READING HALLDOORS OF WISDOM |
BISMARCKAND THE FOUNDATION OF THE GERMAN EMPIRE
CHAPTER VI.
ST. PETERSBURG AND PARIS. 1858-1862.
In the autumn of 1857 the health of the King of Prussia broke down;
he was unable to conduct the affairs of State and in the month of September was
obliged to appoint his brother as his representative to carry on the Government.
There was from the first no hope for his recovery; the commission was three
times renewed and, after a long delay, in October of the following year, the
King signed a decree appointing his brother Regent. At one time, in the spring
of 1858, the Prince had, it is said, thought of
calling on Bismarck to form a Ministry. This, however, was not done. It was,
however, one of the first actions of the Prince Regent to request Manteuffel's
resignation; he formed a Ministry of moderate Liberals, choosing as President
the Prince of Hohenzollern, head of the Catholic branch of his own family.
The new era, as it
was called, was welcomed with delight by all parties except the most extreme
Conservatives. No Ministry had been so unpopular as that of Manteuffel. At the
elections which took place immediately, the Government secured a large
majority. The Prince and his Ministers were able to begin their work with the
full support of Parliament and country.
Bismarck did not
altogether regret the change; his differences with the dominant faction at
Court had extended to the management of home as well as of foreign affairs; for
the last two years he had been falling out of favour. He desired, moreover, to
see fresh blood in the Chamber.
"The disease
to which our Parliamentary life has succumbed, is, besides the incapacity of
the individual, the servility of the Lower House. The majority has no
independent convictions, it is the tool of ministerial omnipotence. If our
Chambers do not succeed in binding the public interest
to themselves and drawing the attention of the country, they will sooner or
later go to their grave without sympathy."
Curious it is to
see how his opinion as to the duties and relations of the House towards the
Government were to alter when he himself became Minister. He regarded it as an
advantage that the Ministry would have the power which comes from popularity;
his only fear was that they might draw the Regent too much to the left; but he
hoped that in German and foreign affairs they would act with more decision,
that the Prince would be free from the scruples which had so much influenced
his brother, and that he would not fear to rely on the military strength of
Prussia.
One of their first
acts was to recall Bismarck from Frankfort; the change was inevitable, and he
had foreseen it. The new Government naturally wished to be able to start clear
in their relations to Austria; the Prince Regent did not wish to commit himself
from the beginning to a policy of hostility. It was, however, impossible for a
cordial co-operation between the two States to be established in German affairs
so long as Bismarck remained at Frankfort; the opinions which he had formed
during the last eight years were too well known. It was, moreover, evident that
a crisis in the relations with Austria was approaching; war between France and
Austria was imminent; a new factor and a new man had appeared in Europe,—Piedmont and Cavour.
In August, 1858, Cavour had had a secret and decisive interview
with Napoleon at Plombières; the two statesmen had
come to an agreement by which France engaged to help the Piedmontese to expel
the Austrians from Italy. Bismarck would have desired to seize this
opportunity, and use the embarrassment of Austria as the occasion for taking a
stronger position in Germany; if it were necessary he
was prepared to go as far as an alliance with France. He was influenced not so
much by sympathy with Piedmont, for, as we have seen, he held that those who
were responsible for foreign policy should never give way to sympathy, but by
the simple calculation that Austria was the common enemy of Prussia and
Piedmont, and where there were common interests an
alliance might be formed. The Government were, however, not prepared to adopt
this policy. It might have been supposed that a Liberal Ministry would have shewn more sympathy with the Italian aspirations than the
Conservatives whom they had succeeded. This was not the case, as Cavour himself
soon found out.
After his visit to Plombières, Cavour had hurried across the frontier and
spent two days at Baden-Baden, where he met the Prince of Prussia, Manteuffel,
who was still Minister, and other German statesmen. Bismarck had been at
Baden-Baden in the previous week and returned a few days later; he happened,
however, on the two days when Cavour was there, to be occupied with his duties
at Frankfort; the two great statesmen therefore never met. Cavour after his
visit wrote to La Marmora saying that he had been extremely pleased with the
sympathy which had been displayed to him, both by the Prince and the other Prussians. So far as he could foresee, the attitude of Prussia
would not be hostile to Italian aspirations. In December, however, after the
change of Ministry, he writes to the Italian Envoy at Frankfort that the language
of Schleinitz, the new Foreign Minister, is less favourable than that of his predecessor. The Cabinet do not
feel the same antipathy to Austria as that of Manteuffel did; German ideas have
brought about a rapprochement.
"I do not
trust their apparently Liberal tendencies. It is possible that your colleague,
Herr von Bismarck, will support us more closely, but I fear that even if he is
kept at Frankfort he will not exercise so much
influence as under the former Ministry."
Cavour's insight
did not deceive him. The Italian question had for the moment re-awakened the
old sympathy for Austria; Austria, it seemed, was now the champion of German
nationality against the unscrupulous aggression of France. There were few men
who, like Bismarck, were willing to disregard this national feeling and support
the Italians. To have deliberately joined Napoleon in what after all was an
unprovoked attack on a friendly prince of the same nation, was an act which
could have been undertaken only by a man of the calibre of Frederick the Great. After all, Austria was German; the Austrian provinces
in Italy had been assigned to the Emperor by the same
authority as the Polish provinces to Prussia. We can imagine how great would have
been the outcry had Austria joined with the French to set up a united Poland,
taking Posen and West Prussia for the purpose; and yet this act would have been
just of the same kind as that which would have been committed had Prussia at
this time joined or even lent diplomatic support to the French-Italian
alliance. It is very improbable that even if Bismarck had been Minister at this period he would have been able to carry out this
policy.
