web counter

CRISTO RAUL. READING HALL THE DOORS OF WISDOM

THE HISTORY OF THE POPES

 

 

THE LIFE AND TIMES OF POPE GREGORY I THE GREAT. A.D. 540 – 604

 

CHAPTER V

GREGORY PATRIARCH OF THE WEST.

HIS RELATIONS WITH OTHER WESTERN CHURCHES

.

 

(c)   The church of Milan.

The great metropolitan see of Milan was independent of Rome. Here again, however, Gregory did his best to establish an informal kind of authority, and to interfere, though unostentatiously, with the acts and privileges of the archbishops. But the Church of Milan, like the Church in Africa, was not disposed to submit tamely to dictation from Rome, and Gregory found it necessary to proceed with the greatest circumspection.

Since the Lombard invasion in 569, the Archbishop of Milan, together with the greater part of his clergy, had been residing at Genoa, which was in the hands of the Imperialists. A certain number of clergy, however, remained in Milan itself, and these, on the death of the aged Archbishop Laurentius in 592, unanimously elected Constantius, a deacon of the Church, as his successor. The document of election was drawn up and forwarded to Rome, but, since the clergy residing in Milan were a minority, it was not subscribed. The Pope, who had the right of confirming the election and of seeing that the consecration of the new archbishop was performed according to precedent, refused to accept Constantius until he learned whether he would be acceptable also to the Milanese clergy at Genoa. Accordingly he ordered John, his rector in Liguria, to proceed to Genoa and ascertain the wishes of the clergy there; if they were in favor of Constantius, then the agent was to “cause him to be consecrated by his own suffragans, as ancient use demands, with the assent of our authority and the help of the Lord, that by the preservation of the custom the Apostolic See may both retain its proper authority and also preserve intact the rights which it has conceded to others”." Meanwhile Gregory wrote to the clergy at Milan, expressing his approval of Constantius, whom he had met at Constantinople, and for whom he had a regard. Nevertheless, he urged them completely to satisfy themselves respecting their nominee before they took the irrevocable step of consecrating him as their bishop. “For when he is once set over you he can no longer be judged by you. Therefore you should examine him all the more thoroughly now. But when your pastor has once been consecrated, give yourselves to him heart and soul, and in his person serve Almighty God who has set him over you”.

Gregory went on to remind them that if they wished for a good bishop they must show themselves worthy of one. “Divine judgment provides shepherds according to the deserts of the flock. Therefore do you seek the things of the Spirit, love what is heavenly, despise the temporal which passeth away, and be assured that you will have a shepherd well-pleasing to God, if you, on your part, please God by your actions. Lo, as the Scripture foretold, all the glory of the world has perished. Cities are overthrown, camps uprooted, churches destroyed; no tiller of the ground inhabits our land. Among ourselves, the poor remnant who are left, the sword of man rages incessantly, and the hand of God deals slaughter from above. The world-destruction, which we heard was coming, we now see before our eyes; the regions of the earth are become to us an open book. So in the passing of things we should reflect how all that we loved is nothing. Consider with trembling the day of the Eternal Judge which is coming, and by repentance anticipate its terrors. Wash away with your tears all the stains of your sins. By sorrow for a season allay the eternal wrath which is drawing nigh. For our loving Creator, when He comes for judgment, will comfort us with greater favor, as He sees us now punishing ourselves for our own transgressions”.

Constantius in the end was consecrated, but almost immediately afterwards he became involved in difficulties. In Liguria, of which Milan was the metropolis, there were many who still adhered to the schism of the Three Chapters: and certain bishops, the most prominent of whom was the Bishop of Brescia, refused to communicate with Constantius, alleging that he had signed a document pledging himself to uphold the Fifth General Council. Such a document had indeed been signed by the last archbishop, Laurentius, and had been subscribed by certain nobles, among whom was Gregory himself, at that time Prefect of Rome. But no such security had been asked from or given by Constantius. The rumor that was circulated, however, had one serious effect. For the Catholic Queen of the Lombards, Theudelinda, hearing of it, and being influenced by the disaffected bishops, withdrew from communion with the suspected Archbishop. Gregory was greatly distressed at this news, and wrote at once to allay the royal scruples, professing his own entire adherence to the Council of Chalcedon, and affirming that the Fifth Council did nothing more than confirm the doctrine therein set forth. "Whatever was done in the time of Justinian was done that the faith of the Council of Chalcedon might in no way be disturbed." He forwarded this letter to Constantius to deliver to the Queen. But the Archbishop, who knew that such outspoken commendation of the Fifth Council would only exasperate Theudelinda, suppressed the document and recommended the Pope to send another in more guarded terms. Gregory, therefore, wrote again, omitting all reference to the Three Chapters, and merely stating his complete agreement with all that was done in the first four Councils.

