|
CHAPTER IX
.
THE TRAGEDY OF CROWN PRINCE CHENG-CHIEN,
AD 643
Up to the year AD 640 the life and reign of Shih-Min
had been unbrokenly glorious and successful. He had never met with failure in
any enterprise of importance, and his domestic life, apart from the fatal
quarrel with his brothers, had been serene and fortunate. It is true that he
had already, four years previously, had to bear the sad loss of the Empress
Chang-Sun, a lady of virtues as tare and outstanding as those of the emperor
himself. Seldom indeed has a monarch of the genius and wisdom of Shih-Min been
blessed with a consort of an equally admirable character.
It might have been hoped that the children which this
remarkable lady bore to Shih-Min would inherit some of the virtues and strength
of character which so signally distinguished their parents. But it was here
that the jealous gods reserved for the great emperor the nemesis which lies in
wait for the over-fortunate. Li Cheng-Chien, the eldest son of the Empress
Chang-Sun, had been appointed crown prince when Shih-Min succeeded to the
throne in AD 626. Although the boy was then eight years old, and his father
only twenty- six, Cheng-Chien was not the eldest of Shih-Min’s sons, Li Tai
Prince Wei was a year older, but Tai was the son of a concubine, and therefore
had no claim to the throne while any son or grandson of the empress was living.
Shih-Min had several other sons, some by the empress,
and others by concubines, but of all these only two played a prominent part in
the politics of the time, Li Chih Prince Chin, second son of the Empress
Chang-Sun, and Li Yu Prince Chi, son of the concubine Queen Yin.
It was in the year AD 640, when he was twenty-two
years old, that the conduct and character of the Crown Prince Cheng-Chien first
began to attract the unfavourable notice of the court, presaging a repetition
of the terrible quarrel between Shih-Min and his brothers, which had convulsed
the capital fourteen years earlier. The character of Prince Cheng-Chien, as
described by the historians of the time, is especially interesting to an age
which has made psychology a science. The old historians, steeped in the
traditional Confucian morality, naturally regarded Cheng-Chien as the perfect
type of what a Confucian prince should not be. They were not interested in
psychology, not did they understand the influence of heredity.
When the actions and words of this seventh-century
prince are regarded in the light of modern psychological knowledge, it becomes
perfectly plain that Cheng-Chien was an unbalanced neurotic with tastes and
inclinations derived from his far-off Tartar ancestry. He was also lame in one
leg, and as it is nowhere stated that this was due to an accident, it was more
probably an inherited defect. Cheng-Chien’s curiously atavistic tastes took the
form of a passionate admiration for everything Turkish: he craved the
simplicity of Tartar life, and the crude barbarity of nomad social customs. As
was inevitable with these inclinations, he took a violent dislike to the tutors
and courtiers who endeavoured to perfect him in the polite civilisation of
China.
Already, in ad 640, his delight in wild, barbarian music, and his persistent neglect of the
ministers of the court brought him rebukes from the emperor and from his
tutors. The next year, as these improper habits grew upon him, and he began to
keep Turks among his retainers, the chief tutor admonished the prince so
strongly that the unbalanced youth attempted to have this zealous official
assassinated. The prince sent two desperadoes in secret to his tutor’s house,
but the ruffians, having found the old man peacefully asleep, were unable to
nerve themselves to commit such a crime, and withdrew, leaving him unharmed.
This murderous plot was therefore undiscovered at the time.
While the crown prince was becoming the object of
unfavourable court gossip on account of his extravagant behaviour, his elder
half-brother, Tai Prince Wei, of an utterly different character, gained the
esteem and affection of all by his accomplishments and personal charm. The
fatal antithesis of Chien-Cheng and Shih-Min seemed to be repeated, as if the
gods, with cruel irony, were determined to revenge the morning at the Hsuan Wu
gate by enacting a similar tragedy with Shih-Min’s own sons as participants.
Tai was talented and fond of literature, indifferent
to the lusts of the flesh, courteous and respectful to the scholars who
frequented his palace and eagerly sought his friendship. But the prince had one
fault, which in one of his rank could not be considered trivial. He was ambitious.
His position as a concubine’s son, though the eldest of all the emperor’s
children, was galling, especially when he observed the improper conduct of his
half-brother, the crown prince, who would one day inherit the throne. Tai knew
that he was the more suitable character to be crown prince, nor could he banish
the hope that the follies of Cheng-Chien would one day lead to his degradation
and the elevation of himself, Tai, to that coveted dignity.