The Prussian
Government acted on the whole correctly. As the war became
more imminent the Prince Regent prepared the Prussian army and eventually the
whole was placed on a war footing. He offered to the Emperor of Austria his
armed neutrality and a guarantee of the Austrian possessions in Italy, In return he required that he himself should have the
command of all the forces of the German Diet. Had Austria accepted these terms,
either the war would have been stopped or the whole force of Germany under the
King of Prussia would have attacked France on the Rhine. The Emperor however refused to accept them; he required a guarantee not only of his
possessions in Italy but also of his treaties with the other Italian princes.
Moreover, he would accept the assistance of Prussia only on condition that the
Prussian army was placed under the orders of the general appointed by the Diet.
It was absurd to suppose that any Prussian statesman would allow this. The
action of Austria shewed in fact a distrust and hatred of Prussia which more
than justified all that Bismarck had written during his tenure of office at
Frankfort. In the end, rather than accept Prussian assistance on the terms on
which it was offered, the Emperor of Austria made peace with France; he
preferred to surrender Lombardy rather than save it by Prussian help. "Thank
God," said Cavour, "Austria by her arrogance has succeeded in uniting
all the world against her."
The spring of the
year was spent by Bismarck at St. Petersburg. He had been appointed Prussian
Minister to that capital—put out in the cold, as he expressed it. From the
point of dignity and position it was an advance, but at St. Petersburg he was
away from the centre of political affairs. Russia had
not yet recovered from the effects of the Crimean War; the Czar was chiefly
occupied with internal reforms and the emancipation of the serfs. The Eastern
Question was dormant, and Russia did not aim at keeping a leading part in the
settlement of Italian affairs. Bismarck's immediate duties were not therefore important and he no longer had the opportunity of giving his
advice to the Government upon the general practice. It is improbable that Herr
von Schleinitz would have welcomed advice. He was one
of the weakest of the Ministry; an amiable man of no very marked ability, who
owed his position to the personal friendship of the Prince Regent and his wife.
The position which Bismarck had occupied during the last few years could not
but be embarrassing to any Minister; this man still young, so full of
self-confidence, so unremitting in his labours, who,
while other diplomatists thought only of getting through their routine work,
spent the long hours of the night in writing despatches,
discussing the whole foreign policy of the country, might well cause
apprehension even to the strongest Minister.
From the time of
Bismarck's departure from Frankfort our knowledge of his official despatches ceases; we lose the invaluable assistance of his
letters to Manteuffel and Gerlach. For some time he
stood so much alone that there was no one to whom he could write unreservedly
on political matters.
He watched with
great anxiety the progress of affairs with regard to Italy. At the beginning of May he wrote a long letter to Schleinitz,
as he had done to Manteuffel, urging him to bold action; he recounted his
experiences at the Diet, he reiterated his conviction that no good would come
to Prussia from the federal tie—the sooner it was broken the better; nothing
was so much to be desired as that the Diet should overstep its powers, and pass
some resolution which Prussia could not accept, so that Prussia could take up
the glove and force a breach. The opportunity was favourable for a revision of the Constitution. "I see," he wrote "in our Federal connection only a weakness of Prussia which sooner
or later must be cured, ferro et igni."
Probably Schleinitz's answer was not of such a kind
as to tempt him to write again. In his private letters he harps on the same
string; he spent June in a visit to Moscow but he
hurried back at the end of the month to St. Petersburg to receive news of the
war. Before news had come of the peace of Villafranca he was constantly in
dread that Prussia would go to war on behalf of Austria:
"We have
prepared too soon and too thoroughly, the weight of the burden we have taken on
ourselves is drawing us down the incline. We shall not be even an Austrian
reserve; we shall simply sacrifice ourselves for Austria and take away the war
from her."
How disturbed he
was, we can see by the tone of religious resignation which he assumes—no doubt
a sign that he fears his advice has not yet been acted upon.
"As God will.
Everything here is only a question of time; peoples and men, wisdom and folly, war and peace, they come and go like rain and water, and the
sea alone remains. There is nothing on earth but hypocrisy and deceit."
The language of
this and other letters was partly due to the state of his health; the continual
anxiety and work of his life at Frankfort, joined to irregular hours and
careless habits, had told upon his constitution. He fell seriously ill in St.
Petersburg with a gastric and rheumatic affection; an injury to the leg
received while shooting in Sweden, became painful; the treatment adopted by the
doctor, bleeding and iodine, seems to have made him
worse. At the beginning of July, 1860, he returned on
leave to Berlin; there he was laid up for ten days; his wife was summoned and
under her care he began to improve. August he spent at
Wiesbaden and Nauheim, taking the waters, the greater part of the autumn in
Berlin; in October he had to go Warsaw officially to receive and accompany the
Czar, who came to Breslau for an interview with the Prince Regent. From Breslau
he hurried back to Berlin, from Berlin down to Pomerania, where his wife was
staying with her father; then the same week back to Berlin,
and started for St. Petersburg. The result of these long journeys when
his health was not completely reestablished was very serious. He was to spend a
night on the journey to St. Petersburg with his old friend, Herr von Below, at Hohendorf, in East Prussia; he had scarcely reached the
house when he fell dangerously ill of inflammation of the lungs and rheumatic
fever. He remained here all the winter, and it was not until the beginning of March, 1860, that he was well enough to return to Berlin.
