norway, Scotland, Savoy, and the
Swiss. At the same time Julius II refused the extravagant demands of the Zurich
Council, having warned the Swiss beforehand that though he was willing to grant
them ecclesiastical privileges he could not go beyond what was right and
fitting.
As regards
questions of reform it has been already demonstrated that Julius was by no
means inactive in individual cases, and especially in dealing with convents. He
was far too clear-sighted not to be aware that much more than this was wanted.
The reform of abuses in all departments of the Church, and especially in the
Roman Court, was the primary task of the Lateran Council, as the Pope himself
in June 1511, and again on other occasions, repeatedly declared. Previous to
its opening in March 1512, Julius had nominated a Commission of eight Cardinals
to deal specially with the reform of the Roman Court and its officials. On the
30th March, 1512, a Bull was issued, reducing the fees in various departments,
and intended to check abuses practised by officials of the Court. The rest was
to be settled by the Council. It is hardly fair to accuse Julius of indifference
on this point, because he was interrupted by death just at the time that he was
beginning to take the question seriously in hand. “It may, of course, be asked
whether it would not have been better to have begun with the internal
reformation of the Church, and then proceed to work for her external
aggrandisement”. The answer is obvious. The conditions created by the Borgia
were such that, before the new Pope could do anything else, it was absolutely
necessary to secure some firm ground to stand upon. How could a powerless Pope,
whose own life even was not secure, attempt to attack questions of reform in
which so many conflicting interests were involved. Julius II saw plainly that
his first official duty was the restoration of the States of the Church in order
to secure the freedom and independence of the Holy See.
He was firmly
convinced that no freedom in the Church was possible, unless she could secure
an independent position, by means of her temporal possessions. On his death-bed
he declared that the whole course of his reign had been so thickly strewn with
anxieties and sorrows, that it had been a veritable martyrdom. This clearly
proves that, as far as his wars were concerned, his conscience did not reproach
him; he had no doubt of this necessity, and his motives were honest and pure.
It is, however,
objected, the Vicar of Christ should not be a warrior. This objection
completely ignores the twofold nature of the position created for the Papacy
by its historical development. Ever since the 8th Century the Popes, besides
being Vicars of Christ, had also been temporal princes. As such they were
compelled, when necessary, to defend their rights against attacks, and to make
use of arms for the purpose. During the course of the Middle Ages the great Popes
were again and again placed in this predicament Even a Saint like Leo IX betook
himself to his camp without scruple. Of course it is taken for granted that the
war is a just one, and for purposes of defence and not of aggression. This was
eminently the case in regard to the wars of Julius II. It is undeniable that
when he ascended the Throne the rights of the States of the Church had been
seriously violated, and that later the liberty of the Holy See was in the
greatest danger from its enemies. At that time it was clearly a case of being
“either anvil or hammer”. Thus it was possible for Julius II. not only openly
to avow his intentions but also to maintain that his cause was just. The world
of that day appreciated the recovery of the States of the Church as a noble and
religious enterprise.
If the
necessity of the temporal power is admitted, then the Head of the Church cannot
be blamed for defending his rights with secular weapons; but of course this
necessity is denied, and was denied, though only by a small number, even in his
own day. Vettori maintains that in the interests of
religion the ministers of the Church, including her Head, ought to be excluded
from all temporal cares or authority over worldly things. The truth that the
care and preservation of the States of the Church entails a danger of
secularisation for the clergy lies at the root of this view. But though this
danger exists, the perils and impossibilities for the Holy See and for the
whole Church of the opposite situation are so great that no Pope would be
justified in allowing her temporal possession to be taken away from her. Even
such a man as Guicciardini, who on the whole in his judgment of Julius II.
inclines to agree with Vettori, is found in another
place to admit that, though in itself it would be a good thing if the Pope had
no temporal sovereignty, still, the world being what it is, a powerless Head of
the Church would be very likely to find himself seriously hampered in the
exercise of his spiritual office, or indeed reduced to absolute impotence.
As a matter of
fact this was a time in which no respect seemed to be paid to anything but
material force, and the secular powers were striving on all sides to subjugate
the Church to the State. Purely ecclesiastical questions were regarded merely
as counters in the game of politics, and the Popes were obliged to consolidate
their temporal possessions in order to secure for themselves a standing ground
from which they could defend their spiritual authority. As practical
politicians they thought and acted in accordance with the views of one of the
speakers at the Council of Basle, who made this remarkable confession: “I used
formerly often to agree with those who thought it would be better if the Church
were deprived of all temporal power. I fancied that the priests of the Lord
would be better fitted to celebrate the divine mysteries, and that the Princes
of the world would be more ready to obey them. Now, however, I have found out
that virtue without power will only be mocked, and that the Roman Pope without
the patrimony of the Church would be a mere slave of the Kings and Princes.”
Such a position appeared intolerable to Julius II. Penetrated with the
conviction that, in order to rule the Church with independence, the Pope must
be his own master in a territory of his own, he set himself with his whole soul
to the task of putting a stop to the dismemberment of the temporal possessions
of the Holy See and saving the Church from again falling under the domination
of France, and he succeeded. Though he was unable to effect the complete
liberation of Italy, still the crushing yoke of France was cast off, the
independence and unity of the Church was saved, and her patrimony, which he had
found almost entirely dispersed, was restored and enlarged. “The kingdom of S.
Peter now included the best and richest portion of Italy, and the Papacy had
become the centre of gravity of the peninsula and, indeed, of the whole
political world.” “Formerly,” says Machiavelli, “ the most insignificant of the
Barons felt himself at liberty to defy the Papal power; now it commands the
respect of a King of France”. The great importance of this achievement was made
evident later in the terrible season of storm and stress which the Holy See had
to pass through. If it would be too much to say that without its temporal
possessions the Papacy could never have weathered those storms,§ it is quite
certain that, without the solid support which it derived from the reconstitution
of the States of the Church, it is impossible to calculate to what straits it
might not have been reduced; possibly it might have been forced again to take
refuge in the Catacombs. It was the heroic courage and energy of Julius II.,
which Michael Angelo thought worthy of being symbolised in his colossal Moses,
which saved the world and the Church from some such catastrophe as this.
Thus, though
Julius II cannot be called an ideal Pope, he is certainly one of the greatest
since Innocent III. No impartial historian can deny that Julius II in all his
undertakings displayed a violence and want of moderation that was far from
becoming in a Pope. He was a genuine child of the South, impulsive, passionate,
herculean in his strength; but possibly in such a stormy period as was the
beginning of the 16th Century some such personality as his was needed to be the
“Saviour of the Papacy”. This honourable title has been bestowed upon him by
one who is not within the pale of the Catholic Church, and no one will be
inclined to dispute it There still remains, however, another point of view from
which Julius II. is a marked figure in the history of the world. He was the
restorer not only of the States of the Church, but was also one of the greatest
among the Papal patrons of the Arts.
CHAPTER
VIII.
Julius
II. as the Patron of the Arts.—The Rebuilding of S. Peter’s and the
Vatican.—Bramante as the Architect of Julius II.—The Sculpture Gallery in the
Belvedere at the Vatican.—Discoveries of Antique Remains.—Building in the
States of the Church.—The Glories of the New Rome created by Julius II.
Nothing so
impresses on the mind the sense of the real greatness of the Pontiff who
occupied the Chair of S. Peter from the year 1503, as the amount of attention
that he found time to bestow on Art. When we consider the incessant and
harassing anxieties, both political and ecclesiastical, and all the labours of
his reign, the quantity and quality of what he left behind him in Rome and
elsewhere in this respect are really amazing. At the beginning of the 16th
Century, Rome, representing as she did the art of antiquity, the Middle Ages
and the Renaissance, was already the most beautiful and interesting city in the
world. But it is to the patron of Bramante, Michael Angelo, and Raphael, to the
Pope who, even as a Cardinal, was such a generous friend of artists, that she
owes the proud position that she now holds of being the ideal centre of
aesthetic beauty for all its devotees throughout the whole world. It was under
his rule that the foundations were laid for most of those magnificent creations
of architecture, sculpture, and painting which constitute by no means the
smallest part of the magic charm of the Eternal City, and are a source of neverending delight to both thinkers and poets.
The aspirations
of Julius II were in perfect accordance with those of his great predecessors
Nicholas V and Sixtus IV. He took up their work where they left it, and
continued on the same lines. He too aimed at embodying the religious, regal,
and universal spirit of the Papacy in monumental works of architecture,
sculpture, and painting, and vindicating the intellectual supremacy of the
Church, by making Rome the centre of aesthetic development for the great
Renaissance movement. As with Nicholas V., family or personal aggrandisement
was nothing to him. The fruit of all his wars was to be reaped not by his
relations but by the Church; and equally all that “he did for Art was done for
the honour of the Church and the Papacy.” Thus, though under Julius II Roman,
like all Italian art was under the patronage of a Court, the spirit of that
patronage was wholly different from anything which prevailed elsewhere. The
importance for art of these a Courts of the Muses consisted not so much in
their character, as a rule, as in their number. The encouragement of art and of
artistic culture in general was merely an essential part of a princely style of
living. In contrast to this, the artist in Rome at the Court of Julius II. was
called upon to bear a part in the realisation, if only for a few years, of a
magnificent dream, the perfect fusion of two ages, the antique and the
Christian, into one harmonious whole. Bramante’s S. Peter’s, Michael Angelo’s
ceiling in the Sistine, Raphael’s frescoes in the Stanze,
all devoted to the idealisation of Christian worship and doctrine and the
supremacy of the Vicar of Christ, are the undying mem
In spite,
however, of the close resemblance in their aims there is a considerable
difference between the spirit of Nicholas V and that of Julius II. While
Nicholas V patronised learning quite as much as art, with Julius even more
than with Sixtus IV art was the chief interest. And in his patronage of art he
also displayed the true Rovere spirit, confining his plans to what was possible
and practicable, and not giving the reins to his imagination to the extent that
his two predecessors had done. Splendid as his projects were, he undertook
nothing without providing ample means for carrying out his plans.
It is
undeniable that Julius II was singularly happy in the time in which he lived,
which produced such men as those whose services he was able to command. But
this does not lessen his merit. He deserves lasting honour for his sympathetic
appreciation of their genius, which enabled him to attract them to Rome, and to
stimulate their powers to the utmost by the kind of work which he demanded from
them—nothing small or trivial, but monumental creations corresponding to the
largeness of his own nature. Thus, the great masters found free scope for their
genius in all its fulness, and nascent talent was fostered and developed. The
home of Art was transferred from Florence to Rome. A world of beauty in
architecture, painting, and the plastic art sprang up in the ancient city, and
the name of Julius II became inseparably united with those of the divinely
gifted men in whom Italian art attained its meridian glory. “He began, and
others went on with the work on the foundation which he had laid. The
initiative was his; in reality the age of Leo X belongs to him.” It was
through him that Rome became the classical city of the world, the normal centre
of European culture, and the Papacy the pioneer of civilisation.
The resemblance
between the spirit of Julius II and that of Nicholas V is most apparent in his
architectural undertakings. The laying out of new streets and districts, the
enlargement of the Vatican Palace, and the erection of the new Church of S.
Peter, works which had been interrupted by the premature death of Nicholas V
were energetically resumed by him.
The Florentine
architect, Giuliano da Sangallo, was one of Julius II’s most intimate and
congenial friends in his earlier days while he was still only a Cardinal. It
was he who planned the magnificent structure of Grottaferrata,
the buildings at Ostia, and the Palace at Savona. Giuliano shared his patron’s
voluntary banishment during the reign of Alexander V, and during this time
(1494) was introduced by the Cardinal to the French King, Charles VIII. It was
not to be wondered at, therefore, if when Julius II became Pope, Sangallo soon
appeared in Rome to recall himself to the memory of his old master, and to
offer his services. He was first employed on some repairs in the Castle of St
Angelo, which the troubled times made urgently necessary, and on the 30th of
May, 1504, he received an instalment of pay for this work, to be completed
later by a larger sum. After this, Julius continued to make use of him in
various ways; in 1505 he made a drawing for a tribune for musicians (Cantoria),
and he seems to have been the Pope’s chief adviser at this time in all matters
of art It was through him in the Spring of the year 1505 that Michael Angelo
and Andrea Sansovino were invited to Rome. Sansovino was called upon to erect a
monumental tomb to Cardinal Ascanio Sforza in Su Maria del Popolo; Michael Angelo’s task was a tomb
for the Pope himself. The plan which the great sculptor drew, and which Julius
approved, was of such colossal dimensions that no church in Rome, not excepting
the old S. Peter’s, could contain it Later, it was thought that the tribune
begun by Rossellino for the new church of S. Peter
might be adapted to receive this monument. But this had first to be finished
and connected with the old building; and thus the work fell into the hands of
the architects. At this moment the great master appeared on the scene to whom
from henceforth almost all Julius II’s architectural works were to be
entrusted. This man was Donato Bramante, who had been working and studying in
Rome since the year 1500.
In affording to
“the most original architect of his time” the opportunity of putting forth all
his powers, Julius II rendered an inestimable service to Art. Bramante very
soon came to occupy the position of a sort of minister of public works and fine
arts at the Papal Court; apartments in the Belvedere were assigned to him, as
well as to the famous goldsmith, Caradosso; the great
architect accompanied Julius in all his journeys and planned all his
fortifications; to him was entrusted the rebuilding of the Vatican and of the
church of S. Peter, in which a suitable site was to be provided for the Pope’s
tomb.
It is
impossible to determine with certainty when Julius II adopted the plans for the
new S. Peter’s. A writer on architecture, who has made the study of the plans
and projects for the church the special task of his life, believes that the
design of rebuilding S. Peter’s occupied the Pope’s mind in connection with the
restoration of the Vatican Palace as early as 1503. This would quite correspond
with what we know of the character of the new Pope; but as yet we have no
contemporaneous testimony to support this view, and the extremely constrained
and difficult position in which Julius found himself at the outset of his reign
is against the probability of his having immediately contemplated such a work
as this, though, considering his sanguine temperament, this would have been far
from impossible. It is not till the year 1505 that unmistakeable signs appear
that the thought of the new S. Peter’s and its adjuncts had taken root in his
mind. According to Vasari the deliberations preliminary to the work constituted
a sort of duel between the Umbrian and Lombard tendencies of Bramante and the
Florentine spirit represented by Sangallo and his protege Michael Angelo. It is
not unlikely that there is some truth in this statement, as Vasari knew the son
of Giuliano da Sangallo intimately; but, on the other hand, this author is often
confused and inaccurate. However this may be, it appears certain that as soon
as Julius II saw Bramante’s magnificent plan for S. Peter’s, he determined to
put the work into his hands; while everything else, even his own tomb,
retreated into the background. Even for S. Peter’s alone on this scale the
means at his disposal were not sufficient. “And knowing his disposition, no one
can be surprised that S. Peter’s was the work that lay nearest to the Pope’s
heart. His preference even in Art was always for the colossal. Magnarum semper molium avidus was said of him, and though Michael Angelo’s design
must have satisfied him in that respect, the tomb was only for himself, whereas
the magnificent Basilica would be a glory for the whole Church. For Julius the
larger aim, whether for State or Church, was always more attractive than
anything that was merely personal.”
In the history
of the building of S. Peter’s in the time of Julius II there are three distinct
periods. The first idea (March, 1505) was to build a Chapel for the Pope’s
tomb. In the second period (before nth April, 1505) the completion of the works
commenced by Nicholas V and Paul II was contemplated; in the third (from the
Summer of that year) it was finally determined that the building should be on
entirely new lines, far more splendid and more beautiful. Even then, however,
the idea of making use of the buildings already commenced by former Popes was
not abandoned, and the attempt was frequently made, but they were only utilised
in a fragmentary way as portions of a wholly new design. The immense number of
drawings for S. Peter’s which are still extant, shew with what energy the work
was undertaken. Some of these were executed by Bramante himself, then sixty
years old; many others, from his instructions, by artists working under him;
amongst these were the youthful Baldassari Peruzzi
and Antonio da Sangallo.
For a long time
all that was known on the subject was that the outline of Bramante’s plan was a
commanding central dome resting on a Greek Cross, with four smaller domes in
the four angles. It is only quite recently that modern research has eliminated
out of the immense mass of materials afforded by the collection of sketches in
the Uffizzi at Florence (about 9000 sheets), a series
of studies and plans for S. Peter’s, from which Bramante’s original design can
be determined. With these sketches before us we begin to realise what the world
has lost by the later changes in what, as originally conceived, would have been
an artistic creation of perfectly ideal majesty and beauty.
The new
Basilica, “which was to take the place of a building teeming with venerable
memories, was to embody the greatness of the present and the future,” and was
to surpass all other churches in the world in its proportions and in its
splendour. The mausoleum of the poor fisherman of the Lake of Genesareth was to represent the dignity and significance,
in its history and in its scope, of the office which he had bequeathed to his
successors. The idea of the Universal Church demanded a colossal edifice, that
of the Papacy an imposing centre, therefore its main feature must be a central
dome of such proportions as to dominate the whole structure. This, Bramante
thought, could be best attained by a groundplan in
the form of a Greek Cross with the great dome in the centre, over the tomb of
the Apostles. In the old Basilica, however, the tomb was at the end of the
church, and this created difficulties which led to the adoption at first of a
Latin Cross. Bramante’s contemporaries were enthusiastic in their admiration of
his design, and the poets of the day sang of it as the ninth wonder of the
world. Bramante is said to have himself described his design as the Pantheon
reared on the substructure of the Temple of Peace in the Forum (Constantine’s
Basilica); a truly noble thought, worthy of the great architect and his large-minded
patron.
Two complete
drawings, which are still preserved, exhibit Bramante’s plan in detail; it
consisted of a Greek Cross with apsidal ends and a huge cupola in the centre on
the model of the Pantheon, surrounded by four smaller domes; pillared aisles
led into the central space. In one design the arms of the cross are enclosed in
large semicircular ambulatories; in the other these
do not appear. They may be a reminiscence of the very ancient Christian Church
of San Lorenzo in Milan, which was justly very much admired by Bramante, or
they may have been intended to strengthen the great pillars which supported the
cupola. In both designs the dome is of colossal proportions. “Bramante,
borrowing the idea from older structures, designed with admirable effect
immense niches corresponding with the pillars, which would also ingeniously
serve to suggest the curved outline for all spaces which is the predominant form
in the whole scheme of building. The four smaller cupolas in the corners, the
diameters of which are half that of the central dome, by dimming the light,
were to prepare the eye for the vast central space ; on the exterior, as Caradosso’s medal soews, they
were not to rise above the gabled roofing of the arms of the Cross.” Four
sacristies and chapels and bell-towers were to be distributed around the
external angles. As this plan appears upon Caradosso’s medals it must have been for some time the accepted one. The other plan, in
which the arms of the Cross were encased in spacious ambulatories, would have
occupied a still larger area. Here the drum of the central dome would have been
encircled with pillars forming a crown over the tomb of the Apostles, which
would have been bathed in light from the dome. The victory of Christianity over
Paganism was to be represented by the Cross on the summit of the most beautiful
creation of antique architecture.
The colossal
dimensions of this majestic though singularly simple design, aptly symbolising
the world-wide fold into which all the nations of the earth were to be
gathered, will be realised when we find that Bramante’s plan would have covered
an area of over 28,900 square yards, while the present church on the plan of
Michael Angelo, without Maderna’s additions, occupies
only a little more than 17,300, more than a third less.