Tai knew himself to be the emperor’s favourite son.
Shih-Min was much attracted to this talented youth, whose interests and tastes
coincided with his own. He could not help recognising that Tai had inherited
his own character and brains, while Cheng-Chien seemed to have more of the evil
disposition of the dead Li Yuan-Chi, Shih-Min’s younger brother. Tai knew that
his father had these thoughts. The trample of the fatal morning at the Hsuan Wu
gate was always before the prince to suggest the possibility that crown princes
do not always live to wear the crown, while brothers not in the direct
succession sometimes find a way to win a position which was not theirs by
birth.
Chien Lung, the
greatest emperor of the Manchu dynasty, who most nearly of all later emperors
approaches the greatness of Shih-Min by his conquests in war and sage
administration in time of peace, wrote concerning the domestic tragedies of his
Tang predecessor, “The quarrel between the sons of Tai Tsung (Shih-Min) was the consequence of the
quarrel between Tai Tsung and his own brothers”. A profoundly true comment. The
example of violence which Shih-Min had given when he slew his brothers,
inevitable though it may have been, dominated the minds of his own sons, and
beckoned them on to similar extremities.
The ambitions of Tai Prince Wei were first brought to
the notice of the emperor by Chu Sui-Liang, President of the Board of History,
who in the year ad 642 presented a
memorial on the behaviour of this prince. Chu Sui-Liang asserted that while
many officials were giving expression to the opinion that Prince Wei should be
made crown prince and Cheng-Chien degraded, Tai himself did not treat his
half-brother with the courtesy properly accorded to the crown prince, behaviour
which naturally aggravated the jealousy of Cheng-Chien.
The emperor, who fully appreciated the arguments put
forward by Chu Sui-Liang, decided to take positive action to prevent the
jealousy of the brothers leading to a serious quarrel. His own experience at
the hands of the vacillating Li Yuan had made him fully aware of the dangers of
procrastination in affairs of this kind. Cheng-Chien had recently given fresh
proof of his unbridled nature by violently assaulting an officer who had
ventured to remonstrate with him on his wasteful extravagance. As this incident
had led to increased talk of the crown prince’s degradation by the partisans of
Prince Wei, the emperor derided to silence such intrigues by issuing an edict,
in which he announced that in the event of the death of the crown prince (who,
as has been mentioned, was partly crippled and had delicate health), Cheng-Chien’s
five-year-old son would inherit the position of crown prince; in no
circumstances would any one of the sons of the imperial concubines be preferred
over the children or grandchildren of the Empress Chang-Sun.
At the same time, in order to reform the character of
Cheng-Chien, Wei Cheng, the emperor’s most respected and eminent minister, was
appointed Grand Tutor to the crown prince. It was hoped that the instructions
of this statesman, famous for his forthright nature, and the frankness of his
criticisms when he did not approve of the conduct or policy of the emperor
himself, would make a lasting impression on the wayward prince.
Perhaps Wei Cheng might have reformed Cheng-Chien had
he lived; unfortunately, early in ad 643 this great minister died, to the abiding sorrow of Shih-Min, who was
inconsolable at his loss. On the occasion of Wei Cheng’s funeral, which the
emperor was with difficulty restrained from following in person, Shih-Min said
to the court, “In my life I used three mirrors. One of bronze to adjust my
dress; the records of history to correct the mistaken policies of the present;
and Wei Cheng who served to reveal the faults of my character. Now I have lost
the best of my mirrors”.
Whether it was due to the influence of Wei Cheng, or
to the fear of his father’s displeasure, Prince Cheng-Chien had made an
apparent change in the manner of his life. He no longer showed fury and hatred
to those who endeavoured to correct him. Instead he professed in public the
most model virtues, frequently citing the maxims of the sages with enthusiasm.
If reproved, he would listen docilely to any admonishments, accept the
criticism with every sign of gratitude, and feign a most tractable disposition.
But in the privacy of his own palace he maintained a very different style of
life.