Leopold von Gerlach, who met him shortly afterwards, speaks of him as still
looking wretchedly ill. This prolonged illness forms an epoch in his life. He
never recovered the freshness and strength of his youth. It left a nervous
irritation and restlessness which often greatly interfered with his political
work and made the immense labour which came upon him
doubly distasteful. He loses the good humour which
had been characteristic of him in early life; he became irritable and more
exacting. He spent the next three months in Berlin attending the meetings of
the Herrenhaus, and giving a silent vote in favour of the Government
measures; he considered it was his duty as a servant of the State to support
the Government, though he did not agree with the Liberal policy which in
internal affairs they adopted. At this time he stood
almost completely alone. His opinions on the Italian question had brought about
a complete breach with his old friends. Since the conclusion of the war, public
opinion in Germany, as in England, had veered round. The success of Cavour had
raised a desire to imitate him; a strong impulse had been given to the national
feeling, and a society, the National Verein, had been founded to further the
cause of United Germany under Prussian leadership. The question of the recognition
of the new Kingdom of Italy was becoming prominent; all the Liberal party laid
much stress on this. The Prince Regent, however, was averse to an act by which
he might seem to express his approval of the forcible expulsion of princes from
their thrones. As the national and liberal feeling in the country grew, his
monarchical principles seemed to be strengthened. The opinions which Bismarck
was known to hold on the French alliance had got into the papers and were much
exaggerated; he had plenty of enemies to take care that it should be said that
he wished Prussia to join with France; to do as Piedmont had done, and by the
cession of the left bank of the Rhine to France to receive the assistance of
Napoleon in annexing the smaller states. In his letters of this period Bismarck
constantly protests against the truth of these
accusations. "If I am to go to the devil," he writes, "it will
at least not be a French one. Do not take me for a Bonapartist, only for a very
ambitious Prussian." It is at this time that his last letter to Gerlach
was written. They had met at the end of April, and Gerlach wrote to protest against the opinion to which Bismarck had given
expression:
"After the
conversation which I have had with you I was particularly distressed that, by
your bitterness against Austria, you had allowed yourself to be diverted from
the simple attitude towards law and the Revolution. For you an alliance with
France and Piedmont is a possibility, a thought which is far from me and, dear
Bismarck, ought to be far from you. For me Louis Napoleon is even more than his
uncle the incarnation of the Revolution, and Cavour is a Rheinbund Minister like Montgellas. You cannot and ought not to
deny the principles of the Holy Alliance; they are no other than that authority
comes from God, and that the Princes must govern as
servants appointed by God."
Bismarck answers
the letter the next day:
"I am a child
of other times than you. No one loses the mark impressed on him in the period
of his youth. In you the victorious hatred of Bonaparte is indelible; you call
him the incarnation of the Revolution and if you knew of any worse name you
would bestow it upon him. I have lived in the country from my twenty-third to
my thirty-second year and will never be rid of the longing to be back again; I
am in politics with only half my heart; what dislike I have of France is based
rather on the Orleans than the Bonapartist régime. It is opposed to
bureaucratic corruption under the mask of constitutional government. I should
be glad to fight against Bonaparte till the dogs lick up the blood but with no
more malice than against Croats, Bohemians, and Bamberger
fellow-countrymen."
The two friends
were never to meet again. The old King of Prussia died at the beginning of the
next year, and Gerlach, who had served him so faithfully, though perhaps not
always wisely, survived his master scarcely a week.
In the summer of
1860 Bismarck returned to his duties in Russia; and this time, with the exception of a fortnight in October, he spent a
whole year in St. Petersburg. He had still not recovered from the effects of
his illness and could not, therefore, go out much in society, but he was much
liked at Court and succeeded in winning the confidence both of the Emperor and his family. His wife and children were now with
him, and after the uncertainty of his last two years he settled down with
pleasure to a quieter mode of life. He enjoyed the sport which he had in the
Russian forests; he studied Russian and made himself completely at home.
Political work he had little to do, except what arose from the charge of
"some 200,000 vagabond Prussians" who lived in Russia. Of home
affairs he had little knowledge:
"I am quite
separated from home politics, as besides the newspapers I receive scarcely
anything but official news which does not expose the foundation of
affairs."
For the time the
reports of his entering the Ministry had ceased; he professed to be, and
perhaps was, quite satisfied.
"I am quite
contented with my existence here; I ask for no change in my position until it
be God's will I settle down quietly at Schönhausen or Reinfeld and can leisurely set about having my coffin
made."
In October he had
to attend the Czar on a journey to Warsaw where he had an interview with the
Prince Regent. The Prince was accompanied by his
Minister-President, the Prince of Hohenzollern, who took the opportunity of
having long conversations with the Ambassador to St. Petersburg. It is said
that as a result of this the Minister, who wished to
be relieved from a post which was daily becoming more burdensome, advised the
Prince Regent to appoint Bismarck Minister-President. The advice, however, was
not taken.
