CRISTO RAUL.ORG |
READING HALLTHE DOORS OF WISDOM |
OCTAVIUS CAESAR AUGUSTUS :THE LIFE AND TIMES OF THE FOUNDER OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE
CHAPTER IX
THE FIRST PRINCIPATUS, B.C. 27-23
The settlement of his official status at Rome left
Augustus free to turn to other parts of the Empire. He had spent the greater
part of two years after the victory at Actium in organising the East. His face
was now turned northward and westward. In the spring of BC27, he set, out for
Gaul to reorganise the provinces won by Iulius in BC 58-49, and farther secured
by the operations of Agrippa in BC 37 and Messalla in
BC29. It was understood that he meant also to cross to Britain, and the court
poets are dutifully anxious as to the dangers he will incur, and prophetically
certain of the victories he will win. A British expedition had been for some
years floating in Roman minds. It is true that Iulius Caesar had invaded the
island and imposed a tribute on some of the tribes. But the tribute does not
seem to have been paid. The Briton was still intactus, and was classed
with the Parthian as a danger to the frontier of the Empire. He was chiefly
known at Rome by the presence of certain stalwart slaves, and by the
determination he displayed not to admit adventurous Roman merchants. But, after
all, Augustus found enough to do in Gaul, and saw good reason for abstaining
from such a dangerous adventure. The Britons, though they neglected the tributum, yet paid a duty on exports and imports
to and from Gaul, principally ivory ornaments, and the better sorts of glass
and pottery; and it was pointed out that the danger of a British invasion of
Gallia was small, that a military occupation of the island would cost more than
the tribute would bring in, and that the portoria would be rather
diminished than increased by it. Augustus, at any rate, professed to
be satisfied by certain envoys sent to him from Britain. They dedicated some
offerings on the Capitol, and received for their
countrymen the title of “Friends of Rome!”
Augustus spent the summer and winter of BC 27-6 in Narbo, finding enough to do in holding a census of the rest
of Gaul for purposes of taxation, and regularly organising the country annexed
by Iulius to that ancient province, which had been Roman long before his time.
Four provinces were created with separate legati. The
original “province” was now called Gallia Narbonensis;
the south-western district, extending from the Pyrenees to the Loire, retained
its old name of Aquitania; the Central or “Celtic” Gaul was called Lugdunensis, from its capital Lugdunum,
made a colonia in BC43; the northern country up to the Rhine was Belgica,
including the districts on the left bank of the Rhine, in which Agrippa had
settled certain German tribes who had crossed the river. Augustus was not
content with a merely political organisation. He established schools to spread
the use of the Latin language, and everywhere introduced the principles of
Roman law. He took especial pains to adorn and promote the towns in Narbonensis, where traces of his buildings are still to be
seen. The effect of his work now and ten years later was that Gaul became
rapidly Romanised both in speech and manners, and that in learning and civilisation
it soon rivalled Italy itself.
This was a work thoroughly congenial to Augustus, and
in which his ability was conspicuous. But he now had to engage again in war,
for which his genius was by no means so well suited. Ianus Quirinus was again open. The surrounding barbarians were again threatening
Macedonia; the Salassi of the Val d’Aosta were again making raids, and there was imminent danger
in Northern Spain.
The Salassi, who had for the
last 100 years given much trouble, had twice in recent years been in arms: in BC35
they defeated C. Antistius Vetus,
and, in BC34, had, with great difficulty, been partly subdued by Valerius Messalla. Their command
of the principal Alpine pass made it important that they should be kept in
check.
The governor of Macedonia, M. Crassus (grandson of the
triumvir) had been so successful over the Thracians and Getae, that he was
allowed a triumph in July, BC27, but it appears that their incursions did not
cease in spite of these victories. The war with the Salassi was entrusted to Terentius Varro Muraena, who, after winning some victories in the field,
sold many thousands of their men of military age into slavery, and established
a colony of 3,000 veterans to overawe them, called Augusta Pretoria, the modern Aosta.