His atavistic passion for nomad simplicity and Turkish
customs led him to perform the most astonishing actions. Dressed in Turkish
costume, and speaking the Turkish language, he passed his time with a few
attendants whom he had chosen for their resemblance to Turks. These men he dressed
in Turkish style with sheepskin coats and their hair done in queues. With these
mock Turks he passed hours, and even days, in a Turkish tent which he had
erected in the grounds of his palace. There, under the floating pennants of
Turkish “wolf’s head” banners, the prince would feast with his imitation Turks
upon the flesh of a sheep toasted whole at a camp fire, and roughly carved up
with swords, in the true nomad style. He obtained the animals which were needed
for these barbaric repasts by sending his followers out to steal them from the
citizens of Chang An, for in his character of a Turkish freebooter he could not
bear to feed upon meat purchased in the ordinary legal way.
Another favourite amusement of the eccentric young man
was a play, or pageant, which he called the “Funeral of the Khan”. While Cheng-Chien
himself, stretched out upon the ground, impersonated the dead khan, his
imitation Turkish followers rode round him on horseback uttering the yells and
howls of nomad lamentation. These amusements, though bizarre, and to the
Chinese most unseemly, predicted no great harm. It was in casual conversation
with his intimates that the crown prince gave expression to views and plans
which raised the gravest doubts as to his fitness for the imperial throne.
“When I am emperor”, Cheng-Chien was wont to remark, “the first thing I shall
do is to take an army of several thousands of horsemen and go hunting in the
Turkish country. There I shall live and dress in true Turkish style and have a
free life.”
This aspiration gives striking proof of the nature of
Cheng-Chien’s obsession. To a character which seemed to have harked back to
some distant Tartar ancestor, the civilised life of seventh-century China
presented no attractions. Cheng-Chien found the restraints and ceremonies of Chinese
court life an intolerable and meaningless bote. His soul craved the free life
of the Mongolian steppe. The well-meant attempts of his father and tutors to
mould him to the pattern of a Chinese prince merely made him more intractable
and savage. Had he been granted his wish, and sent to rule the vassal Turkish
tribes as khan, he might have passed a useful and happy life; instead, doomed
to perform the part of a Chinese prince, his brusque and wilful character
became warped to a savage melancholy.
Almost the only friend of the crown
prince was his halfuncle, Li Yuan-Chang Prince Han, one of die youngest of Li
Yuan’s many concubine-born sons. Yuan-Chang, who was about the same age as the
crown prince, was a cheerful libertine, who though content with the life of a
Chinese prince, and free from Turkish longings, cultivated the friendship of
his half-nephew in the hope of gratifying to the full his own passion for wine
and women. Yuan-Chang and the crown prince became inseparable companions; and
the former, more corrupt by nature than the eccentric Cheng-Chien, soon
introduced the crown prince to more questionable amusements.
Cheng-Chien’s liking for drama and pageantry was
stimulated by Yuan-Chang’s devices. The two princes divided their followers
into two corps, between whom they staged sham battles, and although the
combatants were only armed with bamboo spears, and were protected by felt
armour, the princes urged them an so furiously that serious casualties were not
uncommon. Cheng-Chien was so taken with this sport that he planned, when
emperor, to divided the regular army into two camps and stage a grand
gladiatorial combat between them at Chang An.
Any qualms the people of China may have felt at the
prospect of such a ruler were not diminished by another of his sayings, “When I
am emperor”, the prince used to remark, “I must have my way in all matters. If
anyone remonstrates with me, I will have him put to death. After I have done
that to a few hundreds the test will keep silent of their own accord”.
It certainly seems probable that Cheng-Chien would
have found this prediction confirmed in the event.
Although the crown prince kept the expression of such
sentiments for the ears of his intimates, there were not lacking spies who
reported his extravagant words to his half-brother, Tai Prince Wei, who was
only too anxious to hear anything which was to Cheng-Chien’s discredit. Tai
began to cultivate the court more assiduously than ever, and foment the belief
that Cheng-Chien ought to be degraded. These intrigues were in due course
reported to the crown prince himself, for in China, then as now, nothing can
ever be kept hidden for long. Cheng-Chien conceived a furious hatred and
jealousy of his brother, and henceforward began to entertain murderous
projects.
From the account of Cheng-Chien’s character so far
presented, it will have been made plain that he was a neurotic to whom the
exotic and the perverted made a natural appeal. It is therefore in no way
surprising that this love of perversion manifested itself in his sexual life.
Mention has already been made of the dramatic dances
such as the Po Chen which were performed at the Tang court. These dances were
performed by boys specially trained to dance and sing. In this year, AD 643, Cheng-Chien fell madly in love
with one of these boys, Cheng Hsin by name, who was about thirteen years old,
and not only had a beautiful voice but was also exceptionally handsome. Before
long this connection, which the prince was at no pains to keep secret, was
brought to the knowledge of the emperor.