There is,
however, one consideration which mars the pleasure with which we should
otherwise contemplate Bramante’s splendid conception, and this is the regretful
recollection that its realisation involved the sacrifice of one of the oldest
and most venerable sanctuaries in all Christendom. “These ancient walls had
been standing for nearly 1200 years; they had, so to speak, participated in all
the fortunes and storms of the Papacy; they had witnessed the rapid succession
of its triumphs, its humiliations, and its recoveries; and again and again been
the scene of epoch-making events, focussed in Rome, and stretching in their
effects to the furthest limits of Christendom. The Vatican Basilica was scored
all over with mementos of this long history. Though now falling to pieces and
disfigured by the traces of the debased art of the period of its origin, it was
an imposing building, and far more interesting from its age-worn tokens of the
victory of Christianity over Paganism, than it could have been in the days of
its pristine splendour. All that might be distasteful in the inharmonious
jumble of its styles and materials was forgotten in retracing the ever-living
memorials which recalled the times of Constantine, of S. Leo and S. Gregory the
Great, Charles the Great, and Otho, S. Gregory VII, Alexander III, Innocent
III”.
This was
strongly felt by many of Bramante’s contemporaries, as it had been when the
rebuilding of S. Peter’s was contemplated in the time of Nicholas V, which we
see from the words of the Christian humanist, Maffeo Vegio. This time the opposition was even more serious, as
nearly the whole of the Sacred College seems to have pronounced against the
plan. Panvinius reports that people of all classes,
and especially the Cardinals, protested against Julius II’s intention of
pulling down the old S. Peter’s. They would have gladly welcomed the erection
of a new and splendid church; but the complete destruction of the old Basilica,
so consecrated by the veneration of the whole world, the tombs of so many
saints, and the memorials of so many great events, went to their hearts.
The opposition
to the rebuilding of S. Peter’s continued even after the death of Julius II. In
the year 1517 Andrea Guarna of Salerno published a
satirical Dialogue between S. Peter, Bramante, and the Bolognese Alessandro Zambeccari. Bramante arrives at the gates of Heaven and S.
Peter asks if he is the man who had demolished his church. Zambeccari replies in the affirmative, and adds, “He would have destroyed Rome also and
the whole world if he had been able”. S. Peter asks Bramante what could have
induced him to pull down his church in Rome, which by its age alone spoke of
God to the most unbelieving. The architect excuses himself by saying that it
was not he who pulled it down but the workmen at the command of Pope Julius.
“No,” answers S. Peter, “that will not serve, it was you who persuaded the Pope
to take down the church, it was at your instigation and by your orders that the
workmen did it How could you dare?”. Bramante replies, “I wanted to lighten the
Pope’s heavy purse a little”. On S. Peter inquiring further whether he had
carried out his design, he answers, “No I Julius II pulled down the old church,
but he kept his purse closed; he only gave Indulgences, and besides he was
making war”. Further on, the conversation becomes broader and more farcical.
Bramante refuses to enter Heaven unless he is allowed to get rid of the “steep
and difficult way that leads thither from the earth. I will build a new broad
and commodious road so that old and feeble souls may travel on horseback. And
then I will make a new Paradise with delightful residences for the blessed.” As
S. Peter will not consent to this, Bramante declares he will go down to Pluto
and build a new hell as the old one is almost burnt out. In the end S. Peter
asks him again, “Tell me seriously, what made you destroy my church? ” Bramante
answers, “Alas! it is demolished, but Pope Leo will build a new one.” “Well,
then,” says S. Peter, you must wait at the gate of Paradise until it is
finished.” “But if it never is finished?” Bramante objects. “Oh,” S. Peter
answers, “my Leo will not fail to get it done.” “I must hope so,” Bramante
replies; “at any rate, I seem to have no alternative but to wait.”
Julius II. s
still often blamed for having allowed the old church to be destroyed, but
whether the reproach is just seems very doubtful. If even under Nicholas V the
old Basilica had become so unsafe that in 1451 the Pope could say it was in
danger of falling—and we have trustworthy testimony to this effect—no doubt its
condition must have been considerably worse in the reign of Julius II. In the
well-known letter to the King of England on the laying of the foundation-stone
of the new S. Peter’s, the Pope distinctly asserts that the old church was in a
ruinous condition, and this statement is repeated in a whole series of other
Briefs. The inscription on the foundation-stone also supports this opinion.
Well-informed contemporaneous writers, such as Lorenzo Parmino,
Custodian of the Vatican Library, and Sigismondo de’ Conti, say the same. It
seems, therefore, that he cannot be accused of having wilfully pulled down the
old Basilica.
Considering
what the plans of the Pope and his architect were, it was clear that the
rebuilding of S. Peter’s would be very costly, and on the 10th of November,
1505, Julius commanded that the property left by a certain Monserati de Guda should be set apart for the building of S.
Peter’s. This is the first authentic document which shows that the work had
been practically begun. On the 6th of January, 1506, Julius wrote to the King
of England and also to the nobility and Bishops of that country begging them to
help him in this great undertaking. A money order for Bramante for the payment of
five sub-architects is dated 6th April, 1506; on the 18th the Briefs announcing
the laying of the foundation-stone by the Pope himself were sent out. At this
time Julius II was preparing for the campaign against Perugia and Bologna. It
is certainly a striking proof of the courage and energy of Julius II that at
his advanced age, and in the face of such arduous political undertakings, he
should have had no hesitation in putting his hand to a work of such magnitude
as this.
We have two
accounts of the laying of the foundationstone, which
took place on “Low Sunday” (18th April} in the year 1506; one is by Burchard,
the other by Paris de Grassis. The Pope, accompanied
by the Cardinals and Prelates and preceded by the Cross, went down in solemn
procession to the edge of the excavation for the foundation, which was 25 feet
deep. Only the Pope with two Cardinal-deacons, some masons, and one or two
other persons entered it. Someone who is called a medallist, probably Caradosso, brought twelve medals in an earthen pot, two
large gold ones worth 50 ducats; the others were of bronze. On one side was
stamped the head of Julius II, and on the other a representation of the new
Church. The foundation-stone was of white marble, about four palms in length,
two in breadth, and three fingers in thickness. It bore an inscription
declaring that Pope Julius II. of Liguria, in the year 1506, the third of his
reign, restored this Basilica, which had fallen into decay. After the Pope had
blessed the stone he set it with his own hands, while the masons placed the
vessel with the medals underneath it The ceremony concluded with the solemn
Papal benediction, a prayer before the crucifix, and the granting of a Plenary
Indulgence, which was announced in Latin by Cardinal Colonna. After this the
Pope returned to the Vatican.
Entries of
disbursements in April 1506, shew that 7500 ducats were paid at that time to
five contractors for the building of S. Peter’s. These, as well as other sums,
all passed through Bramante’s hands, who signed the agreements with the
builders in the Pope’s name. Hitherto, no entry of any payment to Bramante for
his own services has been found, although he undoubtedly acted as master of the
works. He employed by preference Tuscan architects, and pushed on the work with
energy. Sigismondo de’ Conti’s statement that the building made but slow
progress, not owing to want of funds, but from Bramante’s supineness is
unsupported by any other writer. It may possibly be due to personal spite It
comes from one who knew nothing of architecture, and is contradicted by
authentic documents. It is quite possible that the work may have flagged to a
certain extent in the year 1506, but not from any fault of Bramante, who, by
the Pope’s orders, accompanied his master to Bologna. A document in the Secret
Archives of the Vatican, dated 15th December, 1506, and hitherto unknown, shews
with what anxious care Julius strove to guard against any interruption in the
progress of the building during his absence in that city. Many proofs are extant
of the diligence with which it was prosecuted from the moment the Pope returned
to Rome. In March, 1507, Giuliano di Giovanni, Francesco del Toccio, and others were at work on the capitals of the
pillars of the new Basilica. On the 7th of April the Modenese Envoy reports
that the Pope is delighted with the new building and visits it frequently; it
is evident that the completion of this work is one of the things that lie
nearest to his heart. On the 12th, he writes, “Today the Pope went to S.
Peter’s to inspect the work. I was there also. The Pope brought Bramante with
him, and said smilingly to me, ‘Bramante tells me that he has 2500 men at work;
one might hold a review of such an army.’ I replied that one could indeed compare
such a band with an army, and expressed my admiration of the building, as was
becoming. Presently, Cardinals Farnese, Carvajal, and Fiesco came up, and the Pope granted them their audience without leaving the spot.”
This report is in flat contradiction with Sigismondo de’ Conti’s statement. So
far from idling over the work, Bramante can hardly be acquitted of the charge
of vandalism in the ruthless haste with which he tore down the venerable old
church.
It is certainly
startling to find that apparently no expert was consulted, and no attempt made
to find out whether it might not still be possible to retain and repair the old
Basilica. We should have expected that before proceeding to destroy so
venerable a sanctuary the opinion of some unbiassed person, not included in the
circle of the enterprising architects eager for the fray, should have been
sought, as to what could be done in the way of preserving at any rate some
portion of the ancient building. We find no trace of any such attempt, and
probably this is due to the extravagant admiration of the votaries of the
Renaissance for their new style of architecture which led them to look down
with utter contempt on all the productions of the preceding periods. From this
point of view Sigismondo de’ Conti’s account of the rebuilding of S. Peter’s is
singularly significant. Christian humanist as he was, he betrays not the
smallest trace of reverence for, or interest in, the Basilica of Constantine.
Although he calls the ancient building grand and majestic, he adds immediately
that it was erected in an uncultured age, which had no idea of elegance or
beauty in architecture.
But what was
still more inexcusable was that no inventory should have been taken of the
inestimably precious memories which it contained, and also the way in which these
venerable relics were treated. In truth, the men of the Renaissance had as
little sense of reverence for the past as those of the Middle Ages; not that
they had any desire to break with the past; this would have been in complete
contradiction to the whole spirit of the Papacy, for which more than for any
other power in the world, the past, the present, and the future are bound
together in an indissoluble union; but the passion for the new style stifled
all interest in the monuments of former days. In his strong consciousness of
power, Bramante was more reckless than any of the other architects of his day
in regard to ancient memorials, or even the creations of the centuries
immediately preceding his own time. His contemporaries reproached him with
this. Paris de Grassis says he was called the
destroyer, “Ruinante”, because of his merciless
destructiveness in Rome, as well as in other places for instance, in Loreto.
Michael Angelo complained to Julius II, and later, Raphael made similar
representations to Leo X in regard to Bramante’s barbarism in knocking to
pieces the noble ancient pillars in the old church, which might so easily have
been preserved if they had been carefully taken down. Artistic merit was no
more regarded than antiquity, and Mino’s beautiful later monuments, and even
the tomb of Nicholas V, the first of the Papal Maecenas, were broken to pieces,
together with those of the older Popes. There can be no excuse for such
vandalism as this. Attempts have been made to lay the blame on the carelessness
of the Papal Maggiordomo Bartolomeo Ferrantini, or on the sub-architects. No doubt, Ferrantini and Julius himself are partially responsible,
but it is in consequence of Bramante’s ruthless methods that Christendom and
the Papacy have been robbed of so many venerable and touching memorials. Those
which are preserved in the Crypt and the Vatican Grottos, far from exculpating
him, only bear witness to the extent of his guilt This magazine of defaced and
dismembered monuments, altars, ciboriums, which formerly
adorned the atrium, the porticos and the nave of the old Basilica, are the
clearest proof of the barbarous vandalism which began under Julius II, and
continued until the completion of S. Peter’s.
If we may
believe Aegidius of Viterbo, who is usually
well-informed, and was a contemporary, Bramante’s destructive spirit actually
carried him so far as to lead him to propose to move the Tomb of the Apostles.
Here, however, Julius II, usually so ready to lend himself to all the great
architect’s plans, stood firm, and absolutely refused to permit any tampering
with a shrine which, through all the changes during the centuries which had
elapsed since the days of Constantine, had been preserved untouched on the spot
where he erected it. Aegidius narrates in detail the
efforts made by Bramante to overcome the Pope’s objections. He wanted to make
the new Church face southwards, instead of to the east, as the old one had
done, in order to have the Vatican Obelisk, which stood in the Circus of Nero
on the south side of the Basilica, fronting the main entrance of the new
Church. Julius II would not consent to this plan, saying that Shrines must not
be displaced. Bramante, however, persisted in his project. He expatiated on the
admirable suggestiveness of placing this majestic memorial of the First Caesars
in the Court of the new S. Peter’s of Julius II, and on the effect that the
sight of this colossal monument would have in stimulating religious awe in the
minds of those who were about to enter the church. He promised to effect the
removal of the tomb in such a manner that it should be impossible that it
should be injured in any way. But Julius II, however, turned a deaf ear to all
his arguments and blandishments, and assured him that he would never, under any
pretext, permit the tomb of the first Pope to be touched. As to the Obelisk,
Bramante might do what he pleased with that. His view was that Christianity
must be preferred to Paganism, religion to splendour, piety to ornament.
In addition to
this most interesting conversation between Julius II and Bramante, we have
other proofs that in all their undertakings, religious interests, and not his
own glory, held the first place in his mind. One such is the Rule of 19th
February, 1513, on the Cappella Giulia, which was the last official document
issued by him before his death. In it he sums up the reasons which led him to
found this institution. “We hold it to be our duty,” he says, “to promote the
solemnity of religious worship by example as well as by precept. While yet a
Cardinal we partly restored and partly rebuilt many churches and convents in
various places, and especially in Rome. Since our elevation to the Chair of S.
Peter we have endeavoured to be more diligent and liberal in such works in
proportion to our larger duties and responsibilities. The wise King Solomon,
although the light of Christianity had not dawned upon him, thought no sacrifice too great to make in order to build a worthy House for the Lord of
Hosts. Our predecessors also were zealous for the beauty and dignity of the
sanctuary. This was especially the case with our Uncle, Sixtus IV., now resting
in the Lord. Nothing lay nearer to his heart than to provide for the majesty of
the Offices of the Church and the splendour of God’s House.” The Pope desired
to follow in his footsteps.
On the 16th of
April, 1507, Enrico Bruni, Archbishop of Tarento,
laid the foundation-stones of the three other pillars of the Dome. Various
entries of payments and contracts, though, unfortunately, scanty and
unconnected, mark the progress of the work. On the 24th of August, a Roman, Menico Antonio di Jacopo, undertook a contract for some
capitals of pillars, and in another document, which only bears the date of the
year 1507, the same sculptor joins with Giuliano del Tozzo,
Franco, Paolo Mancino, Vincenzio da Viterbo and Bianchino, in an agreement for
executing the capitals of the pillars and the balcony on the outside of the
Tribune, and the cornice inside, after Bramante’s designs. A contract with
Francesco di Domenico of Milan, Antonio di Giacomo of Pontasieve and Benedetto di Giovanni Albini of Rome for the
capitals of the large pilasters in the interior is dated 1st March, I508. In
August 1508, the Venetian Envoy reports an unsuccessful attempt on the part of
the Pope to obtain the fourth part of the tithes granted by him to the King of
Spain for the building of S. Peter’s. In December, the same Envoy mentions the
zeal of the Pope for this great work. There are no accounts of the year 1509.
On the 16th January, 1510, Antonio di Sangallo received 200 ducats for
preparing the centering for the arches of the Cupola.
A similar payment is again entered on the 15th November.
Julius II was
unwearied in his efforts to obtain funds for the building. A portion of the
revenue of the Holy House at Loreto was assigned to this purpose, and
commissioners were appointed everywhere for the collection of charitable gifts
with power to grant Indulgences on the usual conditions to all contributors.
How large the sums thus obtained were, may be gathered from the report of the
Venetian Envoy who says that one lay-brother alone brought back from his
journey 27,000 ducats. Even then, in April 1510, it was plain that a long time
must elapse before the work could be completed. It was no doubt a beautiful
thought that the whole of Christendom should bear a part in the erection of a
worthy shrine for the Princes of the Apostles, but considering the hostile
feeling in many places in regard to all such collections, and the bitter
opponents who were always ready to misrepresent everything that the Popes did,
there were serious objections to the attempt to carry it out. When Julius II
became involved in the great conflict with France it was asserted by many that
money collected for the Church was spent in the war. When the pressure was very
great this may have been the case; in the year 1511, a slackening in the work
is observable; still even in that year there are entries of payments, and the
Venetian Envoy’s Report in August 1511 shows that even in the most trying times
Julius II. never forgot his Church. The very last document to which the Pope
put his hand, the day before he died, testifies to his zeal in this work.
The
disbursements for the payment of contractors and overseers for the works of S.
Peter’s in the time of Julius II, amount, according to the Papal registers, to
70,653 gold ducats, not too large a sum compared with those of succeeding
Popes. In the period between the 22nd December, 1529 and the 2nd January, 1543,
the building cost 89,727 scudi, and from the 9th January, 1543, to the 25th
February, 1549, 160,774 scudi.
When Julius
died, the four pillars for the Cupola, each of which was more than 100 paces in
circumference at the base, with their connecting arches, were finished. These
were strengthened by the introduction of cast-iron centerings,
a method which Bramante had rediscovered. The choir, begun under Nicholas V.by
Bernardo Rosselino, was utilised by Bramante in part
for the posterior walls of the transept and in part for a choir, which,
however, was only meant to be a provisional one. Besides these, the tribunes
for the nave had been begun and an enclosure adorned with Doric pillars for the
Pope and his Court at High Mass, which was finished later by Peruzzi, but
eventually done away with. The high altar and the tribune of the old church
were still in existence at that time, but by All Saints’ Day in 1511, the
solemn masses were celebrated in the Sistine chapel, and no longer in the old
church.
Bramante had
drawn out a wonderful design for the rebuilding of the Vatican Palace as well
as for the church of S. Peter’s. Here too, the plan, for both precincts and
Palace, was practically a new building, but the death of Julius II. interrupted
it Still even then, what had been accomplished was so important that even in
1509 Albertini could say “Your Holiness has already made more progress with the
Vatican than all your predecessors together have done in the last hundred
years.”
Bramante’s
genius was not less admirable in secular architecture than in sacred. Everyone
knows the famous Cortile di Damaso. The design for
this building, which so marvellously combines dignity in composition with
exquisite grace and delicacy in detail, was his, though it was only executed in
Raphael’s time, and part of it even later.
A further
project, and one that could only have come into such a mind as that of Julius
II, was to connect the old Vatican Palace, a mere heterogeneous aggregation of
houses, with the Belvedere situated on the rise of the hill about 100 paces
higher up. Bramante drew a magnificent plan for this. In it two straight
corridors lead from the old Palace to the Belvedere. The space between them,
measuring about 327 yards by 70, was divided in two; the part next the Palace
(now the great lower Court) was to form the arena of a theatre for tournaments
or bull-fights; from thence, a broad flight of steps led up to a terrace and
from x that again a massive double staircase ascended to the upper half, which
was laid out as a garden (now the Giardino della Pigna). The two long sides
of the theatre were broken by three Loggie, while the lower narrow side was
occupied by a semi-circular amphitheatre for the spectators. The two upper
Loggie joined the long sides of the garden above the terrace; its narrow end
was closed by a colossal niche roofed with a half-dome and crowned by a
semi-circular course of pillars and facing the amphitheatre. It was a design
which, had it been carried out, would certainly have been unrivalled in the
whole world. Although the work was energetically begun, the only portion that
had been completed when Julius II. died was the eastern gallery. Later, so many
alterations and additions were made that the original plan is hardly recognisable.
It was Sixtus V who cut the large Court in two by building the Vatican Library
across it. The effect of the whole design was completely destroyed by this, and
also that of the great niche which now looks monstrous, not having sufficient
foreground. He also walled up the open Loggie. The long corridor, commanding an
exquisite view of Rome and the Campagna, is now used to contain the Vatican
collection of Christian and ancient inscriptions. Under Pius VII. the Braccio
Nuovo was built parallel with the Library to serve as a museum.
The extension and
embellishment of the Belvedere was another of the works undertaken by Bramante
to improve and put the Papal residence “into shape,” as Vasari expresses it. A
new two-storied façade was added to the whole building, looking southwards
towards the garden, and having for its centre the gigantic niche already
mentioned, which is about 80 feet high. From its exposed situation the
Belvedere was often called the tower of the winds (Tor de venti).