From Narbo, Augustus next
proceeded to Spain in the early part of BC26, and spent the rest of the year in peaceful reforms and in the organisation of the
province. But in BC25 he was forced to enter upon a campaign against the Cantabri and Astures, those
warlike tribes in the north-west, who, nominally included in the upper
province, were continually harassing the more obedient peoples, and showing
their dislike of Roman supremacy. The war was tantalising and difficult. The
hardy highlanders knew every forest, mountain, and valley, and the Roman
soldiers could neither provide against sudden attacks, not get at the enemy in
their fastnesses. From fatigue and anxiety Augustus fell ill and was obliged to
retire to Tarraco, leaving the conduct of the campaign
to Gaius Antistius Vetus,
who was able to win several engagements, because after the retirement of
Augustus the natives ventured more frequently to appear in the open. Another of
his legates, Titus Carisius, took Lance (Sallanco);
and finally Augustus founded a colony of veterans
among the Lusitani, called Augusta Emerita (Merida), and another called
Caesar-Augusta (Zaragossa) among the Editani, on the site of the ancient Salduba, from which all the great roads to the Pyrennees branch off. The Cantabri were not crushed, but they were quiet for a time. Ianus was closed, and Augustus returned at the beginning of BC24; and the courtier
Horace is again called on to celebrate a success, and to welcome the Emperor’s home-coming as of a victor. The Senate voted him a
triumph, partly for the Spanish campaign and partly for some successes of his
legate, M. Vinicius, in Gaul, who had caused his soldiers to proclaim Augustus
imperator for the eighth time. Augustus refused the triumph,
but accepted the acclamation of imperator—thus assuming as head of the
army that what was everywhere done was, to use the technical expression, done
“under his auspices,” and was to be reckoned to his credit. He also accepted
honours for his young nephew Marcellus, and his stepson Tiberius. The former
was admitted to the Senate with praetorian rank, and with ten years seniority
for office, in virtue of which he was at once elected aedile, though only in
his twentieth year; the latter was allowed five years’ seniority, and at once elected
quaestor in his nineteenth year. A triumphal arch was also erected in honour of
Augustus in the Alpine region. The temple of Ianus did not remain long closed, however. Soon after Augustus left Spain the Cantabri and Astures again rose;
and in BC24 took place the ill-judged and unfortunate expedition of Aelius
Gallus into Arabia. A march of six months’ duration, in which large numbers
perished from heat and disease and only seven men in actual fighting, was
followed by a retreat lasting sixty days. Gallus had been misled and duped by
the satrap of the Nabataeans, and all the hopes of splendid booty were baffled.
The expedition had been approved, if not suggested, by Augustus, partly on the
pretext of preventing incursions into Egypt; but more, it would seem, because
Arabia was regarded as an El Dorado, where vast treasures of gold and jewels
were to be found, accumulated from the export of the rich spices of the
country, which the inhabitants were believed to keep jealously in a country as yet never pillaged by an invader. As usual, the court
poets echo the popular delusions, and eulogise the certain success of the Emperor; Horace harps on the rich “treasures of the
Arabians,” their “well-stocked houses,” their “virgin stores.” The Roman arms
are to strike terror in the East and the Red Sea, and are at length being employed on what is their proper and natural foe: Augustus,
says another poet, is now a terror to the “homestead of the yet unplundered Arabia.” Happily this
was an almost solitary instance of such wild schemes, prompted by greed, and
promoted by ignorance and delusion. Augustus came to see that the frontiers of
his great empire afforded sufficient work for its military resources; but it
was not till near the end of his long life that a great military disaster gave
him a sharp reminder of the impolicy of pushing beyond them.