Meanwhile events
were taking place in Prussia which were to bring about important constitutional
changes. The success of the Ministry of the new era had not answered the
expectations of the country. Their foreign policy had been correct, but they
had shown no more spirit than their predecessors, and the country was in that
excited state in which people wanted to see some brilliant and exciting stroke
of policy, though they were not at all clear what it was they desired. Then a
rift had begun to grow between the Regent and his Ministers. The Liberalism of
the Prince had never been very deep; it owed its origin in fact chiefly to his
opposition to the reactionary government of his brother. As an honest man he
intended to govern strictly in accordance with the Constitution. He had,
however, from the beginning no intention of allowing the Chambers to encroach
upon the prerogatives of the Crown. The Ministers on the other hand regarded
themselves to some extent as a Parliamentary Ministry; they had a majority in
the House and they were inclined to defer to it. The
latent causes of difference were brought into activity by the question of army
reform.
The Prince Regent
was chiefly and primarily a soldier. As a second son it had been doubtful
whether he would ever succeed to the throne. He had an intimate acquaintance
with the whole condition of the army, and he had long known that in many points
reform was necessary. His first action on succeeding his brother was to appoint
a Commission of the War Office to prepare a scheme of reorganisation.
A memorandum had been drawn up for him by Albert von Roon,
and with some alterations it was accepted by the Commission. The Minister of
War, Bonin (the same who had been dismissed in 1854 at the crisis of the
Eastern complications), seems to have been indifferent in the matter; he did
not feel in himself the energy for carrying through an important reform which
he had not himself originated, and of which perhaps he did not altogether
approve. The Prince Regent had set his mind upon the matter; the experience
gained during the mobilisation of 1859 had shewn how serious the defects were; the army was still on a
war footing and it was a good opportunity for at once
carrying through the proposed changes. Bonin therefore resigned his office and Roon, in December, 1859, was
appointed in his place.
This appointment
was to have far-reaching results; it at once destroyed all harmony in the
Ministry itself. The rest of the Ministers were Liberals. Roon was a strong Conservative. He was appointed professedly merely as a
departmental Minister, but he soon won more confidence with the Regent than all
the others. He was a man of great energy of character and decision in action.
The best type of Prussian officer, to considerable learning he joined a high
sense of duty founded on deep-rooted and simple religious faith. The President
of the Ministry had practically retired from political life and the Government
had no longer a leader. Roon's introduction was in
fact the beginning of all the momentous events which were to follow. But for
him there would have been no conflict in the Parliament and Bismarck would
never have become Minister.
At the beginning of
1860 the project of law embodying the proposals for army reform was laid before
the Lower House. It was ordered by them in accordance with the practice to be
referred to a small Committee.
The proposals
consisted of (a) an increase in the number of recruits to be raised each year,
(b) a lengthening of the term of service with the colours,
(c) an alteration in the relations of the Landwehr to the rest of the army.
The Committee
appointed to consider these reforms accepted the first, but rejected the second and third. They asserted that the three years' service with
the colours was not necessary, and they strongly
disliked any proposal for interfering with the Landwehr. The report of the
Committee was accepted by the House. It was in vain that the more far-seeing
members of the Liberal party tried to persuade their leaders to support the
Government; it was in vain that the Ministers pointed out that the Liberal
majority had been elected as a Government majority,
and it was their duty to support Ministers taken from their own party. The law
had to be withdrawn and the Government, instead, asked for a vote of nine
million thalers, provisionally, for that year only, as a means of maintaining
the army in the state to which it had been raised. In asking for this vote it was expressly stated that the principles of the organisation should be in no wise prejudiced.
"The question
whether in future a two or three years' service shall
be required; whether the period with the Reserve shall be extended; in what
position the Landwehr shall be placed--all this is not touched by the present
proposal."
On this condition
the House voted the money required, but for one year only. The Government,
however, did not keep this pledge; the Minister of War simply continued to
carry out the reorganisation in accordance with the
plan which had been rejected; new regiments were formed, and by the end of the
year the whole army had been reorganised. This action
was one for which the Prince and Roon were personally
responsible; it was done while the other Ministers were away from Berlin, and
without their knowledge.
When the House met
at the beginning of the next year they felt that they had been deceived; they
were still more indignant when Roon informed them
that he had discovered that the whole of the reorganisation could be legally carried through in virtue of the prerogative of the Crown, and
that a fresh law was not required; that therefore the consideration of the
changes was not before the House, and that all they would have to do would be
to vote the money to pay for them. Of course the House
refused to vote the money; after long debates the final settlement of the
question was postponed for another year; the House, though this time by a
majority of only eleven votes, granting with a few modifications the required
money, but again for one year only.
All this time
Bismarck was living quietly at St. Petersburg; he had no influence on affairs,
for the military law had nothing to do with him, and the Regent did not consult
him on foreign policy. No one, however, profited by Roon's appointment so much as he; he had once more a friend and supporter at Court,
who replaced the loss of Gerlach. Roon and he had
known one another in the old Pomeranian days. There was a link in Moritz Blankenburg, who was a "Dutz"
friend of Bismarck's and Roon's cousin. We can
understand how untenable Roon's position was when we
find the Minister of War choosing as his political confidants two of the
leaders of the party opposed to the Ministry to which he belonged.
Ever since Roon had entered the Government there had been indeed a
perpetual crisis.