Adjoining the Belvedere, on the eastern side, was the tower-shaped hall through
which Bramante’s famous pillared spiral staircase led into the rampart garden.
Baths and aviaries were also added to this building and decorated with views of
all the principal cities in Italy.
The Belvedere
was destined soon to contain the most splendid collection of ancient sculptures
the world then possessed. Julius II was an ardent collector, and the nucleus
was formed out of the numerous Roman remains which were discovered during his
reign. No doubt, by the middle of the 15th Century Rome was already rich in
ancient statues, but in Poggio’s time only five of
these had been publicly erected. Paul II’s valuable collection of antique gems,
vases, etc., had been dispersed at his death. Sixtus IV opened a museum of
antique art in the Capitol, which was the first public collection of this kind
in Italy, and, indeed, in Europe. It consisted for the most part of large
bronzes. Innocent VIII added some newly-found works in brass and the colossal
head of Commodus. The example of Sixtus IV at first does not seem to have found
any imitators. “During the lifetime of this Pope very few in Rome seem to have
taken any interest in the larger ancient marble sculptures, or made any attempt
to form collections; whereas at the same period in Florence, where the
opportunities were so much fewer, the famous Medicean gallery had long been in existence. It was not till the close of the 15th
Century that the feeling for ancient sculpture awoke in Rome, but once started
in such a fruitful soil it naturally developed rapidly”,
As Cardinal
Giuliano della Rovere, the Pope was a diligent
collector. In the time of Innocent VIII apparently he succeeded in obtaining a
newly discovered statue of Apollo, which he placed in the garden of S. Pietro
in Vincoli. It created quite a furore amongst all
lovers of art, and soon acquired a worldwide reputation.
When he became
Pope he transferred the statue to the Vatican and placed it in the Cortile di
Belvedere. This Cortile about 100 feet square, was laid out as a garden with
orange trees and running streamlets. Bramante designed semi-circular niches for
the statues which adorned it. Besides the Apollo, an incomplete group, Antaeus in the grasp of Hercules, and the Venus Felix, were
placed here.
In the year
1506, a fresh discovery added another treasure to these marbles which, in the
eyes of the art-lovers of that day, surpassed everything that had as yet been
known. This was the Laocoon which was found in a vineyard belonging to a Roman
citizen, Felice de’ Freddi. The vineyard was situated
in the so called baths of Titus, which later proved such a veritable mine of
art treasures. It was discovered on the 14th of January in that year, not far
from the water-tower of the Sette Sale. The moment
the Pope heard of it he sent Giuliano da Sangallo to see it. Michael Angelo and
Giuliano’s son, a boy of nine, accompanied him. The latter says: “We then set
off together, I on my father’s shoulders. Directly my father saw the statue he
exclaimed ‘this is the Laocoon mentioned by Pliny;’ the opening had to be
enlarged to get the statue out”.
The Pope had
several rivals also desirous of purchasing the treasure, but finally on the
23rd of March, 1506, a few weeks before the laying of the foundation-stone of
S. Peter’s, he succeeded in obtaining it. The finder and his son Federigo received in exchange for their lifetimes a charge
on the tolls of the Porta S. Giovanni to the amount of 600 gold ducats
annually.
The Laocoon was
installed in a niche in the Belvedere. It inspired the greatest enthusiasm in
Rome: “it was felt to be the most perfect embodiment of the life and spirit of
the ancient world that had yet been seen. It and the Apollo became from
henceforth the most admired and most popular of works of art”.
While Sadolet and other poets sang the praises of the Laocoon in
their lyrics the influence it exerted on the minds of contemporary artists was
striking and important. Michael Angelo’s painting of the execution of Haman on
the roof of the Sistine was evidently inspired by this group. In Raphael’s
Parnassus in the Camera della Segnatura there is a suggestion of the Laocoon in the head of Homer, and other figures in
the same fresco are also taken from antique models. Bramante commissioned
several sculptors to make models in wax of the Laocoon for the mould of a copy
to be executed in brass ; he appointed Raphael judge of the competition; the
young Jacopo Sansovino was awarded the palm. Federigo Gonzaga asked the famous goldsmith, Caradossa, to
copy the Laocoon for him. Another interesting point about this group is that it
was the subject of the first attempt at antiquarian criticism.” The
question arose whether Pliny’s assertion that it had been carved out of a
single block of marble was true. Michael Angelo and Cristoforo Romano, “the
first sculptors in Rome,” were asked to decide the point. They found that it
consisted of several pieces and showed four joints in it, but so skilfully
concealed that it was not surprising that Pliny should not have remarked them.
Hardly less
interest was aroused by the discovery of another antique group, Hercules with
the infant Telephus on his arm, which was found in
May 1507 in the Campo di Fiore. The Pope lost no time in securing the statue,
which he placed at the entrance of his museum with an inscription forbidding
any to enter who had no sympathy with ancient art.
Subsequently
the collection in the Belvedere was enlarged by the addition of the so-called
Tigris statue and the reclining figure of Ariadne, which was supposed to be
Cleopatra, and celebrated under this name in the poems of Capodiferro and Castiglione. Finally, in January 1512, the great statue of the Tiber, found
near the Minerva, was also brought to the Belvedere. The statues were
artistically arranged either beside the fountains or on Sarcophagi ornamented
with reliefs, so that the effect of the whole, with the orange grove in the
centre, was rather that of a decorated garden than of a museum. “From the
garden it was only a step to the eastern balcony, with its exquisite view over
the city and the wide plain to the encircling hills beyond. A spacious covered
hall, enclosing the principal fountain, seems to have opened into the cortile,
on the other side.” Probably the statue of Hermes, now in the Uffizi Palace in
Florence, and a sarcophagus of Meleander, which had
been dug up from behind the church of S. Peter’s, stood here.
Each new
discovery, as it stimulated the eagerness of the collectors, gave rise to fresh
excavations and researches in Rome and the Campagna. The demand for antiquities
became so keen that the extreme difficulty of procuring them is often
mentioned. George of Negroponte, writing from Rome in 1507, says, “The moment
anything is found, innumerable bidders for it start up.” From the same letter
we gather that a flourishing trade in such things was carried on by
speculators, the prices constantly rising and falling. For some time past, many
antiquities had been carried off by foreign dilettanti. In the beginning of the
16th Century the demand for collections in Rome itself was no less eager.
Julius II had to compete not only with Cardinals, such as Riario,
Caraffa, Galeotto della Rovere, and, more especially, Giovanni de’ Medici, but also with rich merchants
such as Agostino Chigi, members of the Court, like
the German Goritz, and finally, with the Roman
nobles, who loved to fill their palaces with antiques. They set them up in
their gardens and courtyards, and built inscriptions and even sculptures into
their walls and staircases, a custom which still survives.
The good effect
of this “Pantheon of classical sculpture” in the Vatican, was not confined to
its results in stimulating research and the knowledge of antiquity; it also
furnished the sculptors of that time with the noblest examples and models. The
Pope himself encouraged the revival of this art by giving employment to its
most distinguished masters. He took Cristoforo Romano, Andrea Sansovino and
Michael Angelo into his service. We shall deal fully in the next chapter with the
commissions given by Julius to the greatest sculptor of modern times. Andrea
Sansovino, who had been residing in Rome from the year 1504, was charged with
the erection of two marble tombs in memory of Cardinals Ascanio Sforza and
Girolamo Basso della Rovere, in the favourite church
of the Rovere, Sta Maria del Popolo. Both were
completed before the end of the year 1509. In his main design the master
adhered to the traditional form, but the composition is free, and the
distribution of the parts broader and clearer. “The figures recline in peaceful
slumber in a sort of a niche in the wall surmounted by a triumphal arch.”
In the year
1512, Sansovino carved a marble group of the Madonna and Child and S. Anne for
the church of S. Agostino by order of the German Prelate, Johann Goritz, whose house was the rendezvous of all the best
scholars and artists in Rome. “This is one of the most perfect productions of
the new style.” Its special characteristic is great tenderness and depth of
expression, and the wonderful delineation of the three different ages which it
represents.
Our admiration
of Julius II’s indefatigable energy is still further increased when we turn to
the numerous other works, which he undertook and carried out in Rome for the
improvement of the existing streets, and the laying out and adorning of new ones.
He connected all that he did in these directions with the works begun by Sixtus
IV and Alexander VI. In April 1505, he determined to complete the Via Alessandrina; the cost of this work was divided between the
Pope, the Cardinals, the officials of the Court, and the Hospital of Sto Spirito. Many other streets, as the approach to the
Lateran, the streets of S. Celso, Sto Lucia and many
of the Piazza were embellished by Julius II. Amongst the new streets which he
made, and many of which still determine the ground-plan of the city, the Via
Giulia bears his name up to the present day. Beginning at the Ponte Sisto it runs westwards in a straight line until it reaches
the Tiber near the ruins of the old triumphal bridge. This latter was to have
been rebuilt and was already spoken of as the Julian Bridge, and so the whole
would have formed a new and splendid approach to S. Peter’s. The Via Giulia was
then the broadest thoroughfare in Rome, and was to have been made the
handsomest. We still see the trace of his plans in the now unfrequented street
from which traffic has been diverted to other ways. Between the churches of San Biagio and del Suffragio we
see the commencement, consisting of huge rough-hewn square stones, of the
basement of an immense building which was intended to contain the Law Courts
and Notarial Offices of the city, and also a handsome chapel. It was to have
had four corner towers with a loftier one in the centre of the facade over the
main entrance. If it had been completed, the Julian Palace would have ranked as
Bramante’s greatest work after S. Peter’s and the Vatican. The immense blocks
of travertine, the largest in Rome, shew on what a colossal scale the edifice
was designed.
The district
lying between the Via Giulia and the Bridge of St. Angelo, which had been
improved under Sixtus IV. was still further embellished by Julius. The church
of S. Celso was restored, and not far from it the new Mint was erected. The
Banking-house of the wealthy and artistic Agostino Chigi,
who was on such intimate terms with the Pope as financial adviser that Julius
received him into the Rovere family, stood in this quarter; and Galeotto della Rovere now
inhabited the Cancellaria which had formerly belonged
to Rodrigo Borgia. An inscription on marble, somewhat in the tombstone style,
was put up in 1512 in the Via di Bacchi by the ediles Domenico Massimo and Hieronymo Pico, praising Julius II for all he had done for the States of the Church and
the liberation of Italy, and especially for having “made Rome the fitting
capital of such a state by enlarging and embellishing her streets.” The
improvements effected in the Lungara, the street
running along the right bank of the Tiber between the Leonine city and the Trastevere, quite altered the appearance of that district.
The intention was to carry it on as far as the Ripa Grande as a parallel to the Via Giulia on the other side, but it did not make
rapid progress. The Riarii and Cardinal Ferarri had country-houses and gardens where it terminated,
and in the time of Julius II. Agostino Chigi’s splendid Villa, the Farnesina, which was celebrated
all over the world for the decorative paintings on its walls, stood there.
Amongst the
Roman churches, for which Julius did more or less, Albertini mentions S. Maria
Maggiore, S. Pietro in Vincoli, S. Biagio della Pagnotta, SS.
Apostoli and Sta Maria del Popolo. Clinging closely
as Julius always did to the traditions of Sixtus IV it will be understood that
he took a special interest in this church. The Chapel of the Choir was enlarged
by Bramante, and the windows filled with stained glass by two French masters,
Claude, whose family name is unknown, and a Dominican, Guillaume de Marcillat. These artists were also employed by the Pope for
the stained glass in the Sala Regia adjoining the Sistine Chapel, and in the
Papal apartments in the Vatican, and liberally rewarded.§ The tombs of
Cardinals Basso and Sforza were placed in this chapel, and it was further
embellished, apparently in the year 1505, with frescoes by Pinturicchio at the Pope’s
command. The exquisite harmony of colouring in this work even surpasses that of
his Siena paintings. The roof seems to open in the centre to reveal a vision of
the Coronation of the Blessed Virgin in a blue sky surrounded with a glory of
cherub faces. Four circular openings in the direction of the cross axes of the
central painting contain half-length figures of the Evangelists, while at the
four corners of the roof square architectural frames enclose reclining forms
of Sybils, painted in colour on a golden mosaic background. The depressed
intermediate spaces are filled with highly-coloured grotesques on a dark ground
while the architectural lines of the roof are defined in pale stone-colour. It
was probably Julius II’s partiality for Sta Maria del Popolo which led Agostino Chigi to commence the building of
a chapel for himself there, which, however, was only completed under Leo X.
Julius II had only possessed a modest conventual-looking house near S. Petro in Vincoli as long as he remained a Cardinal, but when
he became Pope he built himself a Palace by this church. The Villa Maglione, which had already been embellished by the
art-loving Cardinal Alidosi, was further improved by
Pope Julius II.
Outside Rome
one of the first interests of this warrior Pope was to strengthen the
fortresses in the States of the Church and add to their number. Work of this
description was executed in Civita Vecchia, Ostia, Civita Castellana, Montefiascone, Forli, Imola, and Bologna. The
building of churches, however, was by no means neglected. Julius assisted in
the construction of the Cathedrals of Perugia f and Orvieto, and in that
of churches in Bologna, Ferrara, S. Arcangelo, Corneto,
and Toscanella. He also gave a commission to Bramante
for very extensive works at Loreto. While yet a Cardinal he had had the
sacristy there decorated by Signorelli with a series of paintings; ff now he
employed Bramante to embellish this venerated sanctuary, which was a focus of
devotion to the Blessed Virgin for the whole of Italy and a large part of
Europe. Paris de Grassis gives an account of these
works, of which the most important were the decorated casing of marble with
which the Holy House was covered, and which belongs to Julius II, though the
arms of Leo X appear on the pedestal, and the Palace of the Canons, called
subsequently the Palazzo Apostolico or Palazzo del Governo. This building was to have occupied the three sides
of the piazza in front of the church, so as to form a closed atrium leading up
to it, but only a portion of the design was completed.
Next to the
Sanctuary of Loreto the decoration of the Cathedral of Savona, the Pope’s
native city, was the work that lay nearest to his heart. Before he was made
Pope he had enriched it with many gifts, and after his elevation he spent no
less than 27,000 scudi on its endowment and embellishment. He also built a new
Palace for the Bishop there and a Chapter-house, finished the Chapel of S. Sisto, supported the Hospital with liberal alms, and sent a
yearly contribution to the keeping up of the harbour.
But with Julius
II the city in which the Holy See had its seat and held its Court naturally
took the first place, and under him Rome became the true centre of the Artlife of Italy. The Pope’s love of architecture roused
the prelates, the aristocracy, and the wealthy merchants, to follow where he
led, and builders, sculptors and painters were in request in all quarters of
the city. He did not, however, content himself with merely beautifying Rome; he
aimed also at making the city safe and wholesome. The walls were restored in
many places, and the charge of these fortifications and the chief offices of
the city was handed over to men belonging to the noble Roman families, such as
the Massimi, Altieri, Frangipani, Pici, della Valle, Cassarelli, Capodiferri, etc. The works begun by Alexander VI for
strengthening the defences of the Castle of St Angelo were continued. Guglielmo
de Piemonte, a friend of Michael Angelo, and the younger Antonio Picconi da Sangallo were the architects here employed, and
they also completed the entrance and the arcade leading to the Vatican. The
handsome Loggie at the top of the Castle, on which Julius’s name is inscribed,
and from whence there is a magnificent panoramic view of Rome and the Campagna,
are ascribed to Bramante. The repairing of the old Cloacae and the building of
new ones, an important sanitary improvement, was the work of the Pope. He also
constructed a new aqueduct from S. Antonio, two miles out of Rome, to the
Vatican, and repaired that of the Aqua Virgo. Tommaso Inghirami,
in his address to the Cardinals on the death of Julius II, referring to all
that he did in these respects, says, “He found the city mean, uncleanly, and without dignity, and has so purified and
embellished it that it is now worthy of the great name it bears. The buildings
erected by the Savonese Popes within the last forty
years make Rome what it is; all the other houses, if I may be pardoned the
expression, are merely huts.”
During the
lifetime of Julius II. the learned Canon Francesco Albertini compiled a guide
in which, side by side with the old Rome, he describes the “new city” created
by Nicholas V, Sixtus IV, and Julius II. It is really enjoyable to perambulate
Rome under the guidance of this contemporary writer, and behold all the glory
and beauty of the magic city as it appeared in the days of Julius II. No other
source brings home to the mind so vividly as this little book does, the almost
universal feeling for art which prevailed in that “happy generation where not a
single house was to be found, belonging to any one who had the least pretence to culture, that did not possess some artistic
feature. It might consist in the grandeur of its plan, or in some majestic
pillared court, into which all the other rooms opened, or an exquisitely
decorated library, the beloved sanctum of its owner, or blissful resort of his
most congenial friends, or again, some precious collection of statues, or gems,
or vases, or curious stuffs, the admiration and wonder of all who visited Rome.
Frescoes on the walls of reception rooms or studies were so common that no
attempt is made to describe them or name their painters. So little account was
made of them that whole series would be ruthlessly wiped out, as was done in
the cloisters of the Minerva, founded by Cardinal Torquemada, to make way for
new and better ones.” Albertini’s little book on the Wonders of old and new
Rome is dedicated to Julius II. In the Preface he says “Sixtus IV began the
restoration of the city, his successors followed in his footsteps, but your
Holiness has outstripped them all”. At the close we find the date 3rd June,
1509. At that time Raphael was only just beginning to paint the Camera della Segnatura, and Michael
Angelo was still at work in the Sistina; so that the
greatest of all Rome’s wonders, those immortal monuments of religious art, had
not yet been created.
CHAPTER
IX.
Michael
Angelo in the Service of Julius II. Tomb and Bronze Statue of the Pope. Paintings
of the Ceiling in the Sistine Chapel.
Nicholas V and
Sixtus IV while doing so much for architecture and painting had, owing to
unfavourable circumstances, paid but little regard to plastic art. Julius II
following in their footsteps, had the good fortune to be able to secure for
sculpture, as well as for painting, the services of the greatest genius of his
time. His name will always be associated with that of Michael Angelo, as well
as with those of Raphael and Bramante. It was he who afforded to all three the
opportunity for displaying and developing their wonderful gifts.
Julius II knew
Michael Angelo’s Pietà in the Chapel of S. Petronilla in S. Peter’s. No doubt,
it was his acquaintance with this work which is one of the most noble and soulstirring creations of Christian sculpture, which led
him in the Spring of the year 1505 to invite the artist to Rome. The great
sculptor, then 33 years of age, put aside his cartoon of the battle of Cascina,
which he had just begun, and obeyed the Pope’s call. He arrived in March, and
found at once in Julius the most artistic of all the Popes, a patron who
understood and appreciated his power. He took the strongest personal interest
in the sculptor’s work, followed every step, and pressed for its completion
with the impatience of a boy. Between two such hot-tempered men as the Pope and
the artist, collisions were inevitable; but they soon made friends again. They
understood each other, both were Terribili in
the Italian sense, great, vehement souls and lovers of all great and colossal
things materially and spiritually; both crowned heads, one with the diadem of
Christendom, the other with that of genius.
The first
commission which the Pope gave to the artist was characteristic of both men. A
colossal marble tomb was to be carved for him during his lifetime. Michael Angelo
at once set to work to prepare several designs, of which one was accepted, and
an agreement was drawn up binding the sculptor to complete the monument within
five years, and fixing the price at 10,000 ducats meanwhile he was to draw a
monthly provision of 100 ducats. Michael Angelo threw himself into his task
with the greatest enthusiasm. He went at once to Carrara to obtain the material
for his work and remained there eight months, superintending with the greatest
care, first the quarrying, and then the transport of the marble, which weighed
in round numbers about no tons.