During these years the process of adorning Rome with
splendid buildings or restorations of old ones had been steadily going on. For
the largest number of these Augustus himself was responsible. In BC28 the
temple of Apollo on the Palatine, with its colonnades and libraries, had been
dedicated. In the same year the restoration of 82 temples was begun on his
initiative, and apparently at his expense. The new temple of Mars Ultor, vowed at Philippi, with its surrounding forum Augustum, was in process of erection, as well as another to Iupiter Tonans on the
Capitol, vowed in the course of the Cantabrian
expedition to commemorate a narrow escape from being struck by lightning. He
also completed the forum and basilica partly erected by Iulius, had begun or
projected the porticus Livia et Octaviae, and had erected the imposing rotunda intended
as the mortuary of the ulIian gens: while Statilius Taurus had built
the first amphitheatre, Plancus a great temple of Saturn, and Cornelius Balbus was about to begin a new theatre. But most splendid
of all were the benefactions of Agrippa. Baths, bridges, colonnades, gardens,
aqueducts, were all dedicated by him to the use of the public. Above all, by BC25
he had completed the magnificent Pantheon, still in its decline one of the most
striking buildings in the world. It was dedicated to Mars and Venus, mythical
ancestors of the Iulian gens, but its
name may be derived either from its numerous statues of the gods, or from the
supposed likeness of its dome to the sky. Its purpose—beyond being a compliment
to Augustus—is still a subject of dispute. Nor have we any record of its use
except as the meeting-place of the Arval brothers.
Great way, therefore, was already made towards
justifying the boast of Augustus that he found Rome brick and left it marble.
For these buildings were lined or paved with every kind of precious marble and
stone. But the year following his return
from Spain witnessed a crisis in his life as well as in his political position.
He seems to have been in a feeble state of health all through BC 24, the effect
probably of his fatigues and anxieties in Spain. But soon after entering on his
eleventh consulship in BC23, he became so much worse that he believed himself
to be dying. It became necessary, therefore, to make provision for the
continuance of the government. Augustus had no hereditary office, and no power
of transmitting his authority. Still it was supposed
that he was training his nephew and son-in-law Marcellus, or his stepson
Tiberius, to be his successor. The former was curule-aedile,
and seems to have conceived the ambition of succeeding his uncle. But
when he thought death approaching, Augustus did not designate either of these
young men. He handed his seal to Agrippa, and the official records of the army
and revenue to Cn. Calpurnius Piso,
his colleague in the consulship. He would play his part as constitutional
magistrate to the last. To speculate on what might have been
is not very profitable. Agrippa had advised a restoration of the
republic in BC30. But every year since then had made it more difficult; and, if
he had wished to do it, he would probably have found it as impossible as his
master had done, and would have had to choose between
supporting Marcellus and taking the direction of affairs into his own hands.
The difficulty, however, did not arise; for owing either to the goodness of his
constitution, or the skill of his physician, Antonius Musa, Augustus recovered.
When he met the Senate once more he offered to read his will to prove that he had been true to his
constitutional obligations, and had named no successor, but had left the
decision in the hands of the Senate and people. The Senators, however, declined
to hear it, but insisted that the powers which he had been exercising should be
more clearly defined and placed on a better legal footing. Accordingly a Senatus-consultum was drawn up, to be
afterwards submitted to the centuriate assembly,
giving him a variety of powers, and forming a precedent which was followed in
the case of subsequent emperors. It began with a confirmation of the tribunicia potestas, for
life and unlimited as to place, with the right of bringing business of any kind
before the Senate (ius relationis). It next gave him the far proconsular, both within and without the pomaerium, involving a maius imperium in all provinces. Further, it gave him the right of
making treaties; the right of summoning, consuming, and dismissing the Senate (ius consular);
the confirmation of all his acta, “Whatever he shall think to be for the benefit and honour of the republic in
things divine and human, whether public or private”; finally, exemption from
the provisions of certain laws and plebiscita. Some
legal difficulty was apparently discovered afterwards as to the right of
proposing laws to the centuriate assembly, which was
remedied in BC19 by his receiving the full consular power for life, with the
right of having lictors, and sitting
on the consular bench. This seems to have been a concession to legal purists.