The Liberal
Ministers were lukewarm in their support of the military bill; they only
consented to adopt it on condition that the King would give his assent to those
measures which they proposed to introduce, in order to maintain their positions as leaders of the party; they proposed to bring in
bills for the reform of the House of Lords, for the responsibility of
Ministers, for local government. These were opposed to the personal opinions of
the King; he was supported in his opposition by Roon and refused his assent, but he neither dismissed the Ministers nor did they
resign. So long as they were willing to hold office on the terms he required,
there was indeed no reason why he should dismiss them; to do so would be to
give up the last hope of getting the military Bill passed. All through 1861 the
same uncertainty continued; Roon indeed again and
again wrote to his master, pointing out the necessity for getting rid of his
colleagues; he wished for a Conservative Ministry with Bismarck as President.
Here, he thought, was the only man who had the courage to carry through the
army reform. Others thought as he did. Who so fitted to come to the help of the
Crown as this man who, ten years before, had shewn such ability in
Parliamentary debate? And whenever the crisis became more acute, all the
Quidnuncs of Berlin shook their heads and said, "Now we shall have a
Bismarck Ministry, and that will be a coup d'état and the overthrow of the
Constitution."
Bismarck meanwhile
was living quietly at St. Petersburg, awaiting events. At last the summons came; on June 28, 1861, Roon telegraphed
to him that the pear was ripe; he must come at once; there was danger in delay.
His telegram was followed by a letter, in which he more fully explained the
situation. The immediate cause of the crisis was that the King desired to
celebrate his accession, as his brother had done, by receiving the solemn
homage of all his people; the Ministry refused their assent to an act which
would appear to the country as "feudal" and reactionary. A solemn
pledge of obedience to the King was the last thing the Liberals wanted to give,
just for the same reasons that the King made a point of receiving it; his
feelings were deeply engaged, and Roon doubtless
hoped that his colleagues would at last be compelled to resign; he wished,
therefore, to have Bismarck on the spot.
Bismarck could not
leave St. Petersburg for some days; he, however, answered by a telegram and a
long letter; he begins in a manner characteristic of all his letters at this
period:
"Your letter
disturbed me in my comfortable meditations on the quiet time which I was going
to enjoy at Reinfeld. Your cry 'to horse' came with a
shrill discord. I have grown ill in mind, tired out, and spiritless since I
lost the foundation of my health."
And at the end:
"Moving,
quarrelling, annoyance, the whole slavery day and night form a perspective,
which already makes me homesick for Reinfeld or St.
Petersburg. I cannot enter the swindle in better company than yours; but both
of us were happier on the Sadower Heath behind the
partridges."
So he wrote late at
night, but the next morning in a postscript he added: "If the King will to
some extent meet my views, then I will set to the work with pleasure." In
the letter he discusses at length the programme; he
does not attach much importance to the homage; it would be much better to come
to terms on the military question, break with the Chamber, and dissolve. The
real difficulty he sees, however, is foreign policy; only by a change in the
management of foreign affairs can the Crown be relieved from a pressure to
which it must ultimately give way; he would not himself be inclined to accept
the Ministry of the Interior, because no good could be done unless the foreign
policy was changed, and that the King himself would probably not wish that.
"The chief
fault of our policy is that we have been Liberal at home and Conservative
abroad; we hold the rights of our own King too cheap, and those of foreign
princes too high; a natural consequence of the difference between the constitutional
tendency of the Ministers and the legitimist direction which the will of his
Majesty gives to our foreign policy. Of the princely houses from Naples to
Hanover none will be grateful for our love, and we practise towards them a truly evangelical love of our enemies at the cost of the safety
of our own throne. I am true to the sole of my foot to my own princes, but
towards all others I do not feel in a single drop of blood the slightest
obligation to raise up a little finger to help them. In this attitude I fear
that I am so far removed from our Most Gracious Master, that he will scarcely
find me fitted to be a Councillor of his Crown. For
this reason he will anyhow prefer to use me at the
Home-Office. In my opinion, however, that makes no difference, for I promise
myself no useful results from the whole Government unless our attitude abroad
is more vigorous and less dependent on dynastic sympathies."
Bismarck arrived in
Berlin on July 9th. When he got there the crisis was over; Berlin was nearly empty; Roon was away in Pomerania, the King in Baden-Baden;
a compromise had been arranged; there was not to be an act of homage but a
coronation. There was, therefore, no more talk of his entering the Ministry; Schleinitz, however, told him that he was to be transferred
from Russia, but did not say what post he was to have. The next day, in
obedience to a command, he hurried off to Baden-Baden; the King wished to have
his advice on many matters of policy, and instructed
him to draw up a memorandum on the German question. He used the opportunity of
trying to influence the King to adopt a bolder policy. At the same time he attempted to win over the leaders of the
Conservative party. A general election was about to take place; the manifesto
of the Conservative party was so worded that we can hardly believe it was not
an express and intentional repudiation of the language which Bismarck was in
the habit of using; they desired "the unity of our German fatherland,
though not like the Kingdom of Italy through 'blood and fire' (Blut und Brand); almost the words which
Bismarck had used to describe the policy which must be followed], but in the
unity of its princes and peoples holding firm to authority and law."