In the
beginning of the new year (1506) he returned to Rome and set up a workshop in
the Piazzo San Pietro. He was burning with eagerness
to begin his work. “Most honoured father,” he writes on 31st January, 1506, “I
should be quite satisfied with my position, if only my marble had arrived; but
I seem to be most unfortunate in this matter, for in all the time that I have
been here we have had only two days of favourable weather. Some days ago one of
the ships arrived after a narrow escape of running aground owing to the bad
weather. Then, while I was unloading it, the river suddenly rose and flooded
all the wharf, so that as yet I have not been able to do anything. I have only
good words to give to the Pope, and hope he will not get angry. I trust I may
soon be able to begin, and then to get on quickly. God grant it.”
There was,
however, a much worse difficulty in the way, owing to the change in the Pope’s
mind which was now turning more and more away from the thought of the tomb and
towards the building of the new S. Peter’s. In compensation for this
disappointment Michael Angelo was to be given a commission to paint the roof of
the Sistine Chapel; but the master felt himself deeply aggrieved: the money he
had received was not sufficient to pay even the freights of the marble. On the
strength of the Pope’s order he had set up his workshop at his own cost and
procured assistance from Florence. On the 17th of April, 1506, he heard that the
Pope had said to a goldsmith and to his Master of Ceremonies that he would not
give another farthing for stones, large or small. In much astonishment, Michael
Angelo demanded before he left the Vatican a portion of the money that he
required for the prosecution of his work. The Pope put off seeing him till the
Monday following, but when the day came the promised audience was not granted.
The same thing was repeated on the following days. When on the 17th April he
appeared again he was refused admittance by the express command of the Pope.
Upon this he flared up. “Tell the Pope”, he is said to have exclaimed,“ that it
he wants me any more he will have to find me wherever
he can.” Then he rushed out of the Palace, desired his servants to sell his
things, and mounting his horse left Rome at once, with a firm determination
never to set foot in it again.
When Julius was
told of Michael Angelo’s flight (it was on the eve of the day of the laying of
the foundation-stone for S. Peter’s) he commanded that the sculptor should be
pursued at once and brought back by force if necessary. But Michael Angelo had
ridden fast, and it was not till he had arrived safely in Poggibonsi,
on Florentine soil, that the messengers succeeded in overtaking him and handing
him a letter from the Pope, commanding him to return at once under pain of his
serious displeasure. The angry artist, however, had no notion of complying. At
11 p.m. he wrote to the Pope that he would never return to Rome. “For the good
service which I have rendered to your Holiness, I have not deserved to be
turned out of your Palace as if I were a worthless lackey. Since your Holiness
no longer requires the monument I am freed from my obligation, and I will not
contract any new one.”
Michael
Angelo’s friends, and especially Giuliano da Sangallo, did their best to bring
about a reconciliation between him and the Pope. On the 2nd May, Michael Angelo
wrote to Giuliano from Florence, “I beg you to read my answer to the Pope. I
wish His Holiness to know that I am ready, indeed, more willing than ever, to
go on with my work. If he wishes, whatever happens, to have the tomb, he ought
not to mind where I execute the work, provided I keep to my agreement, that at
the end of the five years it shall be put up in S. Peter’s wherever he chooses,
and that it shall be well done. I am certain that when it is completed there
will be nothing to equal it in the whole world. If His Holiness will agree to
this I should be glad to receive his commission in Florence, from whence I will
correspond with him. I have several blocks of marble at Carrara at my disposal
which I can have sent here, and the persons that I shall want to assist me can
also come here. Though I shall be considerably out of pocket by doing the work
here I shall not mind that. As each portion is finished I shall send it at once
to Rome, so that His Holiness will have as much pleasure in it as if I were at
hand, and, indeed, more, as he will only see the finished work and have no
anxieties about it.”
A week later a
friend of Michael Angelo’s wrote to him from Rome, “Last Saturday, I and
Bramante were called up to report to the Pope while he was at table, on a
number of drawings and plans: I was first, and after dinner Bramante was
called, and the Pope said to him, ‘tomorrow Sangallo is going to Florence and
will bring Michael Angelo back with him.’ Bramante answered, ‘our Holiness,
Sangallo had better not count on it: I know Michael Angelo well, and he has
said to me more than once that he did not intend to paint the Chapel; your
Holiness was pushing him hard, but he would not undertake anything but the
tomb’. Bramante said further, ‘Holy Father, I do not think he trusts himself
for this work; he will have to paint figures greatly foreshortened to be seen
from below; that is a very different thing from painting on the flat’. The Pope
answered, ‘If he does not come, it will be a slight to me, and, therefore, I
believe that he will’. Then I showed that I too was there and spoke out,
somewhat as you would have done if you had had to speak for me. I called him a
knave straight out before the Pope, at which he was struck quite dumb, for he
saw that he had said what he ought not. At last I said, Holy Father, this man
has never spoken with Michael Angelo about these things, if what I say is not
true may my head fall at my feet. I will stick to it; this conversation never
took place, and Michael Angelo will return if your Holiness really desires it?
Thus the matter ended, and no more was said. God be with you. If I can do
anything for you, you have only to tell me. My respects to Simone Pollajuolo”.
On the 8th of
July the Pope made another attempt to induce the sculptor to return, writing
the following Brief to the Signoria. “Beloved Sons—Greeting and Apostolic
blessing—Michelangelo the sculptor, who left us without reason, and in mere
caprice, is afraid, we are informed, of returning, though we for our part are
not angry with him, knowing the humours of such men of genius. In order then
that we may lay aside all anxiety, we rely on your loyalty to convince him in
our name, that if he returns to us he shall be uninjured and unhurt, retaining
our Apostolic favour in the same measure as he formerly enjoyed it.”
Michael Angelo,
who apparently had now resumed work on his cartoon and the bronze statues of
the Twelve Apostles for the Cathedral of Florence, adhered resolutely to his
refusal. Meanwhile, another letter arrived from the Pope. The Gonfaloniere Soderini sent for
the artist, to remonstrate with him. “You have behaved towards the Pope,” he is
said to have told him, “in a way that the King of France himself would not have
ventured upon. There must be an end to all this. We are not going to be dragged
into a war, and risk the whole State for you. Make up your mind to go back to
Rome.” It was all in vain : it has even been asserted that Michael Angelo now
thought of leaving Italy, and betaking himself to the
Sultan, who had asked him to build a bridge for him from Constantinople to Pera. The poems composed at that time, in which he
denounces the corruption in Rome in the strongest terms, betray tension and
irritation with which his mind was filled during this period. The good offices
of Cardinal Alidosi, the Pope’s favourite, whose
mediation had been invoked by the Florentine Government proved equally
unavailing.
Meanwhile
Julius II had set out on his march against Bologna, and entered the city in
triumph on the nth of November, I506. It was felt that this magnificent success
should be immortalised by some monumental work of art. A statue of the Pope in
stucco had already on the 17th of December been put up in front of the Palace
of the Government at Bologna. But Julius II had set his heart on a more durable
work, a colossal bronze statue, to be a perpetual memento always under the eyes
of the Bolognese of the greatness of their new ruler. The natural result was a
fresh letter from Cardinal Alidosi to the Florentine
Government, requesting them to send Michael Angelo to Bologna, where he would
have no cause to complain of his reception. Now at last the sculptor gave way.
Towards the end of November he started for the city, provided with a letter
from Soderini, which ran as follows:—“The bearer of
these presents will be Michelangelo the sculptor, whom we send to please and
satisfy His Holiness. We certify that he is an excellent young man, and in his
own art without a peer in Italy, perhaps even in the Universe. It would be
impossible to recommend him too highly. His nature is such that he requires to
be drawn out by kindness and encouragement; but if love is shewn to him, and he
is well treated, he will accomplish things which will make the whole world
wonder”. The letter was dated November 27. A postscript was added which said,
“Michelangelo comes in reliance on our plighted word.” Subsequently, the artist
said that he had gone to Bologna with a halter round his neck.
His reception
was stormy. “It was your business to have come to seek us”, the Pope said,
“whereas you have waited till we came to seek you”; alluding to his march to Bologna.
Michael Angelo fell upon his knees and begged for pardon in a loud voice. He
declared his flight had not been deliberate. He had gone away in a fit of rage
because he could not stand the way in which he had been driven from the Palace.
Julius II made no answer, but sat there frowning, with his head down, until one
of the Prelates who had been asked by Soderini to put
in a good word for Michael Angelo if necessary, intervened and said: “Your
Holiness should not be so hard on this fault of Michael Angelo; he is a man who
has never been taught good manners, these artists do not know how to behave,
they understand nothing but their art.” On this, the Pope, in a fury, turned on
the unlucky mediator. ‘‘You venture,” he shouted, “to say to this man things
that I should not have dreamt of saying. It is you who have no manners. Get out
of my sight, you miserable, ignorant clown.” Then reaching out his hand to
Michael Angelo he forgave him, and at once commissioned him to execute a statue
of himself in bronze, which was to be 7 cubits high (about 14 feet). Then he
asked what the cost would be, to which the sculptor replied, “I think the mould
could be made for 1000 ducats, but foundry is not my trade, and therefore I
cannot bind myself.” “Go,” answered Julius, “set to work at once, and make as
many moulds as you like, until the statue is perfect; you shall have no reason
to complain of your pay.” This famous audience which terminated the
estrangement between these two fiery spirits, probably took place on the 29th
November, 1506. It shows how well the Pope understood that genius levels all
distinction of states.
Michael Angelo
now set to work at once at Bologna. The Pope often visited him. In a letter to
his brother Buonarroti, dated 1st February, 1507, he says, “Last Friday evening
His Holiness spent half an hour in my work-room. He bestowed his blessing on me
and gave me to understand that he was pleased with my work. We have all great
cause to thank God, and I beg you to pray for me.” On the 28th April the
wax model was finished, and at the end of June the casting was begun, but was
unsuccessful; only the bust came out, the other half stuck in the mould.
Michael Angelo, however, was not discouraged, and worked day and night, until
an entirely satisfactory result was attained. From the 18th of February, 1508,
the statue was exhibited for three days in the Cathedral of S. Petronio. The whole city flocked to see it. The Bolognese
magistrates wrote to Rome. “It is a wonderful work, equal to your own ancient
remains.” On the 21st February the statue was placed in a niche over the door
of S. Petronio with great demonstrations of joy.
The figure was
three times the size of life. The Pope was represented sitting in full pontificals, with the Tiara on his head, the keys in one
hand, and the other raised in blessing. The work seemed calculated to last for
ever; in reality, its duration was of the shortest. On the 30th December, 1511,
it fell a victim to the hatred of the Bentivogli party, who had already in May destroyed the stucco figure of the Pope. When the
immense mass of metal, weighing over 14,000 pounds, fell to the ground, it made
a deep hole in the earth although straw and bundles of sticks had been prepared
to receive it. The noble statue was broken to pieces amidst gibes and jeers,
and the Duke of Ferrara had a cannon made from the metal which was called La
Giulia, in mockery of the Pope. The head of the figure, weighing 600 pounds,
was preserved for a long time in Ferrara, but finally disappeared. This was the
end of the finest statue in Italy, as the Bolognese chronicler calls it.
Michael Angelo
had returned to his home in Florence as soon as the statue was finished, but he
was not allowed to remain there long. In March 1508, Julius II recalled him to
Rome, not, however, to proceed with the tomb, but to paint the roof of the
Sistine Chapel. “It is to the honour of Julius that he again set his own
personal glory, in employing the artist on work of a wider scope.” Michael
Angelo, who only felt the fulness of genius with chisel in hand, at first
resisted, saying that painting was not his trade. But the iron will of the Pope
prevailed, and forced the brush into the unwilling fingers that were tingling
to clasp the sterner instrument. An agreement was concluded between Julius II
and the artist, in which the latter engaged himself to paint the central vault
of the roof of the Sistine Chapel for a sum of 3000 ducats.
Michael Angelo,
having received 500 ducats on account from the Pope, set to work at once on the
cartoons with his wonted energy. According to the artist’s own account, in the
first plan the Twelve Apostles were to be painted in the lunettes, and all the
other spaces were, according to the usual practice of the time, to be filled with
decorative designs. Before the end of May the scaffolding had already been put
up. On the eve of Pentecost (10th June) the Chapel was so full of noise and
dust that the Cardinals could hardly get through the office.
Meanwhile
Michael Angelo had conceived a more extensive plan for his paintings,
connecting them with the frescoes already existing in the Chapel, the
superiority of which was at once appreciated by Julius II. In consequence a new
agreement was drawn up in the Summer. The whole roof down to the windows was to
be covered with figures, and the fee was to be 6000 ducats instead of 3000. All
the materials were to be supplied to the artist. Michael Angelo now began to
look about for assistants, ordered his colours, and probably began to paint in the
late Autumn of 1508. The Pope was as usual desperately eager and impatient, and
refused to grant the artist a short leave of absence for a journey to Florence.
On the 27th
January, 1509, Michael Angelo complained to his father that the work was not getting
on, as his assistants had proved worthless, and he had had to dismiss them. The
result of this was, that this gigantic work was not only designed by Michael
Angelo, but almost entirely painted by his own hands. Besides the enormous
amount of labour involved in this, he had also to master the technique of
fresco painting, in which he had had no experience. In consequence, the
hot-tempered artist had many a passage of arms with his impatient patron. But
the two passionate natures understood each other, and were soon friends again.
“Probably the alternations of merciless pressure and unmeasured vituperation
with the frankest indulgence and kindness, which characterised the relations
between Julius II and Michael Angelo, were the means of obtaining more from him
than any other treatment could have done.” In June, 1509, the Roman Canon
Albertini saw the paintings already commenced in the central vault of the roof.
In May 1510,
after a Winter of strenuous labour, Michael Angelo took a short holiday, which he
spent in Florence. With all his diligence and energy, the painter could not
work fast enough for his impatient task-master. Julius II climbed up on the
scaffolding (Michael Angelo had to lend him a hand to help him up the last
ladder) with the sole object of worrying the artist with questions as to when
the work would be finished.
But the time
was approaching when the life or death struggle for the independence of the
Papacy and the liberation of Italy from the French was to absorb the Pope’s
whole energies and thoughts. On the 17th August, 1510, he left Rome, and on the
1st of September he began his march on Bologna, where he found himself reduced
to the greatest straits. For the present it was out of the question to spare
anything for Art. Already in September all payments ceased, and Michael Angelo
did not know what to do. At first he wrote to the Pope, but at the end of the
month he decided on going himself to Bologna. In October he returned to Rome
where, by the orders of Julius, the Datary, Lorenzo Pucci, gave him 500 ducats.
But the payments soon again came to an end; on which the artist repeated his
personal appeal to the Pope and was once more successful. “Last Tuesday,” he
writes from Rome to his brother on the 11th January, 1511, “I got back here
safely, and the money has been paid to me.” He enclosed a bill of exchange for
228 ducats; but by the end of February the needs of the campaign had again
absorbed the promised instalments: “I believe,” he writes to his brother on the
23rd February, “that I shall soon have to pay another visit to Bologna. When
the Pope’s Datary with whom I returned here last time, went back thither, he
promised me that he would see that I should have money to go on with. But now
he has been gone a month, and I have heard nothing from him. I shall wait
another week and then, if there is still no news, shall go to Bologna, taking
Florence on the way. Tell my father this.”
He was able to
put off this journey, for the money arrived, and the work was resumed, and in
spite of all those difficulties, was approaching completion. In the short
period of 22 months (from November, 1508, to August, 1510), not counting
interruptions, the painting of the whole central vault was finished. But at
what a cost of almost superhuman toil. Day after day the artist had to work
lying on his back with the paint dropping on his face. Vasari says that his
eyes had become so accustomed to looking upwards, that for some time, when he
wanted to read a letter he had to hold it above his head. In a sonnet,
addressed to Giovanni da Pistoja, he describes his
sufferings in a vein of somewhat bitter humour:
I’ve
grown a goitre by dwelling in this den,
As
cats from stagnant streams in Lombardy,
As
in whatever land they hap to be
Which
drives the belly close beneath the chin :
My
beard turns up to heaven : my nape falls in,
Fixed
on my spine: my breast bone visibly
Grows
like a harp : a rich embroidery
Bedews
my face from brush-drops thick and thin.
My
loins into my pannels like levers grind :
My
buttock like a crupper bears my weight:
My
feet unguided wander to and fro;
In
front my skin grows loose and long ; behind,
By
bending it becomes more taut and strait;
Crosswise
I strain me like a Syrian bow,
Whence
false and quaint I know,
Must
be the fruit of squinting brain and eye;
For
ill can aim the gun that bends awry.
Come
then, Giovanni, try
To
succour my dead pictures and my fame,
Since
foul I fare and painting is my shame,
SYMONDS’
Michelangelo
In order fully
to estimate the amazing power and energy of the artist it must be remembered that
the surface to be covered measured more than 10,000 square feet, and with its
intersecting curves, lunettes, etc., bristled with difficulties for the
painter. The magic wand of the artist filled the whole of this space with
figures (343) in every imaginable position, attitude, and form of foreshortening,
some 12 feet high, the Prophets and Sybils nearly 18 feet, and all carefully
and conscientiously finished. All the details, the hairs of the head and beard,
the finger nails, the creases in the soles of the feet are painted with the
marvellous truth to nature of the 15th Century, while the whole is steeped in
the large and restful spirit of consummate art.”
The most
important portion of these paintings was completed just at the most critical
moment in the whole Pontificate of Julius II. The States of the Church were
lying defenceless at the mercy of the victorious army of the King of France,
while at the same time the same foe was attacking the spiritual authority of
the Pope with the threat of a Council. In a powerless, but with a still
unbroken spirit, the Pope had returned to his Palace on the 27th June, 1511. On
the eve of the Feast of the Assumption, the patronal festival of the Sistine
Chapel, he attended Vespers there and saw the frescoes unveiled at last, that
is all those of the central vaults; the architectural framework, historical
groups and single figures forming a complete whole in itself.
In the middle
of August, 1511, Michael Angelo began the cartoons for the paintings in the
remaining interspaces and lunettes. At the end of September he had two
audiences from the Pope, after the last of which he received 400 ducats. In May
1512, he was again in distress for money, which was not surprising, considering
the political situation at that time. Michael Angelo told Cardinal Bibbiena
that he would throw up his work and go, on which the Cardinal managed to
procure 2000 ducats for him. In July he was again so diligent that he only
wrote letters at night. On the 24th of July, 1512, he wrote : “I am working
harder than any man has ever worked before, and I am not well, but I am
resolved to have patience, and toil on to the end.” Shortly before this, he had
shown his work from the scaffolding to Duke Alfonso of Ferrara and been cheered
by his hearty appreciation of it; the Duke had also given him a commission for
a picture. In October, he was able at last to announce to his father that all
the paintings were completed, and that the Pope was extremely pleased with
them. With characteristic piety Michael Angelo substituted for the usual
artists’ signature an inscription close to the prophet Jeremias, ascribing the
honour of the completion of his work to God, the Alpha and Omega, through whose
assistance it had been begun and ended.
On All Hallow’s Eve (October 31st), “the most sublime creation
that colours and brush have ever produced,” was unveiled. The work called forth
a perfect furore of enthusiastic admiration. Its nobility of thought and the
skilfulness of the composition were praised to the skies, and still more the
perfection of the drawing and of the plastic effects. The Pope, then rapidly
nearing his end, had the satisfaction of celebrating High Mass in the Chapel,
which through him had become a shrine of noble art; thus fittingly closing a
Pontificate which throughout had been devoted to lofty aims.
Nearly four
centuries have elapsed since the unveiling of the roof of the Sistine. The
smoke of candles has blackened it, time has seamed it with cracks, the colours
have faded more or less, but still the effect ‘is overpowering. “No doubt from
the beginning colour was never the main consideration in this work, the drawing
was the effective element, and continues to this day to impress on the mind
such a sense of its intense power and truthfulness that for the time the
beholder forgets that there can be anything else in the world worth looking
at.”