The luckless Cheng Hsin was executed, and judging by
the severity of this sentence and the extreme displeasure which Shih-Min showed
to his son, homosexuality was held in horror in seventh-century China.
If Shih-Min was indignant at the behaviour of his son,
Cheng-Chien was not only unrepentant, but desolated by the fate of his young
friend. His grief was so real that he became ill, kept entirely to his palace,
and spent his time lamenting Cheng Hsin. He had a statue of the boy set up in
the hall of his palace, and offered libations before it as if mourning the
death of a near relative. In his gardens he set up a memorial tablet to the
dead boy. In spite of the emperor’s displeasure at these manifestations, Cheng-Chien
avoided the court and remained plunged in sorrow.
It was natural that before long his excessive grief
should find an outlet in the desire for revenge. Cheng-Chien believed, and it
is very likely that he was right, that the emperor had been informed of his
relationship with Cheng Hsin through the agency of his rival and enemy, his halfbrother Tai Prince Wei. Whether right or wrong, the
crown prince acted on this belief, finding solace for his grief in plotting the
death of his brother.
There has never been a court, be it ruled never so
wisely, that has not harboured malcontents. The very justice of Shih-Min’s rule
and his firm stand against corruption and the iniquities which commonly
flourish under a despotic government had alienated those whose conduct was not
above reproach. Among these was one man of no mean importance, the general, Hou
Chun-Chi. Hou Chun-Chi was one of the most distinguished officers in the Tang
service. The conqueror in recent years of the Tu-yu-hun, the Tibetans and Karahodjo,
he had been one of the emperor’s intimate followers, a member of the council
which planned the ambush at the Hsuan Wu gate.
But now Hou Chun-Chi was in semi-disgrace. He had been
found guilty of appropriating part of the royal treasure the of Karahodjo, and
making a false return of the riches found in that kingdom, which by law should
have been paid into the imperial treasury. The offence was one which normally
entailed the penalty of death, for the emperor, accustomed to reward his
generals and ministers with great liberality, expected honest service in
return. Hou Chun-Chi had been spared on account of his distinguished services.
He had escaped with a reprimand, a reduction in rank, and the loss of his
office.
Unfortunately the general, instead of acknowledging
this leniency with gratitude, could not endure his disgrace. He became
convinced that he was the victim of an unjust persecution, and observed very
little reticence in airing his grievance. It happened that the general’s
son-in-law was an officer of the crown prince’s household, and this man, knowing
that the prince had some scheme afoot, brought the disgruntled Hou Chun-Chi to
see Cheng-Chien. The crown prince had so far only planned the murder of his
brother Tai Prince Wei, for which purpose be had enlisted one Ho-Kan Cheng-Chi,
a bravo who had brought with him a hundred bad characters to form a sort of
murder gang.
Once Hou Chun-Chi was brought into
the circle of conspiracy the affair became far more serious. Cheng-Chien was a
love-sick young man who madly hated his half-brother. Hou Chun-Chi was a
famous general of great enterprise and ability, well known to the army and the
empire, but smarting under a fancied grievance.
He was not interested in the murder of Prince Wei, which could not further his
ambitions. He wanted a revolution which would restore him to his former
importance, and perhaps sooth his vanity by proving to Shih-Min that he, Hou
Chun-Chi, was not a man to be lightly reprimanded.
At one interview with the crown prince, the general,
baring his right arm, exclaimed, “This good arm is at Your Highness’s
disposition”. Forthwith he urged the prince to avenge his wrongs on their seal
author—his father the emperor. Cheng-Chien, far from being shocked at this
unnatural proposition, was delighted to gain so valuable and influential a
supporter. He richly rewarded Hou Chun-Chi, and followed his advice in every
particular. The proposed revolution also found an enthusiastic supporter in Li
Yuan-Chang Prince Han, who, however, was actuated by other motives. Yuan-Chang,
who had often been rebuked by Shih-Min for his licentiousness, had taken a
violent dislike to his imperial half-brother. The light-hearted libertine
solicited as his reward, when Cheng-Ch’en should be
on the throne, that he be given all the girls and boy musicians in the palace,
a proposition to which his nephew readily assented.