Bismarck, on
hearing this, sent to his old friend Herr von Below, one of the leaders of the
party, a memorandum on German affairs, and accompanied it by a letter. He
repeated his old point that Prussia was sacrificing the authority of the Crown
at home to support that of other princes in whose safety she had not the
slightest interest. The solidarity of Conservative interests was a dangerous
fiction, unless it was carried out with the fullest reciprocity; carried out by
Prussia alone it was Quixotry; it prevented King and Government from executing
their true task, the protection of Prussia from all injustice, whether it came
from home or abroad; this was the task given to the King by God.
"We make the
unhistorical, the jealous, and lawless mania for sovereignty of the German
Princes the bosom child of the Conservative party in Prussia, we are
enthusiastic for the petty sovereignties which were created by Napoleon and
protected by Metternich, and are blind to the dangers
which threaten Prussia and the independence of Germany."
He wishes for a
clear statement of their policy; a stricter concentration of the German
military forces, reform of the Customs' Unions, and a number
of common institutions to protect material interests against the
disadvantages which arise from the unnatural configuration of the different
states.
"Besides all
this I do not see why we should shrink back so bashfully from the idea of a
representation of the people. We cannot fight as revolutionary an institution
which we Conservatives cannot do without even in Prussia, and is recognised as legitimate in every German
State."
This letter is
interesting as shewing how nearly his wishes on German affairs coincided with
those of the Liberal party and of the National Verein: he was asking the
Conservatives to adopt the chief points in their opponents' programme. Of course they would not do so, and the King himself
was more likely to be alarmed than attracted by the bold and adventurous policy
that was recommended to him. Bismarck's anticipation was justified; the King
was not prepared to appoint him Foreign Minister. Herr von Schleinitz indeed resigned, but his place was taken by Bernstorff, Minister at London; he
had so little confidence in the success of his office that he did not even give
up his old post, and occupied the two positions, one of which Bismarck much
desired to have.
After attending the
coronation at Königsberg, Bismarck, therefore, returned to his old post at St.
Petersburg; his future was still quite uncertain; he was troubled by his own
health and that of his children; for the first time he begins to complain of
the cold.
"Since my
illness I am so exhausted that I have lost all my energy for excitement. Three
years ago I would have made a serviceable Minister;
when I think of such a thing now I feel like a broken-down acrobat. I would
gladly go to London, Paris, or remain here, as it pleases God and his Majesty.
I shudder at the prospect of the Ministry as at a cold bath."
In March he is still
in ignorance; his household is in a bad state.
"Johanna has a
cough, which quite exhausts her; Bill is in bed with fever, the doctor does not
yet know what is the matter with him; the governess
has no hope of ever seeing Germany again."
He does not feel up
to taking the Ministry; even Paris would be too noisy for him.
"London is
quieter; but for the climate and the children's health, I would prefer to stay
here. Berne is an old idea of mine; dull places with pretty neighbourhoods suit old people; only there is no sport there, as I do not like climbing after
chamois."
The decision
depended on the events at home; the position of the Government was becoming
untenable. The elections had been most unfavourable;
the Radicals had ceased to efface themselves, the old
leaders of 1848 had appeared again; they had formed a new party of
"Progressives," and had won over a hundred seats at the expense of
the Conservatives and the moderate Liberals; they were pledged not to carry out
the military reforms and to insist on the two years' service. They intended to
make the difference of opinion on this point the occasion of a decisive
struggle to secure and extend the control of the House over the administration,
and for this purpose to bring into prominence constitutional questions which
both Crown and Parliament had hitherto avoided. From the day the session opened
it was clear that there was now no chance of the money being voted for the
army. Before the decisive debate came on, the majority had taken the offensive
and passed what was a direct vote of want of confidence in the Ministry. On
this the Ministry handed in their resignations to the King; their place was
taken by members of the Conservative party and Parliament again dissolved after
sitting only six weeks. It was the end of the new era.
It was doubtful
whether the new Ministers would have the skill and resolution to meet the
crisis; they still were without a leader; Prince von Hohenlohe, a member of the
Protestant branch of the family to which the present Chancellor of the Empire
belongs, was appointed provisional President. The opinions of the country was clear enough; the elections resulted in the complete
defeat not only of the Conservatives but of the moderate Liberals; not a single
one of the Ministers was returned. There was, therefore, no doubt that the King
would either have to give in on the question of the
army or to govern against the will of the majority of the Chamber. The struggle
was no longer confined to the question of the army; it was a formal conflict
for power between the House and the Crown. The attempt to introduce a
Parliamentary government which had been thwarted ten years before was now
revived. Who could say what the end would be? All precedent seemed to shew that
in a struggle between Crown and Parliament sooner or later the King must be
beaten, unless, indeed, he was prepared to adopt the means which Napoleon used.
The King would not give in; he believed that the army reform was necessary to
the safety of his country; on the other hand, he was a man of too loyal a
character to have recourse to violence and a breach of the Constitution. If,
however, the Constitution proved to be of such a kind that it made it
impossible for him to govern the country, he was prepared to retire from his
post; the position would indeed be untenable if on his shoulders lay the
responsibility of guiding the policy and defending the interests of Prussia,
and at the same time the country refused to grant him the means of doing so.