The idea of
framing his pictures in a painted architectural design, subdividing the plain
surface of the roof, was a bold and novel thought, and might have seemed
fanciful, but for the purpose it was meant to serve, the effect was perfect.
“The stone vaulting disappears, the fairy architecture resting on the real,
flings its arches across the intervening space, sometimes with hangings
stretched between them, and sometimes open to the sky in which the figures seem
to float”
In regard to
the subjects of his paintings Michael Angelo simply carried out his scheme
begun in the frescoes on the walls, which had been painted under Sixtus IV, in
accordance with the triple division of the Plan of Salvation in use in the
Middle Ages. This was divided into the period preceding the giving of the Law;
that of the Law, and that of Grace in the Kingdom founded by Christ. The
frescoes on the left side represented the life of Moses, the period of the Law;
those on the right the life of Christ, the Reign of Grace.
Thus the period
before the Law from the Creation to the Deluge was still wanting, and its
principal events, as narrated in Genesis, were taken by Michael Angelo as the
subjects for his pictures. He depicted them in four large and five smaller
rectangular compartments on the flat space in the middle of the roof running
from end to end. His treatment of the idea of the Creation which is described
in revelation as the immediate act of the Divine Will through the efficient
Word, saying, “Be it thus, and it was”, is absolutely unique in its genius and
power. We see and feel the rushing sweep of the breath of the Eternal through
those days in which His Word called forth the heavens and the earth, the
spiritual and the corporeal worlds into existence, out of the void. “Michael
Angelo was the first of all artists to grasp the idea of Creation not as a mere
word with the sign of Benediction, but as motion. Thus with him each separate
creative act can have a characteristic form of its own.”
God, appearing
at first quite alone, calls heaven and earth, the world of spirits, and the
world of matter into existence. He divides light from darkness, which flies
away at His word. Then, with angels now clustering round him, and sheltering
under his mantle, the Father, sweeping through space, creates the earth and all
the life that springs from her. “On this follows the climax of creation in the
bestowal of life upon Adam, and with it that of the genius of Michael Angelo.”
Surrounded by a host of heavenly spirits, “the Almighty approaches the earth,
and touching with His finger the outstretched finger of the first man, in whom
the approaching gift is already foreshadowed, communicates the vital spark. In
the whole realm of art this master-stroke of genius, in thus giving a clear sensuous
expression to a spiritual conception, stands unrivalled, and the progenitor of
the human race is worthily represented in the noble figure of Adam.” The
creation of Eve is an equally perfect conception in its masterly purity and
solemnity. Adam lies in a deep sleep; God stands before him; Eve is rising; she
has just gained her feet, but one knee is still bent. She appears at the
bidding of her Creator, with clasped hands stretching towards Him, thanking Him
for the gift of life. In all these pictures nothing is introduced but what is
absolutely necessary to make the situation clear. All accessories that might
distract the attention from the main subject are excluded.
The scenes
which follow, taken from the early history of mankind,—especially that of the
fall and the expulsion from Paradise,—the sin and its punishment, both
portrayed in the same picture, are equally powerful, simple, and striking. In
the picture of the fall the tree of knowledge occupies the centre, the serpent
(the upper half a female form) hands the forbidden fruit to Eve. Immediately
behind the tempter a startling effect is produced by the instantaneous
apparition of the avenging angel driving the culprits out of Paradise; while
Eve, holding back her golden hair, casts one despairing, longing look behind
her. The deluge, in one of the large compartments, also presents many striking
scenes; in the whole composition the horror of the catastrophe is most
powerfully rendered. The next picture, probably representing the sacrifices of
Cain and Abel, contains an unusually large number of figures. The series is
closed by the picture of Noe and his sons.
The nine
central paintings have the effect of hangings stretched across the simulated
architectural supports of the roof; they form the principal and most prominent
part of its decoration. Next in importance come the series of Prophets and
Sybils painted on the descending curve of the vaulting between the arches.
There are twelve in all, five on each of the long sides and one at each end, all
of colossal size: the giant-spirit needs a giant-form to express it. The effect
of these figures, with their majestic draperies, is intensely spiritual, and
yet the outlines are so strong and firm that they look as if they were carved
in stone. The sides of the marble seats in which they are enthroned form the
main support of the imaginary roof. Attendant genii accompany the Prophets of
the Messiahs for the two worlds of Judaism and heathenism; some sit absorbed in
thought or vision, poring over their books or scrolls, while others again with
impassioned gestures proclaim what they have seen. The manner of life of those
to whom the Lord God “revealed His secrets” (Amos, III. 7), wholly immersed in
the study, and contemplation, and announcement of the coming Salvation, is here
expressed with a perfection which classical art could not conceive and which
modem art can never hope to equal. We need only here mention the most
celebrated. The Delphic Sybil, a singularly powerful and yet attractive figure,
seems gazing with enraptured eyes on the actual fulfilment of her prophecies.
Isaias is reading the book of the world’s destiny. The curve of his brow
suggests that of a heavenly sphere, a source of thought like the crystal
reservoirs on the mountain tops from which the great rivers are fed. The angel
is calling him and he gently raises his head without lifting his eyes from the
book, as though balancing between two infinities. Jeremias is shrouded in
sackcloth and ashes, as befits the prophet who dwells under the shadow of
desolate Jerusalem. His lips seem to vibrate to the sound of the conqueror’s
trumpet. His beard is tangled and matted, his bowed head looks like the crown of
a cedar that has been shattered by lightning, his halfclosed eyes are hidden wells of tears. His hands look strong, but they are swollen,
for they have been bearing up the tottering walls of the temple. We see that
the groans of the captive sons of Israel from the banks of the alien river and
the wailings of the Queen of the nations, now widowed and deserted, are ever
sounding in his ears. Ezekias is in a divine ecstasy, interrogating his
visions, stirred by the spirit which possesses him to the very depths of his
being. Daniel is busily writing; his mission was to proclaim the day of deliverance
for the good, and judgments on tyrants to future generations. The most
admirable thing about these majestic figures, on which one could gaze for ever
with unwearied interest, is, that they are not mere decorations of a hall or
chapel, but men, real men, who have felt the grief that we know, and been
wounded by the thorns which grow on our earth; their brows are furrowed with
human thought; their hearts have felt the chill of deceptions; they have seen
conflicts in which whole generations have perished; they have felt the shadow
of death in the air above them, and they have striven with their own hands to
prepare the way for a new order of things; their eyes have grown worn and dim
through their too fixed gaze on the ever-changing kaleidoscope of the ages;
their flesh has been consumed by the fire of burning thoughts. The attitudes of
some of these figures, such as the Lybian Sybil and
the Prophets Daniel and Jonas, may be to a certain extent violent and
exaggerated, but as a rule massive form and ecstatic emotion are admirably
restrained within the limits of harmony and beauty. Those who are inclined to
find fault with the master in this regard should consider the extreme
difficulty of the task he proposed to himself, which was to create twelve
figures, each of which should impress on the mind the idea of a being raised by
divine inspiration into the superhuman sphere. For this, mere majesty of form
was not enough; a variety of separate situations had to be imagined, each
denoting inspiration, represented in a form that could be apprehended by the
senses. Perhaps complete success in such an undertaking was beyond the powers
of Art itself.”
A third series
of pictures, closely connected with the majestic form of the Prophets and
Sybils, occupy the arches of the wall and the triangular spaces between them
and the pendentives, and represent “the ancestors of Christ in simple scenes of
family life.” The tone of feeling in all these figures is that of patient
resignation, waiting for the promise of the nations. Here, as in the Prophets
and Sybils, Michael Angelo in the plan of his composition follows the received
mediaeval conception.
The fourth
series consists of the large pictures in the four corners of the vaulting.
These represent some of the miraculous deliverances of Israel as types of the
future Redemption. The subjects are the slaying of Goliath, Judith going forth
to the camp of Holofernes, the punishment of Haman, and the Brazen Serpent. The
latter, with its startling contrasts of death and deliverance, is the finest of
the whole set of pictures. “The clear division between the two concentrated
groups, with the symbol of Salvation separating them locally as well as spiritually,
the one turning away in devil-ridden despair, the other pressing forward with
eager confidence, makes this picture perhaps one of the most marvellous
productions of Michael Angelo’s genius, especially when we consider the
difficulties presented by the form of the surface on which it is painted”.
To these four
cycles of paintings the master’s prolific imagination added “a whole world of
purely ideal figures simply as a harmonious living and breathing incarnation of
the ornamental roof which he had devised.” Michael Angelo evidently intended
this roof to represent one of those festal artistic decorations so commonly
employed in the Renaissance age even for religious solemnities. The innumerable
ornamental figures employed, some in holding the tablets with the names of the
Prophets, some, in every variety of posture, to fill up the spaces between the
arches, others again in supporting or crowning the cornices, correspond with
the living personifications so frequently perched on various portions of these
festive erections. All these nude figures, the sturdy children and strong-limbed
youths, are in a sense members of the architectural scheme, supporting
cornices, carrying inscription tablets or shields, or holding up hangings or
garlands. Hardly any of them are at rest, almost all are at work or in motion
in some way, but none have any relation to the subjects of the pictures, they
belong entirely to the decoration. However one may admire these undraped
figures from the point of view of the artist, many will feel them incongruous
for the decoration of a chapel.
Considered as a
spiritual conception, Michael Angelo’s Sistine paintings are fully on a level
with their artistic presentation. They are a mighty poem in colour, having for
its theme the whole course of the human race from the heights of creation down
to the need of salvation and upwards again to the dawning of the day of
deliverance. In their silence they speak with an eloquence that can never be
surpassed. Nowhere has the office of the Old Testament as the preparation for
the new and abiding covenant been set forth with such convincing truth and
beauty. First we have the creation of nature, the standing ground for the
spiritual life of the human race, then the making of man, his fall into sin, in
which the family (Cain and Abel), society (the Deluge), finally, even the best of
the race (drunkenness of Noe), become involved. Under the old law, all humanity
is yearning for deliverance from the burden of guilt. From the midst of the
people God raises up the Prophets for the Jews, and the Sybils for the heathen,
as inspired seers, beholding the future salvation, but at the same time bearing
in their souls the sorrows of their brethren. Four visible types of this
salvation appear in the corner pictures, drawn from the history of Israel: the
enemy who desires to destroy the people of God is vanquished in Goliath, Haman,
Holofernes, and the Serpent, all only types of the victory wrought by the
eternal sacrifice of the Son of God unceasingly celebrated by the Church on the
Altar.
On the
completion of the roof paintings in the Sistina,
Michael Angelo turned again to the tomb of Julius II, apparently by the Pope’s
orders. Ever since the Summer of 1512, Julius II had not disguised from himself
the fact that his days were drawing to their close. The great difficulty about
the tomb consisted in the uncertainty as to where it was to be placed. As the
Choir of S. Peter’s, which had just been erected by Bramante, was only
temporary, it could not be put there. In consequence of this uncertainty
Michael Angelo had to make several sketches for his new design, some complete
on all sides, others intended to stand against a wall.
According to Condivi and Vasari, Michael Angelo’s biographers, the
isolated plan was as follows. The Chapel containing the Pope’s sarcophagus was
to be enclosed in a marble shell, measuring about 54 feet by 36. The pediment
was to be covered with symbolical single figures and groups. The arts of
painting, sculpture, and architecture were to be represented by captive figures
in order to indicate, so Condivi tells us, that they
were now, together with the Pope, prisoners of death, since they would never
again find another Pope to encourage and promote them as he had done. Statues
of Victory, with the conquered provinces at their feet, were to represent
Julius II’s successes in regaining the lost possessions of the States of the
Church. The pediment was to be surmounted by a cornice, above which was to rise
a second storey, bearing four typical figures, two of them being Moses and S.
Paul. Above these again was to be the figure of the Pope sleeping, and borne by
two angels. The whole work was to measure about 30 feet in height, and to
contain more than 40 statues, not counting the bas-reliefs on which the
principal events in the life of Julius II. were to be portrayed.
While Michael
Angelo was employed on this work, the Pope died. Shortly before his death, on
the 19th February, 1513, Julius had given orders that his tomb should be
erected in the Sistine Chapel of S. Peter’s, where his uncle Sixtus IV. lay. He
left 10,000 ducats in his will for the monument. On the 6th May, 1513, Michael
Angelo concluded a very detailed agreement with the executors, Cardinal
Leonardo Grosso della Rovere, and the Protonotary,
Lorenzo Pucci, which is still extant. The monument was to have three faces, the
fourth side was to be against the wall. Each face was to contain two
tabernacles (niches with side pilasters and a cornice) resting on a high
basement. In each niche there were to be two statues somewhat larger than life.
Against the twelve pillars dividing the niches there were to be statues of the
same size, so that twenty-four statues would be required for the substructure
alone. Above this was to be the sarcophagus with the Pope’s statue surrounded
by four other figures all double life-size, and in addition to these, on the
same level, six colossal statues seated. Where the structure joined the wall,
there was to be a Chapel containing five figures which, being further from the
eye, were to be still larger than any of the others. The spaces between the
niches were to be filled with reliefs in bronze or marble.
As this plan
considerably exceeded the former one, both in size and in importance, the
artist was to receive 16,500 ducats, but the 3500 ducats already paid were to
be deducted from the sum; he bound himself to undertake no other large work
until this was finished.
During the
years from 1513-16 Michael Angelo devoted all his powers to this gigantic
undertaking. Sculpture was his favourite art; he used to say he had imbibed it
with his mother’s milk, because his grandmother was the wife of a stone mason ;
and, indeed, as we have seen in the roof of the Sistine Chapel, even in
painting he always thought as a sculptor.
The masterly
statues of the dying youth and the youth in fetters (the slaves) which are now
in the Louvre, were executed during this period. Four other statues intended
for the base of the monuments, gigantic figures of captives or conquered
warriors, crouching and writhing, and only roughly carved, are preserved in the Giardino Boboli at Florence (on the left of the
entrance). In the National Museum in that city, there is also the statue of a
victorious and triumphant warrior; and that of a vanquished one in St.
Petersburg.
The only one of
the statues designed for the upper storey that still exists, is the Moses begun
in the years 1513-1516, while the artist’s mind was still possessed and
dominated by the forms of the Prophets of the Sistine Chapel. This world-famed
statue, “the triumph of modern sculpture”, now adorns the monument of Julius II
in S. Pietro in Vincoli, where at last the tomb was
erected, though greatly reduced from the dimensions originally contemplated.
The gradual
curtailment of this noble design in which Michael Angelo had hoped to have
realised all his loftiest and grandest conceptions, and the money disputes with
the Duke of Urbino connected with this, were the occasion of such prolonged
misery, and such paroxysms of anger and disappointment to the artist as to make
this tomb the tragedy of his whole life. The monument as completed corresponds
with its original plan as little as it does with the first conception approved
by Julius II. But the magnificent effect of the statue of Moses compensates for
all its short-comings. The aspect in which Moses is here presented is that of
the fiery and resolute ruler of Israel, who led the stiff-necked nation for
forty years through the wilderness, who dared the wrath of God for their sakes,
and in his fury at their idolatry, dashed the Tables of the Law to pieces and
commanded 3000 of the rebels to be slain. The wise law-giver, the servant of
Jehovah, the humble penitent confessing himself unworthy to enter the promised
land, are entirely ignored in this essentially one-sided representation. The
artist conceives the teacher and captain of the chosen people exclusively as a
man of action like Julius II. The head is raised, the brow deeply furrowed, the
angry eyes are turned sideways towards the left, the whole frame almost writhes
under the shock of conflicting emotions. The very hairs of the long thick
beard, in which the finger tips of the right hand,
resting on the despised law, are halfconcealed, seem
to quiver. The strong pressure of the left hand against the breast seems
striving to keep down the rising storm. But the forward movement of the right
foot and the tension of the left leg drawn backward, are too significant; in
another moment the giant will have sprung from his seat to wreak his wrath on
the backsliders.
“Any one who has once seen this statue will never lose the
impression. The effect is as of one conscious that he holds in his hands the
thunderbolts of Omnipotence, and waiting to see whether the foes whom he means
to destroy will venture to attack him.” In fact, Michael Angelo’s Moses is the
embodiment of the Pope-king who humbled Venice, reconquered the States of the
Church, and drove the French out of Italy. The masterful vehemence and almost
superhuman energy of Julius II are admirably represented in this Titanic
figure; but none the less is it also a no less faithful transcript of the
sculptor’s own proud and unbending character, and impetuous, passionate
temperament.
Julius II’s
colossal monument was never completed, his bronze statue was destroyed; but the
indomitable spirit of the mighty Pope and the equally kingly soul of the great
sculptor have been carved into the Moses of Michael Angelo. As we gaze upon it
we understand the words of Ariosto, “Michel più che terreno, angel divino”
CHAPTER
X.
Raphael
in the Service of Julius II.—The Camera della Segnatura and the Stanza d’Eliodoro.
In Michael
Angelo’s creations nature found herself outdone by art. When she gave Raphael
to the world she saw herself eclipsed, not only in the artist but also in the
man; for he combined with the highest intellectual gifts the most winning
grace, industry, beauty, modesty, and a perfect life. With these words Vasari,
the father of modern historians of art, begins his description of the life of
one who will ever live in the memory of the world as at once the greatest
master of Christian Art and a genius of first-rate creative power.
Raphael was
endowed by nature with the sweetest of dispositions and great personal beauty.
Constitutionally, he was a true Umbrian, and his early works are pervaded by
the dreamy calm of the school in which he was reared, but unlike Michael Angelo
he possessed a singular power of absorbing and assimilating the most various
external impressions. His genius did not expand much until he came to Florence,
where Leonardi da Vinci and Fra Bartolomeo exercised a strong influence over
him. He arrived in Florence in 1504, and the April of 1508 found him still
working there. In the Autumn of that year, the twentysixth of his life, he appears in Rome. On the 8th September, 1508, he writes to his
friend the painter, Francesco Francia, to excuse his tardiness in sending him
his promised likeness. “On account of my many and important occupations,” he
says, “I was not able sooner to paint it myself, in accordance with our
agreement I could, indeed, have got one of my assistants to do it, and sent it
off thus; but that would not have been becoming, or rather, perhaps, it would
have been becoming, in order to shew that I do not paint as well as you do. I
beg you not to be hard upon me, for you, yourself, must have experienced what
it is to have lost one’s freedom, and have to serve a master”.
The many and
important occupations here mentioned were the great works in the Vatican with
which he had been charged by Julius Il.
The Pope had
left the Appartamento Borgia, in which he had spent
the first four years of his reign, on the 26th November, 1507, in order “not to
be pestered with reminiscences of Alexander VI” and established himself in another
part of the Vatican Palace. He had chosen for his future residence a suite of
rooms looking out on the Cortile di Belvedere, which had been built by Nicholas
V. These were situated in the vicinity of the same Pope’s study, which was
adorned with Fra Angelico’s wonderful frescoes. Perhaps this may have led
Julius II to wish to have the adjoining chambers decorated in the same manner.
These rooms the famous“ Stanze” (living rooms) are
the continuation of a spacious hall, the Sala di Costantino, which is only
lighted from one side. The Stanze, on the contrary,
have two large windows in each room facing each other with marble seats in
their bays. In the two first rooms these windows are opposite each other in the
East (Stanza dell’ Incendio), one is in the corner;
thus, the bad light, coupled with the intricacies of perspective created by the
irregular spaces, make the task of the painter an extremely difficult one. The
only really suitable surfaces for painting are the plain cross vaultings on the
ceiling. The shape of the rooms is oblong; their proportions are simple but
dignified. The doors by which the rooms communicate with each other are in the
corner at the end of the long walls, and are not large, so that on these sides
there is a long free space, semi-circular at the top, well fitted for large
historical compositions, while on the short side, cut up by the windows, there
is little room for anything.