“As you have learnt the soundness of my faith by my express statement of it”, he concludes, “you ought to have no further uneasiness or doubt respecting the Church of St. Peter, the chief of the Apostles. Continue, then, in the true Faith and establish your life on the rock of the Church, that is to say, on the confession of St. Peter, the chief of the Apostles, lest all your tears and all your good deeds be of no avail, if they be found severed from the true Faith. For as boughs wither which receive no nourishment from the root, so actions, however good they may appear, are nothing if they are separated from the foundation of faith. You ought therefore to send a messenger with all speed to my most reverend brother and fellow-bishop Constantius, and inform him by letter that you receive the news of his ordination with all pleasure, and that you in no wise separate yourself from his communion; that so he and I may sincerely rejoice together over you as a good and faithful daughter. By this you may know that you and your actions are pleasing to God, if before they are judged by Him, they are approved by the judgment of His priests." In spite of this letter, however, it seems that Theudelinda clung to her opinions; for many years later we find her still refusing to endorse the condemnation of Theodore, Theodoret, and Ibas. Meanwhile Constantius continued to be the subject of much calumny and malicious gossip, and in 596 the Pope wrote to beg him not to distress himself. “The man who is acquitted by his own conscience is free, however much men may accuse him”.

It seems, however, that, apart from the matter of the Three Chapters, there were some genuine grounds of complaint against Constantius. A great number of people, for instance, were offended because he persisted in mentioning the name of John of Ravenna in the mass. Gregory, hearing of this, directed the Archbishop to inquire if there was any precedent for this practice in his church. If not, he urged him to refrain from giving unnecessary offence, especially as John, for his part, was not accustomed to mention the name of Constantius at the altar.

In 594 Constantius fell out with Gregory himself. The occasion was this. There was at Milan a certain soldier named Fortunatus, who, during the episcopate of the late bishop, had for many years eaten at the table of the Church, had sat among the nobles, and signed public documents. Constantius, however, commenced a suit against him with a view to depriving him of his rank. This appeared to Gregory a most unwarrantable measure, and he suggested that if it was really necessary that a trial should take place at all, it had better be held in Rome before himself. Constantius replied with acrimony that he thought otherwise. To this the Pope rejoined: “Your letter about Fortunatus has amazed us. Either it was not dictated by you, or, if yours, we by no means recognize in it our brother, the Lord Constantius. You ought to have seen, and you ought to see now, that I write on behalf of your own reputation. For when Fortunatus says that he is wronged by you, and is unable to find anyone to help and defend him, he brings your good will into question. Therefore that your reputation may not be tarnished in the opinion of any one, and that your Church, if it has any just claims in this matter, may not suffer any loss, you ought to send an instructed person to represent you here, so that the merits of the case may be thoroughly weighed and a decision given without entailing odium upon yourself. For if, especially after his complaints, sentence in your favor is given in your city, it will be believed that he was worsted, not by force of argument, but solely by the force of your authority. Such is the love with which we are bound to you, that we shall not cease exhorting you to do what is desirable in the interest of your own reputation. For we know that though this exhortation grieves you for a time, it will hereafter give you pleasure, when the spirit of contention has passed away”.

Gregory had a real affection for this hot-tempered prelate, in spite of his faults, and he was sincerely grieved when he heard of his death at Genoa in the year 600. It chanced that at this time there was peace between the Lombards and Imperialists, and King Agilulf, availing himself of the opportunity, made an effort to bring the metropolitan back from Genoa to Milan, and even put forward a candidate of his own for the vacant see. The electors, however, disregarding his wishes, proposed to the Pope the name of the deacon Deusdedit. Gregory approved their choice, and at the same time urgently warned them to make no concessions to the heretical Lombards. “Do not be influenced by the letter which you say you have received from Agilulf. We will never on any account give our assent to a man who is chosen by those who are not Catholics, and especially by the Lombards; nor, if he is made bishop by some presumptuous usurpation, will we recognize him as holding that position and rank. For he is evidently unworthy to be the Vicar of St. Ambrose if he is elected and ordained by such persons. There is nothing in the matter to frighten you or to force you to act as Agilulf wishes, for the property from which the clergy who serve St. Ambrose are supported, is, by the grace of God, in Sicily and in the other provinces of the Empire ; no part of it is in the enemy's territory”.

Deusdedit was accordingly consecrated, the Roman notary Pantaleo being sent to see that everything was done according to precedent. Before long the new archbishop was made sensible of the quiet control and supervision which the Pope thought himself justified in exercising over the metropolitans of Italy. "Our brother and fellow-bishop Theodore," Gregory wrote, "complains that he is subjected to much unjust treatment, in spite of the promise made to him by your Holiness. We find it difficult to believe this, but as we cannot leave the matter uninvestigated, we have entrusted the consideration of it to our brother and fellow-bishop Venantius (of Luna), that he may make himself thoroughly acquainted with the merits of the case, and send us a report. We therefore beg you to send Bishop Theodore with the Defensor of your Church to our brother Venantius, that when he has learnt the truth of the matter himself, he may give us full information by letter." Gregory clearly intended that the final decision should rest with himself.

 

 

CHAPTER V

GREGORY PATRIARCH OF THE WEST

THE CHURCH OF RAVENNA