The elections had
taken place on May 6th; four days later Bismarck arrived in Berlin; he had at
last received his recall. As soon as he was seen in Berlin his appointment as
Minister-President was expected; all those who wished to maintain the authority
of the Crown, looked on him as the only man who could face the danger. Roon was active, as usual, on his side and was now
supported by some of his colleagues, but Schleinitz,
who had the support of the Queen, wished to be President himself; there were
long meetings of the Council and audiences of the King; but the old influences
were still at work; Bismarck did not wish to enter the Ministry except as
Foreign Minister, and the King still feared and distrusted him. An incident
which occurred during these critical days will explain to some extent the
apprehensions which Bismarck so easily awoke. The chronic difficulties with the
Elector of Hesse had culminated in an act of great discourtesy; the King of
Prussia had sent an autograph letter to the Elector by General Willisen; the Elector on receiving it threw it unopened on
the table; as the letter contained the final demands of Prussia, the only
answer was to put some of the neighbouring regiments
on a war footing. Bernstorff took the opportunity of Bismarck's presence in
Berlin to ask his advice; the answer was: "The circumstance that the
Elector has thrown a royal letter on the table is not a clever
casus belli; if you want war, make me your Under Secretary; I will
engage to provide you a German civil war of the best quality in a few weeks."
The King might naturally fear that if he appointed Bismarck, not Under
Secretary, but Minister, he would in a few weeks, whether he liked it or not,
find himself involved in a German civil war of the best quality. He wanted a
man who would defend the Government before the Chambers with courage and
ability; Bismarck, who had gained his reputation as a debater, was the only man
for the post. He could have had the post of Minister of the Interior; he was
offered that of Minister-President without a Portfolio; but if he did not
actually refuse, he strongly disapproved of the plan; he would not be able to
get on with Bernstorff, and Schleinitz would probably
interfere. "I have no confidence in Bernstorff's eye for political
matters; he probably has none in mine." Bernstorff was "too
stiff," "his collars were too high." During these long
discussions he wrote to his wife:
"Our future is
obscure as in Petersburg. Berlin is now to the front; I do nothing one way or another; as soon as I have my credentials for Paris in my
pocket I will dance and sing. At present there is no talk of London, but all
may change again. I scarcely get free of the discussions all day long; I do not
find the Ministers more united than their predecessors were."
Disgusted with the
long waiting and uncertainty he pressed for a decision; after a fortnight's
delay he was appointed Minister at Paris, but this was in
reality only a fresh postponement; nothing had really been decided; the
King expressly told him not to establish himself there. To his wife he wrote
from Berlin:
"I am very
much pleased, but the shadow remains in the background. I was already as good
as caught for the Ministry. Perhaps when I am out of their sight they will
discover another Minister-President. I expect to start for Paris to-morrow;
whether for long, God knows; perhaps only for a few months or even weeks. They
are all conspired together that I should stay here. I have had to be very firm
to get away from this hotel life even for a time."
He did not really
expect to be away more than ten days or a fortnight. At a farewell audience
just before he started, the King seems to have led him to expect that he would
in a very few days be appointed as he wished, Foreign Minister.
He arrived in Paris
on the 30th, to take up his quarters in the empty Embassy. He did not wait even
to see his wife before starting and he wrote to her that she was not to take
any steps towards joining him.
"It is not
decided that I am to stay here; I am in the middle of Paris lonelier than you
are in Reinfeld and sit here like a rat in a deserted
house. How long it will last God knows. Probably in eight or ten days I shall
receive a telegraphic summons to Berlin and then game and dance is over. If my
enemies knew what a benefit they would confer on me by
their victory and how sincerely I wish it for them, Schleinitz out of pure malice would probably do his best to bring me to Berlin."
Day after day,
however, went by and the summons did not come; on the contrary Bernstorff wrote
as though he were proposing to stay on; he did not however, suggest giving up
his post in London, Roon wrote that he had raised the
question in conversation with the King; that he had found the old leaning
towards Bismarck, and the old irresolution. The Chamber had met, but the first
few weeks of the session passed off with unexpected quiet and it was not till
the autumn that the question of the Budget would come up. Bismarck wrote to
Bernstorff to try and find out what was to happen to him, but the King, before
whom the letter was laid, was quite unable to come to any decision.
Bismarck therefore
determined to use his enforced leisure in order to go
across to London for a few days. He had only visited England once as a young
man, and, expecting as he did soon to be responsible for the conduct of foreign
affairs, it was desirable that he should make the personal acquaintance of the
leading English statesmen. Undoubtedly, one of the reasons why he had been sent
to Paris was that he might renew his acquaintance with the Emperor.
There was also a second International Exhibition and
everyone was going to London. We have, unfortunately, no letters written from
England; after his return he writes to Roon:
"I have just
come back from London; people there are much better informed about China and
Turkey than about Prussia. Loftus must write more nonsense to his Ministers
than I thought."
The only event of
which we have any information was his meeting with Mr. Disraeli, who at that
time was leader of the Opposition in the House of Commons; it took place at a
dinner given by the Russian Ambassador to the Grand Duchess of Saxe-Weimar.
Among the guests was Count Vitzthum, Saxon Envoy; he
saw Bismarck and Disraeli engaged in a long conversation after dinner;
afterwards the English statesman told him the substance of it. Bismarck had
spoken as follows:
"I shall soon
be compelled to undertake the leadership of the Prussian Government. My first
care will be, with or without the help of Parliament, to reorganise the army. The King has rightly set himself this task; he cannot however carry
it through with his present councillors. When the
army has been brought to such a state as to command respect, then I will take
the first opportunity to declare war with Austria, burst asunder the German
Confederation, bring the middle and smaller States into subjection, and give
Germany a national union under the leadership of Prussia. I have come here to
tell this to the Queen's Ministers."