The conspiracy also included one or two young noblemen
of the court, a son of the dead statesman Tu Ju-Hui, and a half-nephew of the
emperor, whose mother was the daughter of another of Li Yuan’s many concubines.
These youths, who resented the fact that their follies had excluded them from the
public service, readily fell in with the plot. All took a blood oath to live or
die together.
It was first proposed to seize the palace by open
force, but Hou Chun-Chi pointed out that the failure of the similar plan
adopted by the Tartar rebel Qachashar, proved that
the guards were too strong. Instead it was decided that Cheng-Chien should
feign a serious illness. The emperor would be sure to pay him a visit, and the
other conspirators, who would be lying in wait, could take this opportunity to
assassinate the emperor and proclaim Cheng-Chien. But the consummation of the
iniquity plotted by one of Shih-Min’s sons was to be prevented by the flagrant
crimes of another.
Li Yu Prince Chi was the son of a concubine, the Queen
Yin. Created Prince Chi, a title formerly held by Li Yuan-Chi, the young man
had been sent to govern that region with headquarters at Chi Nan Fu.
It had been the emperor’s intention to train the youth to play a useful part in
public life by this practical experience in the government of a province. As Yu
was still very young, several trustworthy officers of experience were attached
to his household as advisers, with orders to report on his conduct to the
throne.
Yu did not profit by the counsels of these worthy men.
A volatile and foolish young man, he fell, instead, under the influence of
corrupt and ambitious members of his mother’s family. He was particularly
swayed by Yin Hung-Chih, his maternal uncle, who hoped to use the young prince
as a ladder by which all the clan might mount to power and wealth. To this end
Yin Hung-Chih worked on the youth’s ambition. “After ten thousand years have
passed (i.e. when the emperor is dead)”, he said, “there will perhaps be
troubles and a contest for the throne. Unless you have a following and troops
of your own, how can you protect yourself and us?”
Acting on this advice Yu started to enlist troops of
desperadoes through the agency of one of Yin Hung-Chih’s relatives.
These proceedings soon attracted the attention of the
officers whom the emperor had appointed to watch over and assist the young
prince. They remonstrated with him, not only on the matter of his fondness for
the company of worthless intriguers such as Yin Hung-Chih, but also on account
of his excessive passion for hunting, a pursuit upon which he wasted much
money, inflicting hardship on the farming people of the province. His chief
adviser even went so far as to dismiss many of the bad characters enlisted by
Yin Hung-Chih, but the prince immediately cancelled this order.
The emperor, hearing some report of his son’s bad
behaviour, wrote him a letter of warning and reproof. This evidence of the
imperial displeasure made no impression upon Yu, but the chief tutor, realising
what was likely to happen, feared that some serious scandal arose, he himself
would be held responsible for failing to guide and control the young prince in
a proper manner. He therefore decided to put himself in the right with the
emperor. He suggested to Yu that, in view of his father’s letter, it would be
best to send someone to Chang An to make explanations, and assure the emperor
that he had been misinformed about his son’s conduct. The prince thoroughly
approved this plan, and the chief tutor adroitly offered to be the messenger.
His real motive for seeking an interview with the
emperor was not to defend Yu, but, on the contrary, to report his misbehaviour,
and so avoid the accusation of having failed, to exercise proper care over the
prince. Shih-Min, who did not know that the tutor had deceived his son,
rewarded the official for his zeal, and wrote a much stronger letter of
admonition to Yu. On receipt of this unexpected rebuke, the prince flew into a
furious rage, exclaiming, “The Chief Tutor has sold me, accusing me to acquire
merit for himself. He deserves to die!”
From this moment Yu began to hate his tutor with a
deadly enmity, which was folly shared by all his loose associates and
favourites. The chief tutor, on his return from Chang An, could not but notice
the hostile attitude of the court of Chi Nan Fu: indeed the enmity of the
prince’s followers so worked on his nerves that he began to fear for his life.
Accordingly he sent a letter to Chang An declaring that he was menaced with
death. This act precipitated the fate he feared.
The emperor, realising that affairs at Chi Nan Fu were
coming to a dangerous pass, and finding it difficult to discover the real facts
at such a distance, ordered both the prince and his tutor to come up to Chang
An and explain matters. Yu was greatly alarmed at this order. He feared that
once he reached Chang An the emperor would find out all about his illegal army
of desperadoes, as well as his misconduct in other matters. The only way out of
this difficulty, according to his friends, was to kill the chief tutor on the
road. That official, for his part, had wasted no time once he had the imperial
permission to leave Chi Nan Fu, where he went in fear of death. But his harried
departure did not save him. The prince sent some of his bravos in pursuit, who
having overtaken the luckless chief tutor, murdered him on the public road.