These rooms
during the Autumn of 1508 presented a busy scene. In the Stanza dell’ Incendio, Perugino was painting the four round divisions of
the ceiling, filling up the interspaces with decorative designs. In the
adjoining Camera della Segnatura,
Raphael and Sodoma were at work together, the latter
having undertaken the ornamental work on the ceiling. In addition to these
artists the impatient Pope had got Luca Signorelli, Bramantino,
Bernardino Pinturicchio, Suardi, Lorenzo Lotto, and
the Fleming, Johann Ruysch, all variously occupied in
the upper storey. But this did not last long. In a very short time the Pope
perceived how completely the works of the other artists were eclipsed by
Raphael’s magnificent paintings in the Camera della Segnatura, and took his measures accordingly. The slight
mythological pictures with which Sodoma had begun to
adorn the ceiling were countermanded, and his work confined to the purely
decorative parts; all the serious pictures were given to Raphael, and before
long Perugino and Pinturicchio were also dismissed. The former returned to Perugio; Pinturicchio went to Siena, and never came back to
Rome. “Hard as this must have been for them they could not dispute the justice
of the Pope’s verdict, who had, indeed, fully appreciated the worth of what
they had accomplished in their best days.”
Raphael’s
paintings in the Camera della Segnatura,
which the world owes to the appreciative insight of Julius II, are the most
famous and the most interesting of all his creations. Though faded, and in many
ways damaged by the ravages of time, they are still the joy of all artists and
art-lovers. As long as ever a trace of them still remains, they will draw
pilgrims of every nationality to visit this shrine of Art.
The importance
of these frescoes is evinced by the amount of literature to which they have
given rise, and which will continue to increase, for they are as inexhaustible
as the heavens, in which new stars are being perpetually discovered.
In the four
principal divisions of the stuccoed ceiling, which is decorated in the
classical style, Raphael painted four female allegorical figures in large
circular frames, with descriptive inscriptions, supplying the clue to the
meaning of the series of pictures below. These majestic forms, enthroned on
clouds, are painted in vivid colours, toned down by a background of shimmering
gold, representing mosaic work.
The science of
faith, Theology, comprehends the knowledge of divine things (divinarum rerum notitia), as the inscription, borne by angels,
announces. The figure of Theology seems to have been suggested by Dante’s
Beatrice, the expression of the face is sweetly serious, gentle, and yet full
of dignity. The olive crown on the head denotes divine wisdom, the floating
veil is white, the mantle green, the robe red—the colours of the three
theological virtues, Faith, Hope, and Charity. The two principal sources of the
science of Theology are Tradition and Holy Scripture. She holds the sacred
volume in her left hand, and points with the other to the large picture on the
wall in which those to whom Tradition and knowledge have been committed are
represented assembled round the Supreme Mystery and Centre of Christian
worship.
The
representation of Poetry is even finer. Sweetness, sensibility, and enthusiasm
are exquisitely combined in the expression of the whole figure. In her right
hand she holds a book, in her left a lyre; her laurel crown indicates the fame
that waits upon art; her strong wings, her scarf strewn with stars, her azure
drapery, the thrill of emotion which pervades her whole form, denote the
imaginative faculty. The inspired eyes baffle description; altogether as the
scroll carried by the cherubs who attend upon her declares, the divine afflatus
is the breath of her being.
The next
figure, Philosophy, is treated classically and with a good deal of symbolism.
The side of the marble seat on which she is enthroned bears a relief of Diana
of Ephesus, copied from an antique model. Her robes represent the four
elements, Air in the upper garment, which is blue and sown with stars, the
drapery, symbolising Fire, is red and embroidered with salamanders, while Water
and Earth are represented, respectively, by fishes and plants on a sea-green
and an ochre-brown background. The clasp of the diadem which encircles her brow
is a carbuncle. She holds two large books in her hands, the one entitled “Moralis”, the other “Naturali”s,
moral and natural science, while the winged genii on either side carry tablets
with the inscription,“causarum cognitio”,
“knowledge of causes.”
The fourth
figure wears a crown: her sword and scales and the winged boy holding a scroll
with the inscription “Jus suum unicuique tribuit,” giving to each his due, leave no doubt as
to whom she is intended to represent. She has four attendants, two of whom are
angels.
In the long
pendentives of the vaulting, Raphael painted four smaller pictures encircled,
like the large ones, with richly decorated ornamental frames. In the one
adjoining Theology, the Fall is represented; it is perhaps the most beautiful
of all existing presentations of this scene. Next to Poesy is the crowning of
Apollo and the flaying of Marsyas; the judgment of
Solomon illustrates Justice. In these three pictures narrative takes the place
of symbolism, but in the one which accompanies Philosophy, Raphael reverts to
allegory. It is a female figure waited on by two genii carrying book ; she is
bending over a globe poised in the midst of a starry sphere, to which she
points with one hand.
The paintings
on the ceilings, being more out of reach of injury than the wall frescoes, are
in better preservation; the two series are closely connected with each other;
those on the walls representing the four great intellectual powers as they act
upon human life. Theology, unveiling the mysteries of revelation, and
interpreting the miracles of faith; Philosophy, searching out the causes and
natures of things by the light of reason; Poesy, decking life with grace and
beauty; Jurisprudence, maintaining social order and security. Nothing can be
more perfect than is the artistic presentation of this majestic cycle of the
intellectual forces in their graduated order, with Theology at the head.
For the picture
in illustration of Justice, Raphael chose one of the smaller wall spaces, cut
up and curtailed by the large window in the middle of it; it is the simplest of
all. In the semi-circle over the window the three cardinal virtues, Fortitude,
Prudence, and Temperance, the inseparable companions of Justice, are
allegorically represented by a charming group of three female figures. “The
skilful arrangement of the lines in this composition, the variety in the forms,
the unconstrained grace of the attitudes, are an inexhaustible source of
delight.” The pictures on the two sides of the window portray the institution
of Law in the State and in the Church, respectively. On the smaller left side,
the Emperor Justinian, seated on an antique chair, hands his Pandects to Trebonius, who is humbly kneeling before him.
On the right of the window, Gregory IX, whose features are those of Julius II,
gives the Decretals to the Advocate of the Consistory, who also kneels to
receive them. No doubt the giving of the Decretals was intentionally placed in
the ample space and treated with greater fulness to shew that the law of the
Church ranks higher than secular laws. These compositions contain a number of
admirably characteristic heads.
The glories of
Poesy are depicted on the opposite wall, also broken by a window looking into
the Cortile di Belvedere. Raphael here decided on painting a continuous
picture, and ingeniously overcame the difficulty presented by the window, by
making its circular top support the summit of Parnassus from which the sides of
the mountain naturally sloped downwards. On the height, the youthful Apollo
sits enthroned in a bower of laurels, surrounded with flowers, while the Hippocrene fountain wells up from beneath his feet.
A mere copyist
of the antique would have put a lyre into Apollo’s hands. But this was not
Raphael’s mind, and he has chosen the instrument most in use in his day, the
viola di braccio (alto), which allows a freer motion to the hand, and, at the
same time, was better understood by his contemporaries. The muses which are
grouped around Apollo also depart in many ways from strictly classical models,
though they are singularly charming and graceful. Immediately below them come
the great poets crowned with laurel; on the left of the God, Homer, “the king
of noble singers, soaring like an eagle above all his compeers,” stands in a
blue mantle, his head a little thrown back after the manner of blind people,
his face glowing with poetic inspiration, as he dictates his verses, which a
youth at his side is transcribing. Behind him is Dante, absorbed in
introspective thought, while Virgil is trying to draw his attention to Apollo’s
playing. The poetess Sappho designated by an inscription on the half-open roll
which she holds is also in a prominent place on the left. An aged poet on the
other side, opposite to her, to whom three others are listening admiringly, is
supposed to be Pindar. The two sitting figures in the foreground are “admirably
arranged in connection with the architectural lines, so as to make these latter
appear rather to sustain and give effect to the fresco than to cramp it. On the
other side the painted setting of the window is utilised as a support for
Sappho’s arm, who leans against it.”
This fresco has
been called the most perfect specimen of a genre painting that has ever been
produced. The spirit of music pervades the whole composition; one seems
actually to hear the music of Apollo and the song of Homer, and to share with
the delighted listeners the spell of sound which unites them all in one common
sense of perfect content.
The next
subject, which fills one of the long side-walls under the name of the School of
Athens, is of quite a different character from that of the blissful company of
poets assembled on Mount Parnassus. The predominant tone of feeling which
reigns throughout this imposing gathering of so many various schools and
masters is that of deep seriousness, laborious and indefatigable research. The
scene also is very different; instead of the laurel-shaded flowery mount of the
gods, we have a majestic fane, with a nave and transept surmounted by a cupola
and approached by a broad flight of steps. This temple is dedicated to Minerva
and Apollo, whose statues adorn the facade, in front of which a raised platform
in the middle distance runs slantwise across the whole picture.
In the
conception of this building, and also in the arrangement of some of the groups,
we seem to trace a reminiscence of one of Ghiberti’s reliefs in the Baptistery
at Florence. Down the long nave attended by a double band of disciples, the two
princes of the philosophers, Plato and Aristotle, are slowly moving towards the
top of the steps, on one of which the cynic Diogenes lazily reclines by
himself. Aristotle is represented as a man in the prime of life. He wears an
olive-green robe and grey-blue mantle and holds his Ethics in his hand. Plato
is a venerable old man with a large and lofty brow and ample white beard ; his
robe is of a greyish-violet and his mantle red ; he holds a book in his hand on
the back of which Timeo is written. They are occupied
in expounding their respective philosophies; Aristotle is pointing to the
earth, Plato to the heavens. On the right of these two prominent central groups
are several singularly beautiful isolated figures; one a youth writing
diligently, another an older scholar deep in thought, again close to the edge
of the picture an old man leaning on a staff, just entering, with a youth
hurrying after him.
On the left of
the centre Socrates stands with a knot of listeners surrounding him
(Dialecticians). He is numbering his propositions on his fingers and developing
the consequences. Opposite to him is a handsome youth in full armour with a golden
helmet, supposed to be Alcibiades. His features are copied from an antique gem
still to be seen in Florence. A man by his side is eagerly beckoning to three
others to join him. The foremost of these seems explaining why he is not so
eager as his companions to obey the call; in front of him a youth with an
armful of books rushes by in such haste that his golden-brown mantle is
slipping from his shoulders: the connection between the group and the
foreground is sustained by a number of persons assembled round the base of a
pillar against which a youth is leaning turning over the leaves of a book. In
the foreground to the right, not far from the grammarians, is an admirably
composed group representing the arithmeticians and musicians. An old man
(Pythagoras), supporting himself on one knee, is writing diligently, while on
his left a boy is holding a tablet on which the numbers and symbols of the
Pythagorean doctrine of harmonies are inscribed. An Asiatic and an aged man
with an inkstand and pen are standing f behind and at the side of the
philosopher, looking into his book over his shoulder. To the right of this
concentrated circle stands a young man in a long white garment embroidered with
gold, identified, by a not very trustworthy tradition, as Duke Francesco Maria della Rovere of Urbino. Before him appears a man in the
prime of life, one of the most striking personalities ever painted by Raphael,
eagerly expounding his discoveries and views out of a book. The last figure on
this side is strong contrast with him, a philosopher sitting motionless on the
lowest step, absorbed in thought, with pen in hand preparing to write.
The group of
geometricians and astrologers in the foreground on the right side is perhaps as
perfect a representation of the processes of thought and research, reading and
learning, listening and apprehending, as Raphael has ever produced. The
mathematician (at one time thought to be Archimedes, but now rightly held to be
Euclid) is a portrait of Bramante; he is bending low with a circle in his hand,
over a mathematical figure which he is explaining. There is hardly any group in
the whole fresco which is more dramatic and artistic than that of the four
fair-haired youths who surround this teacher. The foremost kneels, and with the
fingers of one hand follows the lines of the drawing which he is trying to
understand. The second youth shows in his eyes and by the movement of his hand
that light is beginning to dawn on him. The third has mastered the problem so
that he can now interpret it to the fourth, whose face beams with the joy of
apprehension. “The psychological process by which the mind passes from the external
sign to its meaning and thence to the internal cognition of the object, has
never elsewhere been so truthfully and vividly portrayed.’’
Adjoining this
group is a King (Ptolemy) with a terrestrial globe in his hands and another
figure (Zoroaster) with his head encircled by a gold band and carrying a
celestial globe. At the edge of the fresco, by the side of the votaries of the
sciences of the earth and heavens, Raphael has introduced a likeness of
himself, and one of his fellowartist, Sodoma.
A connecting
link between all these groups and the central one is formed by two men, the
older of whom is coming down from the platform, while the younger is mounting
the steps towards the two greatest teachers.
Beautiful and
interesting as each one of the numerous separate groups which make up the
picture is in itself, none can withdraw our attention for any length of time
from the splendid figures of Plato and Aristotle which dominate the whole
composition. The eye involuntarily and constantly turns back again to gaze on
the two great masters, the undisputed princes of the whole Academy. A flood of
light from the dome above bathes them in its radiance, a symbol of the heavenly
illumination which was the object of all their toil and its well-merited
reward.
Perhaps no
other work of art in existence has called forth so many various and conflicting
interpretations as has the School of Athens. There are almost as many opinions
as there are figures in the picture in which the artist strove to depict both
the loftiest aspirations and the multiform vagaries of the human mind. Critics
tried to put a name to each, and lost themselves in futile individualisations.
The only way to arrive at a satisfactory solution is to look at the composition
as a whole, and in the light of the general point of view of the time. If this
is done the fundamental idea becomes clear at once. Raphael intended to portray
the efforts of the human mind to discover and scientifically apprehend its own
highest object and final cause by the light of reason. The purpose of the
painter in this monumental work was to celebrate the praise of Philosophy in
the language of Art and from the points of view of his own age. It is possible,
and most probable, that he discussed the subject with his learned friends,
especially with Sadolet, and that he was influenced
by the works of Marsilio Ficino, and also by Dante
and Petrarch. But, essentially, there can be little doubt that his ideas of the
significance and development of ancient philosophy came from Urbino. In some
particulars, as in giving the highest place to Plato, he adopted the point of
view of the Renaissance, but in the main he retained the mediaeval conception.
In this, all knowledge that can possibly be attained by the human intellect
through the experience of the senses and the laws of thought, is comprised in
the seven liberal arts (artes liberals), Grammar,
Rhetoric and Logic (Dialectics) the so-called Trivium; and Music, Arithmetic,
Geometry, and Astronomy—the Quadrivium. Raphael’s composition is entirely
founded on the idea of Philosophy as the sum of the seven liberal arts.
Plato and
Aristotle represent the highest achievements of the human intellect in its
efforts to understand and know the substance of all things; truth came to them
in flashes like lightning at night; but although these intellectual athletes
accomplished as much as it is given to the natural powers of man to work out,
they could not obtain to the full possession of the highest truth. On one point
all the great thinkers of antiquity, and even Plato, the philosopher of
immortality, were at fault; they had no true conception of sin, of the nature
and origin of evil. Thus, Greek philosophy was powerless to heal the deadly
wound of the ancient world. “Philosophy”, says Vincent de Beauvais in his great
Encyclopaedia, “can work the way up to a natural theology, but not to the true
science of theology. That could only come from revelation in the Bible and,
through its interpreters, the great theological teachers.” This distinction between
the realms of natural and supernatural theology is to be found in all the great
Catholic thinkers. Thus Dante makes Beatrice say that the difference between
human knowledge and Divine faith is as great as the distance between heaven and
earth.
Therefore,
Raphael chose the highest object of supernatural lore for the subject of his
fresco on the opposite wall to the School of Athens, which represents the
triumphs of human reason. But it must not be supposed that either the immortal
masters of mediaeval theology, or Dante, the greatest of Christian poets, or
Raphael, the most gifted of Christian artists, were conscious of any opposition
between Theology and Philosophy. As the Church grew to realise her plenary and
imperishable possession of revealed truth through Christianity, her early
Fathers and Doctors quickly understood that the wisdom of the Greeks was far
more her heritage than that of the heathen, and was to be employed in the
service and thus became itself purified and elevated to a far higher dignity.
The scholastics continued to build in the same spirit on the foundations laid
by the Fathers, and thus that system of Christian and Catholic science grew up,
of which S. Thomas Aquinas and S. Bonaventure are the noblest representatives.
“This science was Catholic in the fullest sense of the word, not only because
it was moulded on, and guided by Divine truth, infallibly preserved and interpreted
by the Church, but because it gathered to itself the legitimate and stable
conquests of research in all ages, because it was common to all nations in
communion with the Church, and because it aimed at the union of all truth,
natural and supernatural, in one perfect science ”
In the fourth
great fresco, Raphael wisely abstained from attempting to depict all or even
the principal mysteries and miracles unveiled by revelation and confined
himself to one, the mystery of mysteries and supreme miracle of all.
The name “Disputa del Sacramento” given to this picture, “which
affects the spectator almost like a heavenly vision,” and was Raphael’s first
great work in Rome, has been rather an obstacle than a help to the
understanding of its purport. There is no strife or disputation here; on the
contrary heaven and earth unite together in adoring and praising the miracle of
miracles, the supreme pledge of His love bestowed on man by the Saviour of the
World. The spectator seems to hear the solemn strains of the Tantum ergo
breathing as it were out of the picture itself.
The
representation of the Holy Trinity, conceived in the old mediaeval reverent
manner, occupies the centre of the upper part of the fresco. God the Father is
seen in the highest heaven in a sea of golden rays thronged with floating
angels, as if the painter’s imagination revelled in the thought of the
multitudes of happy spirits in that realm of peace and bliss. On each side, on
the edges of the clouds which encircle this region of light, three angels soar
in flowing drapery. As Creator and Preserver, the Father holds the globe in His
left hand, while the right hand is raised in blessing. Immediately below Him,
in the actual centre of the heavens, is the glorified form of the only begotten
Son (Rex gloriae). Perhaps this is the most beautiful
representation of the Saviour that has ever been created. He is enthroned on
clouds filled with angel-faces. His divinity beams forth in a golden halo
melting into a semi-circle of blue sky out of which cherubs are looking down.
His head is slightly bent and the wounded hands are stretched forth graciously
and lovingly, inviting all men to His banquet. His shining garment leaves the
wound in His side uncovered. On His left hand, S. John the Baptist .its pointing
to the “Lamb of God who taketh away the sins of the world,” on the right, His
Blessed Mother bends adoringly towards him with folded hands pressed to her
bosom.
The “patricians
of this most just and pious empire,” as Dante calls them, are ranged in a
semi-circle spread underneath and stretching upwards to embrace the two sides
of the central group. They, too, are enthroned on a cloud from which angel
faces look out. “For the grouping of the Divine Persons, Raphael went back to
the traditional type, but the arrangement of these figures is all his own and
is admirable for its perfect proportions and its clearness. He mixes the
representatives of the old covenant with the heroes of the new, and places
these latter in a certain way in accordance with their rank in the hierarchy of
the Saints : Apostles with sacred writers, ancestors of Christ together with
martyrs, the former in a chronological sequence according to the age in which
they lived. Those who sit on the same level on opposite sides are always in
some way connected with each other.” In his selection of the Saints and their
juxtaposition, Raphael was guided partly by the prayer in the mass and partly
by Dante.
The series of
the elect begins on the left side with S. Peter. The teacher and guardian of
the Faith appears as a venerable old man holding in one hand a book and in the
other the keys; his eyes are fixed upon his Master and God, who has appointed
him to be His Vicar on earth, with an expression of unbounded trustfulness.
Adam is next him, turning a thoughtful gaze towards him as though musing on the
story of sin and redemption.
Those
highest in bliss,
The
twain, on each hand next our Empress throned,
Are
as it were two roots unto this rose.
He
to the left, the parent, whose rash taste
Proves
bitter to his seed ; and on the right,
That
ancient father of the Holy Church,
Into
whose keeping Christ did give the keys
Of
this sweet flower.