He doubtless exercised the full consular powers before; but a distinction was
drawn by some between the ius consular and
the imperium consulare,
and whatever doubt there might be was now set at rest.
As the imperial powers may now be considered as fully
developed, future extensions being merely logical deduction from the
constitution as now established, it will be convenient here once for all to
point out their nature and extent. They may be classed under two headings—(1) imperium; (2) potestas tribunicia.
The first—imperium—embraces
all those powers which Augustus obtained as representing the curule
magistrates, or from special law and senatorial decrees. As imperator, then, he
had supreme command of all forces by land or sea. The military oath was now
taken in his name, no longer to individual officers raising legions. He alone
had the right to enrol soldiers; he nominated the officers; his procurators
paid the men in his name; from him proceeded all rewards. The Senate, indeed,
still awarded triumphs and triumphalia ornamenta, but it was at his suggestion, and the
tendency was to confine the right of triumph to the Emperor himself.
By the same imperium he decided on questions of peace or war; on the distribution of the ager publicus, and the assignation of lands to veterans and coloni generally.
Finally, the right of conferring the citizenship,
complete or partial, and settling the status of all colonies and municipia, and of interpreting the laws
by a constitutio principis, expressed in an edict or decree, which
amounted, in fact, to legislative power.
The second—potestas tribunicia—was superior to the ordinary powers of the
tribunes, because by it he could veto their proceedings, while they could not veto
his. “It gave him”—to use Dio’s words—“the means of absolutely putting a stop to any proceeding
of which he disapproved; it rendered his person inviolable, so that the least
violence offered him by word or deed made a man liable to death without trial
as being under a curse.” From the ancient constitution of the office also it
made him president of the comitia tributa(representing the old consilia plebis), gave him the right of interposing in all decisions of
magistrates or Senate affecting the persons or civil status of citizens (auxilii latio), and that of compelling obedience by
imprisonment or other means, as in the republic the tribunes had done even to
the consuls in extreme cases (coercitio). Though this power was given the Emperor for life, it was also in a sense annual; and it was
in effect so much the most important of all his powers, while at the same time
in origin and professed object so much the most popular, that it became the
custom from henceforth to date all documents, inscriptions, and the like, by
the year of the tribunician power from 27th of June this year (BC23). The imperium was renewed at intervals of ten
or five years, the tribunician power of Augustus went on from year to year
without break. It was now unnecessary any longer to hold the consulship, for
the imperium given him in other ways
covered all, and more than all, which the consulship could give. It was
convenient to use it for rewarding others, as it retained all its outward signs
of dignity, and still in theory made its holder head of the state, though in reality its duties had become almost wholly ceremonial.
He therefore abdicated the consulship, which he did not hold again till BC5,
when he desired to give éclat to his
grandson’s deductio in forum.
The clause in the lex, quoted above, also gave Augustus supreme control of all religious matters, and
made him able, among other things, to nominate most of the members of the
sacred colleges. He did not become Pontifex Maximus till the death of Lepidus (BC13).
When that took place he became official, as well as
real, head of the Roman religion.
Certain other arrangements in regard
to the city of Rome itself followed, all in the direction of
centralisation. Thus Augustus presided at the review
of the equites, which used to be held by the censors. Public works were mostly
entrusted to curatores appointed by him; for the supply of corn he named a annonne; and for police a praefectus urbi, under whom were the cohortes urbana, the
night-watch and fire brigade (nocturni vigiles). Each of
these bodies had their own officers or praefecti; but Auguustus from time to time appointed some
one as praefectus urbi, to whom all alike would be subject. Such an officer, however,
did not always assume the name, and really as well as theoretically the
ultimate authority was Augustus himself, who later on,
by dividing Rome into regiones and vici, made elaborate arrangements
for the effective policing of the city.