The controller of the household, another of the
imperial officials who had the duty of supervising the young prince, was the
next victim. Refusing to become an accessory to the conspiracy and the murder
of his colleague, he too fled for his life, but was pursued by the prince’s
followers and killed in the same manner as the chief tutor.
As the murder of two highly placed imperial officials
was not a matter which could be passed over without enquiry, the prince now
found himself in a more desperate position than before. On the advice of his
harebrained court he decided to seek safety by disobeying the emperor’s order
and declaring an open revolt. Having issued a proclamation assuming full
authority in the province, he seized and opened the government arsenals at Chi
Nan Fu, ordering the people of the district to assemble in the city to be
enrolled in his army.
The citizens of Chi Nan Fu had more common sense than their
governor. They realised that this foolish youth stood no chance at all of withstanding
the full power and authority of the whole empire, while, if they assisted him
in his revolt, their city would pay bitterly for such folly. Instead of
flocking to his standards, they profited
by the night to escape over the walls and take refuge elsewhere.
On hearing the news of Yu’s disobedience, crimes and rebellion,
the emperor reluctantly realised that the matter had passed beyond the stage of
rebukes and admonitions. Li Shih-Chi was ordered to assume command of the
tegular army in the eastern provinces and suppress the revolt. At the same time
a final warning was sent to the prince, urging him to surrender before he
should incur graver penalties by an armed resistance to the imperial authority.
The prince, who apparently thought himself a match for all comers, threw away
this last chance, and prepared to defend the city.
His foolhardiness did not, however, appeal to the
officers of the regular army forming the Chi Nan Fu garrison. They realised
that any attempt to oppose a general such as Li Shih-Chi, with the garrison of
one city and the few hundred bravos whom Yu had enlisted, was downright
imbecility. The inevitable consequence would be defeat, and the extermination
of the clans of all found guilty of open rebellion against the imperial throne.
The officers were by no means ready to run the risk of such a penalty. The
improvident conduct of the prince himself was the surest augur of his impending
ruin. So far from devoting his time to the training of troops, and preparations
for the defence of the city, he spent his days in feasting, and his nights in
drunken debauches with Yin Hung-Chih and his favourites.
The officers of the garrison, loyal to the emperor,
had thus no difficulty in surprising the prince in the midst of a feast, and
seizing the city. As they were about to force their way into Yu’s palace, a cry
was raised that Li Shih-Chi’s “Flying Horse” were before the walls. This news
rousing the revellers to a realisation of their plight, Yu prepared to defend
himself, only to find his palace besieged by the mutinous garrison. With the
assistance of his private following he defended the palace throughout the
night, till his enemies decided to set fire to the building and burn him out.
When Yu realised their intention, he tried to purchase
his safety by offering to surrender Yin Hung-Chih and other favourites, but the
officers of the garrison replied that the prince was now a declared rebel, with
whom it would be a crime to make any composition. Seeing no hope
left, the prince then surrendered unconditionally. Yin Hung-Chih and others of
the prince’s unworthy court were promptly put to death, while Yu himself was
sent up to Chang An to answer for his crimes.
Thia tragi-comic rebellion, of slight importance in
itself, served to unveil the really dangerous and deadly conspiracy of Hou Chun-Chi
and the Crown Prince Cheng-Chien. When those involved in Yu’s rebellion were
examined, it was found that among the confederates of Yin Hung-Chih was Ho-Kaa
Cheng-Chi, the bravo whom Cheng-Chien bad enlisted to murder Tai Prince Wei.
This criminal, knowing that his only hope of avoiding a terrible death was to
turn king’s evidence, immediately confessed the whole plot.
No time was lost in arresting the accused. Cheng-Chien,
Yuan-Chang Prince Han, Hou Chun-Chi and the rest were brought before a
specially constituted tribunal, composed of the highest and most trusted
officials in the emperor’s service—Chang-Sun Wu-Chi, Fang Hsuan-Ling, Hsiao Yu
and Li Shih-Chi. The proofs being clear and undisputed, the court convicted the
accused and reported its findings to the emperor, Shih-Min, who could not
conceal his distress at this evidence of his son’s unnatural crime, and the
treachery of his old friend Hou Chun-Chi, turned to the ministers and asked
what they advised him to do. In view of the rank of the chief culprit, no one
dared to offer an opinion.