—Dante,
Close to, and
strongly contrasting with the mighty ancestor of the human race, is the gentle
and youthful form of S. John, who is writing his Gospel. David by his side,
with crown and harp, is reading in the book the history which fulfilled his Old
Testament prophecies. Next comes S. Lawrence, the joyous and heroic
martyr-deacon; he wears a golden star on his breast and points to the
theologians assembled below, round the Blessed Sacrament. Turning towards him
is a figure, probably Jeremias, which is almost hidden by the central group and
thus indicates that the circle behind it is unbroken.
On the right
side, the series begins with the other pillar of the Church, S. Paul. The
energetic pose of the figure and the strength and size of the sword on which it
leans suggest both his martyrdom and the characteristic power of his doctrine.
“The word of God is living and effectual, and more piercing than any two-edged
sword” (Heb., IV. 12). Next to him sits Abraham with the knife in his hand
preparing to sacrifice Isaac. After him comes S. James the less, absorbed in
thought, holding a book, then Moses with the tables of the Law, and next to him
S. Stephen. The first martyr holds a palm in his hand; he rests his arm on the
Book of the Faith which he confessed, and gazing upwards seems to repeat the
words which he uttered as he stood before the Council, filled with the Holy
Ghost: “Behold I see the heavens opened, and the Son of man standing on the
right hand of God.’ Again, on this side, half-lost behind the group of the
Saviour and next to the martyr, stands one of the heroes of the old Covenant in
the dress of a warrior, probably Judas Maccabaeus.
The relation
between the Heavenly Paradise and the Church on earth is symbolised by the
descending Dove, the Holy Ghost, attended by four cherubs, each of whom carries
an open Gospel in his hands. The divinity of the Holy Ghost is indicated by the
halo which surrounds the Dove; the graces He bestows by the golden beams which
radiate from its body. The undermost rays are
prolonged to lead the eye to the monstrance with the Sacred Host, Christ in the
Eucharist, the end and crown of all theological science.
A wide stretch
of open country forms the background of the lower part of the picture. To the
right in the plain are the massive remains of an ancient building. On an
eminence to the left somewhat further off, workmen are busy on an extensive
edifice which is in course of construction.
In the
foreground of the picture a balustrade on each side corresponds with the two
buildings which flank the landscape in the background. The middle is left free
so as to concentrate the attention on the central point, towards which all the
figures below turn, and on which the golden rays from the symbolical Dove
descend.
Neither the
altar nor the monstrance are allowed to appeal in any way to the eye. The
monstrance is of the simplest character, the altar is almost without ornament,
there are not even candles on the super-altar; on the altarcloth is the monogram of Julius II. But there is the Blessed Sacrament; the smallest
thing in the whole picture, yet under the form of bread the Godhead lies
hidden, the one thing which, next to the Christ in heaven, draws our gaze to
Itself, and rivets it there. The Holy Trinity rests immediately above the
Sacred Host in which it is contained. All the saints in heaven and the legions
of angels seem only to become visible for the one purpose of honouring the
supreme mystery of earth; the “Bread of Life”, appears as the meeting-point in
which the two spheres are united. On both sides, as though taking the place of
the altar lights, stand the Doctors and Saints of the Church, Popes and
Cardinals, secular and regular Priests, Scholars and Artists. “All are occupied
with the miracle on the altar; some are lost in adoring wonder, some in deep
thought, others absorbed in earnest conversation. This is the human part of the
picture; here we find the most animated groups, figures full of emotion in the
intense efforts of the mind to grasp and understand. Nevertheless, all these
various expressions and characters are blended into a whole of perfect harmony
and beauty. The scope of the picture stretches out far beyond its immediate
subject; we see the long ages of humanity straining after knowledge, embodied
in these venerable fathers striving through the abysses of religious thought to
attain to clear insight. And yet over all broods the spirit of heavenly calm,
the peace of the sanctuary.”
On three sides
broad steps lead up to the altar, and thus facilitate a natural and varied
arrangement of the groups and figures comprised in this happy company, to whom
it has been granted to draw near to the Holiest, the source of all
enlightenment and knowledge. On the two sides of the altar are stationed the four
greatest Fathers of the Western Church; on the left, S. Jerome and S. Gregory
I; on the right, S. Ambrose and S. Augustine. They are seated to denote their
office as teachers, while all the other saints are standing. S. Jerome is in
the dress of a Cardinal, the lion is at his feet, by his side his letters and
translation of the Bible, on his knee a book in which he is reading with an
expression of strenuous attention on his face. An aged Bishop, standing close
against the altar in a green cope embroidered with gold, is turning towards
him, and with a countenance beaming with trust and faith, stretches out both hands
towards the monstrance. Next to S. Jerome, S. Gregory the Great, in full pontificals, is seated on an antique Roman episcopal chair;
he appears to have been reading, but now turns from his book to gaze with a
wistful expression on the symbol of the Holy Ghost, which Paul the Deacon once
saw floating over this saint’s head.
On the right
side, close to the altar, an old man, in a philosopher’s robe of a blue colour,
not specially designated in any way, stands turning towards S. Ambrose and
pointing with his right hand to heaven. The Saint is looking upwards, his hands
raised in adoring wonder, and his lips parted as though just beginning to intone
his hymn of praise. Next to him is the noble figure of S. Augustine, the
favourite author of the Christian humanists, dictating his confessions to a
kneeling youth; his best-known work, “ the City of God,” lies at his feet.
To the right of
SS. Ambrose and Augustine, both in episcopal dress, stand S. Thomas Aquinas and
two prominent figures, one a Pope, the other a Cardinal. The first of these is
probably Innocent III, the author of the well-known works on the Holy Mass;
while the Cardinal, who wears the Franciscan habit, is undoubtedly S.
Bonaventure the Seraphic Doctor. Another Pope, in a robe of gold brocade, stands
at the foot of the altar-step. His features are those of Sixtus IV, Julius II’s
uncle. The books in his hand and at his feet shew that he was a voluminous
writer. Behind Sixtus IV the head of Dante appears crowned with a wreath of
laurels.
On the extreme
right side of the fresco there are a considerable number of figures, the
foremost of whom is leaning over the balustrade with eyes fixed on the altar.
Another man with a beard, in a yellow tunic and blue mantle, evidently a
philosopher, points to Sixtus IV, as to an accredited exponent of the mystery.
A similar order
is observed on the left side. Next to S. Gregory the Great is a beautiful group
of three youths kneeling in adoration, while a man in a yellow mantle points to
the writings of the Fathers of the Church lying on the ground beside them.
Behind this group are two very striking heads of Bishops, and beyond them four
religious, a Benedictine Abbot, an Augustinian, a Franciscan, and a Dominican,
conversing together. This group, no doubt, is intended to indicate the large
share which the religious orders have had in the building up of the scholastic
theology. The corresponding figure on the opposite side to that of Sixtus IV is
a noble youth with flowing golden hair, he is gently, but very earnestly trying
to persuade three men to follow the example of the kneeling youths. The leader
of these less advanced believers is an older man, who is supporting himself
against the balustrade, and seems appealing to some sentence in an open book
which he holds in his hand. The background is filled with other heads, all more
or less interesting, amongst them that of Fra Angelico in blissful contemplation;
the theological painter on this side answers to the theological poet on the
other. The mystery of the Holy Eucharist is not only the highest study of
doctors and theologians, it is also the inspiration of poets and artists; it is
the focus of Christian life, the food and the strength of all Christian souls.
O Godhead hid,
devoutly I adore Thee
Who truly art within
the forms before me;
To Thee my
heart I bow with bended knee,
As failing
quite in contemplating Thee.
Sight, touch,
and taste in Thee are each deceived;
The ear alone
most safely is believed :
I believe all
the Son of God has spoken,
Than truth’s
own word there is no truer token.
Thy wounds, as
Thomas saw, I do not see ;
Yet Thee
confess my Lord and God to be,
Make me believe
Thee ever more and more;
In Thee my
hope, in Thee my love to store.
Jesu ! whom for
the present veil’d I see
What I so
thirst for, oh, vouchsafe to me;
That I may see
thy countenance unfolding,
And may be
blest Thy glory in beholding.
Amen
“Here we have
not a commemoration of Christ, we have Christ Himself. What we are here adoring
is not one of the mysteries of His life, it is the sum of all these mysteries,
the God-man Himself, the crown, the consummation and the comer stone of all his
illuminating, grace-bestowing and redemptive work; it is the source of all
graces, a sea of graces, the way to glory, and glory itself. All the treasures
of nature and creation, all the miracles of grace and redemption, all the
glories of heaven meet in this Sacrament, the centre of the universe. It is
from here that those streams of grace flow East, West, North and South, which
fertilise the whole realm of the Church; this is the source from which beams the
sevenfold radiance of the Sacraments All the virtues blossom around this spring
of grace, all creatures draw the waters of salvation from this well. This is
the living heart whose pulsations give life to the Church, here heaven touches
earth which has become the dwelling place of God.”
But the Holy
Eucharist is also a Sacrifice; the artist has marked this aspect of it by
showing the glorified Saviour with His wounds in heaven immediately above the
Sacred Host. Without both the Sacrament and the Sacrifice the life of the
Church would perish; without the mysteries of Faith, theology would lose all
its efficacy. Thus, all the votaries of Christian science gather round this
most precious jewel, the supreme token of God’s infinite power and mercy, in
glad and grateful adoration. Again the Holy Eucharist is the bond of union
between the militant and the triumphant Church. “It is the mysterious chain
reaching from God in heaven down to the dust of the earth”; it brings heaven
down to earth, and raises earth to heaven. The Master has symbolically
expressed this in two ways, by raising the Sacred Host above the heads of all
the assembly of the faithful who surround It, and by the descending rays of the
Holy Ghost which come down from heaven to rest upon It As the Spirit of Charity
He descends from the empyrean heaven of calm and bliss into the world to bring
it the sacrament of love; as the spirit of truth, in the same act, He brings
the highest enlightenment and knowledge of God. Thus He appears as the
intermediary between the glorified humanity of Christ in heaven and Christ in
the Holy Eucharist under the form of bread. The artist secures the connection
between the upper and lower halves of the picture by a symbolism in which he
also expresses the doctrines of the Catholic Faith.
“The glorified
humanity of Christ under the form of bread constitutes the bond of union
between the world below and the blessed above, whose joy and blessedness
consist in the contemplation of the same glorified humanity unveiled in heaven.
Christ here, hidden under the form of bread; Christ there, “fairest amongst the
sons of men, seen as He is, one and the same Christ yesterday and today. The
identity of the glorified body of the Lord on earth and in heaven is the link
which joins the two parts of the picture into one whole.” Below we have faith,
above, sight.
This
magnificent creation can only be rightly understood from the point of view of
the Catholic faith, and those to whom this is a sealed book must necessarily go
astray in their attempts to decipher its meaning. This consideration alone
explains the fault found by some able art-critics with the composition of the
picture, because neither of the two halves preponderates in mass or importance
over the other. From the point of view from which the fresco is conceived this
very fact is one of its chief merits, for it is intended to represent the truth
so strongly emphasised by all the great theologians, and especially by S.
Thomas Aquinas, that the Sacred Host is essentially the Sacrament of Union.
The same Christ
appears in heaven above and in the Blessed Sacrament on earth below. The whole
court of heaven is gathered round the Incarnate Son of God in his character of
Victim. In the picture, even God the Father and the Holy Ghost are only there,
so to speak, on account of Him. What is seen below is the same as that which
appears above; the only difference is that on earth the great mystery is an
object of Faith, hidden under a visible symbol. But in the symbol, the
Incarnate Son of God is contained, and, consequently, in virtue of the unity of
the Godhead, the Father also and the Holy Ghost, and with them the whole
company of angels and saints.
Joy
past compare, gladness unutterable,
Imperishable
life of peace and love,
Exhaustless
riches and unmeasured bliss.
—Dante
Thus the Disputa represents the supreme, the absolutely
perfect unity; above, the apotheosis of all the love and life of the old and
new covenants in the vision of Him who is the Triune God; below, the
glorification of all human knowledge and art is the faith in the real presence
of the Redeemer in the Most Holy Sacrament. This is the central force which
impels and harmonises all the powers of heaven and earth; all the waters of
life above as well as below the firmament well up from this source, and pulsate
“as in a spherical vessel from centre to circle, and so back from circle to
centre.”
There is no
other work of Raphael’s for which so many preparatory studies and outlines seem
to have been made by the artist as for this one; the well-known sketches at
Windsor, Oxford, the Louvre, Frankfort and Vienna, bear witness to the
conscientious industry which he bestowed on this great composition, refusing to
be content with anything short of his very best.
These
preliminary studies are the only materials that we have for the history of the
production of the frescoes in the Camera della Segnatura; Jovius merely
mentions that Raphael painted this Stanza by order of Julius II, and an
inscription states that they were finished in the year 1511. A marvellously
short space of time when we consider that the artist could not have begun his
work till the late Autumn of 1508, and had besides to master the technique of
fresco painting. The subjects of the pictures were selected by Julius II, but
for the details of their treatment no doubt the young artist consulted many of
the learned men then in Rome; and it is a mistake to exaggerate their influence
to such an extent as to make it appear that in his frescoes he merely carried
out the programme traced for him by a committee of scholars.
In the
Parnassus, humanistic conceptions are clearly traceable. It is thought by some
that the influence of Christian humanism is perceptible in the Disputa, but it is more probable that all the most
useful suggestions for this picture would have come to Raphael from the
official theologians of the Papal Court, the Dominicans. Though Humanists were
by no means excluded from the Vatican circle the old mystical and scholastic
theology of the Dominicans as formulated in the Summa of S. Thomas still held
its place there as the recognised system. Raphael represents the teaching of S.
Thomas Aquinas idealised by his art.
The widespread
acquaintance with mystical theology in those days, in artistic circles quite as
much as elsewhere, is an element in the Art of the time which has not been at
all sufficiently appreciated or understood, nor yet another point connected
with this, namely, the almost universal familiarity with the Liturgy of the
Church. We find the proof of this amongst the Latin races of the present day,
where the common people know and readily follow the Liturgical offices of the
Church. In his picture of the Transfiguration, Raphael exactly follows the
Office for the Feast (6th August). It is not too much to say that he was
already perfectly acquainted with the Office of the Blessed Sacrament, as
compiled by S. Thomas Aquinas, and that in any consultations with Dominican theologians,
the knowledge which he already possessed made it easy for him at once to grasp
and follow whatever thoughts they suggested. A letter of his of the year 1514
shows that he was acquainted with Dominicans, and had received assistance from
them. He was then employed in building S. Peter’s, and in his letter he says
that the Pope had given him the learned Dominican, Fra Giocondo da Verona to help him, and impart to him any secrets of architecture that were
known to him, “in order,” Raphael adds, “that I may perfect myself in the Art.”
The Pope sends for us every day to talk for a while about the building. This
shows the way in which artists worked together in the Vatican; and we may well
assume that the same sort of thing went on in regard to the series of pictures
in the Camera della Segnatura.
Now we come to
the question of the use to which this room, by the Pope’s command, so
magnificently and at the same time so seriously and thoughtfully decorated, was
to be put? Here, too, we can only guess. A recent historian has put forward the
following hypothesis, which seems a highly probable one. It is certain that the
division of all the activities of the human mind into the four branches of
Theology, Philosophy, Poetry and Jurisprudence was the Pope’s idea. He was not
a learned man, and would have proposed nothing but what was simple and obvious.
Now this division exactly corresponds with the plan proposed by Nicholas V, the
first of the papal Maecenas, for the arrangement of his library, and which was
in vogue at that time for libraries generally throughout Italy. Pietro Bembo, in a letter written in February, 1513, mentions the
private library of Julius II, which, though containing fewer volumes than the
large Vatican library, was superior to it both in the value of the books, and
in its fittings; he especially praises its convenient situation, its splendid
marble friezes, its paintings, and the seats in the windows. From a
contemporaneous work by Albertini on the objects of interest in Rome, and from
a payment, connected with it, we gather that this library was in an upper
storey of the Vatican, and was richly decorated. When we remember that in those
days books were not kept in book-shelves fixed against the wall, but in
detached presses (as in the Laurentian library in Florence), there would be no
difficulty in supposing that the Camera della Segnatura was intended to receive the private library
of Julius II. The number of books represented in the various frescoes also
makes for this hypothesis. All the allegorical figures on the ceiling hold
books in their hands, except Justice, who carries the sword and scales. Angels
float down from heaven, bringing the Gospels, the most venerated books of the
Christians, to the faithful. The four Fathers of the Church on either side of
the Blessed Sacrament are all either reading or writing books. Books lie about
on the ground, and nearly all the figures, both lay and clerical, to whom names
can be assigned, are identified by means of books. All the votaries of the Muses
in Parnassus hold rolls or writings in their hands; and in the School of Athens
there is hardly a figure that is not provided with a book or tablets. All are
composing, writing, reading, expounding, so that nothing that has to do with
the processes and products of authorship is left without sensible
representation in some form. Even the two great philosophers are only
designated by their most famous books. The Pope holds a book containing the
laws of the Church, and Justinian is represented with his celebrated Pandects. In the monochromes under the Parnassus, on
one side books are being discovered in a marble sarcophagus, and on the other
books are being burnt. There is no other series of paintings in the world in
which literature takes so prominent a place; almost everything in some way
refers to it.”
It seems as if
in the supposition that this room was intended to contain the Pope’s private
library, we ought also to include a further one, namely, that Julius II meant
besides that, to make it his study and business chamber, which the name Camera della Segnatura (chamber for signatures) seems to imply. “These paintings were to form the
adornment of the room in which the Head of the Church was to sign the papers
and provisions drawn up for the good of the Church. Theology and Philosophy,
Poetry and Law, representing revealed truth, human reason, beauty and Christian
order, were to preside from the walls over his decisions and their final
sanction.’’
But whatever
view may be adopted as to the distinction of the Camera della Segnatura, there should not be any doubt as to
the meaning and connection of the frescoes in it. An utterly unfounded theory
has been recently put forward, and stoutly defended, that these frescoes
represent “the humanistic ideal of free thought, and were intended as a
monumental expression of the achievements of the unaided human intellect.” Far
from doing homage to the Church and the Papacy, their purpose is declared to be
“to exhibit the superiority of free thought and investigation apart from
revelation in matters of religion to the ecclesiasticism of the time”.
In all these
suppositions modern ideas are imported into the age of Raphael, and a single
glance at the frescoes ought to show how untenable they are But it may be asked
whether the devotion of an equal space to the glorification of Philosophy with
that which is given to Theology does not indicate an approach to the
anti-ecclesiastical spirit of the heathen Renaissance? The answer is that this
view is excluded by Raphael himself in the manner in which he treats the two
subjects. In the first place, there is a tone of solemnity in the Disputa which distinguishes it from all the other
frescoes, and its arrangement, being divided into two halves, one heavenly and
the other earthly, is quite different from that of any other. Again, in the
composition of the School of Athens there is no parallel to that concentration
on a single central point, dominating and animating the whole, which we find in
the Disputa. Plato and Aristotle appear as the
greatest of the philosophers, each attended by a separate band of disciples;
each represent a different point of view. The various philosophical schools are
all more or less distinctly divided from each other, and their independence
and exclusiveness is marked on the left side of the picture by the separate
stone seats occupied by the different teachers. Finally, there is a striking
difference also in the scene of the picture. “Here we see no opening heaven
shewing a Divine victim, the Redeemer of the world; no supernatural ray
descends on earth to enlighten the human intelligence”. Here, as the
inscription above denotes, the human intellect wrestles alone with the nature
of things, striving after knowledge. Plato, the philosopher of natural
theology, signifies its incompetence by pointing upwards. By placing the Disputa opposite, Raphael emphasises the contrast
between it and this intellectual laboratory. Here truth is laboriously sought
for, there it is seen embodied and perfect, and in a perfection unlike anything
that the ancient world ever dreamed of as possible, a fulness beyond all human
thought or imagination, such as could only have been conceived by the boundless
love of the Saviour of mankind who chose under the simple form of bread to
remain with his own, even to the consummation of the world.”