Augustus might pose as a constitutional magistrate
enjoying a life-tenure of his office, without the right of transmitting it to
an heir. This view was strictly legal, but it was evident that such a power
could not safely be left by its holder without any understanding as to a
successor. The matter was indeed in the hands of Senate and people; but in the
minds of possible heirs, as well as of the Senate and people themselves, it
began to be thought natural and necessary that some arrangement of the sort
should be made. The cases are numerous in all history of rulers, whether new or
hereditary, who have wished to found or continue a
dynasty, or who have thought to prevent confusion and danger after their own
death by naming a successor, or by taking him into present partnership. Such a
scheme was not as yet fully developed, even if it was
contemplated. But Marcellus, who had been adopted by Augustus on his marriage
to Iulia, betrayed his hopes by protesting against the
preference shewn by the apparently dying Emperor to Agrippa; and Augustus
yielded so far as to send Agrippa from Rome as governor of Syria.
A sudden disaster, however, put an end to any
intention that may have been formed in regard to Marcellus. In the summer of BC23, he was attacked by fever, and Antonius Musa,
who had successfully treated Augustus by a régime of cold baths, tried a
similar treatment on the young man with fatal effect. His death was a great
grief to Augustus and so severe a blow to Octavia, that she lived afterwards in
complete retirement. It produced a sensation in Rome such as has been witnessed
more than once among us at the death of an heir to the throne; and has been
immortalised by a celebrated passage inserted by Vergil in the sixth book of
the Aeneid, a work in which Augustus
was specially interested as a consecration of the
greatness of Rome and the hereditary dignity of the Iulian gents. It is skilfully placed at the end of the catalogue of Roman
heroes whose souls are being reviewed by Anchises in the Elysian realms, where
they are waiting their time for entering the bodies of men destined to make
Roman history. The Marcellus of the Punic war naturally introduces the younger
shade, whose brief tenure of life is even now foreshadowed by the cloud that
hangs about his brow. When Vergil recited the lines to the Emperor and his sorrowing sister, Octavia fainted from emotion, and Augustus bestowed a
splendid reward upon the poet. It may help us to realise the scene if we once
more read the familiar lines. Aeneas notices the mysterious and melancholy
shade and eagerly questions his father :—
“What youth is this of glorious mien
The noblest and the best between,
Cheered to the echo ? See, a cloud
(The darkening shadow of the shroud)
Hovers about him even now,
And black night broods upon his brow.
Is he some scion of the race,
Destined our mighty line to grace ?
Thus spake the son,
the father sighed.
And thus with rising tears replied :
‘Seek not, my son, to learn the woe.
Your progeny is doomed to know.
The fates will show and then withdraw
The gift men loved but hardly saw.
Too mighty, gods ! for so you
deemed,
With such a prince Rome's race had seemed
!
What sobs shall thrill the Martian plain !
Ah, Tiber, what dark funeral train
Your waves shall see, as past the Mound
New-built you sweep your waters round!
No scion of the Ilian stock
Shall raise such hopes, such hopes shall mock.
Ah, Romulus, thy land shall see
No son to fire thy pride as he.
Oh loyalty ! Oh faith unstained !
Oh strong right hand to yield untrained
!
Whether on foot he grasped the sword,
Or charger's flank with rowel scored,
No foe would e'er have faced his steel
Nor learnt what 'tis the vanquished feel.
Oh child of many tears, if fate
Shall not prevent your living date,
Thou art Marcellus ! Lilies
fair
Scatter in handfuls on his bier !
Oh let me but his herse bestrew
With flowers bright with purple hue.
Vain gift ! but let it still
be paid
To grace my far-off grandson’s shade.
”
The death of Marcellus had occurred in an unhealthy
season when many shared the same fate. Yet there were found people who
attributed it to Livia’s jealousy on behalf of her son Tiberius, and her anger
at the preference shown to the Emperor’s nephew.