Shih-Min pondered the terrible decision for a long
space. He could not resolve to put his own son to death. Instead, Cheng-Chien
was imprisoned, degraded from his rank to the humble status of the common
people, and subsequently exiled to a remote town in southern Szechuan province,
then on the frontier of the empire. There, little more than a year later, the
wretched youth died, his health, always weak, undermined by the loss of all
hope and meaning in a further existence.
The emperor wished to spare the life of his
half-brother Yuan-Chang also, but the ministers firmly insisted that an example
should be made in this case. Yuan-Chang was therefore permitted to commit
suicide in his own home, a more honourable death than public execution. His
family were freed from all penalties, which was a rare clemency in the criminal
practice of that age. Even to Hou Chun-Chi, whose guilt was black and
unpardonable, the emperor, for old friendship’s sake, extended the utmost
possible clemency. He wished to save the life of his former friend, but the
ministers represented that such a pardon would be misconstrued, and would
encourage the formation of fresh conspiracies. Shih-Min at length yielded to
these reasons. Hou Chun-Chi was led before the emperor, and when he had been
told of his sentence Shih-Min said, “It is a last farewell”. Hou Chun Chi,
overcome by remorse and the realisation of his own insensate folly, threw
himself on the ground in tears. He was then led out to execution.
By an unparalleled leniency the lives of Hou Chun-Chi’s
wife and son were spared, and they escaped with the lighter sentence of
permanent exile to Canton. The minor members of the conspiracy were
decapitated, but in their case also their families only suffered lesser
penalties. The tutors and officers of the former crown prince’s household, held
guilty of negligence for their failure to correct his wayward disposition and
report his evil conduct, were all cashiered.
When the conspirators had been toed and sentenced, the
question of Cheng-Chien’s successor to the post of crown prince arose to
agitate the disturbed court. Shih-Min`s first thought of yielding to his
natural inclination and appointing Tai Prince Wei, but the ministers,
particularly Chang-Sun Wu-Chi, the brother of the late empress, and Chu Sui-Liang,
were strongly opposed to the elevation of any concubine’s son, so long as there
still remained sons of the empress worthy of the post.
Tai sealed his own fate by that ambition which had provoked
Cheng-Chien to plot his terrible crime. Fearing that Cheng-Chien’s younger full-brother,
the second son of the Empress Chang-Sun, Chih Prince Chin, would be preferred,
he attempted to intimidate the boy (Chih was then sixteen) by accusing him of
having been a close friend and companion of Yuan-Chang Prince Han and other
conspirators. Chih was so alarmed by his half-brother’s menaces that he became
quite unwell, and his dejected and terrified appearance attracted the attention
of the emperor. When questioned, Chih revealed the reason for his fears.
Cheng-Chien, when brought before the emperor, had
tried to excuse his conduct by blaming the ambition and intrigues of Tai Prince
Wei. Shih-Min, who desired above all to be just, investigated this accusation,
and found that Tai had indeed been guilty of planning to obtain the succession.
When these facts were added to his attempt to intimidate the young Chih, the
emperor decided that Tai was an unsuitable candidate for the throne. “Whoever
covets a post is unworthy to occupy it”, he said. Thereupon Chih Prince Chin
was appointed crown prince with the full approval of the court, while Tai was
punished for his intrigues by being degraded to a lower rank of princes, and
was exiled to a city in Hupei province. He did not long survive his disgrace,
dying at his place of banishment within two years.
Shih-Min, fully determined to guard the new crown
prince against the follies and crimes to which his elder brother had been
prone, appointed the most eminent ministers of his court to be the boy’s guardians
and tutors. With Chang-Sun Wu-Chi, Fang Hsuan-Ling, Hsiao Yu and Li Shih-Chi as
tutors, he hoped that no corrupt influence could come near his destined heir.
Chih, indeed, gave every proof of filial devotion and loyalty, but his
character was weak and timid. When he in due coarse did succeed and reign as
emperor, his indolence and weakness opened the road by which his famous
concubine Wu Shih, afterwards the Empress Wu, climbed to supreme power and
influence in the Tang empire.
|
|