Disraeli added to Vitzthum, who, of course, as Saxon Envoy was much
interested: "Take care of that man; he means what he says." It does
not appear that Bismarck had an opportunity of explaining his project either to
Lord Palmerston or to Lord Russell.
All through July he
remained in Paris, to which he was called back in order to receive some despatches which after all never
arrived; the same uncertainty continued; there was no work to be done there,
Emperor and Ministers were going away; he was still all alone in the Embassy
without servants, or furniture. As he wrote to his wife, he did not know what
to have for dinner or what to eat it on. He therefore applied for leave; he was
himself of opinion that as the King would not immediately give him the Foreign
Office it was not yet time for him to enter the Ministry. Writing to Roon he advised that the Government should prolong the
conflict, draw the Chamber into disputes on small matters which would weary the
country; then when they were getting worn out and hoped that the Government
would meet them half-way so as to end the conflict,
then would be the time to summon him, "as a sign that we are far from
giving up the battle. The appearance of a new battalion in the Ministerial
array would then perhaps make an impression that would be wanting now,
especially if beforehand a commotion was created by expressions about a coup
d'état and a new Constitution; then my own reputation for careless violence
would help me and people would think, 'now it is coming!' Then, all the
half-hearted would be inclined to negotiation. I am astonished at the political
incapacity of our Chambers and yet we are an educated country. Undoubtedly too
much so; others are not cleverer but they have not the
childish self-confidence with which our political leaders publish their
incapacity in its complete nakedness as a model and pattern. How have we
Germans got the reputation of retiring modesty? There is not
a single one of us who does not think that he understands everything,
from strategy to picking the fleas off a dog, better than professionals who
have devoted their lives to it."
It was only with
difficulty he could even get leave of absence, for the King was as irresolute
as ever; as to the cause of the difficulty we get some
hint in Roon's letters. There was a party which was
pushing Schleinitz, the only member of the Liberal
Ministry who remained in office; he had very influential support.
"Her Majesty
the Queen returns to Babelsburg on Sunday; she is
much agitated, there will be scenes; the temperature towards the Ministry will
fall to zero or below."
He eventually got
away at the end of July with six weeks' leave of absence; he travelled down to
Bordeaux and Bayonne and across the Pyrenees to San Sebastian; he was away from
all news of the world; for weeks he scarcely saw even a German paper.
On the 14th of
September he was at Toulouse; the sea-bathing, the mountain air, the freedom
from work and anxiety, and the warmth had completely restored his health; for
the first time since he went to St. Petersburg he had
recovered his old spirit, his decision, and directness of action. He wrote that
he must have some definite decision; otherwise he
would send in his resignation. "My furniture is at St. Petersburg and will
be frozen up, my carriages are at Stettin, my horses at Berlin, my family in
Pomerania, and I on the highroad." He was prepared to be his Majesty's
Envoy at Paris but he was also ready at once to enter
the Ministry. "Only get me certainty, one way or another," he writes
to Roon, "and I will paint angels' wings on your
photograph." Two days later, just as a year before, he received a telegram
from Roon telling him to come at once. On the 17th he
was in Paris and on the morning of the 20th he arrived in Berlin.
The long-delayed
crisis had at last come; the debates on the Budget and the vote for the army
reform began on September 11th; it was continued for five days, and at the end
the House, by a majority of 273 to 62, refused the money required for the
increased establishment. The result of this vote would be that if the wishes of
the House were carried out, the whole of the expenditure which had already been
made for eight months of the current year was illegal; moreover, the regiments
which had already existed for two years must be disbanded. It was a vote which
could not possibly be carried into effect, as the money had already been spent.
At a meeting of the Ministry which was held the next
morning, the majority, including this time even Roon,
seemed to have been inclined to attempt a compromise. The King alone remained
firm. When he had heard the opinion of all the Ministers, he rose and said that
in that case it would be impossible for him to carry on the Government any
longer; it would only remain for him to summon the Crown Prince. As he said this he put his hand on the bell to call a messenger. The
Ministers all sprang from their chairs and assured him that he might depend
upon them, and they would support him to the end. Such were the circumstances
in which Roon summoned Bismarck. None the less the
influence of the Queen and the Crown Prince were so strong that the King still
doubted whether he ought to continue the struggle; on one thing he was
determined, that if he had to give way he would abdicate. Two days later he
again asked Roon his advice. "Appoint Bismarck
Minister-President," was the answer. "But he is not here, he will not
accept," objected the King, referring doubtless to the difficulties which
Bismarck had raised formerly. "He is in Berlin at this moment," said Roon. The King ordered him to come to Potsdam. When
Bismarck arrived there he found the King sitting at
his table, and in front of him the act of abdication, already signed. The King
asked him whether he was willing to undertake the Government, even against the majority of the Parliament and without a Budget.
Bismarck said he would do so. It was one last chance, and the King tore up the
act of abdication. Two days later Bismarck was appointed provisional
Minister-President, and, at the beginning of October, received his definite
appointment as President and Foreign Minister.
CHAPTER VII.
THE CONFLICT.1862-1863.
|