Scarcely any death occurred in the imperial family that did not give rise to
some such idle and malevolent gossip. But the Emperor soon had cause to regret
the absence of Agrippa, who was living in Lesbos and administering Syria by his
legate. The next year was a year of sickness and scarcity at Rome,
and was also disturbed by more than one outbreak of political unrest,
one of the few conspiracies against the life of Augustus being detected and
punished. We do not know why Muraena and Fannius Caepio plotted to kill
Augustus, if they really did so. It may be that the change made in the
principate in BC23 seemed to them to be too much in the direction of autocracy,
or that the consulship without Augustus as colleague suggested some idea that
its old supremacy might be recovered. The violent party strife which occurred
later at the election for BC21, may have had some connection with the same
feeling. Muraena had had a successful career, had
been rewarded by an augurship and a consulship in BC23, and there is nothing
known which explains his conduct. It may be that his offence was chiefly
intemperance of language. Dio says that he had a
sharp tongue which spared no one, and Horace perhaps meant to give him a hint
in the ode addressed to him. Velleius tells us that, unlike his fellow
conspirator Fannius Caepid,
he was a map of high character. At any rate their execution—for both are said
to have been put to death—is one of the few instances of severity on the part
of Augustus since the civil war. This trouble was followed by others—a renewed
outbreak in Spain, riots at the elections, and a coldness between himself and
his devoted friend and minister Maecenas, caused, it is said, by his being
supposed to have communicated to his wife Terentia,
the sister of Muraena, some secret as to the
detection of the plot. All these things must have caused Augustus much
uneasiness. He had left Rome in the summer of BC 22 for Sicily, intending to
start thence on another progress through the Eastern Provinces. There urgent
messages came to him to return and put a stop to the disturbances. He did not
wish to give up his Eastern journey and yet did not venture to leave the city
without some control. His thoughts turned naturally to the support that had
never failed him—to Agrippa. He was summoned home primarily to take charge of
Rome; but he came back to what seemed the highest possible position next to
that of the Emperor, and one that promised a still
greater one in the future. Augustus insisted on his divorcing Marcella
(daughter of Octavia) and marrying his own daughter Iulia, left a widow by
Marcellus. As usual Agrippa did all that was imposed upon him well and
thoroughly (BC 21-20). Having restored order in the city, he next went to
Gallia Narbonensis, where he not only put a stop to
some dangerous disturbances, but initiated great
public works in the way of roads and aqueducts. Passing to Spain he finally
crushed the Cantabri adn Astures, who were again in arms. He seems indeed to have
suffered reverses in this war, as his master had done before, but in the end he reduced them to submission. All this good work was
done while Augustus was in the East (BC 21—19), and for it he refused the
triumph offered him by the Senate at the instigation of the Emperor.
But his succession, should he survive the Emperor, was
now secured by his being associated with him in the tribunicia potestas and other prerogatives for five
years at the first renewal of his powers in BC7. Agrippa had now two sons by
Iulia, Gaius born in BC20, Lucius in BC7; and Augustus adopted both of them by the ancient process of a fictitious
purchase. He had now legitimate heirs and nothing farther was done about the
succession for some years. Agrippa died in March, BC12, just as his period of
tribunicial power was expiring. But during these years the two sons of Livia,
Tiberius and Drutss, had begun those services on the
German frontier and among the Rhaeti and other
powerful tribes which proved their vigour and ability. These services were
renewed, after a few months’ interval of quiet, in BC13 and following years. Accordingly Augustus seems to have meditated putting
Tiberius in much the same position as Agrippa had held. In BC11 he compelled
him to divorce his wife Vipsania (a daughter of
Agrippa) and marry Agrippa’s widow Iulia, the Emperor’s only daughter. He
thought still farther to secure a line of descendants to succeed if necessary
to his power. But he made the mistake of neglecting sentiment. Tiberius was
devotedly attached to Vipsania, by whom he had a son,
and could feel neither affection nor respect for Iulia, who fancied that she
lowered herself in marrying him.
The only thing that could compensate him for such a
marriage was the chance of succession, and that was barred by the existence of
Gaius and Lucius Caesar. His only son by Iulia died, and before long her
frivolity and debaucheries disgusted him, and therefore, though associated in
the tribunician power for five years in BC7, he sought and obtained permission
in the next year to retire to Rhodes, where he stayed seven years in seclusion.