In another way
also the artist marked the relation between the sciences and the Church from
his point of view, namely in the Grisailles or imitation bas-reliefs painted in
monochrome, which fill the space underneath the two sides of the Parnassus.
“The two doors at the end of the long sides of the room open immediately
against the wall and then these grisailles are the first things to catch the
eye on entering the room and the last to be looked at on leaving it. This,
therefore, was the most suitable place for the prologue and epilogue of the
whole series expressing their general idea and purport”. Although these reliefs
are some of Raphael’s best and most finished work, they remained for a long
time little observed or understood. It is only quite recently that the
attention they deserve has been bestowed upon them, and that it has been
discovered that the painter intended them to illustrate, in the person of
Sixtus IV, Julius II’s uncle, the attitude of the Papacy towards the true and
the false learning. The burning of the books was perfectly intelligible to
Raphael’s contemporaries, for the censorial edicts of 1491 and 1501 must
certainly have been in force in Rome as well as elsewhere.
Thus it is clear
that far from being intended to serve as a glorification of the false
humanistic ideal, the purpose of the frescoes in the Camera della Segnatura was to
illustrate the four great intellectual forces, Theology, Philosophy, Poetry,
and Jurisprudence in their relation to the Church. It was in the alliance with
intellectual culture that the Church and the Papacy had won all their
beneficent victories and consolidated their power. It was this alliance, the
true connection between intellectual culture and Christendom and the Church,
which was celebrated in Raphael’s picture. The Holy See had always maintained
that secular knowledge could only attain its highest perfection under the
guidance of the organ of Divine wisdom, the Church, by whose authority alone it
could be preserved from errors and distorted growths. Like all the artistic
undertakings of Julius II, the frescoes in the Camera della Segnatura are a development, not only of the
designs of the great Popes of the early Renaissance, Nicholas V and Sixtus IV,
but also of the ancient traditions of the Papacy itself. The grand and simple
fundamental idea in them all belongs to Julius II; the genius displayed in
realising it in Art is Raphael’s and has helped to immortalise the painter’s
name. In this wonderful poem in four cantos, painted on the walls of the Stanze, the artist spreads out before us the whole and vast
regions of human knowledge and achievement as seen from the point of view of
the Church, and in the light of revelation. “All material things are presented
as mirrored in and vivified by a creative spirit which is at once poetical and
real”, while “the reproduction of the life of the classical world is combined
in perfect harmony with the dearest and deepest apprehension of Christian
principles. And all the abstract thought is bathed in an atmosphere of beauty
and grace which yet never detracts from the grave and intellectual character of
the pictures”. One is glad to think that one of the saddest passages in the
Pope’s life may have been soothed in a measure by the sight of these frescoes.
On the 27th of
June, 1511, he had returned to his capital powerless and ill and harassed with
anxieties, both political and ecclesiastical. On the eve of the Feast of the
Assumption Michael Angelo’s roof-paintings in the Sistine had been unveiled.
The frescoes in the Camera della Segnatura must have been completed very soon after
this, as the inscription states that they were finished in the eighth year of
Julius II’s Pontificate, and this closed on the 26th of November, 1511.
The
surpassingly admirable manner in which Raphael had executed the Pope’s first
commission, determined Julius to entrust the painting of the next room, called
from the subject of its chief fresco the Stanza d’Eliodoro,
to him also. While these large works were in progress Raphael also executed
several smaller commissions for easel-pictures, amongst others some for Julius
II, one of which was a Madonna for Su Maria del Popolo, the favourite church of the Rovere. Unfortunately,
this picture has disappeared since the year 1615. From copies of it we see that
it represents the waking from sleep of the Divine child. The Madonna is holding
up the veil which had covered him, and looks thoughtfully down at her son while
he stretches his little arms towards her. S. Joseph is in the background leaning
on a staff. He also ordered a portrait of himself for the same church. Vasari
praises this picture as being such an excellent likeness that it inspires as
much awe as if the Pope himself were present, and it still gives one the
impression of being a characteristic portrait. The Pope is sitting in an
armchair, his smooth, almost white, beard falls over a red velvet cape which he
wears over his shoulders, and the expression of his face is thoughtful and
care-worn. Many copies of this picture were taken almost immediately. Florence
possesses two, one in the Uffizi and the other in the Palazzo Pitti, but critics are not agreed as to which is the
original.
Raphael also
executed a likeness of the Pope’s favourite, Cardinal Alidosi.
It is difficult
to understand how the artist could have found time to paint so many other
pictures in addition to all his work for the Pope. There is quite a long list
of exquisite Madonnas, all bearing dates falling
within the reign of Julius II. The markedly religious tone in all the pictures
of this period is noteworthy.
This is
specially the case in the two wonderfully beautiful Madonnas painted by him in the last year of the Pontiffs life; the Madonna di Foligno, now in the Vatican gallery, and the Madonna del Pesce. Like the Stanza d’Eliodoro both these pictures bear marks of the influence of Sebastiano del Piombo: Raphael made no secret of his admiration for the
style of this master. The Madonna di Foligno was a
votive picture ordered by Julius II’s secretary and friend, Sigismondo de’
Conti, who is represented in it kneeling with folded hands before the Queen of
Heaven. “She is enthroned on a cloud encircled with a golden glory and attended
by angels.” It is the ideal of what a Christian Altarpiece should be, and is in
perfect preservation, its colours as brilliant as when it was first painted.
The Madonna del Pesce, now in the Museum at Madrid, is also a perfect
gem of religious art. It was a thankoffering for the
cure of an affection of the eyes. In depth of expression it is rightly judged
to be one of Raphael’s masterpieces, if, indeed, it is not in this respect, and
also in the harmony of its colouring, the most beautiful of all his works. “The
brilliant red of S. Jerome’s robe is enhanced in its effect by the brownish
yellow of the lion at the feet and the more orange tint of Tobias’ tunic, and
these two shades combine harmoniously with the subdued ruby tones of the
Angel’s dress. These warm colours are tempered by the blue of the Virgin’s
mantle, while this again is relieved by the tender carnations of the infant
Christ; and the sage green curtain in the background makes all the figures
stand out as in a brilliant light. The Madonna del Pesce might be designated as a chord of the three primary colours.”
The colossal
Isaias, attended by two angels, which is now in the church of S. Agostino in
Rome was painted by Raphael for another member of the Papal Court, the German
Prelate, John Goritz.
Raphael also
executed some paintings in the corridors leading from the Vatican to the
Belvedere, but they have all perished, and there is no record of their
subjects. All we know of them is from an account which shows that he received a
payment for work done there.
All this time
his work in the Stanza d’Eliodoro was never interrupted,
but he was obliged to avail himself largely of the assistance of his pupil
Giulio Romano.
Baldassare
Peruzzi had already finished the decoration of the ceiling of this room and
painted scenes from the Old Testament in the four divisions of the vaulting.
Raphael retained these decorations without any alteration, and set to work at
once on the walls. The Pope died before this Stanza was completed, and it is
not recorded whether the selection of the subjects in the frescoes was his. It
seems, however, extremely probable that this was the case, as the first of the
series and the one that is most carefully finished, is the so-called Mass of Bolsena, and Julius and his family had shown a special
interest in the incident which it commemorates.
It represents a
miracle which occurred at Bolsena in the year 1263,
and created an immense impression at the time. A German priest had been greatly
tormented with doubts as to the truth of the doctrine of Transubstantiation,
and had earnestly prayed for a sign that should dispel them. His prayer was
granted in the church of Sta Cristina at Bolsena,
where he had stopped in the course of a pilgrimage to Rome. While he was saying
Mass there, at the moment of consecration, drops of Blood oozed from the Sacred
Host in sufficient quantity to stain the Corporal. This miracle constituted one
of the motives which had determined Urban IV to institute the Feast of Corpus
Christi. By his orders the relic was brought to Orvieto, and the splendid
Cathedral there was built mainly for it. The Bishop of Orvieto gave a
magnificent silver tabernacle, ornamented with twelve pictures in enamel,
representing the history of the miracle, to contain the relic. In 1477 Sixtus
IV granted various Indulgences to promote the veneration of the relic and the
building of the Cathedral. Julius II when staying at Orvieto on his first
expedition against Bologna had manifested great reverence for this relic.
Probably it was on this occasion that the Pope determined to have the miracle
represented at some time in the Vatican, and it is not unlikely that he bound himself by a vow to honour the relic in some special
manner. Now that all that had then been won seemed lost, he may have remembered
this promise.
Raphael’s sympathetic
grasp of his patron’s thought is as striking as the power with which he gives
artistic expression to the Pope’s indomitable confidence in the Divine
assistance, and firm conviction that all pusillanimous doubters will be put to
shame. In this picture the difficulties to be overcome in the shape of the
space at his disposal were even greater than those which he had to conquer in
the Parnassus, and here as there he triumphed over all and turned his
limitations into additional beauties. There is no trace of any sort of
constraint, and the composition of the picture arranges itself quite
naturally, over and on each side of the window which cuts into the wall. Above
its arch is the choir of a church with its altar, approached on each side by a
broad flight of steps. In this case the window, not being in the middle of the
wall, but thrust very much into the left corner, was still more difficult to
manage; however, Raphael had met this by broadening the steps on the right side
so as to preserve the sense of symmetry. A balustrade completely encloses the
choir, and the spacious aisles of a Renaissance church constitute the
background. The priest stands on the left side of the altar holding the Sacred
Host in one hand, and in the other the Blood-stained Corporal. In the
expression of his face, astonishment, shame, contrition and fear are admirably
combined. From the other side of the balustrade two youths gaze intently at the
miracle in mute amazement. Three acolytes are kneeling with lighted candles
behind the priest, a fourth in a bright coloured cassock raises his hand with
an expressive gesture as though to say, “See! it is indeed as the Church
teaches!” The emotions of the beholders, which in the nearer figures are those
of subdued awe and reverence, become more mingled with excitement in the groups
of people who are pressing up the steps on the left side to get a better view.
Some are bowing low in adoring prayer, others pointing with outstretched hands
to the marvel, others triumphantly thanking God for this confirmation of the
faith of the Church. The perception and apprehension of the miracle seems to
flow like a spiritual stream through the throng of worshippers on the left and
is just beginning to reach the women and children sitting on the lowest steps.”
In marked contrast to all this flutter and stir is the perfect calm of the Pope
and those who are with him on the righthand side. The contrast is further
emphasised by the steady flame of the altar lights on this side while on the
left they are flickering and bent as though by a strong wind. The Pope,
unmistakeably Julius II, kneels on a prie-Dieu, exactly opposite the priest,
with his face turned towards the altar absorbed in adoration. His whole
attitude expresses the assured faith which befits the Head of the Church; there
is not a trace of emotion or surprise. No doubt the master had often seen the
old Pope in this attitude during those critical days when the Church was in
such jeopardy. Two Cardinals and two other clerics appear on the steps below, in
attendance on the Pope, and on the lowest, some soldiers of the Swiss Guard
kneel in silent wonder; near them is the Pope’s Sedia gestatoria. One of the Cardinals, generally
thought to be Raffaele Riario, has his hands crossed
on his breast and is looking at the priest with a grave and stern expression.
The other, with folded hands, adores the miraculous Blood; both heads are most
impressive. For skilful composition, truth and depth of expression, and
magnificence in colouring, perhaps the picture is the best of the whole series.
In its homage
to the Blessed Sacrament, towards which Julius II had a special devotion the
Mass of Bolsena is the connecting link between this
Stanza and the adjoining one, which contains the Disputa;
in representing a miracle it strikes the key-note of the Stanza d’Eliodoro where the fundamental idea is the representation
of God’s unfailing care for His Church by instances of His direct intervention
for her support and protection in the hour of need. The history of the reign of
Julius II was a signal illustration of the truth. In the Summer of 1511, when
Italy seemed at the mercy of the French, how wonderfully the storm blew over!
Again in August when the Pope was to all appearances dying, he seemed to have
been miraculously restored in order to negotiate the Holy League by means of
which the unity of the Church was saved. Although the battle was not yet wholly
won, Julius II—and Raphael with him—had the fullest confidence that God would
not withdraw from his Vicar that protection which as yet had never failed. And
they were not mistaken. The schismatic Council melted away, Louis XII was
driven back, and French domination in Italy was annihilated. It was most
natural that the artist, even without having received any special orders to
this effect should have embodied in his pictures the thoughts which were
filling the mind of the Pope and all his surroundings at the time. Thus this
series of paintings sprung out of the historical events of the day, and spoke a
language that all could understand.
The fresco
which occupies one of the longer walls of the Stanza, and gives it its name,
portrays the miraculous expulsion of Heliodorus from
the Temple, narrated in the 2nd Book of Maccabees. Heliodorus,
the treasurer of the Syrian King, Seleucus Philopater,
was sent to carry off the contents of the treasury of the Temple of Jerusalem.
When, however, he attempted to execute his commission the spirit of the
Almighty God gave a great evidence of his presence, so that all that had
presumed to obey him, falling down by the power of God, were struck with
fainting and dread, For there appeared to them a horse with a terrible rider
upon him, adorned with a very rich covering, and he ran fiercely and struck Heliodorus with his fore-feet, and he that sat upon him
seemed to have armour of gold.
Moreover, there
appeared two other young men beautiful and strong, bright and glorious, and in
comely apparel, who stood by him on either side and scourged him without
ceasing, with many stripes. And Heliodorus suddenly
fell to the ground, .... and they acknowledged “the manifest power of God ....
but the Jews praised the Lord because He had glorified his place.” (Maccabees,
II, 3, 24 seq.) Raphael, following the text of Scripture as closely as possible
has represented the scene “with marvellous dramatic power.”
The spectator
looks into the nave of the Temple. At the altar in the background, lighted by
the seven-branched candlestick, the High Priest is praying; behind him the
other priests and a number of people who display by their gestures their
surprise and joy at this manifestation of the mighty hand of God. The centre of
the foreground is purposely left empty that nothing may distract the eye from
the sudden irresistible inrush of the heavenly emissaries who burst in at the
right-hand corner. The horseman in his golden armour, and the swift youths with
their sweeping scourges have just arrived in time. Heliodorus is dashed to the ground, the urn full of coins has slipped from his hands, the
fore-feet of the horse are almost upon him, his terrified attendants strive in
vain to escape. “The poetic feeling in this group is marvellous, we see as it
were the lightning of God’s wrath blasting the sinner; opposite, on the other
side, there is a charming cluster of women and children in various attitudes of
surprise and alarm.” Behind these figures, “reminiscences of which may be
traced like echoes in various forms through all later art”, Julius II appears,
borne in his chair high above the heads of the throng of people into this Old
Testament assembly. Calm and dignified, he seems to recognise in God’s dealings
with His people under the old covenant the same mighty hand which had so
unexpectedly discomfited the schismatic Cardinals and brought the Anti-Papal
Council to naught: “For he that hath his dwelling in the heavens, is the
visitor and protector of that place and he striketh and destroyed them that come to do evil to it.” (Machabees,
II, 3, 39-)
Julius II died
before the two succeeding frescoes were finished, but the subjects of them were
certainly chosen during his lifetime.
On the opposite
wall to Heliodorus, Raphael painted the meeting of
Leo I with Attila. This famous interview (at which, according to the mediaeval
legend, S. Peter appeared in the heavens above the head of his successor) took
place on the banks of the Mincio near Mantua; Raphael
transfers it to the vicinity of Rome. To the left, in the distance, we see some
ruins, a basilica and the Colosseum, while, on the right, the flames rising
from a burning village, denote the approach of the barbarians. Calm and assured
in his trust in God the Pope comes forward to meet Attila, attired in full Pontificals and sitting on his white palfrey attended by
his peaceful followers. Julius II being dead by this time, the Pontiff is
represented with the features of Leo X. The majestic forms of the Princes of
the Apostles appear with drawn swords in the sky over his head. A halo of light
proceeds from them, which sheds a soft radiance over the troop of priests, and
fills the barbarian horsemen with terror and dismay. The heavens are darkened,
violent gusts of wind sweep back the banners, the startled horses rear and
turn. The eyes of the terror-stricken soldiers are fixed on the apparition,
while their leader has dropped the reins, and turns his horse to fly, with an
involuntary pressure of the knee; even then, in the Summer of 1512, were the
“barbarian” hordes of France put to flight, to be again more completely routed
and expelled in the following year at Novara.
The subject on
the other wall over the window and opposite to the Mass of Bolsena is the narrative in the Acts of the Apostles (chap. XII.) of S. Peter’s
deliverance from prison. The composition of the picture is perhaps not quite so
perfect as that of the other, but nevertheless it is full of beauties. In all
the pictures in the Stanza d’Eliodoro Raphael had
paid more attention to effects of colour than he did in the Camera della Segnatura. In the splendid
colouring of the Mass of Bolsena the influence of the
Venetian, Sebastiano del Piombo, can be already
traced in the fresco of the Deliverance of S. Peter, which emphatically
summarises the leading idea of the pictures in the Stanza d’Eliodoro,
namely, the futility of all human attacks upon the divinely protected Church
and her head, Raphael has to some extent resorted to effects produced by light,
but with great sobriety and restraint. To the left of the window, on a flight
of steps, we see the terrified guard who have discovered that their prisoner is
gone. Moonlight and torchlight are combined in this scene. In the centre there
is a grating so cleverly painted that we feel as if we could lay hold of it
Through this the interior of the prison is visible, lighted by the radiant
angel who is in the act of waking the Apostle while the soldiers to whom he is
chained still sleep. “This scene is marvellously effective in its simplicity
and reality and its glamour of supernatural light”. On the right S. Peter
appears again, passing out between the sleeping guards and led by the angel,
from whom all the light proceeds. This heavenly form and the spiritual radiance
which it diffuses are rightly considered to be one of the artist’s most divine
inspirations,
This fresco is
most commonly thought to be meant as an allusion to the escape of Cardinal de’
Medici (afterwards Leo X) out of the hands of the French after the Battle of
Ravenna. As according to the inscription on the window this picture was not
finished till 1514, this interpretation may very possibly have been current
even at the time; but it seems more probable that the design dates back to
Julius II and really has reference to him. S. Pietro in Vincoli was the titular church of Julius II when he was a Cardinal; and on the 23rd
June, 1512, he made a special pilgrimage to it to thank God there for his victory
over the French. It seems exceedingly probable that the Court painter was
commissioned to employ his art in the idealisation of this great triumph which
was so gorgeously celebrated at that time. Thus the Mass of Bolsena would commemorate the prayer of the Pope before the relic at Orvieto in 1506,
at the commencement of his great enterprise for the reconstitution of the
States of the Church, and the deliverance of S. Peter, his thanksgiving in
1512, at the end of his course for the overthrow of the French before the altar
of S. Pietro in Vincoli.
The whole
fabric of the enchanted realm of Raphael’s Vatican pictures rests upon one
simple but far-reaching thought. It is that of the greatness and triumph of the
Church; her greatness in her wisdom, and her centre, the Papacy; her triumph in
the wonderful ways in which God continues to guard and protect the successor of
him to whom the promise was given. “Thou art Peter and on this rock I will
build my Church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.”
It seems a
remarkable providence of God that Julius II, the founder of the great Cathedral
of the world, should have been led to charge the greatest of Christian
painters, with the task of illustrating the doctrine of the most Holy
Sacrament, which was on the point of being so passionately controverted, and
the unfailing Divine protection, which ever preserves the Church and the Head
at the very moment when the most terrible storm, which the Papacy in its course
of nearly two thousand years has ever had to encounter, was about to burst upon
it.
|