Meanwhile the boys were being brought up with a view
to their splendid future under the eye of Augustus, when he was at home, and
often under his personal instruction, accompanied him as they grew older on his
journeys, in a carriage preceding his own or riding by his side, and in fact
were treated in every way as real and much beloved sons.
In the year in which they assumed the toga virilis(BC5 and BC2) Augustus again entered upon
the consulship, that the deductio in forum should be as brilliant and
dignified as possible. The Senate was not behindhand; from the day of taking
the toga virilis it voted that they should be capable of taking part in public business, and
each of them in turn was designated consul, Gaius to enter upon his office that
time five years. A new dignity moreover was invented, each in turn being named
by the equites princeps iuventutis. As Augustus was princeps senatus as well as princeps civitatis, each of these young men was to be the head of the next ordo, the original condition for belonging to which was that a man
must be iuvenis. Both were members of the College of
Augurs. They were, in fact, treated as we expect to see princes of the blood
and heirs-apparent treated. But whatever was the intention of Augustus or the
expectation of the people, fate interposed ruthlessly. The younger—Lucius—died
first, on the 20th of August, A.D. 2, at Marseilles, before he could enter on
the consulship to which he had been designated; the elder Gains was sent into
Asia in BC 1, where he entered upon his consulship of A.D. 1. The object of his
mission was to force Phraates IV, king of the Parthians, to evacuate Armenia
which he had invaded. This was accomplished without fighting and by personal
negotiation with the Parthian king; but when he entered Armenia to take
possession and arrange for its restoration to its recognised king, he was
wounded by an act of treason under the walls of Artagera.
Weakened by this wound, and being in other respects in
a feeble state of health and spirits, he obtained leave from Augustus to lay
down his command. He started on his homeward journey, but died on the way at Limyra in Lycia the 23rd of February, A.D. 4.
The succession was once more uncertain. The members of
the imperial family at this time were few. Of the
children of Agrippa and Iulia Agrippa Postumus was
barely sixteen, and his two sisters, the younger Iulia and Agrippina a few
years older. Drusus, the younger brother of Tiberius, had married Antonia,
daughter of Marcus Antonius and Octavia, and had left three children,
Germanicus, born BC15, Livia born BC 12, and Claudius (afterwards Emperor) born
BC 10.
Augustus meant to provide a new line of descendants by
marrying Agrippina to Germanicus, but that did not take place till about A.D.
5. Meanwhile, probably on Livia’s suggestion, he turned his thoughts to his
stepson Tiberius, who had divorced Iulia and had a son (Drusus) by his former
wife Vipsania, who was married to his cousin Livia.
There is no good evidence that Augustus entertained any but warm feelings for
Tiberius, and he certainly had had good reason to respect his military
abilities and energy. He seems to have been hurt at his prolonged stay at
Rhodes and to have regarded it as a sign that Tiberius cared nothing for him
and his family. He had therefore discouraged his return two years before,
though he had given him the position of legatus as a
colourable pretext for staying abroad without loss of dignity. Upon the death
of Lucius, however, he seems to have wished him to return to Rome. Tiberius did
so, partly on the instigation of his mother, and partly, perhaps, because he
had reason to expect the hostility of Gaius, and yet had judged from the
latter’s visit to him on his way to Syria that he was not likely to be a
formidable rival; for he was at once somewhat arrogant and weak,
and was surrounded by injudicious and dishonest advisers. On his return
he for some time lived in retirement and refrained from all public business.
But when the death of Gaius was announced (A.D. 4) Augustus adopted Tiberius
and Agrippa Postumus, having first arranged that
Tiberius should adopt his nephew Germanicus. The adoption of Agrippa Postumus was shortly afterwards annulled, and he was
banished to an island under surveillance.
There was now therefore a regular line of succession.
Tiberius indeed had no drop of Iulian blood in his veins, but adoption
according to Roman law and sentiment placed him exactly in the same position as
that of a naturally born son, and by his son’s marriage to Antonia, his
adoption of Germanicus, and the marriage of the latter to Agrippina, it seemed
that there was security that after him must come someone who was collaterally
or directly descended from Augustus. In the same year (A.D. 4) Tiberius was
once more associated with Augustus in the tribunician power for ten years.
There could be no longer any doubt who would succeed. At the death of Augustus
there would be, if Tiberius survived, a man already possessed of the most
important of his functions; and his position was still farther strengthened in
the last year of the Emperor’s life by being
associated also in his imperium proconsulare. This gave him authority in the provinces
and the command of all military forces; and we find him, in fact, upon the
death of Augustus giving the watchword at once to the praetorian guard.
Augustus therefore is responsible for the principate
of Tiberius, though some of its powers had to be formally bestowed by a decree
of the Senate. Did he do ill or well in this? Hardly any emperor left behind
him such an evil reputation as Tiberius. His funeral procession was greeted
with shouts of “Tiberius to the Tiber”, the Senate did not vote him the usual
divine honours, and Tacitus has exerted all his skill to make his name
infamous. A gallant attempt has been made by Mr. Tarver to plead for a
rehearing of the case, and to show that Tiberius was pure in private life and
admirable as a ruler. I for one agree with him in rejecting as unproved slander
and often as physically impossible the charges of monstrous immoralities raked
up both by Tacitus and Suetonius, often, no doubt, from the prurient gossip of
Rome, which has never been surpassed for foulness. The same summary rejection
cannot, I think, be applied to the formidable list of his cruelties. But these
mainly fell upon members of the imperial family and their adherents; they did
not affect the Empire at large. Augustus could not foresee these family and
dynastic tragedies; but he judged, and apparently judged rightly, that he was
leaving a successor whose prudence and sagacity, in spite of what seemed a sullen reserve, would secure the peace and prosperity of the
Empire as a whole. There is nothing to prove that Augustus regarded him
otherwise than affectionately. If he turned out to be the monster represented
by his enemies, Augustus no doubt made a grave mistake. It is a ridiculous
suggestion that he deliberately designated him his successor in order that
people might regret himself. Such recondite snares for posthumous fame are more
like the cunning of a madman than the motives influencing a reasonable being.
Suetonius, who reports the suggestion, says that after mature reflection he is
convinced that a man so careful and prudent as Augustus must have acted on
better motives; must have weighed the virtues and faults of Tiberius and
decided that the former predominated. As a matter of fact Augustus had little choice. Agrippa Postumus was
impossible; Germanicus might have served, but he could never have displaced his
uncle without a struggle. At the time of Tiberius’ adoption he was only nineteen, and Augustus could not reckon on the ten more years of
life which in feet remained for him. No doubt in these last years of his life
Augustus had come to see that some sort of hereditary principle was necessary
to prevent civil war at every vacancy. In BC23 he had ignored that principle
altogether, and as far as he could without naming an heir had put Agrippa in
the way of the succession. But Agrippa had now been dead nearly sixteen years,
and Augustus had had no minister since either so able or so faithful. Like
Cromwell in his last hours, he was driven to recognise the conveniency of the
hereditary principle; and though the practical designation of Tiberius was
apparently a breach of it, yet by means of the adoptions and marriages which he
had arranged, it best prepared for its continuance hereafter. It was one of
those politic compromises which had characterised his whole policy. It moreover
best secured the position and safety of the beloved Livia; and it set a
precedent which was often followed with advantage in after-times, when military
arrogance and violence did not overpower every other consideration, that an
Emperor’s natural heir should be his successor, or at any rate someone closely
allied to him; and that in case of the failure or complete unworthiness of such
an heir a prudent emperor should provide for the succession by adoption.
CHAPTER XTHE IMPERIAL AND MILITARY POLICY OF AUGUSTUS
|